DEBBIE LERMAN: That's what a lockdown until . . . and it's not lockdown until vaccine; it's lockdown until countermeasures.

So the civilian framework of Public Health disappeared.  It just got swallowed up by the biodefense framework, and now they're applying the biodefense framework to the entire world, which is utterly and completely counter to medicine and science in public health.  --Debbie Lerman

WAKE UP, MAHA

"Fauci wasn't in charge...He was the public relations face of the policy...The gov't entity that was in charge of the COVID policy was the National Security Council...and now they're applying the biodefense framework to the entire world."  https://t.co/SstHpcslnM

— Sense Receptor (@SenseReceptor) April 18, 2025

The biodefense global public partnership includes all of the public health agencies and stuff on a national level, but they're not the ones who are in charge.  So they're the ones who are just enacting the policy, and that's where everybody has to be really, really clear.  Fauci was not in charge.  Please get that out of your mind.  Yes, we can prosecute him.  Yes, we can blame him for a lot of things.  He didn't make the policy.  He didn't come up with the policy, and he didn't enforce the policy.  He was the public relations face of the policy.  Sure, he's a terrible person.  I would be happy if he were on trial, but I don't think that's where we should be focusing all of our attention.

00:45.  And that's why they brought in Birx.

00:48.  Yes, so Debra Birx is representative of the National Security State.  So what happens . . . so that's why I'm saying, so the second tier is the public health agencies, but what I discovered through my research is that the government entity that was in charge of the COVID policy was the National Security Council.  The National Security Council now again I have to emphasize that before COVID, I didn't want to know this.  I didn't ever want to know about National Security, FBI, CIA, . . . yeah, it's not my thing and so I just went where my research took me and unfortunately that's where it took me, and so I had to go there.  And so the National Security Council is defined as "the leaders of the military and intelligence arms of government that are advising the president on National Security."  That's the definition.  Now, that was the definition before COVID.  They changed it.  So you have to look up the Way Back Machine to find that definition.  Now the way they define it is, yes, it's the intelligence and military, but, of course, it's also pandemics, disasters, anything that requires national coordination now is going to be coordinated through the National Security Council.  That's scary because they have expanded the definition of what the National Security Council is supposed to do and in doing that they've incorporated Public Health into what they call Biosecurity, a biosecurity framework.  A biosecurity framework, the one that they came up with, is based on a biodefense response to outbreaks, which is lockdown until vaccine.  And what that was supposed to be for, it was supposed to be for when there was an Anthrax attack let's say on a subway system in a big city, you could lockdown that city, make sure that it didn't get, it didn't spread further getting brush treatment to the people in the affected area.  It would be a very limited geographic and temporal event.  That's what a lockdown until . . . and it's not lockdown until vaccine; it's lockdown until countermeasures.  So they would rush the counter measures.  They had EUA, which is Emergency Use Authorization, which in that situation was important because you rush the treatment to the people in that area even if you don't know that it's definitely going to to be effective; it's such a big emergency biowarfare, bio terrorism, you got to rush it to the people.  There might be some collateral damage.  We're in a military situation here, right, so in a military situation collateral damage is a whole different consideration than in a civilian framework of Public Health.  So the civilian framework of Public Health disappeared.  It just got swallowed up by the biodefense framework, and now they're applying the biodefense framework to the entire world, which is utterly and completely counter to medicine and science in public health

PAUL SALADINO, MD: How much protein should you eat per day? 1 gram of protein per pound of body weight

How much protein should you eat per day? pic.twitter.com/zRVu6ZRT1b

— Paul Saladino, MD (@paulsaladinomd) April 18, 2025

TOM LUONGO: since Cornwallis surrendered at Yorktown, 1781, we have never really had financial independence in the United States, and if you don't have financial independence you don't really have political independence either.

Tom Luongo and Caitlin Long explore the significant financial shifts in the US monetary system, including the transition from LIBOR to SOFR, the role of stablecoins, and the potential decoupling of the US financial system from European control. https://t.co/7aB98UUPrQ

— St. Michael, the Archangel (@aveng_angel) May 19, 2025

Find the full transcript here. 

My transcript below starts where Tom says, "Oh, wow."

2:45. Donald Trump is a tempting the first real decoupling of the American financial system, broaden that as wide as you want, from the old Colonial European system if you look over the history of the United States has it pertains to money since our conception, since Cornwallis surrendered at Yorktown, 1781, we have never really had financial independence in the United States, and if you don't have financial independence you don't really have political independence either.  How do you feel about the American Revolution?  Since the American Revolution was declared and we are still fighting the vestiges of that system over the course of the past few years, the advent of SOFR, secured overnight financing rate, and the true end of LIBOR [ London Inter-Bank Offered Rate] on March 31st because LIBOR ended on September 30th the 6th month synthetic Library contract that were floating around out there they didn't mature until March 31st.

4:10. LONG.  Can I pause you there and explain the difference between SOFR and LIBOR, and why that means the US is taking power back from London?

4:19.  Sure because the Libor rate is an unsecured rate, decided upon by 18 City of London Banks, only one of which represents American interests in many people's parlance.  And JP Morgan does not represent America's interest at all.  It's only that JP Morgan's London office, their subsidiary, that sat on the board of LIBOR. The secured overnight financing rate . . . LIBOR was a way to price offshore dollars without ever really having to post collateral because you could just pass LIBOR contracts, rehypothecate the maximum themselves, and we had this massive growth the shadow banking system and the euro dollar market over the last 60 or 70 year. . . 

5:03.  Okay let me pause you there.  For people who are just starting to listen to this for the first time and underscore that meant that London Banks set the most important interest rate in US dollar markets . . .

5:15.  . . . and which then would be the most important markets in the world.  So now that we have that established in the LIBOR system was codified in 1984 when LIBOR was unofficially established as the US dollar rate around the world, interestingly enough we had the G5 get together 1985 to create the Plaza Accord so now read currency markets.  That system was really in play all the way up until the global financial crisis of 2008 and that's when the system started to break, really broke, and then, since then years after that around 2011 when the central banks all got together and created swap lines amongst all the major G7 Banks, the Bank of Japan, the Bank of England the Fed, the ECB, they all got together and coordinated monetary policy, and that's actually what broke the last gold bull market.  If you remember it was at that moment in time . That gold peaked and then there was the announcement the coordination of Central Bank policy we were dealing with the potential Greg's it at the time Germany leaving the euro at the time that stabilized markets by the time we got into October November of that year and then that system

READ ALL ABOUT IT: HOSPITAL HOMICIDE IN A SYSTEM NEAR YOU

Will criminal cases break the wall of the PREP Act aka "license to kill"?, by @sasha_latypova https://t.co/CpkYvEPht5

— St. Michael, the Archangel (@aveng_angel) April 18, 2025

14:25. RODRIGUEZ.  That he narrative of defense is, "It was so unprecedented.  We were all trying the best we could.  It's such a shame this happened.  The reason we may not have done this quite right," not that there was an admission, but "the reason this may not have turned out the way we all wanted it to is because we were just trying to figure it out as we went."  Who knew we were talking to "thought leaders" around our area.  We had weekly, I mean they were busy, busy.  They were having weekly meetings with other experts in the field from other hospitals, what is the best thing to do here, how are we going to do this."  But the outcome of it was "this was reasonable treatment because everyone else thought so."  How is that practicing medicine?  You never decide on a patient based on what everybody else thinks about all these other patients.  I mean you can consult, but one patient in front of you is having an active cardiac event and you won't treat it because everybody else thinks that you should stabilize a cold first.  That's how medicine was being practiced in that period of time, and that's extraordinarily bad.  

15:55. LATYPOVA.  Yes I've had personal experience with this.  They tried to kill my mother-in-law in upstate New York in Highland Hospital in Rochester, New York with the same protocol and with the same gas lighting technique.  We managed to save her only because my husband knows the COO of that whole hospital system.  But they were very, very actively trying to kill her, and she self recognized that they were trying to kill her.  She's a doctor herself.  She worked for that hospital system all her life, so it was undeniable that they were on purpose dehydrating her, isolating her, not feeding her, pretending they ran out of apple juice, then send in the representative of patient [patient advocate] liaison to gaslight my husband, her son, who's also no spring chicken; he's also from the pharmaceutical R&D space.  And they were saying we can't treat so she has an elderly person on multiple medications and has blood pressure issues, low blood pressure, so they were trying to use that against her.  And they were removing that medication, hoping that she would collapse from low blood pressure, removing the hydration, and then send in a representative saying, "Oh, we can't treat her other conditions here in this hospital because we only focus on COVID.  

KEVIN MCKERNAN: It’s amazing what a little liability can do to hold companies accountable

It’s amazing what a little liability can do to hold companies accountable.@SecKennedy https://t.co/gwC0mVa4Yx

— Kevin McKernan (@Kevin_McKernan) April 17, 2025