Ah, yes, a philanthropist who has been selflessly donating his wealth to improve the lives of people around the world . . .

Death Cult. https://t.co/6aa15FUNLP

— Tom Fitton (@TomFitton) December 6, 2022

When did being a victim become the highest of values in the west? CARL BENJAMIN: The U.S. Civil Rights Act, 1964.

The guest is Carl Benjamin, who Wikipedia describes as 

a British far-right anti-feminist YouTuber and political commentator. A former member of the Eurosceptic right-wing UK Independence Party, he was one of its unsuccessful candidates for the South West England constituency in the 2019 European Parliament election

This is the reason why fascism exploded as it did.  Fascism was in response to the failures of communism to overthrow the capitalism.  Now the only place it really succeeded was in Russia in 1917 with Lenin overthrowing the provisional government.  But it was the communist revolutionary who got imprisoned by the fascists, called Gramsci, Antonio Gramsci, who said that that's only happened in Russia because Russia is a deeply corrupt country where the people do not support the institutions of government.  So they didn't care if they got overthrown by a small organized minority.  And he accurately, I think, said, or pointed out in his Prison Notebooks, this is not going to happen in the west, somewhere like the United States, Canada, or England, where the institutions are by and large not corrupt and the people uphold them because the people believe the institutions are the best they're going to get and they like them and they think they're important and sustain the world that we have around us.  And so from this, you have a small group of activists in academia, in Harvard Law School, they call themselves the Critical Legal Scholars initially, but they ended up turning themselves into something called the Race Crits, the Critical Race Theorists.  This began with Dereck Bell's alternative course, where they were teaching what would come to be called The Intersectional View of Society, essentially a great expansion of Marxism out of the economic sphere into every other sphere of life.  In her earliest essays, Kimberle Crenshaw, she's the person who coined "intersectionality."  In 1989, she gives her essays these really long titles, and I can really remember, "A Black Feminist Critique of Liberal Human Rights."  In this one essay, she analyzes three particular American Supreme Court decisions, pointing out that what's happening here is that she believes, as a black woman, she has identified a problem, an absence in American Human liberal rights doctrine, which is, for example, when a pair of black women were denied a promotion in a company, a helicopter company, they were being discriminated against by the people above them, the judge ruled, for being as either women or as either black.  So a black man could be discriminated on the basis that he was black, but, of course, he had a privilege because he was a man.  A white woman could be discriminated against on the fact that she was a woman but had some sort of privilege because she was white, claiming that this was a gap in human rights law.  All intersectionality does is chain these together.  That says, what about a black woman who isn't privileged in either one of these ways but is discriminated against both of these ways.  That, in fact, she has a worse level of discrimination, and things are worse for her, and as soon as you start taking on this attitude, you realize that, oh, this is a key weakness in human liberal rights doctrine because what they're doing is staying within the paradigm and essentially warping it into something it's not intended to be.  From this, she writes an essay in 1991, called "Mapping the Margins," where she continues to expound this point of view.  This is where the intersectionality is properly formulated.  And in the conclusion of that, she says, "Look, we can use . . . in this essay, she explicitly cites Gramsci, because Gramsci's position was look, we can't overthrow capitalism in the west while society is strong enough to support its institutions.  He has a nice way of framing it, "When we attack the state and it trembles, behind it is revealed a strong fortification, or rampart, of society.  He says that it's the society itself that we actually need to overthrow [interesting distinction] in order to be able to bring about communism.  Crenshaw says that's a great point, and that we can use this weakness in liberal human rights legislation to attack society itself by promoting minoritarian interests.  And what we can do is find the intersection between being black, being woman, being gay, being trans, all the other identity categories.  And she openly postulates in the conclusion to this essay, that we can form coalitions of marginalized groups in order to strengthen that political voice and hopefully overthrow the regime of white/CIS/hetero/patriarchal norm of capitalism in order to, using their own logic, in order to hopefully bring . . . it's always very speculative, in order to "might bring about a better future."  "Might"?  Brilliant.  Such a secure way of overthrowing society.  I think this is why it's been so unbelievably quick because they're using their own internal logic.  All they do is expand the concept to mean its antonym.  Take any concept.  Racism is at once a person's opinion, which is located in yourself, and it's also objective, outside of yourself, and there's no one person who is responsible for it.  So you've got two opinions, two definitions that are openly contradictory that have been compressed into the same thing and it allows them to pivot at any point.  

When did being a victim become the highest of values in the west?  The U.S. Civil Rights Act, 1964. 

Europe isn't counting on anything to get through next year... starvation and privation of its people is a feature not a bug.

Europe isn't counting on anything to get through next year... starvation and privation of its people is a feature not a bug.   https://t.co/TdMtBjoERj

— Tom Luongo (Give Deflation a Chance!) (@TFL1728) December 6, 2022

blood fibrin/fibrinogen degradation active 4 hours AFTER NK [Nattokinase]

Okay, so this was interesting.  I mean if you're looking for proof to know whether some nutritional supplement works, this evidence here on Fibrinolytics is pretty close to 100% that I've found.  It reads, 

As a result, D-dimer concentrations at 6, and 8 hours, and blood fibrin/fibrinogen degradation products at 4 hours AFTER NK [Nattokinase] administration elevated significantly (p<0.05, respectively factor VIII activity declined at 4 and 6 hours (p<0.05, respectively), blood antithrombin concentration was higher at 2 and 4 hours (p<0.05, respectively), and the activated partial thromboplastin time prolonged significantly at 2 and 4 hours following NK administration (p<0.05 and p<0.01, respectively).  

Fibrinolytic activity of naturally occurring substances. Blockbuster All Clear puts them all in one product. With the micro-clotting issues associated with Long COVID, this might be an area to look into. https://t.co/0e4Ngka0io pic.twitter.com/DMg6TXQXjb

— DCGreenZone1 🐭 (@DCGreenZone) December 6, 2022

So blood concentration of Nattokinase is realized after only 4 hours of consuming it.  So the de-fibrin action begins after 4 hours.

 

Is the United States Coming Undone?

We will be publishing next year a special report on . . . how [the United States] will separate as was the case for every civilization historically. Like the Roman Empire, the United States will separate into three regions [and] to the surprise of many, this will also include Canada

Thank you to Martin Armstrong @ Armstrong Economics.

It is becoming clear[er] day by day why the mainstream media has been so against Elon Musk buying Twitter, for as they say in law enforcement, there is a “Blue Code” where cops do not rat on cops.  The same is true about judges.  Mainstream media is so LEFT it has forgotten how to walk a straight line.  They are no longer the free press – they are propaganda organizations for the takeover of our country, and in the process, they will cause civil war and the collapse of Western culture. The Biden Administration clearly violated the law by telling Twitter to delete photos of Hunter smoking crack cocaine which anyone else would be in prison.

The chaos and confusion behind closed doors at Twitter in the immediate aftermath of the October 2020 surface of Hunter Biden’s Laptop from Hell has exposed that the very top-level execs at Twitter decided to label the New York Post’s story as “hacked material” without any evidence — behind the back of then-CEO and founder Jack Dorsey. Historically, those on the LEFT have always done whatever it takes to win for their very basic philosophy is to dominate society and to shut down all resistance.  [You can't imagine how far they will go to destroy anybody who resists.]

The New York Times called on President Biden to create a “Reality Czar” to shut down all dissent, which they immediately label conspiracy theories without any real investigation.  CNN has called on cable companies to drop Fox News as if everything CNN says is the gospel. We are living in a world where mainstream media has become the enemy of the people pushing a political agenda no different than the New York Times during the 1930s was urging Roosevelt to adopt communism.

New York Times cheered Stalin and constantly reported that this was the way to the future – Stalinism. They seem to be preaching that again with a “Reality Czar” right out of Stalin’s handbook. They are supporting once again this move to a Marxist Utopia. The New York Times hid the truth about Stalin because they were in favor of Communism during the Great Depression. Stalin’s great economic miracle was achieved by taking all the food from Ukraine to pretend Communism was working in Russia causing over 7 million to starve to death. Today, they are cheering World War III to destroy Russia once more in hopes of adopting this Great Reset and imposing upon the world their cancel culture with a one-world government headed by the United Nations.

I strongly recommend you watch the movie, Mr. Jones. This exposes the TRUE STORY of how the New York Times tried to support Communism in the United States back then, with their top journalist, Walter Duranty (1884-1957), who was their main man in Moscow. The New York Times promoted him to be awarded the Pulitzer Prize for reporting on how Communism was Utopia and our future. When Gareth Jones (1905-1935) in March 1933 reported this was all a lie, the truth finally began to appear.

It took the New York Times until 1990 to admit that their reporting covered up the truth about Stalin and the massive starvation in an effort, like Schwab, once again, to sell “equality” as our salvation. The New York Times covered up the more than 7 million people who died of starvation in the Ukraine famine. The New York Times wrote that their reporting on the Russian Revolution constituted “some of the worst reporting to appear in this newspaper.” They never revoked his Pultizer Prize for writing fake news about Stalin.

Homeland Security and the FBI both said that Russia’s hack of the DNC did not involve altering the vote. In fact, it was his own paper that reported on November 25, 2016, “The Obama administration said on Friday that despite Russian attempts to undermine the presidential election, it has concluded that the results “accurately reflect the will of the American people.” So, were four years of stating the Russians put Trump in the White House, not misinformation?

The constant lies the press has spun about Russia invading the US elections in 2016 and manipulations seem intent upon creating war, exactly as took place with the Spanish American War. We have returned to yellow journalism, which is based on sensationalism and crude exaggeration. Pulitzer and Hearst went head to head. I remember grade school history class blaming the Spanish American War on fake news. There is one such story that male Spanish officials were strip-searching American woman tourists in Cuba looking for claimed messages from rebels. This was the front page of Hearst’s newspaper showing what has become known as “yellow journalism” whereby the illustration was by Frederic Remington and published in the New York Journal, on February 12th, 1897.

Hearst’s New York Journal was called out for this fake news by its rival Joseph Pulitzer’s, New York World, reporting that this story was erroneous and its graphically illustrated strip-search of a woman aboard a U.S. passenger steamer was fake. The Journal article was written by Richard Harding Davis, who reported that Spanish authorities boarded the U.S. steamer, the Olivette, as it prepared to leave Havana and searched several passengers for contraband. Among the passengers was a young Cuban woman named Clemencia Arango, whose brother was a leader in the insurgency against Spanish rule. The Journal’s article was ambiguous, implying the woman was strip-searched by men, which was created by the accompanying illustration of Frederic Remington.

The New York World attacked the Journal’s fake news, quoting Arango as denying that men had strip-searched her. That task, she said, had fallen to a matron, or “inspectress.” The Journalist Davis, in a letter to the World, then blamed Frederic Remington for having drawn “an imaginary picture” and insisted his dispatch had not reported that men had conducted the search.

Nevertheless, this story of the strip search discredited the Journal as being unreliable and prone to publishing “fakes” and other thinly documented reports. Welcome to the present where the New York Times and Washington Post seem to be carrying on in the same unreliable manner as well as ABC, CBS, NBC, and of course – CNN.

We will be publishing next year a special report on what the computer is projecting for the Decline and Fall of the United States and how it will separate as was the case for every civilization historically. Like the Roman Empire, the United States will separate into three regions. However, to the surprise of many, this will also include Canada. We will let everyone know when this report is ready.