MASSIMO: Just 28 days without parabens and phthalates turned off breast cancer genes.

Just 28 days without parabens and phthalates turned off breast cancer genes.

Researchers followed a group of healthy women who routinely used common personal-care products containing parabens and phthalates—chemicals found in everything from shampoo and lotion to makeup and… pic.twitter.com/w8K1nj494g

— Massimo (@Rainmaker1973) February 2, 2026

Just 28 days without parabens and phthalates turned off breast cancer genes. Researchers followed a group of healthy women who routinely used common personal-care products containing parabens and phthalates—chemicals found in everything from shampoo and lotion to makeup and fragrance. These compounds can act like estrogen in the body, and excess estrogen-like activity has long been tied to higher breast-cancer risk. For 28 days, 36 women did one simple thing: they switched to paraben- and phthalate-free alternatives. No drugs, no diet changes—just cleaner cosmetics and toiletries. The results were striking: urine tests confirmed that levels of the chemicals’ breakdown products plummeted, proving exposure had been sharply reduced. But the bigger revelation came from breast-tissue biopsies taken before and after the switch. In just four weeks, the women’s breast cells began behaving less like precancerous or cancerous cells. They regained the ability to respond to normal “cell-death” signals (a safeguard tumors often disable). Protective estrogen receptors, which are typically shut down in breast cancer, switched back on. Gene-expression patterns shifted away from high-risk profiles and toward healthier patterns. This is the first human evidence that routine exposure to these everyday chemicals can nudge normal breast cells in a cancer-like direction—and, crucially, that removing the exposure can begin to reverse the process remarkably quickly. It’s not definitive proof that changing your body wash will prevent breast cancer. But it does show that the body notices—and starts to repair itself—almost immediately when you stop putting these substances on your skin.

["Reduction of daily-use parabens and phthalates reverses accumulation of cancer-associated phenotypes within disease-free breast tissue of study subjects," Chemosphere, 2023] 

When Land Acknowledgements are honest about the traditional caretakers of the land.

When Land Acknowledgements are honest about the traditional caretakers of the land pic.twitter.com/j4gnaqL819

— The Real Mr Bench (@therealmrbench) November 26, 2025

RICH HIGGINS: Critical thinking and reason do not exist in the Middle East as we understand them here, and the purpose of the term like Islamophobia is to enforce that Islamic law of slander on westerners to shut down critical thinking and reason that would actually enable us to understand why the enemy fights,

Higgins' book.

The Memo: Twenty Years Inside the Deep State Fighting for America First, Rich Higgins, 2020. 

H. R. McMaster.  On February 20, 2017, U.S. President Donald Trump nominated McMaster for National Security Advisor following the resignation of Michael T. Flynn on February 13.  Trump asked McMaster to remain on active duty while he served as national security advisor.  

Rich Higgins, 1974-2022.  Frank Gaffney provides a eulogy.

Stunning.  Play this interview of Rich Higgins and follow the transcription below, starting at the 8:15 mark titled, "Patriotic." 

 

8:16.  For people that hear the term "narrative," it's not a simple thing to grasp beyond the fact that repetition and purposeful statements, factual or counterfactual, true or not true, have this ability to penetrate into a society and to shape societal thinking.  So what we see is by our enemy in this war a deliberate and purposeful attempt to marry our perception of who they are with left-wing political narratives, terms like "phobia." They know how to use terms that are common to westerners to fulfill their objectives.  So they put together a concept, for example, Islamophobia.  15 years ago we never heard the term Islamophobia, and we have to ask ourselves, where did that come from?  And when you walk it back, you realize that Islamophobia is a term concocted by the generators of these narratives, oftentimes Muslim Brotherhood front organizations, groups like Council of American Islamic Relations, CAIR, or Muslim Public Affairs Council, who generate this term, but from their side it's actually a weaponized version of what is in Islamic law, the law of slander, prohibiting any discussion of Islam that is critical of Islam.  And so by doing this, you've collapsed our ability to do two things that are absolutely pivotal to Western civilization anybody who has spent time in the Middle East will recognize this.  Critical thinking and reason do not exist in the Middle East as we understand them here, and the purpose of the term like Islamophobia is to enforce that Islamic law of slander on westerners to shut down critical thinking and reason that would actually enable us to understand why the enemy fights, why Omar Mateen was drawn to shoot 100 people, 49 who passed at the Pulse gay nightclub in Orlando Florida, in 2016.

ANNA IVERSEN: Greer framed this as a return to the “American System”, the default position for most of U.S. history. In his telling, the post-Cold War era did not “discover” a superior model; it conducted an experiment in hyper-globalisation that constrained the United States while leaving other nations free to use the very American tool kit they had studied and adopted.

Main Street, not Wall Street.
Still trying to make sense of this administration? Susan Kokinda’s latest video says what mainstream media won’t. We’re in an information war—choose your sources wisely. Find her on YouTube and subscribe.   https://t.co/ycnTafpC1a pic.twitter.com/gP4EZjWO46

— UgATigΣr (@DCryptoTiger) February 2, 2026

Kokinda references Elliott Roosevelt's book, As He Saw It: The Story of the World Conferences of F.D.R., 1946, that covers a few conferences that FDR attended with Churchill, Stalin, and Chiang Kai-shek in Casablanca, 1943, Cairo, 1943, Yalta, 1945, and Potsdam, 1945.  Fred Klein at goodreads says that Elliott was not at Yalta,

from Anna Iversen,

At the World Economic Forum Annual Meeting in Davos, Switzerland, U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer delivered a speech [1][2][3] that was striking, not simply for its historical sweep, but for its clarity about what has been lost in the modern trade debate: the assumption that serious nations will use policy tools—tariffs, targeted support, competition policy, and reciprocal agreements—to develop productive capacity, protect labour from abusive conditions, and avoid structural imbalances.

"From Hamilton to Today: Trade and US Economic Strategy," 

Greer framed this as a return to the “American System”, the default position for most of U.S. history. In his telling, the post-Cold War era did not “discover” a superior model; it conducted an experiment in hyper-globalisation that constrained the United States while leaving other nations free to use the very American tool kit they had studied and adopted.

This is not an argument that tariffs are inherently good policy in all cases; it is an argument that industrial capacity does not arise from market access alone—and that financial architecture determines whether rebuilding is broadly distributive or tacitly extractive.

Whether one agrees with every implication or not, the speech is useful because it brings the conversation back to first principles: economic policy is not merely about cheaper imports; it is about national capacity—industrial depth, supply chain resilience, the dignity of work, and the ability of a society to convert ingenuity into durable production.

@TFL1728 hosted Susan Kokinda, a fierce, battle hardened visionary & tireless political warrior whose 50+ years leading @PrometheanActn have forged an unyielding fight vs. British/globalist imperialism & is now perfectly aligned with @realDonaldTrump's "American System 2.0"…

— John E. Montana (@JohnEMontana) February 2, 2026

Yep. Sheikh Sultan bin Jassim Al Thani invested $50 million through the London-based Heritage Advisors into Newsmax between 2019 & 2020.

— John Guandolo (@JGuandolo54271) February 2, 2026

Rich Higgins, 1974-2022.  Frank Gaffney provides a eulogy.

UTT stands for Understanding the Threat, 2021.  

Sheriff Rich Stanek, served as the sheriff of the Hennepin County Sheriff's Office [Minnesota] from 2007 to 2019.

3:32.  When I take my team several people to Minnesota now by the time I take this trip, I'd been doing this work for approximately 14 years I've been briefing and teaching as I mentioned created the first program in the government on this taught and briefed all these leaders I just mentioned and others and I already had an understanding of what was going on in Minnesota so we went there to get it on the ground experience in Minneapolis St Paul and then outside those areas to see what the citizens knew and what local leaders all across the state so went there from the 17th through the 21st of October 2016 and during the day met with local leaders city council County council members sheriffs and others the three of us broke the state up into parts I primarily went to the Twin Cities and North to the Canadian border and did those things and in the evening had major presentations to large numbers of citizens police National Guard and others so at the end of the week Michelle Bachman who was a presidential candidate and member of Congress from that area in Minnesota hosted a fundraiser for us but really a chance to share with key people in the Twin Cities what was actually going on and we did and we went home and I wrote a very detailed lengthy article titled, "In this War, Minnesota's Twin Cities Are Lost," John Guandolo, October 24, 2016, about what we found and put it all together and what it did was this article which was published on October 24th 2016 detailed the governor of Minnesota the US attorney lieutenant governor the mayor of Minneapolis at the time the sheriff of Hennepin County Sheriff Rich Stanek and how all of them were working with jihady's or Communists and their actions were actually furthering these hostile Networks these communist and Jihadi networks used specific examples showed photos and all of that so fast forward to June 2017 June 28, I had met him at a hotel in Reno Nevada having been invited to speak at the national Sheriff's conference the time I was supposed to give my presentation I walked into the room and standing there having just finished a presentation was Sheriff Rich Stanek and I reached out my hand introduce myself hi I'm John Guandolo and he said I Know Who You Are and he asked if we could talk after the meeting after my presentation so we did we sat down at a table and one of his guys was there with him two of my folks were with me and I asked at the beginning of the meeting, "Hey, do you mind if we begin this meeting in prayer?"  And he immediately snapped, "We're not praying!"  So maybe I should have gotten up and walked away at that point, but that's water under the bridge.  So we had this discussion and he asked me he said he'd asked to have this discussion because of the article that I wrote and we discussed it and he said he wanted it retracted because it was full of lies and I asked him what lies were in the article and he explained what he thought was specifically, "I don't work with CAIR!"  I said well you did these things with them.  And we have a letter from them discussing the previous work you've done with them it was going nowhere and he started attacking me personally he attacked my record as a Marine as an FBI agent it was clear this was going nowhere he said that's it he stood up we all stood up we went around the table to leave and he chest bumped me grabbed my ties started strangling me and I couldn't get away by the way he's a foot taller than me in about 70 lb heavier than me not that that necessarily matters but that's just a point in fact so I punched him to keep him from strangling me which she was already doing and a bunch of sheriff's deputies had to break us up and he would not let go of my tie.  And in the end, they came to me and asked, "Do you want to press charges?"  I said no.  Apparently he said yes because criminal charges were filed against me and they were dropped pretty quickly, "No Charges Against ex-FBI Agent in Reno Clash with Sheriff," AP News, October 31, 2017.  One of my witnesses said it appeared that was looking for an altercation he clearly initiated it and his guy wasn't really sure so the court looked at that and said you can't have a criminal case here so we threw it out that's in Reno Nevada so after the criminal case was dropped about 3 weeks later July 18th Mr Stanek filed a restraining order against me and then October 30th again we're in 2000 again we are in 2017 he filed a civil case in Dallas County Texas in the 162nd civil district court and the presiding judge was Marisela Moore the trial began on September 9th 2019 and the trial ended the civil case ended September 19th 2019 and the verdict came back on September 20.  Let me share with you some details of the trial that are relevant to this discussion first of the three attorneys for Mr. Stanek.  One was Peter Krause whose Law Firm was primarily representing Mr. Stanek Waters Kross Paul, Peter Krause being a significant fundraiser for Mr. Obama in Texas.  "President Obama Attends two Dallas Fundraisers: President Barack Obama is spending the day in Dallas for two Democratic fundraisers after arriving in town from Austin Friday night," WFAA March 12, 2016.  Lisa Blue, significant fundraiser for Mrs Clinton in the United States.  ALMLAW.COM. "Q&A with Lisa Blue, 'Hillblazer' for the Clinton Campaign," December 8, 2015.  And sitting behind the attorneys and Mr. Stanek everyday during the trial were at least three members of Hamas doing business as the Council on American Islamic relations in Texas so that sets the stage and the fact that this is the setup in the courtroom and that the attorneys for Mr. Stanek we're very friendly with the judge were right out of the gate disconcerting.

10:55.  Now a couple of things about the practical matter is I was not allowed to claim self-defense despite the fact there was certainly enough evidence of that but more importantly in the filings for bringing a civil case forward Mr stannic claims that his emotional and mental distress and his long-term medical issues caused by my one blow to his face meant over 600,000 in compensation that's what he was looking for and that's why he said he brought the case forward when his attorney when his attorney Mr. Krause asked him when Mr. Stanek was under oath he said the reason he brought the case forward was and he pointed to me and said to silence words to the effect to silence John guandolo and shut utt down what's interesting is that on the first day of trial Peter Krause said to one of my attorneys you know we're probably never going to see a dime from this so you put those together and you realize the attorneys understood what this was about it was about silencing someone that they described in the courtroom as a bigot islamophobe Etc and many much worse things so that's what was going on in the courtroom. On the closing arguments, Mr Krause with PowerPoints gave this presentation that essentially said that all the violence in America can be laid at the feet of John guandolo that my training my teaching my professional career creates hate and violence in the United States and he was allowed to present that to the jury.  When the verdict came back, on September 20 2019 it came back in favor of Mr Stanek and when we went with my attorney's and I went and spoke with the jurors and almost all of them stayed to allow us to speak with them all the ones we talked to said at least eight or nine said it would have made a significant difference if I would have been able to plead self defense which obviously the evidence supports.  One more thing that I think is interesting to note is not only was CAIR in courtroom, each day when they came to court.  Mr. Stanek's attorneys, and certainly Lisa Blue, hugged them, spoke to them, was laughing with them, and outside the courtroom Mr. Stanek was sitting with the members of Hamas doing business as CAIR, which is interesting because he claimed both, when I spoke with him and during the trial under oath, that he didn't work with CAIR, "no knowledge of that."  He said as far as he was concerned and as far as he knew, CAIR was an "advocacy group."  Now the case did actually go to appeal in March 22.  It was upheld mostly because what the trial judge had said was our limitations once they were set working within those limitations I I mean me not being able to claim self-defense made it very difficult now that appeal came two and a half years after the trial in March of 2022 and we had waited because the judgment was huge to see what would happen until the appeal so we knew we were going to have to address this obviously I was incapable of paying $600,000 to Mr. Stanek and neither was UTT. When it was clear that they weren't satisfied with just the victory, they wanted UTT shut down.  And they came after our records and our bank accounts and my personal records and my personal bank accounts and we knew there was no way we were going to going to give any of that to them.  In February 2023, I filed personal bankruptcy, and  in June 2023 when that didn't hold them off UTT filed corporate bankruptcy and in August 2023 that was we had our hearing and my entire bankruptcy case was finished.  It took until September for the courts to close it, so it's only been since September that that case has been closed with regards to the bankruptcy.  So it's all over and our adversaries the adversaries of Liberty we're able to force us to shut down we didn't have a choice with our Advisory Board spoke with our attorneys we tried all kinds of different angles as you might imagine but we weren't able to actually make it happen.

16:37.  A couple things I'd like to share from the time he became sheriff to the time he left, what was the situation well when he became sheriff zero jihadis went from Minneapolis to overseas to commit Jihad and blow themselves up. 

"Another Somalia Suicide Bomber May Have Minneapolis Ties," Jim Adams, Minneapolis Star Tribune October 31, 2011. 

During his tenure as Sheriff, that number went up to at least two dozen, and in some estimates up to four dozen, went overseas, fought in Jihad to blow themselves up. 

"FBI: Minnesota man was suicide bomber in Somalia," CNN Wire Staff, June 9, 2011.  

Plenty of news stories you can look it up yourself and read about it.  "While official estimates vary, Veehe says, 

Fun but serious discussion with friends @CryptoRichYT and @TFL1728 @the_irascible https://t.co/HdvhEL8FBI

— Dangerous Intellectuals Podcast (@DangerThinking) February 1, 2026

00:53.  I love watching Trump transform himself into Patton. That's all I have to say.  Attacking on five fronts at once after he's mostly secured Minnesota. It's not even mostly secured, he's like, "Nope, and I'm gone.  I'm sending Bonvino out to Los Angeles.  We're doing work site raids out in Arizona.  Now we are going after the Georgia GOP in Fulton County and Atlanta. No, he's like, "Nope, we've broken open the front."  It's like Patton, he broke open the front in hedgerow country and immediately attacked in five directions all across France, and that's what I think is going on.

1:30.  I don't think it's five fronts I think it's 8 to 12 and here's the thing Patton squared with a little bit of Churchill mix he's actually using some of their strategies whatever it is we can do to bring everything to a grinding halt but what Trump is doing is easy now starting to get on and offense it's not just what we see here domestically it's that he's making the city of London Silver Spoons he's making them deal with stuff all over the planet weather it's Chinese Beijing controversy the generals and the mess

ROBERT SPENCER: What is repulsive to us and what is morally repugnant to us is a marketing tool for them.

Islam steals, kills, and destroys all that is good & beautiful in the world. #IslamKills https://t.co/IRjo1Xo48l

— John Guandolo (@JGuandolo54271) February 1, 2026

The speaker is Robert Spencer.  His Twitter feed.  Robert Spencer books.

The Quranic imperative is to fight until religion is all for Allah.  The Quranic imperative is to subjugate the Jews and the Christians and other people of the Book under the hegemony of the Muslims and make sure that they feel every day the wrath of Allah as is the Muslims responsibility to execute on this Earth.  And these are fundamentally theological concepts.  So when our Administration says, "Islamic state has nothing to do with Islam," they are cutting themselves off from the only thing that makes coherent what they are doing.  

Finally Chapter 33, Verse 50, "O prophet, we have made lawful for you your wives whose bridal dues you have paid and the slave girls you possess from among the spoils of war."  So this makes it very clear that these are women who'd been captured in war.  And they are non-Muslim women and it is well delineated in Islamic theology that a man can have as many as 4 wives and also these sex slaves that are non-Muslim women that've been captured in war.  This is exactly what the Islamic State did.  And note also, that the Islamic State didn't make this up.  The Islamic State did not originate this.  The Nigerian group Boko Haram, well before the Islamic State did it, also captured a number of non-Muslim women and was doing exactly the same thing.  And remember Michelle Obama had the #bringbackourgirls?  That was about Boko Haram in Nigeria.  Same thing. Because they're both working from the same Islamic principles that are in the Quran.  What is repulsive to us and what is morally repugnant to us is a marketing tool for them. Young Muslims see this.  They read the Quran.  They know what's in it.  And so they see the Islamic State doing this, the beheadings, the sex slavery, the rest of it, and they think, "At last, authentic Islam.  We now see somebody actually doing with the Quran says instead of bowing to the opinion of the infidel westerners and saying no, no, no, we must not do that." And so they've made recruits, 30,000, as I said. 30,000 Muslims from around the world have gone to Iraq and Syria to join the Islamic State because they read the same Quran.

BASIL THE GREAT: 🚨ARGENTINA STARTS TAKING DOWN MURALS OF CHE GUEVARA. The world is healing

🚨ARGENTINA STARTS TAKING DOWN MURALS OF CHE GUEVARA

Javier Milei is teaching his people that capitalism is the way and communism is the enemy

The world is healing 🙏 pic.twitter.com/PuWeQer9kD

— Basil the Great (@BasilTheGreat) February 1, 2026

HENG HE: The Chinese military, Heng explains, is different from armed forces in the rest of the world. It’s ruled by the Chinese Communist Party and its primary function has been to protect the Communist Party—not to fight wars overseas.

“Even if you follow Xi Jinping, you still will be purged. So the hidden rule is broken. I think that will be the end of the whole system,” says China analyst Heng He.

With the recent purges of two top military generals, Zhang Youxia and Liu Zhenli, five of the seven members of… pic.twitter.com/md5gTiaKrw

— Jan Jekielek (@JanJekielek) January 31, 2026

“Even if you follow Xi Jinping, you still will be purged. So the hidden rule is broken. I think that will be the end of the whole system,” says China analyst Heng He. 

With the recent purges of two top military generals, Zhang Youxia and Liu Zhenli, five of the seven members of China’s Central Military Commission have effectively been purged or removed. Only two remain, one of which is Xi Jinping himself. 

Zhang Youxia is known to have been a longtime ally of Xi Jinping, but was purged nonetheless. 

The CCP, like a mafia, is governed by unwritten rules. Now, Xi Jinping has broken all the CCP’s hidden rules, He says. “Now nobody knows whom to trust,” and that’s a big problem for the CCP. Xi has essentially purged the two remaining generals with actual battlefield experience. 

The Chinese military, Heng explains, is different from armed forces in the rest of the world. It’s ruled by the Chinese Communist Party and its primary function has been to protect the Communist Party—not to fight wars overseas. 

The CCP’s leaders, he explains, depend on the protection of the military, but at the same time they do not trust the military: “They are afraid that they will turn the gun to the wrong side.” 

But, in order to conquer Taiwan which, Heng tells me, is Xi’s lifelong dream, the generals must be put in full control: “Xi Jinping cannot fight himself, right? He has to give the command to the military leaders. That means the military has the power to turn the gun backwards.” 

With the removal of General Zhang Youxia—who appears to have opposed Xi Jinping’s views on an invasion of Taiwan—Xi removed an obstacle - but at what price? 

“The chain of command in the military is totally broken…This never happened in the history of communist rule,” he said.

3:13  Also, the chain of command of th emilitary has been broken.  That means the military cannot fight.  Another is that the chinese military is different from the rest of the world.  It belongs to the Party, it does not belong to the people or the state or the government or any state.  So they belong to the Party.  It's a Party-ruled military.  So the military design is totally different.  It's designed to protect the CCP's rule to protect the regime, not fight overseas wars.  So the military basically is design that way they don't have even the soldiers and the guns have no bullets in them because they are afraid that they will turn the guns to the wrong side turn their guns at the party so that's the design

DAN BURMAWI: If Christianity goes, it does not go alone. With it goes everything it produced and then secularized: human dignity, equality before the law, freedom of conscience, freedom of speech, limits on state power, the idea that rulers answer to something higher than themselves.

What makes a king and a homeless man equal? Nature does not, power does not, history does not. Only one idea does: that both are made in the image of God. --Dan Burmawi

Important Truth👇👇👇 https://t.co/2sSfWdTba7

— John Guandolo (@JGuandolo54271) February 1, 2026

from Dan Burmawi,

Christianity in the West is not just another religion. It is the moral infrastructure of the civilization. And the atheists who can’t wait to see it disappear will one day regret their contribution to pushing it out, just as their master, Dawkins, did last year. If Christianity goes, it does not go alone. With it goes everything it produced and then secularized: human dignity, equality before the law, freedom of conscience, freedom of speech, limits on state power, the idea that rulers answer to something higher than themselves. These did not fall from the sky. They were not discovered by pure reason. They were not produced by biology or evolution. They were born from a worldview. What makes a king and a homeless man equal? Nature does not, power does not, history does not. Only one idea does: that both are made in the image of God. What about freedom of speech? Why should anyone be allowed to say what they think? Because in the biblical worldview, conscience belongs to God before it belongs to the state. Because truth is not created by authority. That is not Greek philosophy, or Roman law, or modern science. That is Judeo-Christian theology translated into politics. What about limited state power? Why shouldn’t the state control everything? Because in the biblical model, the state is not divine. It is not sacred. It is not the source of morality. It is restrained because God stands above it. Remove God, and the state has no ceiling. So when people say:“Human reason produced these values,” they are confusing inheritance with invention. You did not invent them, you were born into them. Societies that abandon Christianity keep the language of rights but lose the substance. They still say “human dignity,” but they can no longer explain why humans have it. They still say “freedom,” but they redefine it as appetite. They still say “equality,” but they replace it with grievance. When we defend Judeo-Christian principles we are defending the moral architecture of the West. A society can survive anything except the destruction of its moral foundation. Those who cheer the death of Christianity believe they are freeing society. In reality, they are removing the load-bearing walls. And when the roof collapses, they will discover too late that what they hated was what was holding everything up.

IVAR ANDERSEN: 𝖳𝗁𝗂𝗌 𝗂𝗌 𝗌𝗈 𝗍𝗋𝗎𝖾. 𝖳𝗁𝖾 𝗍𝖾𝖺𝖼𝗁𝖾𝗋𝗌 𝗂𝗇 𝗆𝗒 𝗌𝗈𝗇'𝗌 𝗌𝖼𝗁𝗈𝗈𝗅 𝖼𝖺𝗅𝗅𝖾𝖽 𝗆𝗒 𝗌𝗈𝗇 "𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝗈𝗅𝖽 𝖿𝖺𝗌𝗁𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖾𝖽 𝖻𝗈𝗒", 𝗇𝗈𝗍 𝗂𝗇 𝖺 𝗆𝖾𝖺𝗇 𝗐𝖺𝗒. 𝖡𝖾𝖼𝖺𝗎𝗌𝖾 𝗐𝗁𝖾𝗇 𝗁𝖾 𝗉𝗅𝖺𝗒𝖾𝖽 𝗁𝖾 𝗐𝖺𝗌 𝗋𝗈𝗎𝗀𝗁 𝖺𝗇𝖽 𝗐𝗂𝗅𝖽.

𝖳𝗁𝗂𝗌 𝗂𝗌 𝗌𝗈 𝗍𝗋𝗎𝖾. 𝖳𝗁𝖾 𝗍𝖾𝖺𝖼𝗁𝖾𝗋𝗌 𝗂𝗇 𝗆𝗒 𝗌𝗈𝗇'𝗌 𝗌𝖼𝗁𝗈𝗈𝗅 𝖼𝖺𝗅𝗅𝖾𝖽 𝗆𝗒 𝗌𝗈𝗇 "𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝗈𝗅𝖽 𝖿𝖺𝗌𝗁𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖾𝖽 𝖻𝗈𝗒", 𝗇𝗈𝗍 𝗂𝗇 𝖺 𝗆𝖾𝖺𝗇 𝗐𝖺𝗒.  𝖡𝖾𝖼𝖺𝗎𝗌𝖾 𝗐𝗁𝖾𝗇 𝗁𝖾 𝗉𝗅𝖺𝗒𝖾𝖽 𝗁𝖾 𝗐𝖺𝗌 𝗋𝗈𝗎𝗀𝗁 𝖺𝗇𝖽 𝗐𝗂𝗅𝖽. pic.twitter.com/226eag198W

— 𝐈𝐯𝐚𝐫 𝐀𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐫𝐬𝐞𝐧 (@IvarAndersen_7) February 1, 2026

J. MICHAEL WALLER: You can't be a citizen of the People's Republic of China to study here or to work here unless you spy for their secret police and their intelligence Services when told to. It's part of their law.

5:23.  At the same time they are actively working to steal our University secrets are research Secrets they are actively working to undermine our intellectual property regimes how should we be responding to this?

5:33.  It should be a whole of government response.  It shouldn't just be an FBI fly swatting operation where we're going to work really hard and bust a few people here and there.  But it needs to be across the board because the Chinese Communists are doing it across the board.  You can't be a citizen of the People's Republic of China to study here or to work here unless you spy for their secret police and their intelligence Services when told to.  It's part of their law.  If you have immediate family in China, you're not free, you're not free to be here, and to do as you want if you have parents back in China because they have you over the barrel.  So we have to presume that every citizen of the People's Republic of China, not every Chinese person, but [every] citizen of the People's Republic of China, is in fact, or, is at least, a potential spy for the Chinese intelligence services.

6:25.  So let me ask you this.  I'm going to present the hypothetical to you.  Let's say that there was an organization that was doing advocacy on "Healthcare in America."  And someone had gotten involved in the effort who was a doctor, who had trained at a People's Liberation Army hospital, and this person was advocating for a wholesale changeover of our Healthcare System to one that was more modeled on a Chinese New Age confucianist system.  I would think you would be alarmed by that, especially given the credentials of this person having been trained at a People's Liberation Army Hospital.

7:07.  Sure.  You have to look at anybody being an agent of influence no matter where they're from actually.  Who are they?  Who is behind it?  Is it just a neat idea that they had?  Could it be someone who is from China and thought this is such a bad system that I have to warn the American, so I'm going to recommend something to them, or is this something where I can trick the Americans into doing something and nudge them into moving more in the CCP direction.

NAYIB BUKELE: LGBT lobby is not allowed in schools in El Salvador because it is “unnatural, anti-God, anti-family and a premeditated plan to destroy future generations.”

🇸🇻@nayibbukele: LGBT lobby is not allowed in schools in El Salvador because it is “unnatural, anti-God, anti-family and a premeditated plan to destroy future generations.” TRUTH!
pic.twitter.com/kxNuhYHv6B

— NanLee Marie Carissimi (@NanLee1124) February 1, 2026

VIDEO TRANSCRIPTION (Spanish, cleaned for readability from subtitles)
This is a brief informal interview in a parking area with Nayib Bukele (President of El Salvador) and a woman who introduces herself as the national director of Moms for Liberty (likely a Spanish-language or international affiliate focused on opposing gender ideology in schools).
Entrevistadora (Woman):
Presidente Bukele, muchísimas gracias por aceptar nuestra invitación. Yo soy la directora nacional de Moms for Liberty, una organización que se encarga de combatir esa ideología del género en los colegios. Estamos cansadas las madres de vivir esta ideología marxista en los colegios. Yo sé que esto es a nivel global. ¿Usted qué está haciendo en su país para eso?
Bukele:
Bueno, nosotros no permitimos esas ideologías en nuestras escuelas y en nuestros colegios. Creo que es importante además no solo que la currícula no lleve esta ideología del género y todas esas cosas, sino que también es importante que los padres estén informados y tengan voz y voto en lo que van a aprender sus hijos. Nosotros confiamos nuestros hijos al sistema educativo —qué sé yo, más vale para nosotros que se las confiemos al sistema educativo— para que les enseñen cosas útiles de su vida: biología, matemáticas, claro, cosas importantes para el aprendizaje. Y luego vienen y quieren meterles ideología, quieren hacer cosas contrarias a la naturaleza. Además, pagado por los taxes.
Entrevistadora:
¡Claro! Pagados con impuestos, pero aparte de eso...
Bukele:
Yo creo que al final no me molestaría pagar si tuvieran una educación de verdad basada en lo académico. Pero nos hacen pagar para tener una educación contraria a la naturaleza, contraria a Dios, contraria a la familia, contraria a lo que los padres queremos. Ese es el verdadero peligro. Hay que erradicar esto de las escuelas porque no es así nomás. ¿Qué pasa? Es un plan premeditado para destruir a las futuras generaciones.
Entrevistadora:
Así es. ¿Cuál usted ve como el futuro de la educación? ¿Cómo sería lo ideal para usted una educación con Dios en los colegios?
Bukele:
Yo creo que es importante que se retome a Dios en las escuelas, que se retome la moral, el civismo, que se aprendan las cosas tradicionales como los académicos: matemáticas, etcétera, historia, etcétera. Pero además que sí hagan nuevas materias que no sean las que quieren meter, sino por ejemplo aprender a cocinar —claro, también, por supuesto—, de cosas que son útiles en la vida de la gente. Habilidades importantes. Que la gente... yo digo, si quieren meter cosas nuevas, quieren modernizar, está bien, pero hagámoslo en cosas productivas para la gente, producción para nuestras... y cosas aquí. Nosotros estaríamos contentos que les enseñaran a nuestros hijitos aunque no nos le enseñaron a nosotros. Nadie está en contra de modernizarse. Lo que estamos en contra es de ideologías antinaturales, anti-Dios, anti-familia. Eso no cabe en nuestra escuela.
Entrevistadora:
Absolutamente, Presidente Bukele. ¿Usted mandaría un saludo a nuestros oyentes y seguidores de Padres en Acción, el programa que yo estoy llevando?
Bukele:Claro que sí. Es un gran saludo a toda la audiencia de Padres en Acción. Mucho trabajo siempre con la voluntad de Dios y sigamos luchando por lo que sea mejor para nuestros hijos. 
ENGLISH TRANSLATION

Interviewer (Woman):
President Bukele, thank you very much for accepting our invitation. I am the national director of Moms for Liberty, an organization dedicated to fighting that gender ideology in schools. We mothers are tired of living this Marxist ideology in schools. I know this is happening globally. What are you doing in your country about this?
Bukele:
Well, we do not allow those ideologies in our schools and colleges. I think it's important not only that the curriculum does not include this gender ideology and all those things, but also that parents are informed and have a voice and vote in what their children will learn. We entrust our children to the educational system —I mean, it's better for us to entrust them to the educational system— so they teach them useful things in life: biology, mathematics, of course, important things for learning. And then they come and want to insert ideology, want to do things contrary to nature. And paid for by taxes.
Interviewer:
Of course! Paid with taxes, but besides that...
Bukele:
I think in the end I wouldn't mind paying if they provided a real education based on academics. But they make us pay for an education contrary to nature, contrary to God, contrary to the family, contrary to what we parents want. That is the real danger. We have to eradicate this from schools because it's not just happening by chance. What's happening? It's a premeditated plan to destroy future generations.
Interviewer:
That's right. What do you see as the future of education? What would be ideal for you—an education with God in schools?
Bukele:
I think it's important to bring God back into schools, to bring back morals and civics, to teach traditional subjects like academics: mathematics, etc., history, etc. But also to create new subjects that aren't the ones they want to force in, but for example learning to cook—of course, that too—things that are useful in people's lives. Important skills. I say, if they want to introduce new things, want to modernize, that's fine, but let's do it with productive things for people, production for our... and things here. We would be happy if they taught our children even if they didn't teach us. No one is against modernizing. What we are against are unnatural ideologies, anti-God, anti-family. That has no place in our schools.
Interviewer:
Absolutely, President Bukele. Would you send a greeting to our listeners and followers of Parents in Action, the program I'm leading?
Bukele:
Of course. A big greeting to the entire Parents in Action audience. A lot of work, always with God's will, and let's keep fighting for what's best for our children.