I keep talking about historians of the future -- if we have any honest ones, our "public health" institutions are not going to come out looking too good.
A new paper has just been released that I thought you might want to know about. It's called: "Statistical and Numerical Errors Made by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention During the COVID-19 Pandemic."
The paper has four authors, three of whom are academics at the University of California, San Francisco, and one of whom (Kelley Krohnert) is an independent scholar.
Kelley, I am happy to point out, was a guest on the Tom Woods Show after she, an independent analyst affiliated with no university or institution, demolished the CDC's scaremongering claims about the threat of Covid to children, claims that were obviously intended to encourage panicked parents to give their children the shots.
Eighty percent of the errors the four authors examine in this paper involve -- what a surprise -- exaggerating Covid risks.
As one of the authors, Vinay Prasad, put it:
These errors are going to be hard to dispute. They are factually wrong . . . .
The CDC uses statistics that consistently inflate deaths among children, while it recommended many restrictions on this age group.
These are not errors of interpretation or preference but demonstrably false numbers. Horrific that the CDC has made these errors and in some cases still [has] not issued a correction, and even repeated the errors . . . .
We need more papers like this!
A new paper has just been released that I thought you might want to know about. It's called: "Statistical and Numerical Errors Made by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention During the COVID-19 Pandemic."
The paper has four authors, three of whom are academics at the University of California, San Francisco, and one of whom (Kelley Krohnert) is an independent scholar.
Kelley, I am happy to point out, was a guest on the Tom Woods Show after she, an independent analyst affiliated with no university or institution, demolished the CDC's scaremongering claims about the threat of Covid to children, claims that were obviously intended to encourage panicked parents to give their children the shots.
Eighty percent of the errors the four authors examine in this paper involve -- what a surprise -- exaggerating Covid risks.
As one of the authors, Vinay Prasad, put it:
These errors are going to be hard to dispute. They are factually wrong . . . .
The CDC uses statistics that consistently inflate deaths among children, while it recommended many restrictions on this age group.
These are not errors of interpretation or preference but demonstrably false numbers. Horrific that the CDC has made these errors and in some cases still [has] not issued a correction, and even repeated the errors . . . .
We need more papers like this!
