This video explains why I @nettermike am running for State Senate in California
— Mike Netter (@nettermike) February 11, 2026
We need to cut taxes PERIOD WARNING this video will scare you Your Democrats in Sacramento are robbing you blind pic.twitter.com/Sov2nX6d9q
Wednesday, February 11, 2026
Tuesday, February 10, 2026
END WOKENESS: Sheriff Garry McFadden (Charlotte) was not able to name any of the 3 branches of gov: Legislation, Executive, Judicial. As Sheriff, he falls under the Executive.
Sheriff Garry McFadden (Charlotte) was not able to name any of the 3 branches of gov
— End Wokeness (@EndWokeness) February 10, 2026
Including the one he works for pic.twitter.com/60YmM0jtO0
The congressman is Allen Chesser Republican from North Carolina. It's interesting to see that some Republicans are quite tenacious, like there are ones who do their job and do it well. Chesser looks like on of them.
SUZANNE HUMPHREYS: they looked to see what happened 12 hours later at a genetic level. And what this doctor reported was 33 allergy related jeans were activated. 66 Asthma genes were activated. 67 cancer genes were up regulated, and 25 immunological genes were up regulated.
Doctor shows what childhood vaccines do to a baby’s blood…
— Died Suddenly (@DiedSuddenly_) February 10, 2026
1. Instant allergy markers
2. Instant cancer markers
3. Instant immune disease markers pic.twitter.com/BEXOtx21e7
So this is another study that I will show you from 2008. This was a Swedish study, and they looked at infants after their tetanus acellular pertussis vaccines and polio hib and polio him so these were babies so these are babies and they got the regular vaccines at 3 and 5 months. And then they took some of their blood out and they exposed it to the whooping cough toxin, which is basically what's in the vaccine, and then they looked to see what happened 12 hours later on a genetic level. And what this doctor reported was 33 allergy related jeans were activated. 66 Asthma genes were activated. 67 cancer genes were up regulated, and 25 immunological genes were up regulated. So, we're definitely seeing on a genetic level some waking up. Now, whether or not it goes through completely and causes these diseases, no, it doesn't in everybody right then and there. But do we know that unless something comes along and shuts these down what is the result? We don't know.
HARVEY C. MANSFIELD: But manliness is taking charge of things in a situation of risk and it's just for the few. So it's not the same thing as being a gentleman, which is being gentle though strong.
Harvey C. Mansfield on how intellectuals replaced priests. .Harvey C. Mansfield on how intellectuals replaced priests. @audrey_unver
— University of Austin (UATX) (@uaustinorg) February 10, 2026
00:00 — Preview
00:35 — Is America too feminine?
01:01 — Men are unemployed
03:17 — What Simone de Beauvoir gets wrong
04:32 — Love vs. lust
06:08 — Do you want to be alone?
07:39 — How was Margaret… pic.twitter.com/B4qGsTOYWH
00:00 — Preview
00:35 — Is America too feminine?
01:01 — Men are unemployed.
[1:35] Feminism is an opinion that there's no serious differences between the sex, between the sexes, meaning that your sex doesn't give you duties or rights or status in any way different from the other sex. So that's the kind of equality that feminism wanted which means that the two sexes we're pretty much the same. In the 19th century, feminism was different. In the 19th century, women declared that women were superior not just equal but superior to men, especially in morals and this was an opinion a traditional opinion long time to be seen. You can see it in de Tocqueville's discussion of American women. And since women were more moral, if they had the vote, they would improve our politics and they would take us out of the corruption of the Big City bosses and parties and male voters getting drunk. And that to some extent succeeded, because we did give women the suffrage in the early 20th century. But that wasn't good enough for Simone de Beauvoir, the author of present-day feminism. She wrote a book called The Second Sex.
03:17 — What Simone de Beauvoir gets wrong
04:32 — Love vs. lust
06:08 — Do you want to be alone?
07:39 — How was Margaret Thatcher manly?
[7:40] One of the themes of your book on Manliness is your extraordinary and I think correct respect for both sexes there is such conscientiousness and respect woven throughout your text and I wonder for those who haven't yet had the chance to read your book tell us what is Manliness and how is Margaret Thatcher manly.
My quick definition of manliness is taking charge of things in a situation of risk. So manliness is a quality, sometimes good, sometimes bad, of those who seek to take charge and handle dangerous situations or at least tricky situations, and don't hang back or just watch or ponder things. So manliness is a quality of a very few men, not of most men or all men. That's why I distinguish Manliness from masculinity, or what's called toxic masculinity. There is a certain toxic masculinity that goes with being a male. But manliness is an attitude especially of those people who are manly against those men who aren't. It's not so much against women because they're excused from being manly. After all they're women. But manliness is just for the few. So it's not the same thing as being a gentleman, which is being gentle though strong. A person can be manly without being very gentle or being gentlemanly. So they're kind of levels of the quality of Manliness but it's also the case that there are exceptions and overlaps between men and women and Margaret Thatcher is an example of a woman who sought risk and suffered it in a manly fashion very bold and very durable, "The Iron Lady."
10:44 — Should conservatives police their ranks?
19:36 — How have our elites failed? What do populists get wrong?
25:43 — Anti-Americanism at Harvard
29:50 — Can the universities be saved?
30:41 — Why UATX?
37:51 — Remembering Leo Strauss
38:45 — Prof. Mansfield's intellectual adversary
47:06 — Should UATX be neutral?
48:52 — How Prof. Mansfield wastes time
49:07 — If mass culture poisons the soul, what should we consume instead?
CHARLIE KIRK: Assassination culture is spreading on the left. 48% of liberals say it would be at least somewhat justified to murder Elon Musk. 55% said the same about Donald Trump.
The left is being whipped into a violent frenzy. Any setback, whether losing an election or losing a court case, justifies a maximally violent response. --Charlie Kirk, April 7, 2025
Five months before they assassinated him. https://t.co/OI34O4cFvv
— J Michael Waller (@JMichaelWaller) February 10, 2026
from Charlie Kirk, April 7, 2025,
Assassination culture is spreading on the left. Forty-eight percent of liberals say it would be at least somewhat justified to murder Elon Musk. Fifty-five percent said the same about Donald Trump. In California, activists are naming ballot measures after Luigi Mangione. The left is being whipped into a violent frenzy. Any setback, whether losing an election or losing a court case, justifies a maximally violent response. This is the natural outgrowth of left-wing protest culture tolerating violence and mayhem for years on end. The cowardice of local prosecutors and school officials have turned the left into a ticking time bomb.
CAESAR CHAVEZ, 1974: And Mexico should take the initiative and stop exporting the poverty to us. They should do something about the rural economy over there.
Cesar Chavez all the way back in 1974 understood the importance of protecting America’s borders: “We don’t want Mexico exporting its poverty to us.” pic.twitter.com/MaYdP5NWJg
— Don Keith (@RealDonKeith) February 10, 2026
This question of the illegals is . . . I find very interesting. Would you say that it's at this particular moment as important as any other of the problems facing the Union?
Oh, yes, in the last three weeks it has become, last two weeks, it has become an emergency for us. Was an awful lot of illegals coming in by the hundreds, by the thousands, our people are not only in some of the some of the crews where there is now strike breaking. Some of the schools are 100% illegals outright, openly with no attempt to disguise it. And, so it's so bad now that we estimate 60 to 70% of the Farm Workers in California are the resident worker. The citizen is out of a job because of the wetbacks. They're coming in by the thousands. Just unbelievable. See they're coming in with the consent of the Immigration Service which is part of the Department of Justice. How else could they come? We, for instance, know that if you go to Coachella, you go around the El Paso area, the secondary immigration checkpoints have been have been unmanned now for, oh, at least three, four weeks. They're closed. They're . . . at night, they're dark. There aren't any patrol in there. It's, it's a gimmick. We think that it's a prelude, the beginning to a big drive on the part of the administration and the Mexican Government to bring the Bracero Program again. It's a vicious attack on the, on the local worker and it's just one of those things that every business thinks they can get away with, and our job is to inform the whole country what's happening together with the boycott and solve it that way. And so the workers themselves, even though a lot of them are Mexican descendants and descendants themselves, are very uptight, very, very worried and very mad about the illegals coming to break their strikes. It takes away their jobs.
Does that put you in and comfortable position to be to be against the illegal immigrants because they are from Mexico? In other words, part of your, part of your program has been an appeal to equal treatment of people of Mexican origin.
Oh, yeah, sure but we're speaking of the legal ones. You know, we don't want Mexico to export its poverty to us. And then we pay . . . it's not their culture, it's not society in general, it's a farm worker again paying for those sins you know. And Mexico should take the initiative and stop exporting the poverty to us. They should do something about the rural economy over there. And then, see it's, it's a way of breaking the strike. It's a way of demoralize in a Farm Workers. And for instance, workers are going to ask for stamps, for food stamps. They go, they're lining up in the offices for welfare and they're being told we can't give you a job because there are plenty of jobs, and the workers say, well, there aren't any jobs. We just came from the fields. They won't hire us or they just laid us off because either because we're strikers or because we're members of the Union or because the Braceros, the illegals rather, the illegals, will do the job for half the money we're getting . . .
STEPHEN COUGHLIN: Multiculturalism is the intersectional targeting of your culture . . . by other cultures for the purpose of displacing yours. That the NFL has been an intersectional player is obvious.
That the NFL has been an intersectional player is obvious.That the NFL has been an intersectional player is obvious.
— Stephen Coughlin (@S_Coughlin_DC) February 10, 2026
Multiculturalism is the intersectional targeting of your culture (whatever culture you were born into) by other cultures for the purpose of displacing yours. It's a line of effort that seeks as its object the… https://t.co/2gT3ZIUiyE
Multiculturalism is the intersectional targeting of your culture (whatever culture you were born into) by other cultures for the purpose of displacing yours. It's a line of effort that seeks as its object the destruction of your culture. The telos is cultural genocide.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)