Sunday, July 26, 2026

MJ MURPHY: The word "seem" protects the claim. The word "impossible" escalates urgency. Emotion leads. Fear anchors. Authority reinforces. Statistics legitimize. And then the story seals it.

00:00.  "We will do anything for his mental health."

00:04.  So here we have the moral high ground.  It implies if you disagree, you don't care about a child's mental health, and there's preemptive guilt installation.

00:16.  "Why would a parent go through so much to . . ."

00:19.  "Why would a parent go through so much."  This is a rhetorical question and it presupposes the action is justified before proving it.  You are guided to accept the premise.

00:29.  . . . To support our child's gender identity in their words 'because they prefer to have a living son than a dead daughter.'

00:39.  Ding, ding, ding.  Here it is.  The forced binary: compliance versus death.  It collapses all alternatives into one extreme outcome.  It is absolutely emotional blackmail, and it suggests suicide.

00:57.  "The parents of my patients will tell you . . ."

00:59.  "The parents of my patients will tell you . . . ."  So what is this doing?  It's appeal to authority.  I see this up close so trust me.  It's anecdotal disguised as evidence.  

01:12.  "That having a transgender child is not something they wished for . . . ."

1:15.  "Having a transgender child is not something they wished for."  What is that?  We know that's a suffering frame it signals authenticity hardship it makes it feel like it's earned and therefore true.

1:33.  "Because it is indeed a difficult road to . . . ."

1:35.  "It's a difficult Road . . . ."  So this is a vague intensifier.  There's no specifics just emotional weight.  So it's building sympathy without data.  

1:43.  "Walk for them and for their kids.  Do you know how many transgender youth attempt suicide?"

1:50.  Oh for f*** sake.  So this is a pattern interrupt question.  It creates anticipation and tension.  It prepares you emotionally for a shocking number.  

2:01.  "41%."

2:03.  So this is an anchor statistic.  It's high impact number being dropped without context.  It sticks emotionally before analysis kicks in.

2:15.  At least in part because they're frequently discriminated against . . ."

2:18.  So now we have causation being smuggled in softly.  Sounds reasonable but it avoids needing proof and it leaves room so it can't be directly challenged.

2:29.  "Because they're frequently discriminated against, bullied, isolated . . ."

2:32.  You guys know what this is.  This is stacking causes, emotional layering, and there's no quantification of contribution from each factor.

2:44.  "My patient Tyler told me . . ."

2:47.  Look at her face.  This is a narrative insertion.  Insert a personal story to humanize the claim so it makes the argument feel real and immediate.

2:58.  "He felt like a ghost at school."

3:01.  Maybe he should join some sports.  So she's using a vivid metaphor.  There is emotional imagery, so this will bypass critical thinking.

3:10.  "Having romantic relationships, going to college, finding a job . . ."

3:16.  So now she's future pacing.  She's expanding the problem into the entire life trajectory, raising the perceived stakes.

3:27.  "Many things that many people take for granted can seem very difficult or impossible for transgender youth."

3:33.  So now we have soft absolutism.  The word "seem" protects the claim.  The word "impossible" escalates urgency.  Emotion leads.  Fear anchors.  Authority reinforces.  Statistics legitimize.  And then the story seals it.  So again, if you missed the sequence because it can be hard to pick it out and see it as it's happening in real time, so again, I want you to notice: emotion leads.  Then the fear, right, of the suicide anchors.  Then the authority reinforces.  Then the statistics legitimize. And then the little story seals it all with a bow.  And it all leads you to one conclusion without ever actually proving it. 

Saturday, July 25, 2026

ANDY NGO: Some of the far-left anti-ICE, anti-government extremists in Portland, Ore. are going up to people in cars and harassing and threatening them. City allows them to do that.

Seems worth it.


 

NATIONAL CONSERVATIVE: Last September, Brian Karalus, the attorney for Shiloh Hendrix, had a White friend who was savagely maimed by a Black knifeman in Minneapolis. He almost died. The office of Mary Moriarty only charged the knifeman with 2nd deg assault and released him on a tiny $50k bond.

CATO INSTITUTE: The new Cato Institute survey asked 7 basic civic knowledge questions. A majority of Gen Z correctly answered only 1 of them.

"Gen Z Fails Basic Civics Quiz as America Nears Its 250th," Jonah Messinger and Emily Ekins, CATO Institute, July 2, 2026.

WHO HAS THE FINAL SAY?  More than two-thirds (68%) did not know who has final say if the president and the Supreme Court disagree about whether a president’s actions are constitutional; 32% knew that the Supreme Court has the final say.

WHY DID WE DECLARE INDEPDENCE?  More importantly, two-thirds (67%) of Gen Z do not know why the American colonies declared independence from Great Britain, while 33% correctly answered that it was to protest high taxes and a lack of representation in government. 

MAIN PURPOSE OF THE U.S. CONSTITUTION? Six in ten Americans (64%) under 30 likewise don’t know what the main purpose of the US Constitution is. Instead, 14% thought the main purpose of the Constitution was to declare independence from Great Britain (which is what the Declaration of Independence did), 17% thought the main purpose was to create a presidency, Congress, and Supreme Court, 8% thought it was to list all federal laws, and 4% thought it was to create two major political parties. Another 21% admitted they didn’t know. Only 36% knew that the main purpose of the Constitution is to establish and limit the powers of government.

WHAT DOES AMERICA'S 250TH COMMEMORATE? Nearly two-thirds (61%) of Americans under 30 are unaware of what America’s 250th is commemorating this year, while just 39% know we are celebrating the adoption of the Declaration of Independence. Of those who answered incorrectly, 11% thought America’s 250th was celebrating the first presidential election, 8% thought it was the ratification of the Constitution, 7% thought it was the victory of the Revolutionary War, 4% thought it was the pilgrims’ landing at Plymouth Rock, 1% said it was the founding of Jamestown, and 30% admitted they didn’t know what America’s 250th is about.

FROM WHICH COUNTRY DID WE DECLARE INDEPENDENCE?  A majority (52%) of Gen Z Americans also don’t know what country from which the American colonies declared their independence, while 48% correctly answered that it was Great Britain. 

NUMBER OF GOV'T BRANCHES?  Gen Z came close to knowing that the federal government has three separate branches, with 50% who answered correctly and 50% who did not.

FIRST U.S. PRESIDENT? While about two-thirds (66%) of Gen Z correctly identified George Washington as the first president, a substantial minority (34%) could not.

KRZYSZTOF SZCZAWINSKI: The gun is the physical enforcement of the idea that all men are created equal. Which is why the American founders put it in the second amendment – not as an afterthought, but as the guarantee of everything else.


The gun is the most misunderstood object in Western civilization. Not a weapon. A technology. The technology that made the idea of equality physically real. 1. The longbow democratized warfare – a peasant could kill a knight with a stick and a string, and Agincourt proved it. The gun completed the process. The armored warrior class whose claim to social dominance rested on physical superiority became obsolete. The aristocratic monopoly on violence ended not with a philosophy but with a mechanism. The gun is the physical enforcement of the idea that all men are created equal. Which is why the American founders put it in the second amendment – not as an afterthought, but as the guarantee of everything else. 2. The Roman citizen had the right to bear arms. The Greek citizen had it. The English yeoman had it. The Swiss canton built its entire civilization on it. The disarming of the population has always been, in every civilization, in every century, the first act of the government that intends to stop being answerable to that population. Show me a disarmed population and I will show you a population that lost something else shortly after. 3. The Second Amendment is not about hunting. It is not about sport. It is about the relationship between the armed citizen and the state – the explicit constitutional acknowledgment that the citizen’s right to defend himself, his family, and his civilization against any threat, including the government itself, is not granted by the state and cannot be revoked by it. Power flows upward from the armed citizen, not downward from the armed state. 4. The gun defends the family. The woman alone with her children. The farmer on the edge of civilization. The shopkeeper in the neighborhood the police no longer patrol. The gun is the equalizer – the technology that makes the physical difference between a large man and a small woman irrelevant. Every argument for disarmament is, at its core, an argument that the state will protect you better than you can protect yourself. The evidence for this proposition is not encouraging. 5. In Europe, the disarmament is now nearly complete – and it happened precisely as the state’s ability and willingness to protect its citizens began to decline. The timing is not coincidental. A population that cannot defend itself must trust the state to defend it – which is a population that cannot effectively question whether the state is doing so. The dependency is the design. 6. The gun is a civilizational technology in the deepest sense: it requires responsibility, judgment, and the willingness to accept the consequences of your decisions. You cannot outsource it. You cannot have a committee fire it. It is the most anti-bureaucratic object ever invented – a direct, personal, consequential instrument that puts the full weight of the decision on the individual holding it. Which is precisely why the administrative state finds it intolerable. Not because it is dangerous. Because it is sovereign.

7. The family that can defend itself does not depend on the state for its most fundamental security. The civilization that can defend itself has not yet outsourced its survival to an institution that will negotiate the terms of that survival on its own behalf. The gun determines who controls violence – and therefore who controls everything that violence can threaten. Which is everything. The Sobieski who rode down the hill had a sword and sixty thousand horsemen. The equivalent today is the armed citizen who understands what he is defending and why. Every civilization that forgot this discovered it the hard way. The ones that remembered it are still here. 

J. MICHAEL WALLER: 1985 Reagan State Department report, “The Soviet-Cuban Connection in Central America and the Caribbean.”

Contrast this report with the one that recently came out by Rubio's State Department, "Cuba: The Capital of 21st Century Communism."  

DANE WIGINTON: Fires: Incendiary Nanoparticle Fallout, otherwise known as incendiary dust.

Fire conditions are so horrifically bad, climate engineering, so core to all of it, cutting off precipitation, contaminating the precipitation that does fall, dumping an incendiary dust, aluminum, barium, strontium, manganese on forest foliage, forest floors, destroying the ozone layer, which allows intense UV radiation to destroy the foliage and hamper growth.

Geoengineering operations are completely disrupting historical rain and wind patterns, the nanoparticle fallout from climate engineering is a desiccant incendiary dust that coats forest foliage and everything else at ground level. The incendiary particles are further fueling firestorm intensity and volatility.

Yet another firestorm recently broke out near my off-grid Northern California wilderness home, the "Brook Fire". I filmed this short video from the front line of the fire as it was advancing up ridges about 3 miles southwest of my home and habitat preserve. Please forgive my helmet in this footage, I used a fast-moving off-road vehicle in order to reach the fire quickly, which was upwind and heading toward my land. Cal Fire and affiliated agencies immediately deployed substantial resources to fight the blaze, I am again indebted to Cal Fire's above and beyond response. In spite of the "Brook Fire" being in very difficult terrain with extreme overall fire conditions, Cal Fire was able to stop the advance of the flames.

Follow us for more @ Dane Wigington.

REP. HARRIET HAGEMAN: mid-1980s there was a judge, a federal district court judge in New Jersey, who entered a consent decree that Republicans could not be poll watchers.

I actually don't quite trust her statement here, because before the 80s and going back to the 1960s, you had a greater influence of Dixiecrats, Southern Democrats, in the Democratic Party before it went all woke and left on people.  All you have to do is listen to George Wallace's policies for his state of Alabama to know the integrity of Southern Democrats.  Not perfect, but certainly in word and in deed worked to serve his people genuinely.  Scroll down to the March 8, 2026 interview with Bill Buckley and give a listen.

SUMMARY

Here it is: One of the most corrupt scams in American history. Since the mid-’80s, a Democrat-appointed federal judge in New Jersey entered a consent decree that allowed Democrats to cheat, lie, and steal elections, including overthrowing the U.S. government in 2020. Rep. Harriet Hageman,
A Democrat-appointed federal judge entered a consent decree that banned Republicans from serving as poll watchers. So, from the mid-’80s until 2020, Republicans were not allowed to serve as poll watchers in national elections. The order had to be renewed by Democrats every 5 to 8 years. It remained in effect until the judge dropped dead and was ultimately overturned by an Obama-appointed judge, who ruled that continuing the decree was unconstitutional.

In other words, the Republican losers in the Republican Party just sat on their asses and took shit—as they always do. Think about that for a whole minute.

What do you think John Thune is doing right now?

TRANSCRIPT

With the dropboxes, there were the issues associated with what was going on in the polling places. Something else people don't know is that in the mid-1980s there was a judge, a federal district court judge in New Jersey, who entered a consent decree that Republicans could not be poll watchers. So from the mid 80s until 2020 Republicans were not allowed to be poll watchers on these national elections. And what happened was that judge eventually died, and the Democrats, the DNC, had to go get that injunction renewed every 5 to 8 years, something along those lines. And when that judge died, he was replaced by an Obama judge and they went back to that judge and they said we want this consent decree in place making it so Republicans cannot be poll watchers and cannot be a part of this process. And he said what in the heck are you talking about? This is absolutely so unconstitutional and he refused to renew that consent decree. He refused to renew that injunction. So 2020 was one of the first years that we had professional Republican poll watchers in these elections to see what was going on in Atlanta, in Detroit, in Milwaukee, in Philadelphia. It was the first time we were able to really see what was going on in these polling places. And what that tells me is that probably a lot of these shenanigans had been going on for a long long time but there were no Republicans there to report on it.

MJ MURPHY: If this policy is truly so fair, why did every women who objected become the real problem?

7:35  Women objected, so they were called bigots.

Women forfeited so forfeiting reportedly became prohibited.

People filmed.  So guess what?  Filming became controversial and prohibited. 

Women spoke, so speech became "vilification." 

Every form of resistance became the next thing that had to be eliminated.

Notice what never changed.  The policy. 

The burden was never placed on the men entering women's football.  The burden was always placed on the women, expected to accept it, play anyway, don't forfeit, don't protest, don't film, don't name, don't use male pronouns, don't describe biological reality.  And if you refuse, prepare for court.  Prepare for court.  That's why I'm making this video because I'm an American.  I can say their names, [Justin] 'Riley' Dennis and [Nicholas] 'Stephanie' Blanch.  I can show the footage.  I can discuss the public controversy involving public figures and public sporting events.  And I think people deserve to see the evidence for themselves.  You don't have to agree with me.  You don't.  Just watch the footage.  Read the judgments.  Look at the photographs, and then ask yourself one question, "If this policy is truly so fair, why did every women who objected become the real problem?"  Just tell me that. 

Friday, July 24, 2026

J. MICHAEL WALLER: When the US ousted the Communist Grenada regime in 1983, we recovered the entire government archive intact. Revelations: Military treaties with Moscow, Havana, Pyongyang & more. Evidence of Cuban agents, including congressional staff.

ROLAND GUNN: This is the mystical significance of Johnny & June as representations of the unity of Tennessee

This is the mystical significance of Johnny & June as representations of the unity of Tennessee. Johnny: coming out of Memphis, Swamp Cracker energy, rockabilly, earthy, dark, root chakra. June: coming out of Bristol, mountain girl energy, bluegrass, ethereal, light, crown chakra. They are united in Nashville: heart chakra, love, balance.

SAMA HOOLE: Feed someone nothing but steak and there is no disease at the end of the sentence. No syndrome. No name. Nothing to clear.

Feed someone nothing but polished white rice and they get beriberi. Meat, milk and barley clears it. Feed someone nothing but maize and they get pellagra. Meat, milk and eggs clears it. Feed someone nothing but oatmeal in a sunless city and they get rickets. Cod liver oil clears it. Feed someone nothing but unleavened wholemeal bread and they stop growing. Meat clears it. Feed someone nothing but cassava through a bad season and their legs stop working. Protein clears it. Feed someone nothing but plants today and they run out of B12. A needle clears it. Feed someone nothing but steak and there is no disease at the end of the sentence. No syndrome. No name. Nothing to clear.

They just quietly thrive. 

Senator Tim Sheehy, R-Montana. 

Transcript.  

“From the 1983 barracks bombing, where 280 Marines were vaporized in the morning. From USS Cole to the Achille Lauro to every terrorist attack from the Houthis, Hezbollah, Hamas. These are not humanitarian freedom organizations. They are death-dealing cults, and they want all of us to die brutal deaths.

William Buckley was abducted in 1985, an American military officer. He was skinned alive on camera by the Iranians.

“American prisoners of war who were captured, they were never called prisoners of war because they were captured by lunatic terrorists, so they were not subject to the Geneva Convention. They were captured and murdered. Power drills through their brains. This is in Iraq. These are families that have dealt with this, and they’ve never gotten a single dime. These families have never gotten restitution, and not a single president has ever stood up to them.

KRZYSZTOF SZCZAWINSKI: They never say: we are dismantling Western Civilization institution by institution. They say: we are making it more inclusive. More equitable. More modern. More safe.

Western Institutions – What Is Actually Being Destroyed They don’t announce it.

They never say: we are dismantling Western Civilization institution by institution.

They say: we are making it more inclusive. More equitable. More modern. More safe. Here is what they are actually demolishing: THE FOUNDATIONS

The nuclear family. 
The nation state. 
National borders.
National culture – language, history, memory, identity.
The homeland – the specific, particular place you are from, replaced by interchangeable global citizenship.
Ancestry and lineage – the memory of who you come from.
The calendar – Christian holidays, the rhythms of civilizational time being secularized into commercial events.
The concept of Western civilization itself – as something worth defending.

THE POLITICAL INSTITUTIONS 

The elected leader – replaced by the manageable administrator. Democratic accountability – replaced by technocratic governance. The constitution – reinterpreted until unrecognizable. The separation of powers – collapsed into the administrative state. The rule of law – replaced by decrees and regulations. Free speech – the equilibrium mechanism for ideas. The presumption of innocence – replaced by social media verdict.

THE ECONOMIC INSTITUTIONS

The free market – captured by regulation and cronyism.
Sound money – inflated into a political instrument .
Private property – taxed, regulated, and ESG’d into conditionality.
The entrepreneur – punished for succeeding.
The price mechanism – distorted beyond recognition.
The small business – the economic unit of the community, destroyed by regulation designed for corporations.

THE CULTURAL INSTITUTIONS 

The school – curriculum replaced by indoctrination. The university – captured by ideology and credential inflation. The museum – collections reframed, statues removed. The canon – Shakespeare, Homer, the great books, all under attack. High culture – opera, classical music, defunded and democratized into irrelevance.

THE SOCIAL INSTITUTIONS 

The meritocracy – replaced by equity of outcome. The Church – as civilizational memory and moral framework, emptied from within. The sports field – the last meritocracy, being captured. The military – optimized for diversity rather than lethality. The police – delegitimized and defunded. The coffeehouse / public square – replaced by the algorithm. The hospital – captured by the administrative state. The profession – doctor, lawyer, engineer, replaced by the credentialed bureaucrat. The gentleman.

THE TRANSMISSION MECHANISMS

The father – removed from the family.
The teacher – the master replaced by the facilitator.
The mentor – replaced by the HR department.
The apprenticeship – replaced by the degree.
The craft – replaced by the certificate. 
The local community – replaced by online identity groups.
The wife – as partner, mother, and civilizational transmission mechanism, replaced by the independent consumer unit.
The grandmother.

THE DEEPEST LOSSES

Beauty as a serious matter – replaced by inclusion as the aesthetic criterion.
Excellence as a goal – replaced by equity as the organizing principle.
Truth as the standard – replaced by narrative.
Shame as a healthy social regulator – replaced by therapeutic non-judgment.
Honor – replaced by compliance Courage – replaced by safety. 
The hero – replaced by the victim.
The leader – replaced by the administrator.

The pattern is always the same. The institution is first reframed as oppressive. Then captured from within. Then hollowed out while the form remains. Then replaced by its administrative substitute which performs the same function for the system rather than for the civilization. They don’t need to burn everything at once. They just need to keep working, institution by institution, until the civilization that produced these things no longer recognizes itself in what remains. The Herostratus instinct with a five-year plan and a diversity statement. We will go through them one by one.

J. MICHAEL WALLER: Immigration As a Weapon of Unconventional War

"Immigration As a Weapon of Unconventional War," J. Michael Waller, Jewish Policy Center, Spring 2026.

Waller explains that "Dear Shoshaha Bryen, who just passed away, asked me to write it.  Said she was horrified when she read it." 
Shoshaha Bryen, 1953-2026.

What has escaped the public eye is the subversive dimension of weaponized migration: The purposeful mass movement of people to penetrate, disrupt, divide, burden, and destroy the target destination of settlement.

Small regimes weaponize migration to cleanse their own domains of dissidents, criminals, parasites, and the ill, aged, or otherwise non-productive. The weaponization part is not the purgative effects, but the focused projection of economic and social burdens upon a target.

Governments and tribes of some of the most primitive countries weaponize emigration to prosperous lands with the intent to milk the host country’s generosity through demands, extortion, and criminal enterprises to send cash back home.

More efficient weaponization exploits or even orchestrates migration to infiltrate intelligence operatives, political agitators, street gangs, terrorists, and saboteurs into the target’s body politic for the purpose of destroying it from within.

This type of migration, as Nathan D. Steger wrote in a 2016 Naval Postgraduate School study ["The Weaponization of Migration: Examining Migration as a 21st Century Tool of Political Warfare"], “can range from overt and hostile in support of military operations to more clandestine or passive undertakings, such as espionage” or influencing political and social demographics. “Due to lengthy timeframes required to plan and execute fifth-column operations, people often dismiss evidence as imaginings of the conspiracy-minded who are quick to voice suspicions on politically sensitive and polarizing topics such as racism or immigration.”

VANGUARD COLONIALISM

Fifth-column immigrants settle abroad to subvert the societies that welcome them, in support of a larger military or terrorist strategy. Their dual purposes are to feed off their hosts in their new countries while acting as ideological, political, and cultural vanguards for a foreign actor. Those vanguard forces impose discipline to dominate the immigrant community. They operate within the system to establish colonies and build the material, political, and legal support structures for their foreign subversive strategy.

The Communists in Bolshevik and Stalinist times called their migrating operatives the “vanguard of the proletariat.” They would dispatch a “detachment of the vanguard” abroad to organize workers’ movements nationally, as part of an international “struggle."  

from the Frankfurt School, 

From that meeting, a group of mostly German or German-speaking party leaders and academics reverted to Marx’s pre-Communist Manifesto ravings about waging class warfare not against the wealthy, but against Western culture. Civilization, not the bourgeoisie, was the oppressor. This concept refined itself over the decades after the Comintern and Soviet intelligence services set up what became the Frankfurt School of cultural warfare—the critical theory that is sometimes called Cultural Marxism.

Critical theory became a fashionable and sophisticated way for intellectuals and other privileged elites, disillusioned with Stalin, to remain true to Marx and Bolshevism. Culture replaced economics as the dialectical battlespace. The rich were no longer the oppressor—the oppressor was Judeo-Christian values and traditions.

It just gets uglier and uglier.

Part of that cultural destruction is intended to right the terrible wrongs of Dead White Men who built the Greco-Roman and Judeo-Christian foundations of what became Western Civilization. That meant importing large numbers of civilizational rejectionists into Europe, Canada, and the United States.

After migrating to Columbia University in New York, the Frankfurt School refined the idea to devise an intellectual discipline: Critical legal theory to weaponize the law, critical race theory to weaponize issues of race and ethnicity, and all the other critical theories to destroy civilization and all its oppressiveness.

Self-hating Europeans and North Americans, in the thrall of their unrelenting self-criticism, would support and ultimately demand unrestricted migration—not of the best people from around the world who would make the host countries greater, but of the worst parasites from the worst countries to feed off the hosts and bring them down.

Who can forget this?  And still no one in my circles knew to question who the people were invading our country. 

Cuba’s Fidel Castro pioneered illegal mass migration into the United States with his Mariel Boatlift of 1980. Not only did he allow hundreds of thousands of opponents of his regime to seek freedom in America, but he emptied his prisons and insane asylums to inflict his social problems as a weapon against the United States.

1980, Sanctuary movement begins.

The Mariel Boatlift took place amid Cuba’s more systematic and disciplined support, including strong Soviet backing for Marxist-Leninist revolutions in the Americas. The Sandinista revolution of 1979 soon led to the unification of the Farabundo Martí National Liberation Front (FMLN) insurgency in El Salvador under Castro’s supervision. The FMLN waged a vicious guerrilla war across what President Ronald Reagan considered the red line against Communist expansion in the hemisphere.

Reagan’s support for El Salvador’s fight to crush the FMLN caused the guerrillas to evacuate their family members to a safe haven – deep inside the United States. Front organizations and allied churches smuggled FMLN civilian loyalists by the thousands into the US in direct support of the insurgency. They moved human FMLN assets through Mexico to “sanctuaries” from California to Massachusetts, first under the protective auspices of churches, and then under the legal protection of cities and later states to provide “sanctuary” from federal immigration officials.

This sanctuary movement began in the mid-1980s and endures to the present day. It became far broader among people indoctrinated into the worldview of critical theory that claimed their own country and culture were oppressors to be resisted.

Critical Race Theory is the mass psychosis op implemented on the American people to hate their own country.

It became far broader among people indoctrinated into the worldview of critical theory that claimed their own country and culture were oppressors to be resisted.

This mass psychosis helps explain the widespread support for unchecked mass migration among American-born citizens.

Through exploiting that psychosis and fueling it, other foreign actors, as Castro did nearly a half-century ago, dispatch their own fifth-column immigrants into America. Meanwhile, mayors and governors refuse to cooperate with federal authorities to remove the illegal aliens, be they rapists, child molesters, or agitators for Hamas.

With uncommon awareness, former Trump National Security Council staffer Joshua Steinman posts regularly on X with questions about “foreign sabotage teams,” including Iranian, inside the United States.  

One awaits news of the deportation of any of the estimated 60,000 disciplined, physically fit, military-age men from the People’s Republic of China who crossed in from Mexico during the Biden years. Sixty thousand men. That is the equivalent of six US Army divisions.

Who's to blame for the mass migration? 

Such a study will also show that it was Christian churches and culturally Jewish philanthropies, often more than the Brotherhood, that pressured for and sponsored the mass migration of the world’s Islamic pawns from places including Somalia to colonize parts of this country. They demanded and received billions in charitable, state, and federal tax dollars to fund NGOs and contractors for the influx.

FOR A LITTLE CONTEXT