3:30. Why is the Muslim Brotherhood a threat to American National Security?
3:36. It's a profound threat to our national security not so much because it has elements of terrorist networks within it and it supports terrorism. But an even deeper threat is it's colonizing us. It's waging a civilizational jihad against us to build population centers, to silence critics, to make themselves indispensable parts of political coalition and to take political power. So they're looking at playing a very long game in our country, and it's not to come here to become Americans and to assimilate. It's to impose what they feel like they're morally bound to do, and that is to impose Islamic law over the US Constitution.
4:22. I knew that a lot of this was happening in Europe. I mean we see the effects of it throughout the streets of London, Paris, certainly Brussels, but I didn't know it had gotten that bad already in the United States.
4:35. It's getting there. Europe is already 20 years ahead of us, a generation or two ahead of us. And it has been going on really since the early mass movements, like the Communist movements, the, you know, the anarchist movements. They sort of spawn in Europe and then they come over here. But they're very well embedded in many communities where you can see in places like Minneapolis, or now you've seen in the election of this Mayor [Mamdani] of New York. They have colonies down in Texas, really in pockets all around the country, large and small, and they're in some of the . . . most of the immigrants are harmless, but if they go to a mosque, that's a Muslim Brotherhood mosque. They're going to get gradually radicalized very softly, almost imperceptibly, not to come out and endorse terrorism or push people out into the streets to support Hamas which some of them do. But the really long-term civilizational Jihad mosques, run by the Muslim Brotherhood, will just sort of gradually assimilate people, raise their children this way by going to their religious schools, and create a civilization within a civilization that will never assimilate with us.
5:54. Why do they care about us? I mean one of the great Muslim Brotherhood ideologues and this was the organization that was founded in Egypt but the Egyptian ideologue site could tub famously came to the United States I can remember. It was the 40s or the 1950s but he was grossed out just looking at a community church dance and these were you know we're very modest people in a modest dance but he took it as a sign of corruption and rot and lust and all these different things. So why wouldn't they just avoid America why did they feel that it's their need now to take over America?
6:32. Well, that's the place for everybody to come. If America is the real threat whether it's American culture as Sayyid Qutb said or whether it's American support for Israel or American support for other countries that are Muslim majority countries they're just not Muslim Brotherhood countries where the greatest power to support everything they hate so they have to colonize us
The only thing worse than waking up and finding out your car has been towed, is waking up and finding out your car has been towed by your landlord that’s turning your parking spot into an ADU.
At least there’s almost no chance these ADUs become trash filled fire hazards that… pic.twitter.com/JEHWzObc6F
"Just Cause" allows the city and state to modify the lease.
"Just Cause" eviction policies require landlords to provide valid reasons for terminating a lease, enhancing tenant stability and preventing arbitrary evictions. These laws can vary by city and state, allowing local jurisdictions to implement their own specific regulations.
This 9News report suggests that the reason the state is holding onto Peters is that she's got damning information on Democrat polling practices and how fraud is built into their game.
Flynn has said Peters, 70, should be moved into federal custody because she could be a witness into an investigation of the 2020 election.
DENVER(AP) — A federal magistrate judge on Monday rejected a bid by a former Colorado county clerk to be released from prison while she appeals her state conviction for orchestrating a data breach scheme driven by false claims about voting machine fraud in the 2020 presidential race. 9News.
Peters argued that the magistrate judge should free her because she said the state judge who sentenced her to 9 years behind bars violated her First Amendment rights. Peters claimed he punished her for making allegations about election fraud, but prosecutors argued that the U.S. Supreme Court has allowed judges to consider people’s speech during sentencings if they deem it relevant.
During Peters’ October 2024 sentencing, Judge Matthew Barrett called the defendant a “charlatan” and said she posed a danger to the community for spreading lies about voting and undermining the democratic process.
Peters was unapologetic and insisted that everything she did was geared toward trying to unroot what she believed was fraud. She claimed her actions were done for the greater good.
Her lawyers argued that Barrett was wrong to call Peters' statements “lies” and said there was no evidence her speech posed a danger.
President Donald Trump and other supporters, including retired Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn, the national security adviser during Trump’s first term, have called for Peters to be released. In August, Trump warned he would “take harsh measures” if Peters wasn’t freed, saying she was old and very sick.
The administration sent a letter to the Colorado prison system in mid-November asking that Peters be transferred to federal custody. One her lawyers said he believed the request was made so Peters could more easily be involved in the investigation into the election.
There is no evidence of any widespread cheating in Colorado elections, which have been staunchly defended by county clerks throughout the state, most of whom are Republican. Peters was prosecuted by an elected Republican district attorney, and the three supervisors in her conservative-leaning county also supported the case and defended the integrity of the state’s elections.
The U.S. Justice Department got involved in Peters’ federal case in March, saying “reasonable concerns” had been raised about her prosecution. It also said the DOJ was reviewing whether the prosecution was “oriented more toward inflicting political pain than toward pursuing actual justice or legitimate governmental objectives,” a line from an executive order entitled “Ending the Weaponization of The Federal Government” that Trump signed shortly after his inauguration.
The state objected to the federal government inserting itself, saying the statement the department filed in the case appeared to be a “naked, political attempt” to intimidate the court or Peters’ prosecutors. It unsuccessfully asked for the court to reject it.
Peters’ lawyers pointed to three cases in which federal judges ordered people convicted of state crimes to be released from prison while they appealed, including one involving free speech. In that 1977 case, a judge freed the late Native American activist Russell Means after he was placed back behind bars because he remained active in the American Indian Movement while free on bond from state custody. The state court had largely barred him from participating in the group. The federal judge ruled that was an unconstitutional limit on his First Amendment rights of speech and association.
The nutritional differences between raw and pasteurized milk are so vast, it continues to amaze me how so much of the American public has been kept in the dark about it.
Before 1980: Cholesterol was just cholesterol. Doctors measured total cholesterol.
1980s: Researchers discover LDL and HDL particles that transport cholesterol.
LDL takes cholesterol to tissues. HDL brings it back to liver. Both are essential transport mechanisms.
But the cholesterol hypothesis needed a villain. Just saying "cholesterol" wasn't working because cholesterol is essential for life.
Solution: Rebrand LDL as "bad cholesterol" and HDL as "good cholesterol."
This is marketing, not science. LDL isn't bad. It's a transport vehicle your body requires for delivering cholesterol to cells that need it for membranes, hormones, and repair.
But "bad cholesterol" sounds dangerous. It gave the hypothesis a villain that people could understand.
The media ran with it:
"Bad cholesterol clogs arteries!"
"Lower your bad cholesterol!"
"Good cholesterol protects you!"
Simple narrative. Memorable. Wrong.
What actually matters isn't LDL level. It's:
- LDL particle size (small dense particles are concerning, large fluffy are benign)
- Oxidation status (oxidized LDL causes inflammation, native LDL doesn't)
- Inflammatory markers (CRP, IL-6)
- Triglyceride/HDL ratio (better predictor than LDL)
But explaining that requires nuance. "Bad cholesterol" requires no nuance.
The rebrand was so successful that doctors still say "bad cholesterol" and patients understand it as inherently harmful.
Half of heart attack patients have normal LDL. Half of people with high LDL never have heart attacks.
If LDL was actually "bad" and caused heart disease, this wouldn't be true.
But once you've branded something "bad," evidence doesn't matter. The label sticks.
"Bad cholesterol" is marketing language that became medical terminology.
Your body doesn't have "bad cholesterol." It has LDL particles performing essential transport functions.
Calling them "bad" is like calling delivery trucks "bad" because sometimes they're involved in accidents.
The truck isn't the problem. What it's carrying and how it's driving matter.
But "bad truck" sells more fear than "check your particle size and oxidation status."
You start carnivore. Week 2 hits. Suddenly:
Joint pain you didn't have before
Rashes appearing
Digestion is chaos
Energy is terrible
Sleep is disrupted
You panic. "Carnivore is making me sick!"
Actually, carnivore is revealing how sick you already were.
Oxalate dumping:
You've been eating spinach, almonds, sweet potatoes, and chocolate for years. Oxalates accumulate in tissues because your body can't process them fast enough.
Remove plant foods → oxalates start releasing from storage → temporary symptoms as your body expels them.
This can take weeks to months depending on how much you accumulated.
Fat-stored toxins:
You start burning body fat. That fat has been storing pesticides, seed oil metabolites, and environmental toxins for years.
Burn the fat → toxins release into bloodstream → temporary increase in symptoms until they're eliminated.
Your body is literally detoxing. This is healing, not harm.
The alternative: Keep eating plants, keep storing toxins, never feel the temporary discomfort, and just... stay sick permanently with vague symptoms you accept as normal.
Or: Push through 2-8 weeks of detox symptoms and come out the other side actually healthy.
Your choice: temporary discomfort leading to health, or permanent comfort leading to decline.
Most people choose the latter and wonder why they never get better.
Nitrate comparison time:
Bacon (per serving): 5mg nitrates
Spinach (per serving): 250mg nitrates
Arugula (per serving): 250mg nitrates
Celery (per serving): 150mg nitrates
Beetroot (per serving): 110mg nitrates
Guess which one has the cancer warning label.
Not the vegetables that health influencers blend into smoothies.
The bacon. With 50x LESS nitrates.
Your body produces 60-80mg nitrates daily. In your mouth and gut. Naturally.
But 5mg in bacon is apparently carcinogenic while 250mg in spinach is a superfood.
Same molecule. Different marketing budget.
Processed meat gets the WHO warning. Vegetables get the health halo.
Not because of science. Because bacon threatens grain industry market share and vegetables don't.
Follow the money. Always.
2000s-2010s: Researchers study Mongolian herdsmen.
Diet: Mutton, dairy (yogurt, cheese, butter tea), fermented mare's milk.
Estimated 60-70% of calories from animal fat. Mostly saturated.
Very little vegetables. Almost no processed food.
According to saturated fat hypothesis: Should have catastrophic cardiovascular disease.
Reality:
- Low cardiovascular disease rates despite high cholesterol
- Good metabolic health
- Low diabetes
- Robust physical condition into old age
Researchers: "This is surprising given their high saturated fat intake."
Translation: "Our hypothesis predicts they should be dead, but they're thriving."
When Mongolian herdsmen move to cities and adopt modern diet:
- Cardiovascular disease increases
- Diabetes appears
- Obesity emerges
Same genetics. Different diet. Different outcomes.
Traditional high-fat diet: Healthy.
Modern low-fat processed diet: Diseased.
This pattern has been observed in:
Maasai → City migration
Inuit → Southern migration
Aboriginal → Colonization
Mongolian → Urbanization
Every time: Traditional high saturated fat = healthy. Modern "healthy" diet = disease.
At what point do we admit the pattern is clear?
Answer: Never. Because admitting it means admitting 70 years of error.
So each population is studied, the pattern is observed, it's called "interesting," and then filed away.
The Mongolian herdsmen prove the hypothesis wrong.
Along with the Maasai, Inuit, Kitavans, Aboriginal, Tokelauans, and traditional populations globally.
But one more study that disproves the hypothesis just gets added to the pile.
Immigrants from Somalia overwhelmingly rely on government welfare
- Norway: 73% of Somali immigrants are on government aid - Sweden: 64% of Somali immigrants do NOT have jobs or education - Denmark: 69% of Somali immigrants are on public benefits - America: 88% of Somalians… pic.twitter.com/7F8HdyKD1o
And so you now have perhaps millions of people who are ready for a revolution they need a catalyst a catalyzing moment, like a polarizing moment, and then you'll probably throw in a good number of Jihadis that the Brits control and you're going to get a good number of Azovites from Ukraine who are going to take charge. --Alex Krainer
29:25. You were talking about the Russian Revolution the Bolsheviks, the Civil War, both of the Revolution, numbers of people killed, you were talking about the United States, and the United States primed for it, and I think you're absolutely right. So do most of the guys coming from my world, the Special Operations Intel world, not so much the financial world, those guys seem to not get it. But one of the things I wonder about it is that I suspect as the Europeans know that they can't defeat Russia in a fight but that's not the intent. The intent is to use Russia as the excuse to cover for the collapse and to use the build up for war as an excuse but the real intent is the United States and to unleash Civil Wars there and to back it with logistics, manpower, Azov, leadership, highly experienced warfighting experience all of that and they're trying of course in Eastern Europe they are getting their marching papers handed to them at the border.
30:45. I agree entirely, EM. It's almost obvious that they're doing it because they're not going to stop. The whole empire doesn't even make any sense without the United States being a part of it. And so now Trump doing course correction, especially now on Thursday with the publishing of the new National Security Strategy 2025, it's very clear that he's basically abandoning them. And for them, this is completely existential. So they will do everything in their power to try to topple Trump and maybe even completely topple the American constitutional order. And I think that this is the reason why they have vacuumed up all of these tens of millions of immigrants from everywhere. I think that this is why they have been pouring so much money into things like Black Lives Matter and LBGTQ, Antifa, and all of these people, including arming some of them and training them how to use arms. And so you now have perhaps millions of people who are ready for a revolution they need a catalyst a catalyzing moment, like a polarizing moment, and then you'll probably throw in a good number of Jihadis that the Brits control and you're going to get a good number of Azovites from Ukraine who are going to take charge. And then you have a recipe for disaster and, of course, they also control the media, so everything is wrapped into this "No Kings," "Trump is overreaching," and on and on. So I see great danger because the playbook is almost exactly the same as the way they overthrew the Czarist regime. People in the United States, feeling untouchable, might feel a little bit relaxed because "you can't overthrow . . . you can't do that s*** over here." Well, you know, they overthrew a 300-year regime that had a continual government under Romanov and everything intertwined with the, with their cultural norms, and traditions, and the Orthodox Church, so it was a very unlikely success, but it was a success.
33:50. . . . because of how they did it.
33:53. Yeah because they've been building up for decades. Look at all the prosecutors, the district attorneys, Sheriffs, look at all the ports in this country, the main ports. If I was going to do whatever . . . a revolution, if I was going to overthrow the United States and the inertia days, they don't care which one of these factions come out dominant in the end, because they're going to control them and they're going to take them out Stalin style and shoot them. So they don't really care which factions. If I'm, you know, as an unconventional warfare, dirty warfare trained guy, an Intel guy, a targeting guy, when I look at the United States we are completely and totally and absolutely primed to be taken down and primarily by being not invaded by armies but by logistically, but by our enemies logistically supporting local forces that are led by foreign because by the most, likes by the way did bring in people from all over the world, even guys that had fought in the Boer Wars, and elsewhere, they brought British-leading or British-connected people from all over fighting in these kinds of dirty wars and sending them in there. They weren't Bolsheviks.
35:10. They sent probably as many as 25,000 people before the Revolution took place. And then when the Civil War took off, it was 300 to 400,000 troops-- Japanese, American, British, Czech, Greek.
35:33. Which at the time was a disproportionate number today that would be millions, right?
35:40. One of the things that Richard Poe is bringing up on the podcast last time we talked about the sheer number of multiple wars, and multiple armies fighting in the years after the initial Revolution . . .
35:50. . . . for 20 years
35:51. And it was Churchill actually managing a lot of the White Russian forces because he was being told to manage White Russian forces to fail because they really wanted . . .
36:03. Yeah because they pretended to be allied, pretended to be allied with them because supposedly because they were against the Bolsheviks and the Communists, but they managed them to failure, kind of like maneuvered them off the cliff.
36:20. No different than when we watch places like Syria. It's the same thing. Whenever these conflicts look incomprehensible, they're not incomprehensible they just don't fit into a simple narrative whatever the narrative we've been told is it's always something far more ugly than that and it's designed that way on purpose.
36:41. You put the City of London into the puzzle, and suddenly the whole picture makes sense.
36:49. The encryption key. But it's not just the city of London right that's just where things flow through this goes to the Hague to Amsterdam this goes to Rome this goes to the other places that they're centered you know you were talking about Venezuela and you're absolutely right and I've articulated this before that Venezuela is city of London HQ in the Western Hemisphere just the same as they had set up for their Devil's Legions, which is this composite Intel, paramilitary, terrorist organizations, cartels, they've all been brought together under this same umbrella, same leadership structure, same financial structure in the global war on terror. That's what it really was. It was a mob war.
I wish Tom Barrack would just say what he wants clearly and spare us this BS: What he really wants is an Islamic caliphate, preferably Ottoman. https://t.co/zLW59QMFlq
Democrats are the leading edge of the U.S. communist Movement. The elites follow one set of rules, the masses another. That’s how communism works. https://t.co/3Oj0UQUo0f
The speaker's name is Hassan Ali Khaire, former PM of Somali from 2017 to 2020.
Siad Barre is claimed to Ilhan Omar's father, but Grok rejects that. Mike Cernovich claims that Colonel Nur Omar Mohamed is her father and that he led death squads in Somalia and fled after his side lost power.
Does anyone get the idea that the governments in the United States are owned and occupied by other states, like Afghanistan, Somalia, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, or is it just me?
