Wednesday, December 10, 2025

ANDREW BRANCA: They don't kill you because you're a Nazi. They call you a Nazi so they can kill you.

And then the outcome will be just what we see happening in South Africa today.  Now the black majority in charge is aggressively murdering the white South Africans, seizing the farms, seizing their property, driving them out of the country until the white South Africans are desperately, and with some help from Trump, trying to migrate to America.  White South Africans, of course, like Elon Musk, are first world peoples, right.  They came from Europe, First-World Europe.  I'm more than happy to have them in America.  But what's happening in South Africa is what will happen in Europe, is what will happen in America if we don't check this mass migration of the third world into our cultures. We will be where the South Africans are today hunted down for our skin color, because they hate us.  They don't really hate racism.  They just hate white people, and I understand why. Maybe I would feel the same way, I don't know.  But I'm the target of that hate, my children are, their children are, and I'm not going to go down without a fight.

And this is something I've seen Elon post before as well,

They don't kill you because you're a Nazi.  They call you a Nazi so they can kill you.

They dehumanize you, so they're comfortable killing you and publicly urging others to kill you.  That's how the process works 

ANDREW BRANCA: Libertarianism is a luxury belief of a high IQ culture that's protected against low- IQ, third world invasion.

Reading a subscriber's comment: 

The old Libertarian coalition required free flow of people regardless of whether we could go there or what their merit.  But even now they're not willing to compromise even though they can get welfare.  Libertarians insist we must remove the welfare not add border controls. 

Listen, Libertarianism it's one of those political perspectives that you have as a kid, right.  There was a point in my life, I think I was in my first year of college.  I actually sent money to the Libertarian Party.  I was a card carrying Libertarian.  But Libertarianism is a luxury belief of a high IQ culture that's protected against low- IQ, third world invasion.  So Libertarianism works if you're Ayn Rand living in America, if you're Robert Heinlein living in America, your high IQ.  Everyone you interact with is high IQ.  You have no real exposure to low IQ people, certainly they're not in charge of anything.  So they're not a constraint to anything you want to do.  And if you have this imaginary world where everybody was an IQ of 100 or better, Libertarianism might work.  But that's not the world we live in.  That's the white population of the world, which is now, you know, down to 8%.  Most of the world is not that.  Most of the world is mentally retarded and libertarianism doesn't work with mentally retarded people.  That's why Libertarianism can't work. Right there, it's the IQ map again.  The IQ map it's always the same map, and it answers all the questions.

— C3 (@C_3C_3): Clinton appointed Judge Breyer tries blocking President Trump from deploying the National Guard to California. Again. Judicial Coup continues.

ANDREW BRANCA: Because the majority of the voting public in America is women. And this kind of emotional laden propaganda not only appeals to women, but women are themselves by Nature amenable to resources being taken from White men and distributed to those who need it so it'll be fair.

All that happens is that Africa goes from a starving population of 200 million to a starving population of 800 million to a starving population of a billion and now they're a starving population of 1.3 billion, and the answer, according to the Left, is take even more money from white men in America and give it to Africa. This is a black hole of consumption, and all we're doing is creating more starving Africans.  It strikes me as a bad plan, but I'm supposed to feel guilty about it.  And here is the thing: this line of propaganda will work.  It can work.  Do you know why?  Because the majority of the voting public in America is women.  And this kind of emotional laden propaganda not only appeals to women, but women are themselves by Nature amenable to resources being taken from White men and distributed to those who need it so it'll be fair.  Like Timmy brought in a bag of candy to kindergarten.  He better have brought enough for everybody.  Got to be fair.

Sex and Culture, Joseph Daniel Unwin, 1934.

HUD SECRETARY, SCOTT TURNER: But when you have over 12 million people coming over our borders unchecked, unvetted, this is straining our housing market from a supply standpoint, from an affordability standpoint.

But when you have over 12 million people coming over our borders unchecked, unvetted, this is straining our housing market from a supply standpoint, from an affordability standpoint.  HUD just put out a report and found that between 2021 and 2024 the foreign-born population in our country in just three short years is 6 million people, which is the most in that period of time of American history.  So we cannot forgo the thought that because of illegal immigration, because of people coming into our country, prices have risen, supply has been squeezed, but we're working very hard at HUD along with the president and the leaders in the administration to bring down the cost and raise the supply.  And we're doing it through inter-agencies but we need the FED to cut rates.  We need to continue to deport illegals that are taking houses from the American people.  So we are very intentional and focused about it at HUD and across the Administration.  

HUD Secretary, Scott Turner.

Fentanyl Kills 100,000+ Year

Kristofer Ferreyra, 23 months.

Joel Romero, 15 yrs, Miami, FL.

Alyssa Kittendorff, 17 yrs, Downey, CA.

Kermani Gray, 13 yrs. 

Cali Anne Sylvis, 21 yrs, 2002-2023, Weatherford, Parker County, Texas.

Raymone Aragon, 22 yrs.

Brooklyn Jade Bowers, 19 yrs., 2003-2022, Cedar Rapids, Iowa.

Ella Sweeney, 20 yrs.

Miah VanHouten, 16 yrs. 

Jaci Hinsey, 15 yrs. 

Tyler Williams, 13 yrs.

Shaun Hunter, 16 yrs.

VALERIE ANNE SMITH: Today, research shows babies cry for connection, comfort & regulation, that is crucial to their development, trust, & so much more

For 1,000s of years, babies slept with their mothers. They were never left alone. They were held, rocked & fed when hungry.

Did you know the 'cry-it-out' method didn’t even exist before the early 1900s? Until two men came along...Psychologist John Watson & Dr. Luther Holt pushed the idea that babies should be left to cry. Before that, families co-slept, rocked, or responded to babies’ needs without the concept of strict training. These doctors believed responding too much to infants would 'spoil' them, an idea that shaped decades of parenting advice. They said babies should be trained, isolated & controlled. That babies had to fit the assembly line & office schedules of their parents. Dr Watson had 4 children, 3 attempted suicide & 1 succeeded [. . .]. His remaining 3 children blamed him for their psychological pain & damage. Watson died alone, isolated & estranged from his family...the same painful way in which he brainwashed millions of parents to treat their babies. Dr Watson's granddaughter is quoted as stating, "my grandfather's ideas were a legacy of psychological damage." These methods became parenting norms...not because they were right, but because they worked for the system. A system that demanded efficiency. Not connection. You're not being manipulated by your baby by attending their needs. You're resisting rules built for factories, not families. Your instincts aren't outdated. They're what kept our species alive & emotionally healthy. Without abandonment issues & the ability to have emotional connection with others. Today, research shows babies cry for connection, comfort & regulation, that is crucial to their development, trust, & so much more.

SAMA HOOLE: Chicken was lean, stringy, required long cooking, not particularly desirable. It was acceptable protein when the egg production ended. Nothing more.

Chickens were domesticated 8,000 years ago in Southeast Asia. For 7,900 years, humans kept chickens for one reason: eggs. Chicken meat was eaten only when the hen stopped laying. Usually after 3-5 years. The bird had earned its retirement in the cooking pot. Chicken was lean, stringy, required long cooking, not particularly desirable. It was acceptable protein when the egg production ended. Nothing more. 1950s: The low-fat era begins. Saturated fat becomes the enemy. Beef and pork are suddenly "dangerous." Chicken becomes "healthy lean protein." 1960s: Factory farming begins breeding chickens specifically for meat. The Cornish Cross is developed - grows from chick to slaughter weight in 6 weeks instead of 16 weeks. These birds are bred for: - Massive breast meat (consumers want lean protein) - Rapid growth (more production cycles per year) - Docile temperament (easier factory farming) They're so far removed from ancestral chickens that they can barely walk under their own weight. Their skeletons can't support the meat mass. Many develop heart failure before reaching slaughter age from the metabolic strain. 1980s: "Chicken breast and rice" becomes the default fitness meal. Bodybuilders everywhere trim the fat, eat the lean muscle, call it optimal. Your great-grandparents would have fed that part to the dog. The fattiest parts - the thighs, the skin, the liver - those were the valuable bits. The breast was just convenient bulk. We've spent 60 years promoting the least nutritious part of the chicken as a health food while demonising the parts humans actually valued for millennia. Chicken wasn't a health food until we decided fat was poison.

Before that, it was just the consolation prize when your laying hen retired. 

SAMA HOOLE: The deer belonged to the king. The barley belonged to the king. The peasant belonged to the king. And the king ate venison while the peasant ate gruel. This wasn't about protecting animals. It was about controlling protein access.

1066, England. William the Conquering just taken the throne.

Within months, he issues the Forest Laws. Hunting deer is now forbidden to anyone below noble rank. The punishment isn't a fine. It's death. Not execution by sword, which would be quick. Execution by hanging, slow strangulation, body displayed in the village square as a warning. Sometimes they'd blind you first and let you starve instead. The cruelty was the point. These weren't conservation laws. The deer population was massive. Herds roamed freely across thousands of acres of "royal forest" that just happened to include the land peasants had been hunting on for generations. The real reason becomes clear when you look at what replaced venison in the peasant diet. Bread. Lots of bread. Grain-based gruel. Pottage made from whatever vegetables they could grow. The lords continued eating venison. Multiple deer per week. Whole roasted boars. Fatty game birds. Their tables groaned with meat at every meal. The peasants ate grain and were told it was God's will that only nobility could hunt. The Church backed this up with sermons about knowing your place in the divine order. A peasant family could watch deer walk through their barley field, destroying their crop, and be executed for killing the deer to feed their starving children. The deer belonged to the king. The barley belonged to the king. The peasant belonged to the king. And the king ate venison while the peasant ate gruel. This wasn't about protecting animals. It was about controlling protein access. A population fed on grain is weaker, more compliant, easier to manage. A population eating meat is stronger, more energetic, more likely to cause problems for the ruling class. The Forest Laws stayed in effect for 800 years. Eight centuries of restricting meat to the elites while forcing the masses onto grain. And during those eight centuries, the peasant class got shorter, weaker, more disease-prone with each generation. The nobility, eating their venison and boar, stayed tall and strong. You can see it in the armor. Noble armor from the 1400s fits a 5'10" man. Peasant remains from the same period average 5'3". Same genetics. Different diets. The nobility ate what humans evolved eating. The peasants ate what they were allowed to eat. The elites have always known: Control the meat supply, control the population.

Tuesday, December 9, 2025

3:30.  Why is the Muslim Brotherhood a threat to American National Security? 

3:36.  It's a profound threat to our national security not so much because it has elements of terrorist networks within it and it supports terrorism.  But an even deeper threat is it's colonizing us.  It's waging a civilizational jihad against us to build population centers, to silence critics, to make themselves indispensable parts of political coalition and to take political power.  So they're looking at playing a very long game in our country, and it's not to come here to become Americans and to assimilate.  It's to impose what they feel like they're morally bound to do, and that is to impose Islamic law over the US Constitution.

4:22.  I knew that a lot of this was happening in Europe.  I mean we see the effects of it throughout the streets of London, Paris, certainly Brussels, but I didn't know it had gotten that bad already in the United States.

4:35.  It's getting there. Europe is already 20 years ahead of us, a generation or two ahead of us.  And it has been going on really since the early mass movements, like the Communist movements, the, you know, the anarchist movements.  They sort of spawn in Europe and then they come over here.  But they're very well embedded in many communities where you can see in places like Minneapolis, or now you've seen in the election of this Mayor [Mamdani] of New York.  They have colonies down in Texas, really in pockets all around the country, large and small, and they're in some of the . . . most of the immigrants are harmless, but if they go to a mosque, that's a Muslim Brotherhood mosque. They're going to get gradually radicalized very softly, almost imperceptibly, not to come out and endorse terrorism or push people out into the streets to support Hamas which some of them do.  But the really long-term civilizational Jihad mosques, run by the Muslim Brotherhood, will just sort of gradually assimilate people, raise their children this way by going to their religious schools, and create a civilization within a civilization that will never assimilate with us.

5:54.  Why do they care about us?  I mean one of the great Muslim Brotherhood ideologues and this was the organization that was founded in Egypt but the Egyptian ideologue site could tub famously came to the United States I can remember.  It was the 40s or the 1950s but he was grossed out just looking at a community church dance and these were you know we're very modest people in a modest dance but he took it as a sign of corruption and rot and lust and all these different things. So why wouldn't they just avoid America why did they feel that it's their need now to take over America?

6:32.  Well, that's the place for everybody to come.  If America is the real threat whether it's American culture as Sayyid Qutb said or whether it's American support for Israel or American support for other countries that are Muslim majority countries they're just not Muslim Brotherhood countries where the greatest power to support everything they hate so they have to colonize us  



"Just Cause" allows the city and state to modify the lease.

Accessory Dwelling Units.  

"Just Cause" allows the city and state to modify the lease.   

"Just Cause" eviction policies require landlords to provide valid reasons for terminating a lease, enhancing tenant stability and preventing arbitrary evictions. These laws can vary by city and state, allowing local jurisdictions to implement their own specific regulations.

Just Cause Evictions.

PAGE 7 OF TINA PETERS PARDON LETTER TO TRUMP: "In the new unit, she was attacked by other prisoners 3 times in different locations where guards had to pull inmates off of her"

Here's a copy of the full letter and request for Tina Peters pardon to President Trump., dated December 7, 2025.


This  9News report suggests that the reason the state is holding onto Peters is that she's got damning information on Democrat polling practices and how fraud is built into their game.  

Flynn has said Peters, 70, should be moved into federal custody because she could be a witness into an investigation of the 2020 election.

DENVER(AP) — A federal magistrate judge on Monday rejected a bid by a former Colorado county clerk to be released from prison while she appeals her state conviction for orchestrating a data breach scheme driven by false claims about voting machine fraud in the 2020 presidential race.  9News.

Peters argued that the magistrate judge should free her because she said the state judge who sentenced her to 9 years behind bars violated her First Amendment rights. Peters claimed he punished her for making allegations about election fraud, but prosecutors argued that the U.S. Supreme Court has allowed judges to consider people’s speech during sentencings if they deem it relevant.  

During Peters’ October 2024 sentencing, Judge Matthew Barrett called the defendant a “charlatan” and said she posed a danger to the community for spreading lies about voting and undermining the democratic process.

Peters was unapologetic and insisted that everything she did was geared toward trying to unroot what she believed was fraud. She claimed her actions were done for the greater good.

Her lawyers argued that Barrett was wrong to call Peters' statements “lies” and said there was no evidence her speech posed a danger.

President Donald Trump and other supporters, including retired Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn, the national security adviser during Trump’s first term, have called for Peters to be released. In August, Trump warned he would “take harsh measures” if Peters wasn’t freed, saying she was old and very sick.  

The administration sent a letter to the Colorado prison system in mid-November asking that Peters be transferred to federal custody. One her lawyers said he believed the request was made so Peters could more easily be involved in the investigation into the election.

There is no evidence of any widespread cheating in Colorado elections, which have been staunchly defended by county clerks throughout the state, most of whom are Republican. Peters was prosecuted by an elected Republican district attorney, and the three supervisors in her conservative-leaning county also supported the case and defended the integrity of the state’s elections.

The U.S. Justice Department got involved in Peters’ federal case in March, saying “reasonable concerns” had been raised about her prosecution. It also said the DOJ was reviewing whether the prosecution was “oriented more toward inflicting political pain than toward pursuing actual justice or legitimate governmental objectives,” a line from an executive order entitled “Ending the Weaponization of The Federal Government” that Trump signed shortly after his inauguration.

The state objected to the federal government inserting itself, saying the statement the department filed in the case appeared to be a “naked, political attempt” to intimidate the court or Peters’ prosecutors. It unsuccessfully asked for the court to reject it.

Peters’ lawyers pointed to three cases in which federal judges ordered people convicted of state crimes to be released from prison while they appealed, including one involving free speech. In that 1977 case, a judge freed the late Native American activist Russell Means after he was placed back behind bars because he remained active in the American Indian Movement while free on bond from state custody. The state court had largely barred him from participating in the group. The federal judge ruled that was an unconstitutional limit on his First Amendment rights of speech and association.

TRUMP DID WHAAAAAAAAAT!

SCORECARDS HELP

WIDE AWAKE MEDIA: In 1994, Japan ceased all mandatory vaccines for children under 24 months old. Can you guess what happened next?

BREAKING - This woman received 100k likes for explaining exactly how the mainstream media lies and slanders ICE.

SAMA HOOLE: You're not "detoxing" with juice cleanses. Your liver detoxes. It's been doing it since birth. It doesn't need £89 of blended vegetables.

SAMA HOOLE: But the cholesterol hypothesis needed a villain. Just saying "cholesterol" wasn't working because cholesterol is essential for life. Solution: Rebrand LDL as "bad cholesterol" and HDL as "good cholesterol." This is marketing, not science.

Before 1980: Cholesterol was just cholesterol. Doctors measured total cholesterol. 1980s: Researchers discover LDL and HDL particles that transport cholesterol. LDL takes cholesterol to tissues. HDL brings it back to liver. Both are essential transport mechanisms. But the cholesterol hypothesis needed a villain. Just saying "cholesterol" wasn't working because cholesterol is essential for life. Solution: Rebrand LDL as "bad cholesterol" and HDL as "good cholesterol." This is marketing, not science. LDL isn't bad. It's a transport vehicle your body requires for delivering cholesterol to cells that need it for membranes, hormones, and repair. But "bad cholesterol" sounds dangerous. It gave the hypothesis a villain that people could understand. The media ran with it: "Bad cholesterol clogs arteries!" "Lower your bad cholesterol!" "Good cholesterol protects you!" Simple narrative. Memorable. Wrong. What actually matters isn't LDL level. It's: - LDL particle size (small dense particles are concerning, large fluffy are benign) - Oxidation status (oxidized LDL causes inflammation, native LDL doesn't) - Inflammatory markers (CRP, IL-6) - Triglyceride/HDL ratio (better predictor than LDL) But explaining that requires nuance. "Bad cholesterol" requires no nuance. The rebrand was so successful that doctors still say "bad cholesterol" and patients understand it as inherently harmful. Half of heart attack patients have normal LDL. Half of people with high LDL never have heart attacks. If LDL was actually "bad" and caused heart disease, this wouldn't be true. But once you've branded something "bad," evidence doesn't matter. The label sticks. "Bad cholesterol" is marketing language that became medical terminology. Your body doesn't have "bad cholesterol." It has LDL particles performing essential transport functions. Calling them "bad" is like calling delivery trucks "bad" because sometimes they're involved in accidents. The truck isn't the problem. What it's carrying and how it's driving matter.

But "bad truck" sells more fear than "check your particle size and oxidation status." 

SAMA HOOLE: Your choice: temporary discomfort leading to health, or permanent comfort leading to decline.

You start carnivore. Week 2 hits. Suddenly: Joint pain you didn't have before Rashes appearing Digestion is chaos Energy is terrible Sleep is disrupted You panic. "Carnivore is making me sick!" Actually, carnivore is revealing how sick you already were. Oxalate dumping: You've been eating spinach, almonds, sweet potatoes, and chocolate for years. Oxalates accumulate in tissues because your body can't process them fast enough. Remove plant foods → oxalates start releasing from storage → temporary symptoms as your body expels them. This can take weeks to months depending on how much you accumulated. Fat-stored toxins: You start burning body fat. That fat has been storing pesticides, seed oil metabolites, and environmental toxins for years. Burn the fat → toxins release into bloodstream → temporary increase in symptoms until they're eliminated. Your body is literally detoxing. This is healing, not harm. The alternative: Keep eating plants, keep storing toxins, never feel the temporary discomfort, and just... stay sick permanently with vague symptoms you accept as normal. Or: Push through 2-8 weeks of detox symptoms and come out the other side actually healthy. Your choice: temporary discomfort leading to health, or permanent comfort leading to decline. Most people choose the latter and wonder why they never get better.