A brilliant analysis of
vaccination, by Richard Moskowitz, MD, and homeopath
Dec 24 by Jon Rappoport
by Jon Rappoport
December 24, 2020
(To join Jon Rappoport's email list, click here.)
BACKGROUND ON VACCINES
In the age of COVID, vaccination
looms large. As in mandatory. And of course, toxic.
I’ve already covered two new
vaccine technologies, one of which has already been pushed forward, to
“protect” people from a virus that has never been properly proven to exist.
DNA vaccines, aka gene therapy,
permanently alter recipients’ genetic makeup in unknown ways. RNA vaccines
(Pfizer’s and Moderna’s, just approved for COVID) can cause auto-immune
reactions—which means the body attacks itself. [1] [2]
In this piece, I want to take a
look at a few fundamentals about vaccination. In particular, the claim that
vaccines have done a fantastic job of reducing case numbers of diseases, and
therefore all criticisms of these injections are irrelevant.
WHO IS DR. RICHARD MOSKOWITZ?
From his bio [3]: “Richard
Moskowitz was born in 1938 and educated at Harvard (B.A.) and New York
University (M.D.). After medical school, he did 3 years of graduate study in
Philosophy at the University of Colorado in Boulder on a U. S. Steel
Fellowship.”
“He took his internship at St.
Anthony’s Hospital, Denver, and has been practicing family medicine since 1967,
as well as attending about 800 home births. With a background in Oriental
medicine and other forms of natural healing, Dr. Moskowitz studied homeopathy
with George Vithoulkas in Greece and Rajan Sankaran and others in India.”
In 1987, while writing my first
book, AIDS INC., I had a long conversation on the phone with Richard about
vaccination. It was my first trip exploring vaccines as a form of immune-system
suppression.
I had already seen that AIDS was
actually a lumping together of various immune-system problems, none of which
needed HIV as an explanation.
I still recall that phone
conversation with Richard Moskowitz. I came away from it with an idea about how
vaccines could be touted and trumpeted as the reason for vastly reducing cases
of diseases, when in fact the reduction of visible symptoms was occurring—a
very different thing.
If vaccines were lowering
immune-system response, then the acute, vigorous, and all-out inflammatory
reaction to germs would be eliminated. And it IS that acute reaction which
creates the visible symptoms (rashes, spots, etc.).
Vaccination equals no cases of
measles, the experts say. But really, as a result of vaccination, it’s just the
visible rash that is missing, while something more dangerous, out of view, is
going on in the body.
I’m printing here an excerpt from
Richard’s article (written years ago), The Case Against Immunizations. The
article is based on a classical view of germs and the action of the human
immune system. The pros and cons of germ theory itself are a different matter,
about which I’ve spoken and written in other places. [4] [5]
Note: Although the RNA COVID
vaccines deploy a technology different from classical vaccines, they still rely
on antibody response as the key to “producing immunity.” But that response is
only one of many natural reactions in the body which maintain health and ward
off disease.
From Dr. Richard Moskowitz’s
brilliantly articulated article, The Case Against Immunizations: [6]
“It is dangerously misleading, and
indeed the exact opposite of the truth, to claim that a vaccine renders us ‘immune’
to or protects us against an acute disease, if in fact it only drives the
disease deeper into the interior and causes us to harbor it chronically
instead, with the result that our responses to it become progressively weaker,
but show less and less of a tendency to heal or resolve themselves
spontaneously. What I propose, then, is to investigate as thoroughly and
objectively as I can how the vaccines actually work inside the human body, and
to begin by simply paying attention to the implications of what we already
know. Consider the process of falling ill with and recovering from a typical
acute disease, such as the measles, in contrast with what we can observe
following administration of the measles vaccine.”
“…Once inhaled by a susceptible
individual, the [measles] virus undergoes a prolonged period of silent
multiplication, first in the tonsils, adenoids, and accessory lymphoid
aggregations of the nasopharynx; later in the regional lymph nodes of the head
and neck; and eventually, several days later, it passes into the blood and
enters the spleen, the liver, the thymus, and the bone marrow, the ‘visceral’
organs of the immune system. Throughout this ‘incubation’ period, which lasts
from 10 to 14 days, the patient typically feels quite well, and experiences few
or no symptoms of any kind.”
“By the time that the first
symptoms of measles appear, circulating antibodies are already detectable in
the blood, and the height of the symptomatology coincides with the peak of the
antibody response. In other words, the ‘illness’ that we call the measles is
simply the definitive effort of the immune system to clear this virus from the
blood. Notice also that this expulsion is accomplished by sneezing and
coughing, i. e., via the same route through which it entered in the first
place. It is abundantly clear from the above that the process of mounting and
recovering from an acute illness like the measles involves a general
mobilization of the immune system as a whole, including inflammation of the
previously sensitized tissues at the portal(s) of entry, activation of
leukocytes, macrophages, and the serum complement system, and a host of other
mechanisms, of which the production of circulating antibodies is only one, and
by no means the most important.”
“Such splendid outpourings indeed
represent the decisive experiences in the normal physiological maturation of
the immune system in the life of a healthy child. For recovery from the measles
not only protects children from being susceptible to it again, no matter how
many more times they may be exposed to it, but also prepares them to respond
promptly and effectively to any other infections they may encounter in the
future. The ability to mount a vigorous acute response to infection must
therefore be reckoned among the most fundamental requirements of health and
well-being that we all share.”
“By contrast, the live but
artificially attenuated measles-virus vaccine is injected directly into the
blood, bypassing the normal port of entry and set[ting] up at most a brief
inflammatory reaction at the injection site, or perhaps in the regional lymph
nodes, with no local sensitization at the normal portal of entry, no
‘incubation period,’ no generalized inflammatory response, and no generalized
outpouring. By ‘tricking’ the body in this fashion, we have accomplished
precisely what the entire immune system seems to have evolved to prevent: we
have placed the virus directly into the blood, and given it free and immediate
access to the major immune organs and tissues, without any obvious mechanism or
route for getting rid of it.”
“The result is the production of
circulating antibodies against the virus, which can in fact be measured in the
blood; but this antibody response occurs as an isolated technical feat, without
any overt illness to recover from, or any noticeable improvement in the general
health of the recipient. Indeed I submit that exactly the opposite is true,
that the price we have to pay for these antibodies is the persistence of viral
elements in the blood for long periods of time, perhaps permanently, which in
turn carries with it a systematic weakening of our capacity to mount an acute
response, not only to the measles, but to other infections as well.”
“Far from producing a genuine
immunity, then, my suspicion and my fear is that vaccines act by interfering
with and even suppressing the immune response as a whole, in much the same way
that radiation, chemotherapy, corticosteroids, and other anti-inflammatory
drugs do. Artificial immunization focuses on antibody production, a single
aspect of the immune process, disarticulates it, and allows it to stand for the
whole, in much the same way as chemical suppression of an elevated blood
pressure is accepted as a valid substitute for genuine healing or cure of the
patient whose blood pressure has risen. It is the frosting on the cake, without
the cake. The worst part of this counterfeiting is that it becomes more
difficult, if not impossible, for vaccinated children to mount a normally acute
and vigorous response to infection, by substituting for it a much weaker,
essentially chronic response, with little or no tendency to heal itself
spontaneously.”
This is an explanation of
vaccination which chops down the claim that vaccines are wonderful because they
eliminate cases of disease.
With experimental RNA COVID
vaccines, who knows how long the injected RNA lingers in the body, and what
effects it produces over time? The relatively short clinical trials certainly
don’t offer useful conclusions. [7] [8] The CDC blithely assures us that once the
injected RNA offers “instructions to cells of the body,” the cells destroy the
RNA. Sounds magical. The cells wait, receive instructions, THEN destroy the
messenger.
And again, as I stated above, RNA
technology has, in the past, caused auto-immune reactions, in which the body
basically attacks itself.
SOURCES:
[1]
https://www.denverpost.com/2020/12/09/pfizer-covid-vaccine-allergic-reactions/
[2]
https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020/01/26/vaccine-for-the-china-virus-the-planet-is-the-guinea-pig-for-a-vast-experiment/
[3]
https://healthy.net/author/richard-moskowitz-md/
[4]
https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2016/08/08/what-youll-never-read-about-virus-research-fraud/
[5]
https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2018/08/01/remember-the-pandemic-that-was-going-to-wipe-out-humanity-were-still-here/
[6]
https://vaccineimpact.com/2015/richard-moskowitz-m-d-the-case-against-immunizations/
[7] https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020/12/21/why-you-shouldnt-believe-the-covid-vaccine-is-effective/
[8]
https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020/09/24/covid-vaccine-clinical-trials-doomed-to-fail-fatal-design-flaw/
