4:15. It was a blue Massacre is what it was and I know that there are many facets to what happened in the midterms because as we've mentioned before this was not the Democrat Party. It's not Democrats versus Republicans, it's communism Republicans. They are non JFK's party these people the dangerous thing of course in my opinion is about allowing these marxists and is that once they're in they're going to find every way to stay in whether it's cheat to see if she they will do anything to stay in power and to have what happened last night is puzzling to me so how do you see it how do you break down what we saw last night?
5:02. Well, I think a good way to start is to get rid of the color blue for the Democrats and move it to red and green. It's a good idea but I have not done a tight tally on this, but Mike Waller from the Center for Security policy has posted an interesting comment about this. He's saying that the red-green axis is becoming the majority coalition in Congress. Now what that means is that there is this very large Marxist factions and Muslim Brotherhood faction that are working together that are going to be the political engine of what we've been talking about for some years now with this red green axis which is essentially two sides of a totalitarian movement that is anti-constitutional and anti-American. Yeah, it's it's anti-American. This is where people become so befuddled and rightfully so or perplexed horrified all rightfully so because the question always becomes how can people want to overthrow our government and change her Constitution out of recognition and impose various totalitarian features of Marxism and Islam on us which is unconstitutional and the question is you know there have been the guardrails were pulled off of totalitarians entering into our system many many years ago and it goes back really I've been thinking about this more and more and it goes back to the days when Congress the Senate in particular bipartisan Senate and House looked at the subversion by communists of our government coming out of the World War II years and actually started doing something about it and one of the things they did was that they defined subversion in terms of the totalitarian system that wish to overthrow our country and they drew a big line against it and this was codified in a law called the McCarran internal Security Act of 1950, which I will tell you, this will be shocking to people, President Truman vetoed it; he vetoed that law, yes, he did and yet a bipartisan Senate overrode that veto so that we could actually address the subversion that was already changing our system in this very dangerous fashion. And just to make a very long story short, this act, and acts like it, were systematically dismantled by the courts, by the Supreme Court and we were essentially left without the protection that such laws afforded us. You know, when our Founders were beginning their country, we didn't have things like communism and Islam as threats, but this totalitarian threat that's become so pernicious and forceful in the 20th century was addressed by law, but it was taken away from us. So, we're at this point now where we have subversives being elected, and that kind of language, I know some people will turn off to it, "subversive," what does that mean? It sounds crazy, red paranoia, this kind of thing. However, we could define it this way in terms of people who seek a totalitarian destruction of our constitutional republic.
