Sunday, January 5, 2025

The FDA created a loophole that’s been allowing Big Food to approve their own chemicals to use in our foods

Posted by at No comments:

ZAFIR: there’s nothing that guy can do to touch those politicians personally. He can sue the government and get taxpayer money, but they can do anything they want and are immune from prosecution or civil suit.

Some background. 


Not a redress.  Not a legal resolution.  Tyrants being served.  Tallulah explains, 
I looked this up, district court dismissed the case stating they did not exhaust their administrative remedies. But Chief Blanchard resigned to take his old job which begins January 6th in Sinton. 

All of this makes for entertaining court drama, not to mention the risk of having an arrest on your record, but in too many cases it always feels like someone is trampling your rights, but the judges rarely concur.  I was almost bitten by someone's pit bull.  I called an attorney because in my escape from the jaws of the land shark, I had nowhere to go but up on top of my Honda.  I found myself standing on my 2000 Accord roof, while the pit was angling to find a route up to me.  The result was that I dented my roof.  I tried to sue for damages because of the lady's dog.  The attorney told me that I'd have to be bitten first for any damages to occur.  So shredding of flesh was required for the law to be broken.  Nice.  The law is not always on your side.  

You Smell That? Yep at least cites a law.  Whether it has standing in this case is another matter, 

In March 1964, the Supreme Court issued a 9–0 decision defending the principle of wide-open debate will inevitably include "vehement, caustic, and...unpleasantly sharp attacks on government and public officials." He is right, they are wrong. 

And it's Zafir that makes the coup de grace, 

The problem is, there’s nothing that guy can do to touch those politicians personally. He can sue the government and get taxpayer money, but they can do anything they want and are immune from prosecution or civil suit. 

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: ,

JOHN BEAUDOIN on CONNECTICUT'S FAILURES

CT Memo Vol. I Sudden Kidney Failure and Hospital Homicides

From official government records

Facts found nowhere else in the world - 2 signals

SummaLogicaLLC dot com

Corroborated by Phinance Technologies
@DowdEdward in total excess kidney failure USA ~153,000 dead.  
Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , ,

SUZANNE HUMPHRIES: Nature didn't leave out vitamin K from babies, and that until babies are 6 months old they're not actually having a full coagulation, normal coagulation, so there's a reason

afterward in most societies that [umbilical] cord is clamped right away, which is a problem because you're not only leaving behind up to 40% of that baby's blood that belongs to that baby, but you're also leaving behind stem cells, which have the potential to go in and clear up any of the problems that happened in the brain or elsewhere.  Now if you thicken the blood, what is it, 2000 times more or something like that, then how is that going to affect the ability for those stem cells to go where they need to go?  --Suzanne Humphries

00:08. What is your opinion on vitamin K being administered to newborns?  

00:14. My opinion is that the more I read about vitamin K, the more I can't believe that it is injected into newborn infants.  My scientific endeavors have really shown me that by and large nature overall didn't make mistakes like this.  Nature didn't leave out vitamin K from babies, and that until babies are 6 months old they're not actually having a full coagulation, normal coagulation, so there's a reason . . . just like babies are programmed to be anti-inflammatory, I believe that babies are programmed to not have numerously higher levels of coagulation than adults.  If you look at the coagulation, the supposed deficits, that a baby has, it's not just the vitamin K factors.  So I would suggest that you read a lot about it and consider . . . if you feel better about giving it, then only give the drops.  But most people I know, who understand the difference, don't give any at all.  And if you do give it, maybe it would just be maybe if there was an extremely traumatic birth. 

01:34.  But you have to understand some of the things that medical interventions do at birth.  For instance, when the baby is born what happens is that it's a very tight passageway, as we all know, and so the baby is squeezed very tightly.  The brain, I'm sorry, the cranium is made so that it can compact in on itself.  The brain is squeezed.  There's trauma all throughout the body.  About 30% of babies will have micro hemorrhages from a normal delivery.  Now afterward in most societies that cord is clamped right away, which is a problem because you're not only leaving behind up to 40% of that baby's blood that belongs to that baby, but you're also leaving behind stem cells, which have the potential to go in and clear up any of the problems that happened in the brain or elsewhere.  Now if you thicken the blood, what is it, 2000 times more or something like that, then how is that going to affect the ability for those stem cells to go where they need to go?  When you have these vitamin K factors, those areas that bleed tend to clot and it's a little harder to clear that out than if you just leave it that way.  The concern is always the minority, this vastly small percentage of children who can develop an inter-cranial hemorrhage and it can be problematic.  We are now treating everybody for this problem.  So I think it's important to understand the full spectrum before agreeing to the injection, and it should be your personal decision that you feel comfortable with AFTER knowing what there is to be known about vitamin K, which I believe in the USA has been given since 1970s something like that, but before that, we weren't giving it.  

03:29. The other thing is that if the baby's clotting is not full until 6 months of age, how long is your injection going to work for?  So it's not completely logical [to give] a huge injection on the first day of life.  Is it going to protect them over the long term?  But I think that it's always a good idea for mothers to consume lots of greens during, the entire pregnancy if possible, because not only do you get vitamin K that can be delivered to the baby in normal amounts if they need it, but you're also getting folic acid, magnesium, and lots of other minerals that are required to build a baby.  

Dissolving Illusions: Disease, Vaccines, and the Forgotten History, Suzanne Humphries MD (Author), Roman Bystrianyk (Author), 2013.

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , ,

METABOLIC SOURCE OF CANCER: Amino Acid and Glucose Fermentation Maintain Energy in Mouse and Human Malignant Glioma Cells

 
 Here is their paper, "Amino Acid and Glucose Fermentation Maintain ATP Content in Mouse and Human Malignant Glioma Cells," Lee, D. C., Ta, L., Mukherjee, P., Duraj, T., Domin, M., Greenwood, B., … Seyfried, T. N. (2024). ASN Neuro, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/17590914.2024.2422268

from Seyfried's presentation above: 

00:12. Amino acid fermentation can also participate in the dysregulated growth of the tumor cell and the amino acid that we're speaking predominantly about is glutamine and we tested all the other Amino acids. All 20 amino acids we interrogated, the cancer cells both mouse and human glioblastoma cells.  We interrogated them to ask what fuels could they use to maintain their growth?  Then we do this is very simple we just take the tumor cells and we grow them in Saline salt solution and, of course, there's no food there's nothing for them to eat and then you take and time them to see how fast they die with no food and mouse cells because they have a very high basil metabolic rate seven times faster than that of the human they die quick when you take away their fuels Mouse cells will die in 24 hours human cells human cells will die in about 72 hours, 48 to 72 hours with no fuel in what we call a buffered sailing solution.  And then what we do, we simply add individual amino acids back in and we see whether or not the viability of the cells is improved, and what we see is we do this both in the presence and absence of glucose.  Glucose alone will keep the cells alive longer but then they die because they don't have any nitrogen source.  And then we do it without glucose.  So we just do in pure nothing and then we add glucose and then we add individual amino acids back, and what we see is when we at amino acid glutamine these cells explode in growth capacity relative to all other amino acids.  Now we found a little bit of stimulation from glutamate because it's the first product that glutamine is metabolized to, but it's not nearly as powerful as glutamine.  None of the other amino acids had any come close to how powerful glutamine is so the question is when you have glucose and glutamine the two pathways are synergistic and provide all of the metabolites and all of the energy needed for rapid dysregulated growth.  So the question is how is glutamine able to facilitate the growth of the tumor is it respired through the respiration it's called and aplorotic respiratory process where the carbons glutamine entered into the TCA cycle to produce reducing equivalents allowing oxidative phosphorylation to operate producing energy or is the glutamine fermented which is generating energy through mitochondrial substrate level phosphorylation in the sucks you will call a ligase step Within the Krebs cycle or the TCA cycle so what we did and why we this paper is so important is we were able to test this hypothesis this is many different ways so many different ways so we would take all of the glucose away from the tumor in the presence of oxygen and then give glutamine with oxygen and glutamine in the absence of glucose but then that doesn't tell us whether the glutamine is fermented or has respired so we repeatedly experiment this time removing all the oxygen we grew them in a deep hypoxia in the acid of glucose and we still got ATP production in these cells yes it was significantly reduced but it was still being produced ATP was still being produced in the cancer cells in the absence of oxygen and in the absence of glucose and in the absence of glucose so the question is where is that ATP coming from so we think it's coming from the substrate level phosphorylation in the T c a cycle and we were able to show that when we use labeled glutamate glutamine C-13 glutamine we were able to see C-13 succinic acid as a waste product, that's the end product of the glutaminolysis pathway. 


Posted by at No comments:
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)