DR. JUDY WOOD: You have a steel beam flying through the air and it's dissolving as it flies through the air and it's not hitting anything

The Twin Towers did not "collapse" on 9/11/01

Unfortunately no one can be told what actually happened.
You have to see it for yourself.
After this, there is no turning back. You've taken the red pill. pic.twitter.com/issI6Xv8oy

— 9/11 Revisited (@911Revisionist) May 7, 2025

Where Did the Towers Go?  Evidence of Directed Free-Energy Technology on 9/11, Dr. Judy Wood, and Eric Larsen (Foreward), 2010.

STEEL TURNING TO DUST IN MID-AIR

00:47.  

PULVERIZED

You have a steel beam flying through the air and it's dissolving as it flies through the air and it's not hitting anything.  The building was not smashed to bits, so that's why pulverizing doesn't describe it.

VAPORIZED

No explosions.  No heat.  No flames.

Vaporization implies high heat.  You would have seen the whole building glowing.  You would have been blinded by the light.  

DUST BLOWING OFF

It's very dense dust.  It initially blocked out all of the sunlight, 100% of the sunlight, so it was pitch black. 

DUSTIFY

It comes to a realization that these pieces of material are becoming dust, they're frothing up into dust as they fall.  

And if you watch some of these pieces, you can actually see them turning to dust before they hit the ground.

It turns to dust.  

That's amazing.  That is amazing.  I mean just like a Star Trek thing.  It just poof!  It's gone.

What we saw and what happened on 9/11 was something that we as the public have never seen before.

VENTURA:  What happened on 9/11, I believe today, it was not a controlled demolition.  It was not nanothermite, and it certainly was not the pancake affect of two planes hitting the building.  

CORE COLUMNS TURN TO DUST

There's a cluster of core columns that remains here.  Watch what happens to them.  They just faint.  

There's Building 7, which is a 47-story building.  It's like 650 ft tall approximately.  This has got to be over that.

It physically disintegrates in front of your eyes.  Not concrete, but steel.

You can see all of this is frothing up into dust, and it's also blowing downward.  That's about 700 ft tall.  If that thing tipped over, it would take out a few blocks worth of buildings.  How is it going to go straight down?  You got a 750-ft pole in the ground to drop it into?

Summary of the interview from Latypova: 

(Monique Lukens joins late.) We began with the latest from the Middle East, where Hal Turner reports that special aircraft to conduct military ops have been sent, which suggests attacks are imminent--but whether on Yemen or Iran remains unclear. Secretary of State Rubio has (absurdly) declared that Iran must give up its (peaceful atomic energy) enrichment program entirely, which is a non-starter for Tehran. Trump is sending US troops for a land invasion of Yemen without Congressional authorization, where I predict the Houthis will kill each and every one of them. (Honestly, I mistakenly believed the guy had a brain in his head. This act has disproven it.) Sen. Fetterman has (insanely) called for the US to bomb Iran because of its (non-existence) nuclear weapons program. Unreal! The new head of NATO has come to the US in an attempt to persuade him not to encourage Zalensky to make peace with Russia. Most of the show was on the COVID fraud, where Sasha is among the world's leading experts. Her comments, explanations, and observations were extremely insightful and illuminating. Monique joined late and we had calls from Brian and Paul to round out the show.

When Ian Carroll says it’s funded by “billionaires” he should actually say it’s funded by the “CIA”, who have been systematically producing “cultural programs” to divide the family since its inception.

But, why piss off your employer when you’re being paid & amplified so well? https://t.co/CF4IrYUXCl

— Johnny Vedmore (@JohnnyVedmore) May 7, 2025

MARTIN ARMSTRONG: Thankfully, politicians in the US are beginning to wake up to the realization that the climate change agenda will not benefit their constituents. America avoided being swept into the globalist vortex the moment Kamala Harris lost the presidential election.

Thank you to Martin Armstrong's "Fossil Fuel Car Ban Blocked," May 5, 2025, @ Armstrong Economics. 

This will cause all vehicles to be dependent on the electrical grid, which the government controls. Yet, they never planned to stop at electric vehicles. They want full control over you and where you go. It was announced at the 2023 Summer Davos that the ultimate goal is to end 75% of ALL car ownership, including electric vehicles, by the year 2050.  --Martin Armstrong

A month before exiting the office, Joe Biden inserted a measure permitting California to ban gas-powered vehicles by 2035. Thankfully, the measure was overturned with bipartisan support in a 246 to 164 vote, with 35 Democrats breaking with party lines to overrule the ban.

House Majority Whip Tom Emmer, R-Minn., said, “There is no reason the radical climate policies of California should regulate the entire American population and rob every American of consumer choice.”

California’s Gavin Newsom fully supported the ban. The Advanced Clean Cars II rule would prohibit ALL gas car sales by 2035, at a time when the average American cannot afford an electric car or maintenance on an electric vehicle. Beginning in 2026, 35% of new autos sold in California would have been required to produce zero emissions. By 2027, 51% of all new cars would have been electric, and that amount would have risen to 68% in 2028, followed by an all-out ban on gas-powered cars in 2035.

California does not have the infrastructure to support such a measure. The California Independent System Operator has repeatedly called for a “voluntary energy conservation” during holiday weekends as they are concerned the power grid cannot handle the volume. California may be in the spotlight, but countless Democrat-run states were on board with the ban. Washing state, for example, had a target to ban gas car sales by 2030. Delaware, New York, New Jersey, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Vermont, Maine, Massachusetts, Maryland, and Rhode Island were also considering restrictions on fossil fuel car sales by 2035.

This is part of a broader globalist trend to restrict the freedom of movement, citing fossil fuels as the reason for enhanced government control. The World Economic Forum (WEF) blatantly said that private car ownership should follow the fossil fuel ban.

“Goodbye car ownership, hello clean air: welcome to the future of transport,” the WEF published on its website back in December 2016. The first step is to transition cars to electric under the guise of climate change. This will cause all vehicles to be dependent on the electrical grid, which the government controls. Yet, they never planned to stop at electric vehicles. They want full control over you and where you go. It was announced at the 2023 Summer Davos that the ultimate goal is to end 75% of ALL car ownership, including electric vehicles, by the year 2050.

Schwab claimed that eliminating private car ownership could slash CO2 emissions by 3.9 billion tons per year. As a reminder, everyone flew on private jets and was chauffeured in limousines to Davos – they do not care about the environment in the slightest. There is a much darker motive at play that the public needs to realize. Free transportation will be provided in these 15-minute cities where most of the population will reside. Everyone will have a digital ID and social credit score. This is NOT about climate change — the goal is to eliminate the freedom of movement.

Thankfully, politicians in the US are beginning to wake up to the realization that the climate change agenda will not benefit their constituents. America avoided being swept into the globalist vortex the moment Kamala Harris lost the presidential election. The Trump Administration has taken numerous measures to overturn Biden-era globalist measures, such as leaving the WHO, but make no mistake that the unelected elites who control governments are eager for the world’s leading superpower to join their ranks again, and the battle against them will be ongoing. 

EL GATO MALO: you seek to break [systems of wealth creation] by assuming that anyone who gets rich must be hogging some collective resource instead of being the ones who actually created it and without which it would not exist.

Catastic post. https://t.co/KWHwrBiilL

— Kevin McKernan (@Kevin_McKernan) May 6, 2025

and this is why your political movement has done 100 times more damage to the poor than pretty much any other set of ideas in history. you do not understand wealth or the path to human flourishing. the base state of man is grinding poverty. to escape it takes systems of wealth creation. you seek to break them by assuming that anyone who gets rich must be hogging some collective resource instead of being the ones who actually created it and without which it would not exist. so you take from those who build to give to those who do not, punish enterprise and reward indolent dependence, and destroy the incentives of human progress. free markets and capitalism are the only ideas in all of human history that have raised the masses out of perpetual penury and you seek to undermine them because you're too jealous of the people who make it work. so you go after them and take their things then wonder where all the wealth went. destroying the only high function system of the word out of envy and stupidity is not much of a political philosophy. it's just wrecker tantrum. please just stop talking and let the adults in the room make the world rich. you've done quite enough damage already.