Sunday, March 29, 2026

🇺🇸 $3000 in 1967 could get you a car or . . .

Wanker Michael Healy-Rae is selling out his countrymen to 3rd world Jihadis.

Wanker Michael Healy-Rae is selling out his countrymen to 3rd world Jihadis.

Anglo-Saxon Bloke Don't Like to Be Poked

RYAN GERRITSEN: US vs Canada's military strength.

President Trump’s military demonstrations in Venezuela and Iran were acts of supreme kindness towards Chairman Xi, as they have given him the first **real** information about the Communist Party’s military capabilities. Marxists use language to persuade, not describe, both internally and externally. So the CCP military was never **not** going to develop “a stealth fighter,” or “stealth-detecting radars.” To fail at these tasks would be an unacceptable humiliation. But the question is: did they really? The answer is no. Which is to say: Xi lives in a world where he cannot trust ANY information presented to him by his own system, because it arrives via a filter not only of consensus but also of pride. “The CCP cannot fail, history is on our side!” Except it isn’t. Realty exists. And the total failure of their equipment in VZ and IR was the first time Xi has ever received REAL information about his military’s capabilities. And it’s not good. Xi must now revisit every assumption he has about action in Taiwan. And he is now forced to confront reality, that his staff lie not out of malice but because COMMUNISM DEMANDS YOU IGNORE REALITY.

Interesting days ahead. 

MARK GROUBERT: 500 groups with $3B in revenues are behind the #NoKings protests and communist call for 'revolution'

RYAN HOLIDAY: The Stoic Abilities That Determine Your Entire Life

Saturday, March 28, 2026

STEPHEN COUGHLIN: 18 U.S.C. § 111 makes it a federal crime to forcibly assault, resist, oppose, impede, intimidate, or interfere with designated federal officers or employees while they are performing official duties.


@linuxhippie. Clearly, the Philly DA Larry forgot his ConLaw class on the Federal Pre-emption clause of the Constitution.

He also seems to have forgotten that Title 18 USC Section 111 makes it a felony for him to interfere with a federal officer in the execution of his office. Question? Has the FBI or DHS ALSO forgotten Section 111? Because, from where many stand in the cheap seats, the moment a state or local actor interferes with a federal officer in the conduct of his duties, those persons should be arrested, as should any and all individuals ordering that activity. And yes, it's really as simple, and as simply clear, as that. From the AI distillation of Section 111:

18 U.S.C. § 111 makes it a federal crime to forcibly assault, resist, oppose, impede, intimidate, or interfere with designated federal officers or employees while they are performing official duties. Penalties range from 1 year (simple assault) up to 20 years (use of a deadly weapon or infliction of bodily injury.

For Larry Krasner's political grandstanding,

ARTURO MCFIELDS YESCAS: During the 10th Summit of the Community of Latin American and Caribbean States, organized by Colombia, Xi Jinping had hoped to deliver a virtual address to 33 heads of state from the Americas. But the event managed to attract only three Latin American presidents.

Just a few days ago, China suffered yet another major political defeat. During the tenth Summit of the Community of Latin American and Caribbean States, organized by Colombia, Xi Jinping had hoped to deliver a virtual address to 33 heads of state from the Americas. But the event managed to attract only three Latin American presidents. This was a significant embarrassment, given that this organization is China’s version of the U.S.-created Organization of American States. "China Is Losing Ports, Power, and Presence in Latin America," Arturo McFields, The Hill, March 25, 2026.

TRANSODIUS: California is a bigger national security threat than Iran is.

For your Stockholm Syndrome / That makes us Dhimmi in our home / O, you know where you can shove your Palestine

O, you know where you can shove your Palestine.

You can stick it where the sun don't shine

For your Stockholm Syndrome 

That makes us Dhimmi in our home,

O, you know where you can shove your Palestine

Friday, March 27, 2026

EYAL YAKOBY: Outside of City Hall in Philadelphia, masked Islamists light dozens of American flags on fire.

MAG 1775: Church of England primary school in Lincolnshire. Seven-year-old kids kneeling toward Mecca. Then told to “have a go” on prayer rugs to Allah.Not Christian prayers. Islamic ones. In a Christian school.

REP. PRAMILA JAYAPAL: REPARATIONS FOR ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS?! 😳

REPARATIONS FOR ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS?! 😳

Rep. Pramila Jayapal calls for taxpayer-funded reparations for illegal immigrants, saying: “The people that have been inflicting this harm need to be prosecuted… And we are going to have to have some form of reparation.” 

Where in the World Is American, Calla Walsh? O, in Beirut where she's a contributor to Press TV, an Iranian State Outlet Sanctioned by the United States.

STEPHEN COUGHLIN: the objective of feminism is the destruction of families.

the "Open Marriage" narrative designed to liquify relationships. --Stephen Coughlin

As you watch the video clip below, one of many suddenly appearing in unison, consider this question, and do so in a dialectical frame. Is the clip a rejection of the Intersectional "Me Too" active measure, which was directed at (primarily young) women, or is it a purposefully planned continuation of it, directed at (primarily young) men? Recollect that, whether Plato (in The Republic), or de Sade (in Juliette), or Engels, or NOW in the 60s, or DSA today, the objective of feminism is the destruction of families. (While this point is terribly easy to prove, just watch the blowback.) Was the (real) objective of the "Me Too" movement to "empower" women or to antagonize men? Notice the trajectory of the supporting narratives, the Karen narratives that will become intersectional, and the "Open Marriage" narrative designed to liquify relationships. As one checks out the "Manly Mentor" clip, because it is such a foreseeable outcome to the prior narratives, is it a continuation or rejection of the "Me Too?" Then, as you ponder your answer, does it have the effect of making marriageable men reconsider the value proposition of a marital relationship? Is it a coincidence that this type of video to men comes out on social media at the same time we see a parallel explosion on social media of seemingly weak Christian men marrying porn stars? Could that make a reasonable young man ponder, "Do I really want this?" I picked this video clip, but could have chosen any number of them from just today. In dialectical attacks, those running them control both sides of the equation.

LEUVEN, BELGIUM: "Leftist Rats, Roll Up Your Mats."

Leuven, Belgium

WANJIRU NJOYA: He was given the keys to the Cathedral by the priests. They put him in charge of locking up and gave him verger duties. After he set it on fire, destroying the organ and organ loft, Fr Maire offered him a safe haven in his home to await trial.

JOHANNES M. KOENRAADT: Almost all North-West Europeans and their descendants can digest milk. I produced this mini-doc to explain why White people are the pastoralist supremacy.