"when Reagan and the Congress at the time put in the public health and emergencies section that was the beginning of concentrating much more power in the hands of the Health and Human Services Secretary."

SARS-COV-2/COVID-19 IS A US DOD MILITARY PROTOTYPE PROJECT

Public Health Services Act, 1944.

National Emergencies Act, 1976.

The Public Health Emergency Fund, PHEF, 1983.

The Public Health Emergency Fund (PHEF; Figure 1), created in 1983, falls under the authority of the HHS. The HHS secretary is authorized to access PHEP funds following the declaration of a PHE.

National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (Public Law 99-660), 1986.

Katherine Watt's substack site is called Bailiwick News.

What was the earliest and most relevant piece of law that you can trace that was changed for this particular pandemic to occur? 

1983 establishment of the public health emergencies program under the Public Health Emergencies Act, which was a 1944 law.  But when Reagan and the Congress at the time put in the public health and emergencies section that was the beginning of concentrating much more power in the hands of the Health and Human Services Secretary.  Whenever a health emergency has been declared by the HHS, it's a completely closed loop.  Once it's declared, they have all the power.  And they are the only ones who can suspend their power because of the way they wrote the laws . . . to the extent let's say, to the extent that federal judges and Congress accept the premise that the Executive Branch can shut them out of everything after the announcement has been made.  

6:10  This unconstitutional law was put into place in the 1980s.  This branch of government can reserve power at its own discretion.  So what is required to declare an emergency?  Does it have to have a set of concrete rules, dates, and any threshold that needs to be reached for a public health emergency to be declared? Or is it just something that they describe as one?

Yep.  They 

So far, I think it's just something they describe as one.  

8:05  They want to propagandize specifically viral pandemics through Hollywood, Netflix shows, books, and publications.  

And through test-runs: SARS-1, 2003; H1N1, 2009.

And then they would have these old stories about ebola in Africa.  So they wanted that image of a scary, scary virus, that causes a pandemic, that kills half of the world's population, which is total nonsense scientifically, I can assure you.  With a bomb, you can respond to concrete things.  But with a virus, the government plays on people's fears based on invisible threats that you can't identify, so deadly and so stealthily.  

Yes, and it's much less destructive of infrastructure.  It can destroy social and economic structures without taking out buildings, railroad tracks, and factories with bombs.  So for the architects of the takeover, these folks can take over the production facilities.  They do it with board games too.  Her kids play Pandemi[c].  The whole premise 

3rd circuit court of Appeals stopped the resistance against the lockdowns.  

"if Putin does not become more aggressive, [the Russian hardliners] may indeed replace him [with a coup] by May and then holy hell will break loose."

Thank you to Martin Armstrong @ Armstrong Economics.   

Washington is wielding its own array of pressures to paint Putin as a loser as Octavian did to Mark Antony. 

If the US hands Zelensky long-range missiles, he will use them to attack mainland Russia and that will begin World War. 

I kept thinking that the war in Ukraine would simply end and the country would be divided.  But it looks like NATO, i.e, the United States, wants war with Russia.  In fact, they want the war to conquer Russia.  Talk about your existential battles.  Martin Armstrong explains.

Russian Navy ships and submarines have suddenly left their base at Novorossiysk, in the Black Sea, en-masse.

This is highly unusual and many fear that this is a change in tactics. The Western Press keeps trying to paint Russia as losing the war so, quite frankly, they can get more people to volunteer to join the military if they think they are on the winning side.  There is no question that the US and Russia are waging the most intense confrontation since the 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis. Our model on that confrontation aligned with our major war model showing that 2014 was the end of that period and the beginning of this new period as we head into World War III.

The hardliners are not happy in Russia and President Vladimir Putin is being pushed into a corner. Either he gets more aggressive, or there could be a coup by May. The hardliners are using nuclear threats and other escalations in what they know is now really a proxy war of the USA and NATO against Russia using Ukraine as the pawn they are willing to sacrifice. NATO troops will not venture in until the last Ukrainian dies on the battlefield.

Washington is wielding its own array of pressures to paint Putin as a loser as Octavian did to Mark Antony. The good news is that, so far, both strategies have been very carefully calibrated. The bad news is that America and Russia are still on a collision course because the end goal is actually to conquer Russia.

Sweden has now escalated its draft. Poland is building its army of up to 250,000 men. All of this is based on the expectation that Ukraine can reduce the Russian army and that will make it a cakewalk to invade Russia and drive tanks from Poland right into Moscow

Sweden was preparing by boosting military spending by around 40% over the five years from 2016 and doubling the numbers conscripted into the armed forces as it looks to beef up its defence amid growing tensions with Russia post-2014. Meanwhile, France, Italy, Latvia and Lithuania scrapped conscription as they concluded that large-scale defence was no longer necessary before 2014, but now they have all reversed policies.

The Joe Biden administration pledged to defend “every inch” of Nato territory. That has complicated matters for Putin to interfere with Ukraine’s supply lines through Romania and Poland. The Western Press keeps pitching the same propaganda that Putin is spiralling toward defeat in Ukraine and may not survive that outcome politically. Yet I know that the hardliners are there and if Putin does not become more aggressive, they may indeed replace him by May and then holy hell will break loose.

Putin is warning Washington as well as Kyiv that attacks on those territories are tantamount to attacks on Russia itself. The Biden administration has opted not to listen to anything from Putin and only seeks war instructing Zelensky to sacrifice his own people and to reject any peace talks whatsoever. If the US hands Zelensky long-range missiles, he will use them to attack mainland Russia and that will begin World War.

EVERY President throughout my entire life has always sought peace. The Biden Administration and NATO only talk about pushing war. NEVER have I ever witnessed such irresponsible leadership for . . .  "Climate Change."

American gas producers are trying to cut US consumption so as to sell the gas to the EU at huge markups.

Anyone pushing the bullshit that gas stoves are toxic is more likely than not being paid to shill.

No exceptions. https://t.co/zR8Gw197HE

— Gonzalo Lira (@GonzaloLira1968) January 12, 2023

You know why they are all of a sudden talking about how bad gas stoves and gas heating is in general?

The EU sanctions cut off cheap Russian gas. So American gas producers are trying to cut US consumption so as to sell the gas to the EU at huge markups. pic.twitter.com/5b4UlnHHEB

— Gonzalo Lira (@GonzaloLira1968) January 12, 2023

Congressman Thomas Massie, Inventor

Congressman Thomas Massie, Inventor.

Maddie de Garay's Story

Pfizer's trial only vaccinated 1,131 children so a single serious injury would have made the vaccine too dangerous.

Maddie's story shows just how far medicine will go to betray and gaslight patients who threaten its narrative. We may never know who else was swept under the rug. pic.twitter.com/4ONwty5Hu6

— Pierre Kory, MD MPA (@PierreKory) January 11, 2023

You've probably heard of her. You've probably seen her on television or at Ron Johnson's Advisory Hearing back in October 2021.  But her name is Maddie de Garay and she was severely injured by the Pfizer vaccine.  Here's more testimony on Maddie's condition and her parents' grief.  The dad is in the medical field and her mom is an engineer who states that they both have faith in science.  Yes, science can be beneficial but you can't ignore the personal agency of the purveyor of that or any science.  We've all been set up by the deceit.  For the doctors to dismiss her symptoms as nothing and then as some fleeting side effect that will get better over time is proof that we're all alone when it comes to government-sponsored medical procedures.  No apologies.  No explanation.  No compensation.  No restoration.  Fine.  Then let us take the approach: Never forget.  Never forgive.  Hold the line.