They maintain strict Asylum policies and this is because they lived under real, genuine, practiced communism and so they developed a cultural immune system that instantly recognized the multiculturalism, open borders, and Native self-hatred, . . . --Paul Weston
I recently talked about the Revolutionary Left's planned subversion of Britain and the West, but I barely touched on their ace in the pack which is of course mass immigration from the least Westernized countries that our traitor class could possibly find. Now, many speak of an anti-white ethos dominating our institutions driven by a sort of racial hatred but I disagree. From a revolutionary communist perspective, skin color secondary, what mattered was that the Christian, or post-Christian, capitalist West was never going to submit wittingly to communist rule because westerners were too educated, too comfortable, too affluent, and too culturally conservative therefore they had to be replaced a la Bertolt Brecht. Now there's a striking contrast between subverted Britain and countries like Poland, Czechoslovakia, and Hungary, which overthrew communist rule in 1989. And today these nations refuse the UN migration compact. They refuse the EU relocation quotas. They built border fences. They maintain strict Asylum policies and this is because they lived under real, genuine, practiced communism and so they developed a cultural immune system that instantly recognized the multiculturalism, open borders, and Native self-hatred was just a softer more Insidious form of the same communist Soviet ideology. Western Europe however took the opposite path Muslim populations in the UK, France, Germany, and Sweden now stand at 6% to 10% and rising with disproportionately higher birth shares. And the white British birth now hover near or below just 15%, believe it or not. So many Poles and Czechs who came to Britain decades ago are now returning home to countries which are racial and cultural utopias compared to the fragmented tents and broken Britain.
2:32. And what renders this Western betrayal it is a total betrayal historically unparalleled is that it has no historical precedent no previous civilizations especially one at the peak of it's well technological achievement and Global power has deliberately accelerated its own demographic replacement through Mass immigration from culturally totally opposite regions and nor have they done this while simultaneously be building an Institutional apparatus of Critical Race Theory, DEI, and equality laws that demonize its own historical native majority. And epochal moments in history, like the 7th and 8th century Islamic conquest of the Persian Empire, or German migration into collapsing Rome, had they occurred under military victory or interior weakness, the host societies did not invite them in and they did not enact propaganda laws which told their own people to hate their own traditions, history, and very founding identity. The modern Western case is unique a prosperous and militarily on unbeatable Society is destroying itself as moral justification for alleged historical evils, alleged by the Revolutionary Left, of course. And equally telling is the complete absence of any role reversal. No non-white majority country anywhere in the world is importing large numbers of whites while granting the protected status in criticizing its own native population as inherently oppressive. The flow remains decidedly one way only. And the post 1989 divergence reveals a profound irony. The half of Europe that suffered real communism is now preserving civilization continuity, while the half that believed itself free has succumbed to cultural subversion and is sleepwalking toward one of two choices: confrontation or collapse. And in human terms this hinge point moves slowly. In civilizational terms, it's happening with breathtaking speed and history offers no precedent for these pathological times. But history does indeed offer warnings.
On Bertolt Brecht,
One notable statement is from his essay "The Radio as an Apparatus of Communication," 1932, where he discusses the role of the bourgeoisie and the necessity for societal change. However, the most direct and well-known articulation is from his 1938 poem "The Song of the German Mother," [Dear God, take your Prozac before listening] and his writings during the 1930s where he emphasizes the need to overthrow bourgeois values and structures.
A specific quote often attributed to Brecht is:
"The bourgeoisie must be replaced by a new class, the working class."
While this precise phrase may not appear verbatim in a single, famous quote, it encapsulates Brecht's consistent Marxist stance: the overthrow of bourgeoisie dominance and the establishment of a proletarian society.
Key source:
Brecht's writings and speeches from the 1930s and his Marxist essays articulate the need for the bourgeoisie to be replaced by a new societal order based on socialist principles.
If you're looking for a particular quote or speech, I recommend reviewing Brecht's "The Measures Taken" or his essays in collections like "Brecht's Collected Plays" or "Reflections on Theatre."
