Wednesday, October 9, 2024

SASHA LATYPOVA: And, in summary, I can say none of it is regulated. The FDA kind of pretend regulates [the vaccines], and that's been the case since forever...

"None of it [vaccines] is regulated. The FDA kind of pretend regulates these things, and that's been the case since forever...up until 1973 there were no regulations and no standards for manufacturing...[then] in '86 there was [The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act]." Retired pharma R&D executive Sasha Latypova (@sasha_latypova) describes for Dr. Drew (
@drdrew
) how "vaccines" are not actually regulated in the U.S. by the FDA but rather only "pretend regulated." The pharma insider notes that the injections were entirely unregulated prior to 1973, and then, by 1986, protected by The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act—meaning there's no liability and thus, in effect, still no regulations. "My colleague, Katherine [Watt], traced the relevant US law all the way back to late 1700s. And so, we now have a better understanding of the regulatory frameworks in the US as it applies to all vaccines in general, and then, a much greater understanding about the COVID shots, which are EUA countermeasures and how that's regulated," Latypova says. "And...in summary, I can say none of it is regulated. The FDA kind of pretend regulates these things, and that's been the case since forever..." "In the US, the vaccines have not been under FDA mandate until 1973," Latypova adds. "Many people don't realize that. They were not regulated at all as pharmaceuticals. They were manufactured essentially by public health service, which is predecessor of CDC, the US government, public health service." "After 1973, they technically came under FDA purview. And as you know, in '86, there was [The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act and] that shielded all the manufacturers from liability; that was under Reagan." "Since then, the manufacturers of vaccines [have] had no liability. And if you have no liability for injuries or deaths that you cause, then it's as if regulations don't exist for you because you have no consequences," Latypova notes. Partial transcription of clip: "So the manufacturing, those remain great concerns. In fact, I've I've gotten additional information that it's even worse, than I thought, and the problem actually goes a long time back. Even my colleague, Katherine [Watt], traced the relevant US law all the way back to late 1700s. And so, we now have a better understanding of the regulatory frameworks in the US, as it applies to vaccines, all vaccines in general, and then, a much greater understanding, about the COVID shots, which are EUA countermeasures and how that's regulated. And...in summary, I can say none of it is regulated. The FDA kind of pretend regulates these things, and that's been the case since forever... "So the law research is ongoing, and, Katherine and one of the colleagues are writing a big report on relevant law tracing back to, as I said, late 1700s when, you know, vaccination as we kind of know it in a modern world has, started being used more or less in mass subjects. Now, in the US, the vaccines have not been under FDA mandate until 1973. Many people don't realize that. They were not regulated at all as pharmaceuticals. They were manufactured essentially by public health service, which is predecessor of CDC, the US government, public health service. And, they were sort of, you know, you could order order the samples or whatever you needed, the box. You could even, like, order it in the mail from the US government, and they would send it to you. "And so up until 1973, there were no regulation and no standards for manufacturing, for purity testing, for contaminants, for, characterizing what you have made in the pharmaceutical process, which is standard for anybody who works in pharma making drugs. That didn't exist, really. It wasn't anything codified. After 1973, they technically came under FDA purview. And as you know, in '86, there was a national vaccine, I forget the correct name of the law, but basically, the act that came in that, shielded all the manufacturers from liability that was under Reagan. "And since then, the manufacturers of vaccines had no liability. And if you have no liability, for injuries or deaths that you cause, then it's as if regulations don't exist for you because you have no consequences."
Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , ,

THE SOLITARY REAPER: RFK Jr went quiet about vaccines after associating with Calley & Casey Means. The REAL story behind the nepo babies & their promotion by Tucker, RFK Jr, Trump

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , ,

A biopsy, part of the sales plan?

A tumor is protection - the body’s way of isolating damaged cells to protect healthy tissue. Given the right support, your body can eliminate this tumor - the damaged cells - naturally, without invasive interventions. 

A clean, natural diet and lifestyle are crucial first steps. They provide the body with the resources needed to fight and prevent cancer.   from Simone Gisondi, a certified holistic cancer practitioner.
Posted by at No comments:
Labels: ,

New Northern Ireland Health Bill Is Full-On Tyranny

I pray that people have noticed by now that the state uses the health sector as its primary tact to introduce tyranny and mass murder.  The state gets a high percentage of compliance from health edicts and fiat because people associate healthcare with early childhood experiences where they're obedient to a mother's instructions; so that scenario still exists in people's memory and the state exploits that.  Now not everybody complies, of course, but the fact that they're able to get such a high percentage of compliance says that most people are kind of, you know, in a child like, victim consciousness obedient posture when it comes to the state.  Like "law-abiding citizens" is a euphemism for obedient child.

The advantage of living in the United States is the Constitution that puts, albeit thin, restraints on government tyranny.  Though I am sure that any of us can point to a score of violations or exemptions to that claim.  The 4th Amendment in the US requires police to get a warrant to search property, yet when it comes to your vehicle out on the road in the middle of nowhere, they apparently have free range.  So the Constitution may not restrain the state, but it at least allows redress in court; that is if you have the money to sue the state, county, or city.

Detaining and quarantining individuals for up to 28 days.  Liz Evans' article, mandating the wearing of medical clothing such as face masks, forcibly entering premises and confiscating belongings without a warrant and in this Northern Ireland bill it talks about agents, agents of Northern Ireland Public Health officers or anyone the officers have designated anyone or many individuals.  So people can literally pitch up at your doorstep, break down the door, drag you out, take things from your house, examine things without a warrant.  They can require your children to be kept off school.  They can close your business and keep adults off work.  They can breach medical confidentiality and privacy and share your data with other patient medical information with various State bodies, which may or may not be working for the government directly or indirectly.  They can require an individual to answer questions regarding their health status; so there goes medical confidentiality.  They can require a person to attend training or advice sessions.  They can legislate as to where the person may go, or with whom the person has contact; that's the same as the Scottish one.  There goes your freedom of movement and freedom of assembly.  

It is real it's already in Scotland

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: ,

Tuesday, October 8, 2024

Where did all of that building material disappear to?

Posted by at No comments:
Subscribe to: Comments (Atom)