and yet, until the old system is thrown off completely, it's just another case of "Meet the New Boss, Same as the Old Boss!" https://t.co/4mnBjpHqaV
— Tom Luongo (@TFL1728) June 22, 2026
Monday, June 22, 2026
TOM LUONGO: and yet, until the old system is thrown off completely, it's just another case of "Meet the New Boss, Same as the Old Boss!"
THE FACTS DUDE: Jacob Rockwell was fined for running a red light in Pensacola, Florida. Only thing is Jacob wasn’t in Florida, he was in Alabama.
The fact that you can’t appeal the ticket with the city/their courts is mind-boggling. He’s right; we’ve outsourced our government to a foreign billionaire. --Donnagirl
— Lisalovesshells (@lisalovesshells) June 22, 2026
MJ MURPHY: Find out why when he says he was raped…..I say….”I don’t care”
My response to the man in my comments may shock you.
— MJ Murphy (@hothingsgirlsay) June 22, 2026
Find out why when he says he was raped…..I say….”I don’t care” pic.twitter.com/i1ggvdbIkS
Sunday, June 21, 2026
ELIZABETH AUSTIN: obscenity is NOT protected by the First Amendment.
#OverturnMiller and make porn illegal again. Contrary to popular myth, obscenity is NOT protected by the First Amendment. https://t.co/SAyxdFDRlq
— Elizabeth Austin (@lazarusatgate) June 21, 2026
From US Law Explained,
Key Takeaways At-a-Glance:
The Miller Test Defined: Miller v. California established a three-prong test to determine if content is legally obscene and therefore unprotected by the first_amendment.
Community, Not Country: Miller v. California famously declared that two parts of its test must be judged by “contemporary community standards,” meaning what is considered obscene in rural Texas might be different from what is acceptable in New York City.
The SLAPS Safety Valve: Miller v. California created a critical protection for legitimate works by stating that material cannot be obscene if it has Serious, Literary, Artistic, Political, or Scientific value (the “SLAPS” test)
LIFE THRU BOOK: Dante's point was that fraud attacks something even deeper than the body: our ability to know what is true. Violence destroys lives but deception destroys the trust that makes civilization possible.
Yes - now recognize the role of philosophers and academic theorists (8th Circle falsifiers all) and the role of Education Pedagogues in directly attacking students’ ability to know what is true and the complicity of expedient adults across the professions to fail to call out lies… https://t.co/atQc3no6kv
— CJ the palmer worm; wife,mother, researcher. (@thepalmerworm) June 21, 2026
LINUXHIPPIE: There's no voting our way out of this, there just isn't.
And we wonder how we got here.....
— Linuxhippie (@linuxhippie) June 22, 2026
There's no voting our way out of this, there just isn't. https://t.co/CaRAU8aKqC pic.twitter.com/vRXTsT4Veb
From Reduxx.info on New Zealand sexologist, John Money,
Dr. John Money, a sexologist and psychologist from New Zealand who practiced at Johns Hopkins, is considered the first to coin the terms “gender identity” and “gender role,” describing the “internal experience of sexuality” and the “social expectations of male and female behavior” respectively. These concepts are prominently featured in trans activism today, and are used to bolster claims of “gender fluidity.”
Millstones fix this.
The only thing that stops evil wicked men from injuring others are good men.
— Linuxhippie (@linuxhippie) June 22, 2026
We are well past time this stuff needs to end.
It doesn't matter how it gets done at this point, it just needs to get done. https://t.co/VuJmM2evtU
Why can't Los Angeles put out fires?
Why can't Los Angeles put out fires? City officials offer a ton of explanations but no answers.
In California, we don't have the isolated fires or an extra inch of rain after a couple of days of a storm. No. In California, we have state of emergencies. So the local cities Los Angeles, Sacramento, San Francisco, Fresno, San Diego, they're all plugged into the state of emergency to get funds. Uh-oh, a little rain. State of emergency!Why can't LA officials put out a *simple* building fire?
— Annie Jacobsen (@AnnieJacobsen) June 21, 2026
LA remains disastrously unprepared for... everything.
Day 5: Boyle Heights cold storage facility is STILL on fire. Noxious fumes across the city. Air like a chem bath.
Mayor Bass: "we are concerned about the biohazard… pic.twitter.com/tFQBkzFriQ
Karen was sipping cocktails in Chicago when the Boyle Heights Fire erupted, just as she was sipping cocktails in Ghana when our Palisades Fire erupted. I warned you all...what happened to us will happen to all of LA. That smoke choking out LA is full of lead. Don't breathe it! https://t.co/U0DSMqRhL0 pic.twitter.com/HnBLFvl2uj
— Spencer Pratt (@spencerpratt) June 21, 2026
White woman in Texas who stood up for herself after a pair of Muslim women antagonized her in a grocery store so they could record her reaction has been doxxed and fired and is now receiving hundreds of death threats.
The White woman in Texas who stood up for herself after a pair of Muslim women antagonized her in a grocery store so they could record her reaction has been doxxed and fired and is now receiving hundreds of death threats.
— Right Angle News Network (@Rightanglenews) June 21, 2026
It would be a shame if we raised her some money. pic.twitter.com/c260rTfDoZ
Saturday, June 20, 2026
SAMA HOOLE: Ghee. Milk fat. Curd. As much as nineteen times more fat than their southern colleagues, and nearly all of it the saturated animal fat that Ancel Keys was at that very moment teaching the West to dread.
In 1967 India ran one of the most inconvenient heart studies of the century, almost by accident, and the field has been quietly looking away from it ever since.
— Sama Hoole (@SamaHoole) June 20, 2026
Dr S.L. Malhotra had a researcher's dream sitting in front of him: the Indian railway workforce, well over a million… pic.twitter.com/Vcu5TZeUPE
In 1967 India ran one of the most inconvenient heart studies of the century, almost by accident, and the field has been quietly looking away from it ever since.
Dr S.L. Malhotra had a researcher's dream sitting in front of him: the Indian railway workforce, well over a million people. Same employer. Same medical cover. Comparable pay and hours. Scattered the length of a subcontinent. Strip all of that out and one great variable remained. Diet, which in India meant geography. In the north, in Punjab and Rajasthan and UP, the railwaymen ate the way their grandparents had. Ghee. Milk fat. Curd. As much as nineteen times more fat than their southern colleagues, and nearly all of it the saturated animal fat that Ancel Keys was at that very moment teaching the West to dread. In the south, the plate was rice, sambar, and seed oils, groundnut and sesame, with far less fat overall. By the brand-new rules being drafted in America, the southerners were the ones doing everything right. Then Malhotra counted the bodies. Heart disease deaths in the south: 135 per hundred thousand. In the ghee-soaked north: 20. Seven times the disease in the men eating the wholesome seed oils. Among the railway sweepers, the leanest and hardest-working of the lot, the gap yawned open to fifteenfold. He chased down every other explanation within reach. Smoking ran the wrong way, the north smoked more. Activity gave no clean signal. Wealth made things worse if anything, executives dropping dead while the sweepers carried on. The one thing that tracked the dying was the fat in the pan. It was published. Peer-reviewed. British Heart Journal, 1967. It landed in the exact decade the West was pouring concrete around the opposite belief. Heart associations were prescribing vegetable oils. Factories were tooling up to turn them out by the tanker. A study showing the seed-oil eaters dying seven times faster was not a study anyone with a budget wished to repeat. So nobody did. Almost sixty years on, the finding still stands, unrefuted and unloved. It has never once troubled a dietary guideline.Friday, June 19, 2026
SASHA LATYPOVA: All vaccines cause cancer. HPV is one of the worst poison shots out there.
All vaccines cause cancer. HPV is one of the worst poison shots out there. https://t.co/XJhtlDdSrw
— sashalatypova.substack.com "Due Diligence and Art" (@sasha_latypova) June 19, 2026
Thursday, June 18, 2026
MASSIMO: Surgeon Chen Jingyu Lung Transplantation Team rejected a pair of lungs from a 52-year-old brain-dead donor due to severe, tar-like blackening, mild emphysema, bullae, and tuberculosis calcification.
Surgeon Chen Jingyu Lung Transplantation Team rejected a pair of lungs from a 52-year-old brain-dead donor due to severe, tar-like blackening, mild emphysema, bullae, and tuberculosis calcification.
— Massimo (@Rainmaker1973) June 18, 2026
The organs, damaged by 30 years of chain-smoking, were deemed unfit for…
https://t.co/QV1zZFxXYN
— Soviet Nazis Behind Everything (@wakoppa) June 18, 2026
Propaganda Dealing with Russia is like implementing communism, nobody has done it right yet. I think you just can’t Russia, Iran, or China.
MJ MURPHY: The goal isn't to win. The goal is to wake up because questions interrupt trances. Questions force reality back into the conversation.
The Most Powerful Force You’ve Never Heard Of pic.twitter.com/AEeZRPDyLD
— MJ Murphy (@hothingsgirlsay) June 18, 2026
THE CONSENSUS TRANCE
00:00. The most powerful force you've never heard of. Have you ever looked around and wondered how did so many people end up saying the same thing not just agreeing, using the same words, repeating the same phrases, arriving at the same conclusions sometimes seemingly overnight. Many people assume this happens because the evidence became overwhelming. But what if that's not always what's happening? What if people are not primarily responding to evidence? What if they're responding to something much older and much more primitive? The need to belong.
Today I want to talk about a phenomenon I call, The Consensus Trance. And once you understand that you'll start seeing it everywhere. You're going to start seeing it everywhere. So the ancient survival mechanism for most of human history, being rejected by your tribe wasn't uncomfortable, it was dangerous. Being expelled from the group could mean starvation, exposure, death. Our ancestors didn't survive by being right. They survived by remaining part of the group. And because of that, human beings evolved an incredibly sensitive social radar. We are constantly scanning [the room, asking], "What do people think? What is acceptable? What can I say? What should I not say?" This isn't weakness. It's Human Nature. It's just human nature. There is a hidden question. Most people think, they ask, "Is this true?" But very often a different question appears first, a question that stays hidden. The question is, "Am I allowed to believe otherwise?" Think about that. Not "Is it true?" Not "What is the evidence?" But "What happens to me if I disagree?" That question changes everything. It changes everything. Because the trance begins. The Consensus Trance begins when social approval becomes more important than accuracy when fitting in becomes more important than figuring things out. And here's the scary part. The consensus doesn't have to be real. It only has to appear real. If enough people think everyone agrees, they start acting as if everyone agrees, which makes the illusion stronger which convinces more people that everyone agrees. And the cycle feeds itself. Everyone's commenting that The Emperor's New Clothes. This is why the story of The Emperor's New Clothes has survived for centuries. Everyone can see the emperor is naked. He's naked but nobody wants to be the first person to say it because each person believes everyone else must be seeing something they aren't. So they stay silent until one person breaks the spell. Then suddenly everyone sees what was there the entire time. The emperor didn't change.
4:05. Reality didn't change only the perception of consensus changed here's a historical example history is full of examples in authoritarian countries, we disagree people often privately disagree with the regime while publicly supporting it. Then one day the regime collapses and everyone asks where did all these dissenters come from? The answer is: they were there the whole time. They simply believed that they were alone. The consensus was weaker than it appeared, but nobody knew because no one wanted to risk being first. So modern social media. Let's think about that, okay? Social media creates a very powerful illusion. You don't see what most people think. You see what gets amplified. You see what gets rewarded. You see what people are willing to say publicly. These are not the same thing. A thousand people silently disagreeing can be completely invisible. 10 loud people can look like a movement. And once people perceive, perceive a consensus, the trance starts, that hypnotic trance.
And so why [do] smart people fall for it? One of the biggest mistakes people make is assuming only unintelligent people fall into this trap. And actually intelligent people maybe even more vulnerable because intelligent people are often highly socially aware. They understand consequences. They understand incentives. They understand reputational risk, which means they can become experts at rationalizing why silence is a smart choice. But there's a cost, and the cost is enormous. Bad ideas can survive longer, and good ideas are never spoken. Questions go unasked. Evidence goes unexamined and entire societies could end up operating on assumptions that very few people genuinely believe.
HOW TO BREAK THE TRANCE
So how do we break it? How do we break it? You ask questions. You ask simple questions. What do you mean by that? How do you know? What evidence would change your mind? What happens if the opposite is true? The goal isn't to win. The goal is to wake up because questions interrupt trances. Questions force reality back into the conversation. So the consensus trance maybe one of the most powerful forces in human psychology. It shapes politics. It shapes culture. It shapes organizations, families, friend groups, and sometimes even entire civilizations. So the next time you find yourself agreeing with everyone around you, pause, pause and ask yourself, Do I believe this because it's true, or do I believe this because everyone around me seems to? Because those are very different things, and learning to tell the difference might be one of the most important skills you'll ever develop. And if, if these kind of psychological patterns fascinate you the way they fascinate me, that's exactly why I made Breaking the Spell and the new homeschool Edition, How Language and Social Pressure Framing Shape What People Believe often without them realizing it.
Breaking The Spell: Language, Social Pressure, and Psychological Framing in Modern Discourse: A Field Guide for Clear Thinking Under Social Pressure, MJ Murphy, 2025.
Wednesday, June 17, 2026
BISHOP RICHARD WILLIAMSON: 2,000 of the 6,000 versus [in the Quran] are hate verses. It's a religion of hate and certainly not of love. It's a barbaric religion.
The Quran has 6,000 verses.
— Islam Invasion 🚨 (@IslamInvasion) June 17, 2026
2,000 of them are hate verses, calling out that hostility isn’t Islamophobia, it’s simply the truth.
They're not enrichment, they're a threat! pic.twitter.com/MOGsubZQR9
Bishop Richard Williamson, 1940-2025, a traditionalist Catholic bishop, formerly associated with the Society of St. Pius X.
There's something satanic about Islam. It's a fabrication Muhammad himself is a fabrication. The Quran is a fabrication. The Quran has about 6,000 verses. I was reading recently a French book, 2,000 of the 6,000 versus are hate verses. It's a religion of hate and certainly not of love. It's a barbaric religion. It's not even really a religion. It's a caricature of a religion. But it's by golly it has a grip. It's a punishment from God. Go back in history, it arose in the 600s when the Christians of the Middle East and the Christians of North Africa were undoubtedly decadent and even the Christians in Spain at that time. And therefore God allowed that Muhammadism to, Islam to arise as a punishment and it's been a punishment ever since of unfaithful Catholics. Whenever Catholics are faithful, then they conquer the Mohammedans without too much trouble.
For those struggling with "why"? Viewed in light of the post below....it necessarily follows.
— Linuxhippie (@linuxhippie) June 17, 2026
It really is (and always was) that simple. https://t.co/nQR33c8MTI pic.twitter.com/Mtwt1Gu6uo
KANEKOATHEGREAT: Today the European Parliament voted 418-218 to pass the strictest migration law in EU history. When the result was announced, MEPs started chanting. "Send them back."
Today the European Parliament voted 418-218 to pass the strictest migration law in EU history.
— KanekoaTheGreat (@KanekoaTheGreat) June 17, 2026
When the result was announced, MEPs started chanting.
"Send them back."
Inside the parliament chamber. On the floor. In 2026.
Here's what the law actually does:
— Deportation… pic.twitter.com/czGpqdY0pK
Tuesday, June 16, 2026
The warbler's chirping. It probably harbors the greatest healing effect in history. Please enjoy the peak vibrational frequency 😌
ミソサザイのさえずり
— 尊い動物 (@7wVy1) June 16, 2026
おそらく史上最高の癒し効果を秘めています。
最高峰の振動周波数をお楽しみください😌 pic.twitter.com/Zqjc3F8aP9
JOHN A. KONRAD: Inside, they had a young American kid right out of high school. I had to load my own battery, but this kid was a whiz. He flew through the inventory, explaining the lead-acid surface area in each option and why it mattered.
Stopped at a small auto parts store yesterday. For the last few years they had migrant workers behind the counter. Nice guys. Competent at pulling parts from the warehouse and would go out of their way to help you loading heavy stuff like batteries into your car. But ask a question and you got a blank look. ICE cleared them out. The store hired stoners. The place became a dump, and I started driving an hour to AutoZone whenever I needed something. Yesterday I just needed a battery. As I pulled up I noticed the parking lot was unusually full. Inside, they had a young American kid right out of high school. I had to load my own battery, but this kid was a whiz. He flew through the inventory, explaining the lead-acid surface area in each option and why it mattered. I stuck around while he helped another customer diagnose a carburetor problem. I learned more in five minutes than I would have spending two hour on youtube. Then he started figuring out which replacement air filter the customer needed using basic geometry. I don’t know how much additional revenue this kid brought into the store, but it has to be substantial. And he wasn’t alone. They had an older Black gentleman working with him who, I’m told, had run a warehouse for a large repair shop or something in New York City before he got laid off. Slow but methodical and oozed competence. The store recruited him out of retirement, brought him up to our rural area part-time to organize inventory, fix the shelves, and scout local talent. I felt like I was watching a dynamic duo at work. Then nostalgia hit me hard. THIS is what it was like going to an auto parts store with my dad in the late 80s and early 90s. Everything well organized. People who knew cars cold. To be honest, the guys back then weren’t exactly nice, at least not in New York. They roasted you. But they helped. And it wasn’t just auto parts stores back then. Plumbing stores. Boating stores. Stereo shops. I remember going into Manhattan as a kid to a block of nautical shops, stores that sold charts and sextants, where a retired ship captain like I am now explained to me how a chronometer works. I want that job! The nation is healing!Stopped at a small auto parts store yesterday.
— John Ʌ Konrad V (@johnkonrad) May 6, 2026
For the last few years they had migrant workers behind the counter. Nice guys. Competent at pulling parts from the warehouse and would go out of their way to help you loading heavy stuff like batteries into your car.
But ask a…
(but we still have a long way to go)
Monday, June 15, 2026
The 5 Most Dangerous Accusations in Modern Politics
The 5 Most Dangerous Accusations in Modern Politics
— MJ Murphy (@hothingsgirlsay) June 13, 2026
Sunrise ride pic.twitter.com/djqrLeARkn
5. Misinformed.
4. Unsafe.
3. Hatred.
2. Extremist
1. Bigot.
What are the 5 most dangerous accusations in politics? Have you ever noticed that some words can end a conversation before it ever begins and not because they prove anything. Not because they refute an argument but because the moment that they're used everyone stops looking at the claim and starts looking at the person making the claim.
These are the 5 most dangerous accusations in politics, and once you see the pattern you'll never unsee it.
#5: Misinformed. Misinformed sounds harmless after all people can be wrong. People can be misinformed but notice what happens when this accusation is used instead of asking is that claim true the conversation becomes you've been misled so the focus shifts from evidence to the person and sometimes the accusation is correct but sometimes it's just a shortcut that allows people to dismiss an argument without actually engaging with it.
#4: Unsafe. This word becomes incredibly powerful because safety is something everyone values nobody wants people to be harmed but unsafe is often used in ways that go far beyond physical danger. A Viewpoint can be called unsafe a question can be called unsafe a discussion can be called unsafe and once something is framed as a threat to safety people asking whether the concern. The word itself does all the work.
#3: Hateful. And this is where things get interesting because hatred certainly exists but disagreement and hatred are not the same thing I've said that in so many videos criticism and hatred are not the same thing concern and hatred are not the same thing yet political arguments often blur these distinctions and when they do people stop examining the argument itself because they're examining the character of the person speaking.
#2: Extremist. Extremist is one of the most effective accusations because it has no fixed location. What is considered extreme changes depending on the time, the culture, and the audience. Many views once considered mainstream later became extreme. So if someone is called an extremist, the important question isn't "Is that person extreme?" The important question is "compared to what"?.
#1: Bigot. This might be the most powerful accusation in modern politics because unlike most criticisms it doesn't really say you're wrong, it says your motives are wrong. It says your character is wrong. It says there's something morally defective about you and once someone has been labeled a bigot many people feel no obligation to answer their argument at all. The label becomes the answer. I get this comment on so many of my videos. Bigot without engaging with my argument and so here's the important part. I'm not saying these accusations are never true. Sometimes people are misinformed. Sometimes people are hateful. Sometimes people are extremists. Sometimes people really are bigots. The problem is what happens when the accusation replaces the argument because none of these words tell you whether a claim is true. They tell you what to think about the person making the claim. And if you want to think clearly in the political world, that's the habit to watch for whenever you hear one of these accusations don't just ask is that person bad ask did anyone actually answer the argument that's the question that changes everything.