Tuesday, October 27, 2026

SCOTT MECHKOWSKI: NYC gave the Blueprint to Los Angeles, Chicago, Boston , etc. NYC DAs work tirelessly to assist foreign born people. Judges across the city know the immigration implications and work hard for the criminal not for the victims.

"NYC's sanctuary DAs ordered prosecutors to downgrade charges to keep illegal immigrants in US, House GOP report finds," Josh Christenson and Thomas English, NY Post, October 26, 2026.

WASHINGTON — New York City’s elected Democratic district attorneys are bending over backwards to keep illegal immigrants in the US, instructing prosecutors to downgrade charges to those considered “a non-deportable offense,” according to a stunning House Judiciary Committee report shared with The Post.

The GOP-led panel found that Bronx DA Darcel Clark trains her subordinates “to conceal facts from the record of conviction” and “pursue alternative charges” that would keep non-citizens free to roam in America.

Not even cases involving child sex crimes are off-limits — with Clark’s office asking assistant DAs in a 2019 guide to “immigration-conscious plea bargaining” to “[o]ffer something that does not have the child’s age as an element of the crime.”

SAMA HOOLE: [Peanut] meal had been colonised by a mould, Aspergillus flavus, which makes a poison the scientists named after it: aflatoxin. Fed to rats in the lab, it wrecked their livers and then gave them liver cancer. For years afterwards the standard test for a suspect batch was to feed it to day-old ducklings and look at their livers.

Peanut butter is sold as a health food, and the most potent natural liver carcinogen known to science was discovered because it killed over 100,000 English turkeys in 1960. That year, young turkeys on farms within about a hundred miles of London began to die. They went quiet, stopped eating, sat with their heads drawn back and were dead within days. Vets had never seen anything like it. They called it Turkey X disease. By the time it burned out, well over 100,000 birds were dead, along with ducklings and young pheasants on other farms. The common thread was the feed, and a new ingredient in it: peanut meal, shipped in from Brazil. Outbreak after outbreak traced back to mills that had used the same Brazilian groundnut meal. The meal had been colonised by a mould, Aspergillus flavus, which makes a poison the scientists named after it: aflatoxin. Fed to rats in the lab, it wrecked their livers and then gave them liver cancer. For years afterwards the standard test for a suspect batch was to feed it to day-old ducklings and look at their livers. It is now classed as a definite cause of cancer in humans, and it lives where the mould lives: in peanuts, maize, tree nuts, cottonseed and dried figs, crops stored warm and damp in bulk. It is behind tens of thousands of human liver cancers every year, mostly in countries where peanuts and maize are the daily staple. Europe sets a legal limit for aflatoxin in peanuts and turns shipments away at the border every year for breaking it. Nobody has ever needed a border inspection for aflatoxin in a sirloin.

The turkeys were fed peanuts because peanuts were cheap. We are told to eat them because they are full of healthy fats. Both were sold the same nut. 

A MIDWESTERN DOCTOR: Researchers gave office workers who lived under LEDs a 60W incandescent desk lamp. Two weeks later, every one of them had their color vision improve by 25%.

JOHN GUANDOLO: Local and state governments--including #Texas--are giving money to terrorists/jihadis which amounts to aiding and abetting our enemy in this war.

SIGN OF THE CROSS: Bishop Athanasius Schneider calls out the Vatican for collaborating with European elites who want to "de-Christianize Europe."

LATRICE LITTLETON: what we have here is a former president using his star power to laugh off a serious question thus making the audience around him stop asking questions because they will feel ridiculous if they actually take it seriously.

History is full of warnings that people laughed off until it was too late.  When you think about bad actors who wish us harm as a nation, they don't need you to agree with them; they just need to convince you that any criticism of their movement while they advance on you should just be laughed off and not taken seriously.  Latrice Littleton 

Barack Obama,

Par for the course is running all kinds of scary ads to make you think Democrats are radicals or communist or jihadist or the woke police that will come arrest you and force feed you tofu instead of hamburgers.

Ladies and gentlemen, that is the point of the joke.  If people are laughing, it means that they're not thinking.  Instead, Obama is passing this off as something that we should just laugh at, something that we shouldn't even take seriously.  

So what's the tactic that he's using here?  Number one you want to exaggerate a legitimate concern to the point where it seems absurd.  And then you mock the exaggeration instead of answering the very real question that you should be answering.  The DSA has already told us that they're communists.  So by default, people who are a part of the DSA, you should just look at their Manifesto and their page and you can see exactly what they want to do, so that's not absurd.  They're plainly saying that their communists.

As it relates to Abdul El-Sayed and the comments about his affiliations [ with the Muslim Brotherhood], they never sit down and say, "Hey, there are some legitimate concerns.  Can you walk us through this?"  No they just say, "This is ridiculous."  It's the same thing that Abdul El-Sayed does when he's asked about his affiliations [with Muslim Brotherhood].  He just says, "Is that a real question?" like you are utterly obnoxious and ridiculous for even asking him this.  Basically, what we have here is a former president using his star power to laugh off a serious question thus making the audience around him stop asking questions because they will feel ridiculous if they actually take it seriously.  And this is exactly why this is so dangerous and why I've said time and time again that voting for Barack Obama was a mistake, that he is not who he purports to be.  Why else would you laugh off questions of communists invading the Democratic Party?  Why else would you scoff or laugh at accusations about things that could quite literally disrupt or destroy our national security and our safety that we have here in the United States?  You're trying to encourage people to stop paying attention and turn valid concerns into a punchline.  History is full of warnings that people laughed off until it was too late.  When you think about bad actors who wish us harm as a nation, they don't need you to agree with them; they just need to convince you that any criticism of their movement while they advance on you should just be laughed off and not taken seriously.  And that's how they win.  

Monday, October 26, 2026

SETH GRUBER: they won't define marriage, therefore they won't protect it. They won't define a woman, therefore they won't protect them. They won't define the unborn, therefore they won't protect them.

Seth Gruber.

Why does it feel like America is falling apart?

Why can't we define what a woman is?  Because for 52 years we've been pretending that we don't know what a baby is.  They won't def--they won't define marriage, therefore they won't protect it.

They won't define a woman, therefore they won't protect them. 

They won't define the unborn, therefore they won't protect them.

Pay attention.  

John Locke says he who defines the words defines the world Language shapes the way we think and it colors the way we see the world if we're not willing to use the correct words and make the right arguments on this most fundamental of all issues we will continue to surrender every other freedom that we have taken for granted in this Republic.

So when we stand for the unborn we're not just obeying God's Commandment that we find in Leviticus 20 to speak up.  He says if you sacrifice children to Moloch or you let them and you pretend not to see, I'll cut you off from the people. I'll cut you off from your tribe.  I'll cut you off from Israel.  For what?  For killing babies?  No, no, no, no, no.  It says, it says "for looking at those who sacrificed their children to Moloch and not doing anything." So this issue is not important just because God says it is; it's important because if we can't get it right and we can't answer those questions, you can kiss America and your freedoms goodbye because we're dealing with the question, "What does it mean to be human?  What does it mean to be a person?  And do we all share those rights equally?"

LINUXHIPPIE: an Operative that was trained by the Islamic Movement. There are tens of thousands of them in the U.S. These incidents will increase exponentially in the coming years.

The jihadi mentions the Jinn and the shayatin.  These are very dark, demonic people who have a penchant for violence.  Though the representatives within your own country will tell you they're from a peaceful religion.

Sunday, October 25, 2026

KEVIN MCKERNAN: Psilocybin has a much larger therapeutic index than IVM.

I suspect your trolling the means. But in case you’re not, psilocybin has a much larger therapeutic index than IVM. The therapeutic index (TI) is a ratio that compares the toxic dose (usually TD50 or LD50) to the effective dose (ED50) of a drug. A higher TI means a wider margin of safety. Here’s a side-by-side comparison: PSILOCYBIN •ED50 (effective dose): ~6–10 mg orally in humans •LD50 (lethal dose): ~280 mg/kg in rats (oral) •Estimated human LD50 extrapolated: >17,000 mg for a 70 kg adult (very high) •Therapeutic Index: >1000 •Notes: •Extremely low toxicity; no known fatal overdose from pure psilocybin. •Primary risks are psychological (e.g., panic, psychosis) rather than physiological. IVERMECTIN •ED50 (effective antiparasitic dose): ~150–400 Β΅g/kg (human standard dose) •LD50 (lethal dose): ~10–30 mg/kg in mammals •Therapeutic Index: ~50–100 depending on species and route •Notes: •High safety margin in antiparasitic use. •Neurotoxicity becomes a concern at very high doses or in certain dog breeds lacking MDR1 gene; rare in humans at therapeutic levels. SUMMARY •Psilocybin has a much higher therapeutic index (>1000), reflecting its extremely low physical toxicity. 

•Ivermectin has a high but lower TI (~50–100), still considered safe within prescribed doses. 

Duck Eggs vs. Chicken Eggs

Duck eggs have a harder shell so they last a lot longer on your counter than chicken eggs.

Ducks lay all through the winter, and they can give you 250 to 350 + eggs in a year, which is more than a chicken.

Making a coop for [ducks] is so much easier than the ones you have to make for chickens.  You don't need all these roosting boxes or purchase.  They just lay their eggs on the ground in here.  So it's a lot simpler.

Ducks are more disease resistant than chickens, and especially if you feed them red pepper flakes that keeps the parasites down and egg production up. 

Way more protein in one duck egg than you would in a chicken egg, and the yolk is so rich.  As long as you keep clean water and a good feed for them, then their eggs taste exactly like chicken.

Ducks also eat bugs and slugs off of your garden.

Ducks are like less dramatic.  They don't fight like chickens do.

Ducks lay eggs for 5+ plus years; that's longer than chickens who slow down at 2 to 3 years.

NATHAN VERGIN: There is a big difference between I don't have the ideal setup and I can't start. Those are two separate things.

A 19 year old with no land and no money built a 40-cow dairy on somebody else's farm. 300 families were buying milk off that rented ground before he ever paid for an ad. Nathan Vergin got in by managing one of Joel Salatin's rental farms in Virginia: income off the beef herd, an apartment, access to equipment and a shop. He found customers before he had a parlor. He called everybody he knew, told them he was starting a raw milk herd share, and asked them to pass it on. No ads. A list. About 30 said yes. While the parts sat in transit he milked five cows by hand for five days straight, by himself. The parlor: old tie stall stanchions bolted to a hay wagon chassis, a vacuum pump hooked to a lawnmower engine, a box around the engine to keep the weather off. He pulled it into the field, fired it up, milked into a bucket, carried the milk to the cooler. It was ugly as a mud fence. It milked cows. There is a big difference between I don't have the ideal setup and I can't start. Those are two separate things. Word of mouth did the marketing. Somebody drank the milk, told a friend. He bought another cow, needed more ground, more people called, more cows. No five year plan. Demand pulled him forward one cow at a time. Virginia won't let raw milk sit on a store shelf, so the herd share is the road in. Customers own a slice of the herd and pay a boarding fee. The milk is theirs as owners. Nobody handed him a farm. He found the grass, then the customers, and the customers set his size. That is a business a middleman cannot shut off. Your rancher, 

Jason Hanley | 208-714-0478 

KEN BERRY: You don't need expensive cuts of meat to be healthy on the Carnivore Diet . . . because the Carnivore Diet is successful because you're eliminating plants.

Carnivore diet is a bit of a misnomer.  It's an elimination diet.  Eliminate plants, all of them, and replace them with beef.  Doing this first heals your colon by shrinking and dissolving the cellulose lining along your intestinal wall.  Think of your gut as a gatekeeper to the rest of the organs in your body.  You remove the cellulose lining, it means your organs function better.  The muscles attached to the colon strengthen as do other muscles of your core.  All foods produce cellulose in your body, even meat.  But with plants that's all that plants are--cellulose.  Fruits exhaust your liver.  Plants not only have natural chemicals in them to prolong their existence and their seed, but they also carry pesticides.  So it's too risky.  Beef is the cleanest way to go on the carnivore diet, er, elimination diet.

SAMA HOOLE: The heart runs on fat, and the organ they put on a low-fat diet is the one organ in the body that eats almost nothing else.

The heart runs on fat, and the organ they put on a low-fat diet is the one organ in the body that eats almost nothing else. Every heartbeat is paid for, and the currency is fatty acids. They supply the bulk of the heart's energy, around the clock, from the day you are born. Heart muscle is a third mitochondria by volume, more than any other muscle in the body, and mitochondria are where fat is burned. A heart cell burns fat at rest, burns fat under load, and burns fat while you sleep. Given a choice between glucose and fat, the heart takes the fat. Given ketones, it takes those more readily still, and gets more work out of every unit of oxygen. A failing heart, when it starts to run out of road, switches more of its fuel to ketones. The sick heart reaches for the thing the diet sheet forbade. The cardiologist's own ward uses that. Fasting patients, patients in ketosis, patients on fat, and the heart keeps time. Then the same ward hands the patient a diet sheet with the fat cut off and the bread left on, in the name of the heart. The organ they are protecting from fat is the one organ that was built to live on it.

Heart-healthy is a word for food the heart would not choose. 

J. MICHAEL WALLER: This guy is right. We were told after 9/11 that if we fought the jihadists abroad, we would not have to fight them here. Yet Bush and Obama allowed the jihadists in to colonize us and pressure us to submit.

Why would a US Post Office Lease a Wing of a Building that Belongs to a Mosque?

Paying Cash or With Bank Card?

SAYER JI: The soleus muscle pumps blood against gravity, and activating it while seated cut post-meal blood sugar rises by up to 52% in studies.

DR. SHAWN BAKER: Companies paid him because it reliably increased consumption. [Howard Moskowitz] has been clear that this does not create pharmacological addiction. It simply maximizes palatability so that satiety signals are overridden by sensory reward.

Howard Moskowitz engineered the modern food supply.
He is the psychophysicist who mapped the “bliss point”—the precise concentration of sugar, salt, and fat at which liking peaks and then declines. Below it, the product is under-stimulating. Above it, it becomes cloying. At the peak, people keep eating.
Moskowitz applied this systematically. He ran large sensory panels for Prego, optimizing chunkiness, sweetness, and salt until sales rose. He did the same for soft drinks, soups, and snacks for Pepsi, Kraft, and others. The method is straightforward: vary one ingredient across a range, plot hedonic ratings, and formulate to the top of the inverted-U curve.
Companies paid him because it reliably increased consumption.
He has been clear that this does not create pharmacological addiction. It simply maximizes palatability so that satiety signals are overridden by sensory reward. The practical result is hyper-palatable products that drive higher intake than whole foods of the same caloric density.
The data are consistent with what we observe in ultraprocessed food trials: when people are given free access to foods optimized around these sensory peaks, they eat more. Moskowitz’s work shows the mechanism was deliberate and measurable decades ago.