Sunday, February 8, 2026

TAYLOR HATHORN: our weakest points of infrastructure in the United States when it comes to cyber security are really our local and our state municipalities. That is really where Chinese hackers and CCP hackers and any adversarial hackers can get into our networks and start working their way up the chain.

Definitely.  You know, they are effective in many ways. Look at some of the influence that the CCP has had just over our education system.  So I think it's good that Governors are paying attention.  I mean our weakest points of infrastructure in the United States when it comes to cyber security are really our local and our state municipalities.  That is really where Chinese hackers and CCP hackers and any adversarial hackers can get into our networks and start working their way up the chain.  It's a lot harder to break into the DOD network than it is a local municipality that has contracts that they work with DOD on.  And so I think that the State of Florida is very wise to do this.

It's not just one that this has happened in, right. Like that's happened several, several times under the Biden Administration and the media was complicit in covering it up.  Why would they be complicit in covering it up?  I really encourage everyone to look at the funding mechanisms of some of these major news networks and see where their tie backs to the CCP are.  Alex Marlow has a really, really good book about this I believe it's called Breaking the News: Exposing the Media's Hidden Deals and Secret Corruption, 2021, and I encourage everyone to read it that talks a lot about why the media, like a CNN,  national media is often complicit in these things and just like with anything it usually follows the money.  So I think people just need to be educated and this does not mean be racist, right.  This does not mean look at everything with Chinese influence and think that's bad.  That is absolutely inappropriate and not the way to handle this.  But you need to be able to look at the data and look at reality . . . 

Breaking the News: Exposing the Media's Hidden Deals and Secret Corruption, Alex Marlow, 2021.

SYD STEYERHART: The right-wing in Japan has a large enough supermajority that they can amend the Constitution that was forced on them at gunpoint by American liberals in 1945. For the first time in nearly a century, the Soul of the Japan can be reclaimed.

Thank you to Tom Luongo

TAYLOR HATHORN: Economic espionage cases committed by Chinese Nationals have gone up 1300% in the last decade.

How do we stop this transnational repression by the CCP?

First and foremost, you have to call a spade a spade.  You have to call it out when you see it.  I wrote an article recently about the number of students that come into the United States from China to study here and the fact that they are focusing on engineering fields and the fact that they're focusing on AI fields and they are getting that training in the United States and taking it back to China . . . .  "Hybrid Warfare, Student Visas, and Chinas Trojan Horse," Taylor Hathorn, Townhall, September 27, 2025.

Economic espionage cases committed by Chinese Nationals have gone up 1300% in the last decade.  I mean you've got trade best secret cases happening in the United States, 60% of which are attributed to the CCP.  And so the data is there and it shows it.  It shows that we are educating these students and employing these students and they are taking what they're learning here and using it against us in the United States.  I need to be very clear that I am not vilifying all Chinese students.  I do not think that is a problem here.  But we need to create a better awareness pipeline to understand where the students' allegiance are.  And I think the reality is people don't understand that when many of these students come here from China they are given a very strict out processing from China interview and an in-processing interview every single time they come home to make sure that they have not been too heavily influenced by the United States.  To date, there are nearly a quarter of a million Chinese students studying at universities inside the United States, and we have less than a thousand American students studying inside of China.  And China has great universities too, so it makes you wonder, why that tactic?  Why is that being implemented and not the other way around if it really was a shared partnership among education institutions? 

TAYLOR HATHORN: The CCP is inflicting hybrid, asymmetric warfare on the U.S. A lot of scary realities tied to China’s covert tactics.

Thank you to J. Michael Waller

With students what is the long-term strategy here and talk to us about Chinese students and Scholars associations in the US.

So really there are two methodologies that you can have in any kind of mental warfare and really this is mental warfare, right.  So you've got your overt strategies and you have your covert strategies, and really what China is super good at is the covert strategies.  If they were focused on the overt strategies, you wouldn't have Prime Minister Carney in Canada talking about how they wanted to ally and align themselves with China moving forward with this values-based realignment that he talked about in Davos not too long ago. 

And so really you're looking at these covert strategies and covert tactics.  So what does that look like?  It looks like mental manipulation. Our society regrettably is incredibly susceptible to influence from the outside world.  Our youth, because of their involvement on social media, on web platforms, where they have access to information all around the world are incredibly susceptible to this influence.  I wrote a series of articles for Independent Women at the start of last New Year about the Tik Tok ban, "Tik Tok Ban: The Battle Is Not Over Freedom of Speech," Taylor Hathorn, Independent Women, January 26, 2025, and several of my friends were like, "Man, Taylor, you need to get over it.  It's not that big of a deal. It's not that big of an influence."  What a lot of people didn't realize is that the algorithms for Tik Tok in China students were rewarded, vastly rewarded, for looking at videos and watching what videos and promoting their algorithms focused on engineering, education, medicine, reading, literature.  They were promoted and rewarded for that, while the same algorithms in the United States existed for United States students they were promoted for doing Tik Tok dances and Tide pod challenges and their ratings went up for that.  So that is just one example of a covert strategy that has direct effects on the mental capacity, truthfully, and on the educational abilities of our students.  

PETER SCHWEIZER: So they know what you're saying, they know what you're communicating. They also know who your families are back home.

Now if you're a student from China in the United States, you are expected to have and communicate the only app that you were supposed to have on your phone for communication is WeChat and the government monitors that.  So they know what you're saying, they know what you're communicating.  They also know who your families are back home.  So even if you have no interest in damaging the United States, no interest in stealing secrets, if you were working in a sensitive Lab at Yale or Brigham Young or UCLA, and government wants you to steal on their behalf, they will pressure you.  They will say that your family is at risk, and you will be forced to comply.  Those are just the realities that exist for students, and to pretend that that reality does not exist and to pretend that this is not a problem caused by the Chinese government, I think it's just being naive.  

So how do you deal with that? You're not going to be able to get the Chinese government not to pressure students.  You're not going to be able to get them to study comparative lit instead of chemical engineering.  So I think you have to look at curtailing the numbers because they are stealing us blind.  

MARC LANDERS: Cannabis users' brains look YOUNGER! People who used cannabis showed better scores on various thinking tests (multiple areas of cognition / mental performance).

SAMA HOOLE: This is the first time the U.S. government issues dietary advice to the entire population. There's no precedent. No framework for how to proceed. They're making it up as they go.

1977: Senator George McGovern, 1922-2012, chairs the Senate Select Committee on Nutrition and Human Needs. They're investigating dietary causes of chronic disease. The political pressure for action is immense. The committee hears testimony from multiple researchers. The testimony is divided. Some support dietary fat restriction. Others say the evidence is insufficient for population-wide advice. Dr. Pete Ahrens, one of the era's leading lipid researchers, explicitly warns against premature guidelines. Ahrens testifies: "This is a gamble. We are not certain about the effects of dietary change. We should wait for better evidence before making recommendations that will affect the entire population." The committee ignores him. They feel political pressure to do something. Heart disease is killing thousands. The public demands answers. Saying "we need more research" isn't politically viable. McGovern later admits in interviews that they knew the science was uncertain but felt compelled to act. In 1977, they publish "Dietary Goals for the United States" recommending Americans reduce saturated fat, increase carbohydrates, and replace animal fats with vegetable oils. This is the first time the U.S. government issues dietary advice to the entire population. There's no precedent. No framework for how to proceed. They're making it up as they go. The American Medical Association opposes the guidelines. They issue a statement saying the evidence doesn't support population-wide dietary change. The AMA argues for individualized advice rather than universal recommendations. Food industry lobbying intensifies. Beef producers oppose fat restriction. Dairy farmers fight against recommendations to limit butter and whole milk. Grain producers support increased carbohydrate consumption. Everyone sees how this affects their markets. The final guidelines reflect political compromise more than scientific consensus. They're softened slightly compared to drafts to appease meat and dairy lobbies. But the core message remains: eat less fat, more carbs. These guidelines become institutional policy. USDA adopts them. The American Heart Association endorses them. Medical schools begin teaching them. Within five years, they're established dogma. The gamble Ahrens warned about was never framed as a gamble to the public. Guidelines were presented as settled science. Nobody mentioned uncertainty. Nobody disclosed the divided expert opinion. Nobody admitted this was experimental policy affecting 200 million Americans. By the 1980s-90s, the outcomes are visible. Obesity rises. Diabetes increases. Heart disease rates don't improve. The guidelines clearly aren't working as predicted. But rather than revisit the original gamble, committees double down. If outcomes are bad, obviously people aren't following advice closely enough. The solution is more stringent fat restriction and louder public health messaging. McGovern's retrospective acknowledgment that they gambled is telling. He knew at the time that the science was uncertain. He chose to issue guidelines anyway because political circumstances demanded it. This established a precedent: nutritional guidelines could be based on incomplete evidence if political pressure was sufficient. Later committees would follow this model. Advice would be issued before evidence was definitive. Course correction would be avoided to preserve institutional credibility. The McGovern guidelines weren't the careful result of overwhelming scientific evidence. They were a political response to public anxiety, shaped by industry lobbying, issued despite scientific uncertainty, and never revised despite failing outcomes.

Your dietary guidelines began as an admitted gamble by politicians who felt pressured to do something even when scientists said the evidence was insufficient. The gamble failed. Nobody acknowledged it. And you're still following advice from 1977. 

JEFFREY SMITH: "Glyphosate was NEVER meant to come in contact with our food. It was patented to strip the minerals off the walls of pipes."

I don't even like any bread, tortilla, corn or flour, come into contact with my beef or carnitas for this very reason.  Not only is glyphosate a powerful chelator, draining us of valuable minerals but it's a pesticide.  Hello.  

Jeffrey M. Smith is described by Wikipedia as a consumer activist.  Looks like he stopped posting at Twitter back in 2016.

Saturday, February 7, 2026

ANDREW KAUFMAN, MD: Stores like Home Depot are contracting with Flock to install cameras in their parking lots. HOAs are bringing them in. Nursing homes. Gated communities. Private property that you pass through every day without thinking twice.

Flock cameras aren’t just watching the street, they’re watching you. Stores like Home Depot are contracting with Flock to install cameras in their parking lots. HOAs are bringing them in. Nursing homes. Gated communities. Private property that you pass through every day without thinking twice. That means your license plate can be photographed multiple times a day, logged, stored, and cross-referenced — not because you committed a crime, but because you existed in public.
And suddenly all those new data centers popping up everywhere start to make a lot more sense.
Think about it. Cities are signing contracts. Private corporations are signing contracts. Entire neighborhoods are signing contracts. That’s an explosion of data being collected, processed, and stored — constantly.
People will say, “Relax, it’s just license plates.” For now. How long until it’s biometrics? How long until it’s facial recognition? How long until it’s movement tracking, behavioral profiling, predictive policing?
Every system starts small. Every surveillance program begins with “safety” and “convenience.” And every time, the public is told not to worry — right up until the infrastructure is already in place. This isn’t about catching criminals. It’s about normalizing surveillance. This is a clip from my True Health Report podcast with Hakeem Anwar. Click below to watch right now.

ow.ly/80o750Y9vLB

"A TV doctor told actor Rob Schneider that she decided to give her child NO vaccines because they’re “too small to absorb those TOXINS.”

DEREK DOMINO: We were so connected, connected to the land, connected to the nation, to the people, to our history, our heritage, our culture. Our cup runneth over, as they say.

we were so connected, connected to the land, connected to the nation, to the people, to our history, our heritage, our culture.  Our cup runneth over, as they say.

SAMA HOOLE: This requires language. Strategy. Trust. Social bonds. It requires every cognitive advantage that makes us human.

This is why every uniquely human cognitive trait links to hunting: Strategic planning: Essential for ambush hunting. Theory of mind: Predicting animal and human behavior. Complex language: Coordinating multi-step operations. Tool innovation: Better weapons increase success. 

Social bonding: Trust your hunting partners with your life. --Sama Hoole

Solitary humans don't hunt mammoths. Groups hunt mammoths. This cooperation shaped us. Made us human. The archaeological evidence shows systematic, planned megafauna hunting. Not opportunistic scavenging. Multiple spear impact points on bones. Evidence of coordinated strikes. Kill sites showing ambush tactics. You can't ambush a mammoth alone. You need: - Scouts to track movements - Planners to choose kill location - Drivers to direct the herd - Strikers to make the kill - Processors to butcher efficiently This requires language. Strategy. Trust. Social bonds. It requires every cognitive advantage that makes us human. And it only makes sense if the payoff is enormous. Which it was. One mammoth: 2,000,000 calories. Feed twenty five people for a whole month. The ROI justified the cooperation. The cooperation justified developing language. The language enabled better cooperation. Feedback loop for 2.5 million years. Megafauna hunting didn't just feed us. It made us intelligent. We needed big brains to coordinate complex hunts. The hunts provided fat to support big brains. The bigger brains enabled better hunts. This is why every uniquely human cognitive trait links to hunting: Strategic planning: Essential for ambush hunting. Theory of mind: Predicting animal and human behavior. Complex language: Coordinating multi-step operations. Tool innovation: Better weapons increase success. Social bonding: Trust your hunting partners with your life. All of it traces back to hunting fat-rich megafauna cooperatively. We became human by becoming hunters. We became hunters by targeting the fattest prey. The evidence is everywhere. The cognitive traits. The social structures. The linguistic capacity. All optimized for one goal: Hunt megafauna. Access fat. Feed brains. This is human exceptionalism. Not that we're special. That we specialized. We specialized in hunting the hardest targets for the highest returns. And it worked. For 2.5 million years. Until we eliminated the targets.

SAMA HOOLE: Chicken breast: 31g protein, 3.6g fat per 100g. Beef ribeye: 25g protein, 15g fat per 100g. "But chicken has more protein!"

Chicken breast: 31g protein, 3.6g fat per 100g. Beef ribeye: 25g protein, 15g fat per 100g. "But chicken has more protein!" Chicken also has: 3x the omega-6 fatty acids. 1/3 the iron. 1/4 the zinc. 1/10 the vitamin B12. Zero vitamin K2. Minimal fat-soluble vitamins. Beef has: Bioavailable iron. Zinc for testosterone. B12 for neurological function. K2 for bone health. CLA. Creatine. Carnosine. Complete nutrition. You chose more protein and less everything else. Congratulations on your nutritionally bankrupt bird.

SAMA HOOLE: Seed oils appear in foods you'd never suspect. Chocolate. Most brands use soybean oil because cocoa butter costs more. Your "dark chocolate" is seed oil with cocoa powder. Salad dressings obviously, but also the pre-made guacamole.

Seed oils appear in foods you'd never suspect. Chocolate. Most brands use soybean oil because cocoa butter costs more. Your "dark chocolate" is seed oil with cocoa powder. Salad dressings obviously, but also the pre-made guacamole. Hummus from the supermarket. Nut butters that aren't just ground nuts. Bread from bakeries using "vegetable oil" in the dough. Rotisserie chicken from the supermarket is basted in soybean oil. The "healthy" protein box from Pret. Those raw bars with dates and nuts. Protein bars. Nutrition bars. Energy balls. Mayo, unless you make it yourself or buy specific brands. Pesto in jars. Those marinated olives. The anchovies packed in "olive oil" that's actually 90% sunflower oil with 10% olive for the label. Restaurant food universally. Virtually every single restaurant. Including the expensive ones.

"British means ancestry and history and culture, or it means nothing at all."

JOURNAL OF NATURAL SCIENCE, BIOLOGY, AND MEDICINE: Scientists have discovered that wisdom teeth — often removed and discarded in adolescence or young adulthood — contain a rich supply of mesenchymal stem cells capable of transforming into bone, muscle, nerve, and other vital tissues.

Your wisdom teeth could save your life. They contain stem cells that could repair your heart, bone, and even brain tissue. What was once considered medical waste may soon be a powerful tool in regenerative medicine. Scientists have discovered that wisdom teeth — often removed and discarded in adolescence or young adulthood — contain a rich supply of mesenchymal stem cells capable of transforming into bone, muscle, nerve, and other vital tissues. Dental stem cells have shown promise in preclinical studies for conditions ranging from arthritis and diabetes to cognitive disorders like Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease. And unlike stem cell collection from bone marrow or blood, harvesting dental pulp during wisdom tooth removal involves no additional procedures or discomfort.

[Journal of Natural Science, Biology and Medicine. "Current overview on dental stem cells applications in regenerative dentistry." Stem Save (2025). Current Clinical Applications for Stem Cells] 

MASSIMO: When researchers deliberately infected mice with this oral bacterium, the animals rapidly developed key Alzheimer’s pathology, including the buildup of amyloid-beta plaques.

Alzheimer’s may be linked to gum bacteria, new research shows. Scientists have repeatedly found Porphyromonas gingivalis—the chief bacterium that causes periodontitis—inside the brains of people who died with Alzheimer’s. When researchers deliberately infected mice with this oral bacterium, the animals rapidly developed key Alzheimer’s pathology, including the buildup of amyloid-beta plaques. Perhaps most alarming, the bacteria’s toxic enzymes have been detected in the brains of people showing early Alzheimer’s changes years before memory loss or other symptoms appear, suggesting the infection may quietly initiate damage long in advance. These discoveries have sparked serious interest in new treatment approaches. An experimental drug called COR388 (from the company Cortexyme) has already succeeded in lowering both bacterial load and amyloid-beta levels in preclinical models. Although large human trials are still needed, the evidence is mounting that at least some cases of Alzheimer’s may have an infectious trigger rather than being purely degenerative. [Dominy, S. S., et al. "Porphyromonas gingivalis in Alzheimer’s disease brains: Evidence for disease causation and treatment with small-molecule inhibitors", Science Advances, 5(1), eaau3333]

WOW 🚨 Gavin Newsom is preparing to RELEASE 33,179 CRIMINAL ILLEGALS back onto the streets of California

Friday, February 6, 2026

CHRIS VOSS: I'm always going to say is like, "All right, look, well it seems like there's nothing you can do."

My credit cards, almost all of them got fees.  And I call every year, asking them to waive the fee and they almost always do.  Until the guy says, "Well, we waved the fee on you the last five years in a row."

If you can't budge at all, one of the last things I'm always going to say is like, "All right, look, well it seems like there's nothing you can do."

They'll put you on hold, They'll find a way to help. Nobody ever wants to say yes to that.

JOHN GUANDOLO: They're jihadis in suits claiming to be nice people and presenting a very friendly image when, in fact, they're not. And that's why I say this is much more a counterintelligence espionage and subversive movement because they're still doing it.

[citizens have ] at least a general understanding of these movements and that they are operating in their community and they even know some of the organizations, Islamic Society of North America, ISNAMuslim American Society, CAIR, Muslim Student Association, Islamic Circle of North America, ICNA, and they understand they're hostile, and that's the difference . . . .  --John Guandolo

Out of necessity because they've recognized their leaders aren't doing it I can tell you that over the last 20 plus years of actually training FBI, CIA, DHS, local and state law enforcement, 100% of them, 100%, over the years, at the end of the training, I asked two questions, "Did you know this information, so this is about Sharia, about the Muslim Brotherhood Network, and how they actually operate, "Did you know this information before you came in?"  No, 100% have said no, we did not know this, and this includes FBI joint terrorism task force, agents, and officers, it includes DHS, name it, but when I asked the second question, "Do you believe this is critical to protecting your community," 100% said yes.  

Whereas when we go in and teach citizens 10 years ago, 5 years ago, and today, today it's even much more so.  They walk in with at least a general understanding of these movements and that they are operating in their community and they even know some of the organizations, Islamic Society of North America, ISNA, Muslim American Society, CAIR, Muslim Student Association, Islamic Circle of North America, ICNA, and they understand they're hostile, and that's the difference . . . .  Is the way this war works, You just said it when you have jihadi's advising presidents, Governors, State legislatures, pastors, Chambers of Commerce, how to defeat jihadis, it's no wonder that the leadership remains clueless.  They're just staggeringly ignorant of the Islamic threat, and of sharia, of the Muslim Brotherhood, the other movements and networks because that's the intentional target of the information operation from the enemy's perspective.  So we've been looking we have this narrative that there are these competing versions of Islam, and this was true under Bush, and what America needs to do is get the good Muslims to help us understand the bad Muslims.  Except there's only one Islam, one Sharia and that's it.  So are there Muslims who don't want to adhere to Sharia and wage Jihad?  Yes.  But what they believe doesn't constitute a different version of Islam they're just outliers and according to Sharia they are apostates and they should be killed so we can't base National Security decisions foreign policy and domestic counterterrorism strategy based on someone who calls himself a Muslim number one and doesn't follow Sharia and number two in fact 100%, we're leaning on to get advice from in DHS, FBI, our General officers in the military, etc., are Muslim Brotherhood.  They're hostile.  They're jihadis in suits claiming to be nice people and presenting a very friendly image when, in fact, they're not.  And that's why I say this is much more a counterintelligence espionage and subversive movement because they're still doing it.  They're in this Administration doing it, and it creates havoc because you have what appears to be competing versions of Islam and you get people who are in national security positions saying, "Well, what Saudi Arabia does is different from what Jordan does.  It's different from what Indonesia does."  It's all based on Sharia, and so just because they don't dvance Sharia at the same level, well, that's part of jihad.  You can only go as far as and fast as you're able to do without losing too many members of the Islamic community who don't get it.  And so there's a requirement to educate the Muslim population and you can't go so fast in advancing these Jihad that you expose your hand to the non-Muslims on what you're actually doing.