Thursday, June 11, 2026

Microbe function on balance.

WHITE TIGER KNOWS: History Is Watching the Collaborators Who Told Their People to Stop Complaining About Being Murdered


from the Belfast Live press conference outside a government building, L-R, are:

Deirdre Hargey, Sinn Fein MLA, South Belfast.

Rois-Maire Donnelly, Lord Mayor of Belfast/Belfast City Council, and 

Michelle O'Neill, First Minister of Northern Ireland, Sinn Fein.

They discuss the Belfast stabbing incident, threats to the Lord Mayor, and blame figures like Tommy Robinson and Elon Musk for stirring tensions. The video is from a recent press event addressing the unrest.

Every Marine is expected to know about the Battle of Chapultepec, and the associated lore around the "blood stripe" on dress blue trousers, especially corporals and above.

The United States Marine Corps was formally established as a permanent military branch on July 11, 1798.

1917–1919 marks early publication, but 1929 is the “official birthday” of the hymn as we know it.
The Battle of Chapultepec was a pivotal engagement in the Mexican-American War, 1846–1848. It took place on September 12–13, 1847, at Chapultepec Castle on the outskirts of Mexico City.

Chapultepec Castle sat atop a 200-foot (61 m) rocky hill, serving as a natural fortress overlooking the approaches to Mexico City. Originally built in the late 18th century and later converted into a military academy, it was the last major defensive position before the Mexican capital.

U.S. forces under General Winfield Scott (about 7,200 troops) advanced after victories at earlier battles like Cerro Gordo. Mexican General Antonio López de Santa Anna commanded roughly 25,000 men overall, but the castle itself was defended by General Nicolás Bravo with around 800–1,000 troops (including ~50 military cadets from the academy).

SEPTEMBER 12, 1847
U.S. artillery bombarded the castle.

SEPTEMBER 13, 1847
American troops attacked from multiple directions. Divisions under Generals Gideon Pillow and John Quitman led the assault, scaling walls with ladders amid heavy fire. Marines and soldiers played key roles in the storming of the hill and castle.

The fighting was intense and bloody. U.S. forces suffered significant casualties but overwhelmed the defenders. The castle fell by around 9:30 a.m. on the 13th, opening the gates to Mexico City, which U.S. troops entered shortly after. 
General Winnfred Scott Defeats Mexican General Santa Anna at the Battle of Chapultepec in the Mexican-American War, 1847.

Every Marine is expected to know about the Battle of Chapultepec, and the associated lore around the "blood stripe" on dress blue trousers, especially corporals and above.

The scarlet (red) stripe on the outer seam of the Marine Corps dress blue trousers — wider for officers (2 inches) and narrower for NCOs (about 1.5 inches for corporals and up) — is officially called the

Marine Corps lore and tradition strongly tie it to the heavy casualties, especially among officers and NCOs, suffered during the storming of Chapultepec Castle on September 13, 1847. The idea is that it commemorates the blood shed by those leaders in one of the Corps' most famous battles, which is also referenced in the opening line of the Marines' Hymn ("From the Halls of Montezuma").


This story is deeply embedded in Marine culture. Many units even hold formal "blood stripe ceremonies" when a Marine is promoted to corporal (entering the NCO ranks) and earns the right to wear it.

This story is deeply embedded in Marine culture. Many units even hold formal "blood stripe ceremonies" when a Marine is promoted to corporal (entering the NCO ranks) and earns the right to wear it.

Historical records show the red trouser stripe was introduced in the late 1830s (as early as 1837–1840), several years before the Mexican-American War and Chapultepec. It started as a uniform distinction (influenced by Army artillery styles and jacket facings) and evolved into its current form. The Chapultepec connection is a popular, enduring legend that the Corps embraces for its motivational and historical value, even if not strictly factual.

BUMBADUM: Illegals were getting 2% interest rate covid FHA mortgages with 0 down payment backed by the US Government. That's why we cant afford a fucking house.

And you wonder why I've been saying that Obama and London Stole Fannie and Freddie in 2008? This is what they were ultimately doing under the hood. And they stole this from Americans, using Lehman as cover for the theft. Answer these questions and you'll see what I'm getting at: Why was Lehman liquidated/executed by Hank Paulson?
Why was AIG (London-based reinsurer) bailed out multiple times? Why did all of this happen 7 days after a 'report' said Fannie/Freddie were insolvent and nationalized? 2008 was 9/11 for the US mortgage industry times 12.

HOPE and CHANGE MY FAT HAIRY ASS. 

KUNG FU (@CHART_FU): The Petro-Eurodollar refers to the offshore dollar funding and credit creation system that financed much of that trade. Born in London in the 1950s, it grew into a massive global network of dollar deposits and loans existing outside the US regulatory system.

The Petrodollar vs. Petro-Eurodollar: Two Very Different Systems Most people blur these terms, but separating them is essential for clean mapping. The Petrodollar is the pricing and settlement layer: the vast majority of global oil is still sold and settled in US dollars. This core remains structurally strong and gives America enduring demand for its currency. The Petro-Eurodollar refers to the offshore dollar funding and credit creation system that financed much of that trade. Born in London in the 1950s, it grew into a massive global network of dollar deposits and loans existing outside the US regulatory system. London was the historic heart and still the largest single hub, but the system is distributed across other centers like Singapore, Hong Kong, the Cayman Islands, and Dubai. For decades the two worked in tandem: oil priced in dollars + London (and offshore) financing the flows. That combination powered global dollar liquidity and let the US run large deficits. What’s happening now is the deliberate replumbing of the eurodollar funding side. Bilateral energy deals, WTI pricing migration at Cushing, Gulf swap lines, and new permanent funding centers are replacing the old London-heavy intermediation. The transactional funding layer is being rerouted while the core petrodollar settlement dominance is being protected and modernized. This distinction matters. Critics who say “the petrodollar is dying” are usually watching eurodollar funding stress and missing that the US is actively replacing the fragile old plumbing rather than clinging to a collapsing system.

The mercantilist transition isn’t abandoning dollar primacy — it’s upgrading the architecture underneath it. Same dollar, different (and more controllable) pipes. 

MORAL SUPERIORITY OF THE SOUTH

SAMA HOOLE: Week 26: "Pricing up half a cow and a chest freezer." Week 30: "Considering whether the garden could support a heifer." Week 36: "Naming the heifer."

The label reading evolution: Week 1: "I'll cut sunflower oil from the cupboard. Done." Week 2: "Why is rapeseed oil in the bread." Week 3: "Why is sunflower oil in the hummus." Week 4: "Why is canola oil in the pesto." Week 6: "The shop is now taking ninety minutes." Week 8: "There's seed oil in the tinned tomatoes." Week 10: "The 'olive oil mayonnaise' is 96% rapeseed." Week 14: "Asking waiters what they fry the chips in. Nobody knows." Week 18: "Bringing a small bottle of tallow to dinner parties." Week 22: "Rendering my own dripping on a Sunday." Week 26: "Pricing up half a cow and a chest freezer." Week 30: "Considering whether the garden could support a heifer." Week 36: "Naming the heifer."

The descent into paranoia is just pattern recognition arriving in real time.

LINUXHIPPIE: That's why he's in charge.....to make it go away. It's what the GOPe does. It's why they won't pass the SAVE Act or didn't repeal Obamacare and allowed the obvious fabrications of Russia Russua.

Wednesday, June 10, 2026

Karmelo Anthony's Trial Exposed A Black Supremacist Hatred Towards White People

One of the longer-term consequences of this trial has been the degree to which it just exposed the level of delusion estrogenically, emotional, irrational, unreason, racist black supremacist hatred of white people, and our Judicial System is the fairest in the world by such a large swath of the black population.  

Now, not all.  

I've got a bunch of tabs I'm going to share with you of perfectly reasonable black people out there on social media.  

I have a lot of black people who are my friends. They're rational people.  My dream Supreme Court is 9 Clarence Thomas's.  If you don't know, he happens to be black.  

Some of my personal Heroes are people like Thomas Sowell, Walter Williams.  

So it's certainly not all, but it's a substantial chunk, and they are and they are crazy and they are explicitly anti-white racist and pro-black racist.  No facts or reason will compel them to act against their race, no matter how guilty the defendant who happens to be black.  We had a number of prospective jurors for this trial who were black and when asked by the court, "Listen, we'd like to seat you as a juror, all you need to do is tell us that you can be unbiased and impartial, and they said, "I can't. I can't do it to him.  I can't do it to a black boy."  That's why those weren't seated.  

Now there are a few other prospective black jurors who were not seated for other reasons.  I'm laughing because once again I'm talking about Robert Barnes.  I can't believe it, but what he's doing with respect to this case is so funny to me.  But we'll get to Robert later.  But these people are completely delusional, utterly delusional.

How to deprogram from ideology

How to deprogram yourself from ideology?

That's what this video is going to help you do.  How do you know if you're thinking for yourself?  Most people immediately answer, "Of course, of course, I'm thinking for myself."  But that's the thing about programming.  If you knew you were programmed, it wouldn't work very well, would it?  Every generation looks back at previous generations and we see beliefs that seem absurd, and people wonder how could everyone have believed that?  And the uncomfortable truth is that the people living through those periods felt exactly as certain as we do now.  So the real question isn't "Am I programmed?"  The real question is "How would I know if I was?"  How would I know if I was?  

Step One:  you're going to understand that everyone is influenced.  So the first mistake is believing that you are immune nobody is not me not you not scientists not politicians not professors not activists not journalists human beings are social creatures

Arizona trying to steal old man's property from him in broad daylight.

I thought it was only communist countries that take property that belongs to private owners.

It's for the greater good.  It's for higher education.  Don't want to sell?  Fine.  Arizona will take your property.  Your concerns about expenses, so what?  ASU will not tear it down.  It will go to some ombudsman or college president who will fill the home with his presence, artefacts, and family in some last-minute historical preservation bid that ASU and Arizona didn't see or recognize at the time of the purchase.  

ASU offered this guy $850,000 but he keeps denying them because he says it's just too expensive to move and it's unrealistic due to the high cost of relocation.

But there's another issue here that's being ignored and that's the significance of this home.  It's one of the last surviving pre-statehood residential buildings in Central Phoenix.  That means it's older than Arizona itself which got statehood in 1912.  So this has a huge historical significance.  It's been on the Phoenix Historic Property Register since 1990, and they want to tear it down to build a medical facility?

KOENRAADT: The road to Salvation lies in adopting High status behaviors

The road to salvation lies in adopting high status behaviors.  He recommends the book title improv by Keith Johnstone.  

Impro: Improvisation and the Theater, Keith Johnstone, 2018.

Focusing, Eugene T. Gendlin, 1982.

A brave British woman tells it like it is to a Muslim man and a fake priest: “One million British children have been raped by Muslim men in the last 20 years. How are we supposed to reconcile and accept that?”

History matters.  It matters in any exchange between two people.  It matters in any transaction.  You don't think it matters in war?  It matters in geopolitics.  It matters in business deals. 

Culture matters too.  Why do people ignore this fact?  Are they showing off how big of an idiot they can be?  

Has the good priest not heard if the Crusades or the Barbary Coast slave trade in european white men? 

JESSE KELLY on NEW DHS SECRETARY, MARKWAYNE MULLIN: "No bad press!" If that's the goal, we’re in trouble.

The new Secretary of Homeland Security as of March 24, 2026, is Markwayne Mullin. He succeeded Kristi Noem in this position.

 

Tuesday, June 9, 2026

The Spiral of Silence

10 Words/Phrases that end the debate before it even starts.

One,  Transphobia.  Let's start with the most obvious one.  The suffix "phobia" traditionally means irrational fear.  So if disagreement is labeled a "phobia," then disagreement becomes irrational by definition.  So notice what happens psychologically.  The focus shifts from the argument being made to the character of the person making it. Instead of asking is this claim true, we're now asking what's wrong with the person who said it?  The conversation moves away from evidence and toward social judgment.

Two, assigned at Birth. So this phrase sounds neutral but hidden inside is a very important assumption when doctors record someone sex at Birth they are not assigning it in the way a teacher assigns homework they are observing and recording a physical reality so the phrase assigned at Birth subtly suggests sex is a label that could have been different. The language itself nudges listeners toward the conclusion that sex is something socially designated rather than biologically recognized. 

Three, gender affirming care.  This is a master class in framing.  Who wants to oppose affirming someone?  The phrase immediately creates a moral distinction.  One side is affirming and the other side appears unaffirming.  But notice what disappears.  The actual medical interventions-- puberty blockers, amputations, cross-sex hormones, serious surgery. So instead of debating those things directly, the debate is reframed around whether you are willing to affirm someone.  The language does enormous persuasive work before any evidence is presented.

Four, inclusive.  This word sounds universally positive.  Who doesn't want inclusion?  But inclusion always requires a question. Inclusive of whom? And at who's expense?  Every boundary excludes something.  Every category excludes something. Women's sports exclude men.  Children's leagues exclude adults.  Weight classes exclude larger competitors.  The word inclusive often skips the difficult question of competing rights and interests.

Five, lived experience lived experience is real people genuinely experience things but lived experience is not the same thing as evidence. It is possible to sincerely experience something and misunderstand it.  When lived experience is elevated above objective reality disagreement becomes impossible because nobody can verify another person's internal experience.

Six, identity this word sounds harmless but it has become one of the most powerful words in modern politics identity shifts conversations away from what something is and toward how someone feels about what they are that may be useful in some contexts but in law, Sports, Medicine, and safeguarding, objective categories often matter.  They really matter.  So the word identity frequently serves as a bridge that allows subjective feelings to compete with objective classifications.

Seven, hate.  This is one of the strongest emotional words in the language.  Most people want nothing to do with hatred, which is why accusations of hatred are so powerful.  Problem comes when disagreement itself is treated as evidence of hate.  Once that happens people stop evaluating arguments and start evaluating motives.  The debate is no longer about truth, it's about social condemnation.

Eight, kindness.  Kindness is a virtue, but kindness does not answer factual questions.  If someone says, "Be kind," that may be good advice but it doesn't tell us whether a claim is true.  One of the most common rhetorical moves is for placing a factual discussion with a moral appeal.  You can be kind and still ask difficult questions.  You can be compassionate and still disagree.

Nine, gender diverse this phrase often bundles together many different groups that may have very different experiences and interests the broader category becomes the harder it is to discuss specifics language sometimes expands categories so widely that meaningful distinctions disappear and when that happens Clarity often disappears too.

Ten, bigot this is perhaps the ultimate debate ending word nobody wants to be viewed as a bigot which is exactly why the accusation is so powerful and so overused the moment the label appears many people stop examining argument itself they become focused on defending their character and that's the key lesson of this entire video. The most powerful language doesn't defeat your argument, it prevents your argument from ever being heard.  So the next time you hear a loaded phrase pause pause and ask yourself what assumptions are hidden inside this word what conclusion am I being asked to accept and what would the debate sound like if we stripped away the framing and talked directly about the underlying issue that is where clear thinking begins that is where the spell starts to break.  

CATTLEMAN: Ivermectin treats screw worm for one thing. We’ve beat it before and we will again. We check and care for our herds . . .

Allegedly, TWO migrants were involved in the attack on Stephen Ogilvie in BELFAST