Thursday, July 9, 2026

MARC LANDERS: 20-Year Study: The Cannabis paradox. Lower risks of stroke, cardiac arrest & death!

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: ,

JARED TAYLOR QUOTES EDMUND BURKE: Instead of casting off our old prejudices we cherish them. We cherish them because they are prejudices, and the longer they have lasted the more we cherish them. We are afraid to put men to live each on his own private stock of reason

1:32  Right thinking is at first hard, then easy, then delightful.  And right thinking is what's passed down to us by the traditions of our ancestors.  And so I'd like to quote a great Anglo-Irishman, and that is Edmund Burke.  He wrote about what we call prejudices and he didn't mean by this anything pejorative, but things that were just long-standing ways of thinking and behaving.  He said "Instead of casting off our old prejudices we cherish them.  We cherish them because they are prejudices, and the longer they have lasted the more we cherish them.  We are afraid to put men to live each on his own private stock of reason because the stock of reason in each man is small."  He said, "Prejudice renders a man's virtue his habit, not a series of reasoned decisions, and through durable prejudices his duty becomes part of his nature.  When we act according to traditional wisdom, we act instinctively; it's part of our nature.  And we don't dither with thinking about reasons.  And so my father was not at all wrong not to have any reasons to explain why we spoke the way we do.  It was his nature, and I was wrong even to ask that question.  In my own defense, I must say I grew up around a certain number of Yankees who didn't speak the way we did.  I didn't have the advantage of living in a coherent society in which traditions go on without being questioned.  Of course, reason has its place, but not really in the organization of human affairs.  Delaware Representative, John Dickinson, said, experience should be our only guide.  Reason may mislead us.  And reason, of course, has misled us of course, over and over and over. 

During the French Revolution, they proclaimed 

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , ,

MARC LANDERS: Cancer cells are loaded with cannabinoid receptors – and THC knows exactly how to exploit them! THC can slow or stop tumors by: Triggering cancer cells to self-destruct (apoptosis) Making cancer cells "eat themselves" in a controlled way (autophagy)

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: ,

You can set actual churches on fire and nobody cares but if you put a replica mosque on your pyre that's a crime.

Posted by at No comments:

FR. JOHN IACONO: Never underestimate the power of the Bible. Never underestimate the power of the Cross. Never underestimate the power of the Rosary.

Fr. John Iacono, also known as Father John Iacono. He's an elderly Australian priest from the Archdiocese of Sydney, with missionary work in the Philippines, known for his talks on faith, the Rosary, the Eucharist, and his personal story of confessing to Padre Pio. The video in the post (from Lumen Verum Apologetics events) matches his appearance and common themes in his clips, like "Never underestimate the power of the Rosary" and references to the ~44,000 Protestant denominations vs. the Catholic Church's 7 sacraments. 

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , ,

DR. JANE RUBY: MERCK TO PAY $50 MILLION FOR GARDISIL VACCINE HOAX

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: ,

MASTER METABOLISM: When switching from levothyroxine to prescription NDT: —Quality of life impairment from 92% to 34% —Tiredness from 89% to 36% —Impaired daily life from 69% to 24% —Cognitive problems from 67% to 24% —Emotional Susceptibility from 62% to 22% —>Depressivity from 61% to 22%…

Prescription NDT. 

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , ,

KRZYSZTOF SZCZAWINSKI: [Aristotle's] central question is not “what are your rights?” It is “what are you for?” Eudaimonia — flourishing, not happiness — is the answer: the full realization of what a human being can become.

from Krzysztof Szczawinski,

Aristotle wrote the operating system Western civilization ran on for two thousand years – and quietly abandoned in the twentieth century, around the same time all the catastrophes we have been describing began.

1. His central question is not “what are your rights?” It is “what are you for?” Eudaimonia — flourishing, not happiness — is the answer: the full realization of what a human being can become. The moment a civilization stops asking this question and starts asking only about rights, equality, and safety, it has already chosen administration over life.

2. Virtue is not a rule you follow. It is a habit you form – through practice, through the right environment, through a community that models and rewards excellence. This is why negative selection is so catastrophic in Aristotelian terms: it doesn’t just promote the wrong people. It corrupts the very mechanism by which virtue is transmitted across generations.

3. Man is a political animal – not in the sense that man should be governed, but that man is constituted by his community. You cannot flourish alone. But the corollary is equally precise: the polis exists for man’s flourishing, not the other way around. The moment the state becomes the end and the citizen becomes the means, you have not just bad government – you have the inversion of the natural order.

4. Aristotle catalogued the corruptions of every form of government: monarchy becomes tyranny, aristocracy becomes oligarchy, polity becomes mob rule. The pattern in every case is identical – the rulers stop ruling for the common good and start ruling for themselves. This is not a modern insight. It is the oldest political observation in the Western tradition. Every system contains the seed of its own corruption. The question is always: who is it for?

5. Phronesis — practical wisdom — the ability to judge particular situations correctly, without a rulebook. The bureaucratic state destroys phronesis systematically, replacing judgment with procedure, wisdom with compliance, the experienced man with the certified one. This is Aristotle’s explanation for why the credentialed class produces so many wrong decisions with such complete confidence.

6. He identified the middle class as the foundation of the stable republic – the ballast that prevents the ship from capsizing toward oligarchy above or mob rule below. Not as a sociological observation. As a structural necessity. Destroy the middle class and you have not just inequality – you have the preconditions for every tyranny he ever described.

7. The West replaced Aristotle with procedure, utility, and rights. It gained a framework for managing conflict but lost the vocabulary for saying what a good life is. The system can optimize for GDP, equality of outcome, measured safety – but it cannot tell you what you are for. Aristotle could. Every civilization that forgot that question discovered, eventually, that someone else was happy to answer it for them. 

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , ,

MASTER METABOLISM: The reversal of greying has been reported in some hypothyroid patients, and thyroid hormone accelerates hair regrowth in rodents.

Hypothyroidism doubles noradrenaline, the stress hormone that causes greying and hair loss. The reversal of greying has been reported in some hypothyroid patients, and thyroid hormone accelerates hair regrowth in rodents.
“A 63-year-old man, who and been progressively graying over the years... was admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) for 10 days, where he received support measures and intravenous therapy with 0.5 mg of L-thyroxine (precursor to thyroid hormone)... He was able to return home after a month. On discharge from the ICU, complete repigmentation of all gray hairs of his scalp was observed and these have retained their coloration during 2 years of follow-up. The patient did not receive any other medication while he was in hospital.” “These data suggest that follicles in the telogen phase can be induced to enter the anagen phase by the topical application of T3. In the in vitro experiments, T3 stimulated hair shaft growth.” 🐁
“Anecdotal case reports and a recent pilot study suggest that psychological stress and other behavioral factors accelerate the hair greying process (Nahm et al., 2013; Peters et al., 2017), a notion supported by studies in mice demonstrating that adrenergic stimulation by norepinephrine signaling leads to melanocyte stem cell depletion in mice (Zhang et al., 2020). However, contrary to mice where this process appears to be irreversible at the single hair follicle level, our data demonstrates that human hair greying is, at least under some circumstances, reversible.” “Upon fasting, adrenal glands produce hormones, cortisol and epinephrine, which then cause lipolysis to release free fatty acids. The release of these free fatty acids near the hair follicles causes apoptosis of HFSC and subsequently blocks hair growth.”

The research does suggest that you have to catch greying early if you are to reverse it...

References: The Role of Thyroid Hormone in Blood Pressure Homeostasis: Evidence from Short-Term Hypothyroidism in Humans.
Repigmentation of Gray Hair After Thyroid Hormone Treatment.
Quantitative mapping of human hair greying and reversal in relation to life stress. Hangry hairs: intermittent fasting linked to hair loss. 
Intermittent fasting triggers interorgan communication to suppress hair follicle regeneration.
Posted by at No comments:
Labels: ,

JOHN GUANDOLO: In 2017 Turkey took control of the US Muslim Brotherhood via the Diyanet. That means Erdogan of Turkey controls the US Islamic Movement which is waging war against America.

Posted by at No comments:

Wednesday, July 8, 2026

LINUXHIPPIE: Evil does not stop unless you stop it. Do nothing in the face of evil is to be complicit. Acceptance here by the citizens of CA make them accessories to murder. The people of CA should be treated no differently than a citizen from China or Cuba. They have the means to stop…

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , ,

Stakelbeck on Terror: The First Amendment Under Fire - July 9, 2013.  

1:00.  Act for America's Guy Rodgers.  

1:30.  The Organization of Islamic Cooperation, OIC,  this is the Islamic body at the UN.  It's basically looking to shut down free speech about Islam.  Tell us a bit more about who they are and what they're doing at the OIC.  

1:42.  The OIC is the 56 Muslim states and the Palestinian Authority, and they're the [2nd] largest International body [after the UN].  They have been working at this effort to in effect criminalize any speech that is deemed in their view offensive or insulting to Islam they've been working on this now for about 15 years as a UN. They've gotten resolutions passed in the past.  They talk about broadening the resolution, saying "we opposed defamation of religion, generally speaking."  That's not what it's about.

2:20.  UN resolution 1618.  

2:22.   They got it passed they got it passed in 2011 this is what was different about this one.  This was the first time that our government worked with them to get this past and all the prior efforts that they had at the UN going back to the 1990s our government did not work with the Muslims.  This time, former Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, went to the OIC and said, "Can you draft a resolution that will deal with the issue of islamophobia, the denigration of a religion, and still Protect free speech?  

2:57.  Is the Obama Administration . . . what you're telling us, Guy, is basically the American government, the Obama Administration is actually working willingly with this organization that is seeking to shut down . . . basically, this show would not happen if the OIC had its way.

3:15.  How does Benghazi, rewinding a bit to September 2012, Guy, how does Benghazi factor into all of this because when I look back initially the administration blamed the Benghazi Massacre on a film, a low budget film about Muhammad that nobody has seen, and that filmmaker is jailed now.  Obviously we can't get into the administration's heads, but do you think there may have been and ulterior motive there with their whole tack of blaming that film? 

3:45.  Well, it's very clear it was.  They ran ads in the Muslim world decrying the film.  So this has been the message from the Obama Administration from day one.  So what the OIC found was the first time a willing partner in pushing the agenda of their goal of criminalizing anything that denigrates Islam.  What's interesting is is that the State Department will say, "No, this resolution doesn't do this.  Resolution 1618 doesn't do this."  The Istanbul Process which is now they're having meetings now about every 6 months to implement this.  That doesn't do this.  Yeah, to globally implement it.  And yet when you read the leaders of the OIC say, there was a Saudi Gazette article back in February, and this leader said the next session of the Istanbul process on islamophobia will be held in the first half of this year and the session will squarely focus on the issue of criminalizing denigrations of religions.  They're not hiding what they're trying to do. 

4:50.  One religion: Islam. 

4:51.  That's correct.  Because here's the thing.  If they were serious about criminalizing the denigration of all religions, well, you'd have to do things differently in Saudi Arabia, in Yemen, and Iran, and so on, because they denigrate Christianity and Judaism all the time.  

5:08.  No churches.  No synagogues.  No Bibles allowed in Saudi Arabia.  

 

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , ,

FR. RIPPERGER: “You have to practice self-denial *every single day* somewhere in your spiritual life. If you don't, you’re going to become spiritually soft. But if you practice self-denial, then when tempted, you’re going to have the strength from that discipline to say ‘No!’”

Father Chad Ripperger is an American Catholic priest.  

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , ,

Historian Johan Norberg explains that one of the major factors in taking down the Roman Empire that’s rarely discussed, is the rise in entitlement spending.

Historian Johan Norberg explains that one of the major factors in taking down the Roman Empire that’s rarely discussed, is the rise in entitlement spending So many people started receiving welfare and it kept getting expanded, it quickly skyrocket inflation and destroyed their currency “What caused the fall of ancient Rome? There were many reasons; disease, famine, barbarian invaders but historian Johan Norberg covers one rarely talked about. You say entitlement spending played a big role” “The emperors wanted to become popular by handing out free stuff to people. Originally, this started small. You just handed the very poor means of subsistence, make sure that they would but that group was enlarged because it was popular — So the group that lived on the public's expense grew larger all the time And emperors complained about this constantly while they were expanding it. Everyone from Caesar and onwards said, "Oh, we've gotta reform this system because it means that we have fewer people working and more people consuming." But no one succeeded. Instead, it was expanded all the time became more and more costly. So the Romans could conquer the world, but they couldn't do entitlement reform” “It just reminds me of what I see in the West” “It's a very worrying sign in each of these civilizations. Once you have an ever-expanding system of entitlements that you can't afford, then you have to deal with it in different ways. Well, some of them just try to conquer other people’s and take their stuff. But once you run out of that, you have to resort to inflation. Rome started to debase the currency — The Emperor Diocletian, he blamed greedy businessmen for inflation, something that we hear today as well. So he imposed price controls on more than 1,000 goods and even imposed the death penalty on any merchant that increased the price above a certain level. But obviously it all failed because he kept debasing the currency. So inflation kept going, prices kept rising, It only happened in the shadow economy and undermined the Roman Empire completely” I looked into this and found roughly 20% of the entire population ended up on welfare, it got so out of control they devalued their currency by 98% This is exactly what’s happening in America

America is Rome and we’re falling the same way they did 

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , ,

RADIOGENOA: This is South Africa without white people.

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: ,

MASSIMO: Dining styles in different countries explained

from Steven Moore.

In America, they do something which we find strange.  This is how we eat in Europe, but in America they swap the fork into their dominant hand and then eat the food.  It's known as the "cut and switch," and there's actually a historical reason for it.  Because in Europe until the middle of the 19th century, the cutlery wasn't always either side of the plate.  It could be on the right hand side.  You'd have a knife a fork and a spoon, and you would simply use which Implement you needed in whichever hand you chose.  That's because we dined in a star known as Service a la Francaise, where all the the food will be on the table and you simply helped yourself to what you wanted.  When we changed at around 1860, 1870 we started dining in the Russian Style, Service la russe, whereby each course came out and was eaten separately.  So it made sense to then have that cutlery on either side and you worked your way in.  So you'd have your knife in your dominant hand and your fork in your other hand, and you would eat like so.  So when early Europeans went to America, they took that previous dining with them, which is why Americans think nothing of swapping their hand to the fork and eating like so.  The reason it became embedded in American society is because when people took wagon trains out to the West pioneering new States, they had to be very careful about how much weight they took.  So taking a fork was sensible.  Taking a spoon was sensible, but a dinner knife like this was pretty useless.  So they used the side of the fork in place of the knife to cut food and put it into their mouth.  So the start of switching hands became embedded in America.  

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , ,

LYCEUM NOW: The oldest revolutionary story: call destruction “rebirth” and it becomes justice. From the Bolsheviks to the Weathermen to a Columbia activist headed for Congress, the religion of destruction keeps finding converts.

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , ,

SASHA LATYPOVA: Polio now hides behind these names: acute flaccid paralysis (AFP), Transverse Myelitis, Viral or aseptic Meningitis, Guillain-Barre syndrome, Chinese Paralytic syndrome, CHRONIC FATIGUE SYNDROME, epidemic cholera, cholera morbus, spinal meningitis, spinal apoplexy, inhibitory palsy, intermittent fever, famine fever, worm fever, bilious remittent fever, ergotism, ME, post-polio syndrome, Synonyms for GBS

All Vaccines Can Cause Polio by Sasha Latypova

Excerpts from "The Poisoned Needle" By Eleanor McBean, 1957

Read on Substack


Below is an excerpt from Chapter 10 of Eleanor McBean’s book “The Poisoned Needle” (1957):

“Mrs. Helen B. Covington, of Kensington, Pa. filed a $150,000 suit in the United States District Court, against Wyeth Inc. Philadelphia drug manufacturer, charging that an anti-rabies vaccine had produced paralysis” (The Truth Teller p 26, Aug 1947).

Dr William F Koch (MD, PhD) stated that “THE INJECTION OF ANY SERUM, VACCINE, OR EVEN PENICILLIN, HAS SHOWN A VERY MARKED INCREASE IN THE INCIDENCE OF POLIO, AT LEAST 400%. STATISTICS ON THIS ARE SO CONCLUSIVE, NO ONE CAN DENY IT.”

The United States Public Health Bureau is extremely reticent about reporting diseases caused by vaccination but the report from 1922 to 1931 admitted that there had been 85 cases of post-vaccinal encephalitis, which DeKruif states “is the twin of infantile paralysis.”

In St. Louis, 1933, after a typhoid vaccination campaign there was an outbreak of encephalitis, a form of polio, in which over 100 died. It was reported that the disease developed about 10 days after vaccination and in each case vaccinia was indicated in the brain upon postmortem.

In 1926, two prominent English Professors of Pathology, Doctors Turnbull and McIntosh reported a number of cases of encephalitis lethargica (sleeping sickness—a form of polio) following vaccination. This led to the appointment of two — commissions of the British Ministry of Health, to investigate the situation. Their reports published in 1928 revealed that there had been 231 cases and 91 deaths from this cause (post vaccinal encephalitis) in England and Wales.

According to a report in the Hobart (Tasmania) “Mercury,” April 11, 1950, “Combined injections for diphtheria and whooping cough may cause severe cases of infantile paralysis.” It stated that a St. Pancras, London medical officer found 40 cases and that a British Health Ministry doctor reported 65 cases where paralysis occurred two weeks after vaccine injections, and in 49 of these, the paralysis was confined to the limb in which the injection had been given. Two of the cases followed the injection of penicillin. Dr. J. K. Marlin, from the Guy Hospital reported 80 cases where children developed infantile paralysis soon after having been vaccinated. “Mercury” stated that “the doctors realizing the danger of their findings to the government’s diphtheria immunization campaign, withheld publications until some of the cases could be followed up over a period of many months. Some of the children recovered after a year or more. Others are still paralyzed . .”

After the many months of observation of these disasters of vaccination the London County Council finally banned the use of the combined diphtheria and whooping cough injections in the clinics during the months when infantile paralysis was most prevalent.

Isn’t it appalling that the governments and the serum promoters see and know that vaccination causes paralysis yet they curtail it only during the months when polio is most prevalent. They still insist on having the revenue from the deadly practice the rest of the time regardless of the consequences. If they would care to observe the “polio season” they would see that it is only at the times when it is created by the doctors with their poisoned needles and the people with their excessive eating of sugar products and other devitalizing and semi-poisoned foods.

Dr. L. C. Appel writes: “The fact that vaccination is either the (a) adding of a disease to a body already weighted with disease, or else, (b) the giving of a disease to a perfectly healthy body, is the medical reason why some of us (medical doctors) oppose vaccination and urge its abolition. A perfectly healthy body is proof against natural disease; a diseased or unhealthy body is handicapped by being given another (inoculated) disease. A diseased or unhealthy body can never be rendered healthy by inoculation or vaccination.”

Dr. Harry R. Baybee said:
“My honest opinion is that vaccination is the cause of more disease and suffering than anything I could name.”
Dr. F. H. Haines voiced his views on vaccination as follows:
“It is impossible to say what remote after-effects may be caused by the introduction of alien substances into the blood stream. Many nervous and other disorders of unknown origin are too often met with. Products which alter metabolism, change the nature of fundamental secretions, cause profound change in the fluids of the body, allergy and anaphylaxis, are the negation of nature’s own methods, and must be viewed with grave misgivings and cautious suspicion.” (The Truth About Vaccination and Immunization, Lily Loat, 1951)
In an article in Archives of Disease in Childhood, March, 1950, Dr. J. K. Martin, of England, gives details of “17 cases of poliomyelitis which followed 28 days or less after inoculation.” Analysis of the cases showed that 8 of them had been inoculated with A.P.T. Two had other injections against diphtheria, 2 had penicillin injections, 5 had combined diphtheria and whooping cough inoculations and 1 had whooping cough inoculations alone.

Not long after these cases had been published it encouraged other doctors to bring their findings out in the open and several other medical journals in Australia and England published articles which reported numerous cases of paralysis following vaccination. Two investigators, Dr. McCloskey, in Australia and Dr. Geffen in London both observed that “the point that struck them was that the paralysis started in the limb in which the injection had been made.”

(Details of these findings are reported in the Lancet (London) for April 8, 1950 and The Medical Officer, for April 8, 1950.)

Two British statisticians were asked to investigate whether or not there appeared to have been any “Appreciable risk of poliomyelitis following within a month of inoculation during the 1948 outbreak of polio.” The investigators, Dr. A. Bradford Hill and Dr. I. Knowelden, of the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, reported,
The statistics collected in this inquiry reveal clearly an association between recent injections and paralysis . . . We must conclude that in the 1949 epidemic of poliomyelitis in this country, cases of paralysis were occurring which were associated with inoculation procedures carried out within the month preceding the record date of onset of the illness . . . , (Reported in the British Medical Journal, July 1, 1950)
Although the British government, under the pressure of Socialism has been forced to make many concessions in favor of the common people such as abolishing compulsory vaccination, making investigations that revealed the fallacy of many medical practices etc. Mr. Bevin, speaking in behalf of the medical fraternity in the House of Commons on November 24, 1947 still tried to protect the medical rackets when he stated,
As I am advised, there are no medical grounds for attributing to vaccination or diphtheria immunization any connection with polio, i.e., infantile paralysis.
The investigations of the Ministry of Health were not in agreement with this stand as is seen in its statement that “in the last few years, there is evidence that occasionally followed vaccination.”

A report in the Lancet (April 8, 1950) stated that Dr. McClosky of Melbourne had inquired into 340 cases of poliomyelitis which occurred in Victoria from January to August, 1949 and found that 31 of them had occurred in children who had received diphtheria or whooping cough (pertussis) vaccine, or both, within three months of the onset of the disease. Of the 31 cases, 30 of them suffered severe paralysis which was most pronounced in the limb in which the injection was given.

The Medical Officer (April 8, 1950) reported the findings of Dr. D. H. Geffen who stated that in the first four months of that year, in St. Pancras, London, 30 children under five developed infantile paralysis within four weeks of being immunized against diphtheria or whooping cough (or both) “the paralysis affecting, in particular, the limb of injection. In 7 other recently vaccinated cases, paralysis occurred but not in the limb that had received the injection.

Dr. Arthur Gale of the Health Ministry reported (in the Daily Express for April 10, 1950) that he had observed 65 cases mainly from the Midlands’ in which paralysis developed about two weeks after an injection; and in 49 of these, paralysis was confined to the limb in which the injection had been given.

The report of the Government investigation (British Medical Journal, July 1, 1950) conducted by Dr. A Bradford Hill and 3. Knowelden revealed that there were 410 cases of infantile paralysis among children under five years. Of these 249 had been inoculated at the same time. Of 41 cases it was not known if they had been vaccinated or not. Of 35 cases in which poliomyelitis developed within a month of inoculation, the limb that had received the vaccine was paralyzed. This was usually the left arm.

The British Medical Journal (July 29, 1950) reported 112 cases of paralysis admitted to the Park Hospital, London during 1947-1949 in which 14 were paralyzed in the limb “which had received one or more of a course of immunizing injections within the previous two months. The interval between the last injection and the onset of paralysis in the majority of cases was between 9 and 14 days. The paralysis followed (A.P.T.) combined pertussis (whooping cough) and diphtheria prophylactic in nine cases, pertussis vaccine alone in one case, and diphtheria prophylactic alone in four cases. The paralysis, whether of arm or leg, conformed in general to a uniform pattern. It was not associated in time or place with any particular clinic or technique.”

In all 14 cases, paralysis occurred in the injected limb; in 12 cases it was the arm and in 2 cases, the leg. This outbreak of polio followed an intensive immunization campaign during that time (1947-1949).

The serum makers probably had a surplus of vaccine to sell, as is the case in this country (United States) when the scare campaigns are engineered and the gullible people are stampeded into the vaccination centers to be “shot.”

In Los Angeles, 1946, after the largest smallpox vaccination campaign in the history of the city, an epidemic of polio broke out within two weeks after the “shots,” and by the end of the summer there were 26 deaths from this cause and 1,900 reported cases. The County Epidemiologist estimated that there were —about 15 times as many unreported cases which would bring the count up to 28,000 cases. The report for the entire United States for 1951 was only 28,395. An average vaccination campaign nets the doctors about $2,000,000 so this one must have been tremendous in profits. The amount of the “take” has never been revealed. This Polio epidemic triggered off a “bigger than ever” March of Dimes campaign and the people were ‘bled” again for money to support the medical racket that creates more disease in order to scare the people into more donations and so the vicious circle continues.
Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , , ,
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)