Tucker & Guest Caught Lying Again

This is a total lie. In reality, the jizya tax was the Ottoman Empire’s chief source of income in its heyday. The jizya is a tax that the Qur’an says (9:29) should be collected from “the people of the book” (mainly Jews and Christians) as a sign of their subjugation and… https://t.co/tw0e1xw3eS

— Robert Spencer (@jihadwatchRS) June 23, 2026

MJ MURPHY: This is forced teaming plus moral stacking. So it says if you disagree with me, you're aligned with all oppression.

Sarah McBride NLP Breakdown pic.twitter.com/1C1jUpJUqG

— MJ Murphy (@hothingsgirlsay) June 24, 2026

00:00. All right, I'm going to give you the big picture first. This speech is doing three things.  One, experience equals identity.  If I experience what women experience, I am one.  Two, borrowed Authority.  Using real female struggles to build credibility, shield identity from critique.  And three, the moral framing trap.  Disagreement is reframed as oppression, narrow-mindedness, and control.  

I never realized how disempowering and unsafe it would feel to have . . .  

Okay, so here's the emotional anchoring.  He's opening with vulnerability and what that does, that lowers our critical thinking.  Then there's a presupposition which assumes the experience is inherently tied to Womanhood.  Then there is an identity merge: feeling unsafe equals validation of the identity.  So translation is if I feel what [a] woman feel[s], I am one.  

To have a stranger feel and titled to make a comment about my looks or my body . . . 

So now he is trying to use the universal female experience framing and that gives us forced equivalence harassment is shared identity category right so the reality gap is experiencing a behavior does not equal belonging to that biological category that behavior is directed toward.  

Inviting comments for having the audacity to walk down the street.  If I wasn't smiling, I was told to smile . . .  

Yeah, some chaser probably told him to smile.  What he's doing is he's using relatable scripting.  He's pulling from common female complaints in order to build credibility. He's borrowing, and what I want you to notice is this is pattern stacking.  He's using multiple relatable examples layered to create emotional agreement.  

If I am smiling, it's a special invitation for more comments.  You're treated like both a delicate infant and a sexualized Idol in the exact same moment.  

Yeah, he wishes.  He f****** wishes.  What he's doing is he's doing paradox framing, a contradiction equals sophistication illusion.  So this makes the argument feel deep without proving a goddamn thing.  And why this works is that the brain interprets complexity as truth.  It's also a confusion pattern as I've talked about before.  

Your thoughts are dismissed and your emotion minimized your insecurities emphasize and your body objectified.

So notice this is a rhythmic escalation.  It's trance- inducing.  So it's emotionally intensified and it's stacking rapidly.  This is a classic Milton model language.  It's vague.  It's generalized.  It's emotionally loaded and there's no specifics to challenge.  

And your body objectified the simple and the mundane decisions that I never had to think about . . .

So now he's doing his before and after transformation story so what it implies is I didn't deal with this before now I do so therefore I transitioned into Womanhood but there's a hidden leap change in Social treatment does not equal a change in sex category.

The morning before soon became integral to avoiding a thousand judgments and in finding my own Womanhood.  I was told that if I was too feminine that I was a caricature or inauthentic as if masculinity is some sort of natural state of being, a default, a preference.  But if I wasn't feminine enough, then I was told that I wasn't a real woman . . .

So you're still not a real woman.  But what he's doing here is he's trying to use a double-bind.  There's no winning position.  So the audience feels Injustice and what's important to know is this is a real social tension that we women do experience, but he's using it to bridge identity and borrow legitimacy.  

Pop culture, television, movies, music, politics, fashion, all telling all of us what it means to be a real woman.

4:43.  So the technique here is he's diffusing the blame.  Attacks a vague system so that there's no one specific to challenge.  And this is a classic move.  If the enemy is everywhere, it's impossible to question the claim.  

I had finally, finally, come out of the closet only to find myself stuck in the kitchen.

Poor Timothy McBride!  What he's doing here is he's metaphor hijacking.  He's combining LBGTQ oppression narrative with feminist domestic oppression narrative and why this is powerful is because it's merging two narrow frameworks into one emotional punch.  

And it became clear very quickly that the same forces, the same forces, that said to me, "No, you're not a woman," those are the same forces that say there's only one way to love, only one way to live, only one way to act, only one way to dress, only one rule to play. 

Look, he's good.  He's very good.  So what he's doing here it's unification of opposition.  Anyone who disagrees equals the same oppressive force.  This is forced teaming plus moral stacking.  So it says if you disagree with me, you're aligned with all oppression.  

All right, so let me just say this.  Listen, experiencing sexism doesn't change your sex.  It just means you've experienced sexism.  You're describing how women are treated not what women are.  Social treatment is not a biological category.  You borrowed the struggles, but that doesn't grant the identity.  This whole speech replaces definition with feeling and hopes you don't notice.  

MARTIN ARMSTRONG: Britain has now burned through 6 prime ministers in less than a decade. That level of turnover is not normal. It is a symptom of a government that no longer knows how to govern and a population that no longer believes anything politicians say.

Its a government being systematically undermined by a ruling elite that want to be part of the pan-European elite, or Davos for short

They are trying to keep the post WWII institutions viable while inhibiting the US’s final independence. And they are failing

Their old system…

— Tom Luongo (@TFL1728) June 24, 2026

from Martin Armstrong,

What we are witnessing is not merely the failure of one politician. This is the collapse of confidence in the entire political establishment. Britain has now burned through six prime ministers in less than a decade. That level of turnover is not normal. It is a symptom of a government that no longer knows how to govern and a population that no longer believes anything politicians say. The old system is fracturing before our eyes.

From Tom Luongo,

Its a government being systematically undermined by a ruling elite that want to be part of the pan-European elite, or Davos for short They are trying to keep the post WWII institutions viable while inhibiting the US’s final independence. And they are failing Their old system of wealth extraction through false dyads and sowing division is ending Trump just flipped the Middle East on its head. This is the European Sovereign Debt crisis in a nutshell.

LOUIS MONTOYA: Dr. Nisha Verma is an obstetrician-gynecologist (OB-GYN) who performs abortions for Planned Parenthood.

🚨 HOLY CRAP. This actually just happened on Capitol Hill.

SEN. JOSH HAWLEY: "Can men get pregnant?"

LIBERAL DR. VERMA: "I'm not sure what the goal of the question is."

HAWLEY: "The goal is to establish a biological reality. Can men get pregnant?"

VERMA: "I take care of… pic.twitter.com/nNR0m9t7mE

— John Fitzgerald Kennedy Jr. (@MrJohnJnr) June 23, 2026

This ghoul does a disservice to women.  Nisha Verma, an OB-GYN based in Atlanta.  

The hearing took place on January 14, 2026.  

It was a U.S. Senate HELP (Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions) Committee hearing on the use/safety of chemical abortion drugs (mifepristone). During the session, Sen. Josh Hawley (R-MO) questioned Dr. Nisha Verma (an OB/GYN witness) about whether men can get pregnant.

Dr. Nisha Verma is an obstetrician-gynecologist (OB-GYN) who performs abortions for Planned Parenthood.

— Louis Montoya (@montoyalouis1) January 14, 2026

MJ MURPHY: A person’s self-declared identity is not the same thing as their sex. While identity may be relevant to a story and may be reported as a claim about an individual, it should not replace objective facts in news reporting.

Subject: Request for Correction Regarding Reporting on AB Hernandez

Dear San Francisco Chronicle Editors,

I am writing to request a correction to your reporting regarding AB Hernandez.

In your recent article, “Transgender athlete AB Hernandez adds two state titles as high…

— MJ Murphy (@hothingsgirlsay) May 31, 2026

Subject: Request for Correction Regarding Reporting on AB Hernandez Dear San Francisco Chronicle Editors, I am writing to request a correction to your reporting regarding AB Hernandez. In your recent article, “Transgender athlete AB Hernandez adds two state titles as high school track and field career ends,” the Chronicle repeatedly describes AB Hernandez as a transgender girl and uses female pronouns. (San Francisco Chronicle) AB Hernandez is male. A person’s self-declared identity is not the same thing as their sex. While identity may be relevant to a story and may be reported as a claim about an individual, it should not replace objective facts in news reporting. By describing a male athlete as a girl and using female pronouns throughout the article, the Chronicle presents identity-based descriptions in place of biological reality. This creates confusion and leaves readers with an inaccurate understanding of the material facts of the story. (San Francisco Chronicle) This is particularly important in sports reporting because athletic competition is organized around sex-based categories. The central controversy surrounding AB Hernandez exists precisely because Hernandez is male and is competing in a female category. Omitting or obscuring that fact prevents readers from fully understanding the issue being reported. Journalism should accurately describe the people involved in a story. Sex is an objective characteristic of a person and should not be replaced by subjective identity claims. Readers deserve reporting that is factual, transparent, and grounded in observable reality. I respectfully request that the San Francisco Chronicle correct this article and adopt reporting standards that distinguish clearly between sex and identity. Specifically, I request that AB Hernandez be accurately identified as male and that sex-inaccurate pronouns and descriptors be removed from the article. Accuracy and objectivity are foundational principles of journalism. I hope the Chronicle will uphold those principles in its future reporting. Sincerely, 

MJ Murphy 

STEPHEN MILLER: This ongoing saga is a tragically illustrative example of just how many forces are at work constantly, and over many years, to deny Americans their sovereignty.

In 1996, Congress passed a law creating a special fast-track deportation process (“expedited removal”) for illegals who have been inside the US for 2 years or less. After adoption, it was never applied outside very limited circumstances. In 2004, the Bush Administration published… https://t.co/TMBKYXh4yU

— Stephen Miller (@StephenM) June 23, 2026

Are We Like Gorillas?

Are We Like Gorillas? https://t.co/N4t3GkmRNJ via @YouTube

— Mike Walgenbach (@Walgenbach82743) June 23, 2026

STEPHEN COUGHLIN: Also, when there's a shooting, the reason there is such a sustained lockdown on revealing the identity is to secure the social media and related ideological identifiers with an additional intent to curate a persona along favorable ideological lines.

Also, when there's a shooting, the reason there is such a sustained lockdown on revealing the identity is to secure the social media and related ideological identifiers with an additional intent to curate a persona along favorable ideological lines.

Back in the day, the names… https://t.co/Xqfugnt7fO

— Stephen Coughlin (@S_Coughlin_DC) June 23, 2026

MJ MURPHY: . . . join the many people learning how to think clearly under social pressure.

NLP Breakdown pic.twitter.com/sTVwKwvwEh

— MJ Murphy (@hothingsgirlsay) June 23, 2026

00:00. "There is no right or wrong way to be a woman."

00:04.  Okay.  So the false universal when he says "there is no right or wrong way to be a woman," it sounds compassionate because it appeals to individuality.  The hidden move is that it quietly removes any objective criteria from the category while still insisting the category remains meaningful.  If there is literally no right or wrong way to be a woman, then the category itself becomes impossible to define.  So a useful challenge would go something like this.  If there is no right or wrong way to be a woman, then what makes someone a woman in the first place?  The statement destroys the boundary while pretending to defend it.  

And that is the whole point.  If you are doing all of this, if you're transitioning to assimilate into approval from parties that have the strictest rules on gender expression, you will fail.  You will be disappointed and you will be miserable, because nothing you ever do will be enough for those people.  If you're . . .

All right.  So this creates an enemy before evidence is presented.  The audience is encouraged to dismiss criticism not because the criticism is wrong, but because the critics are supposedly impossible to satisfy.  This is a classic persuasion move.  Discredit the referee before the game starts.

If you're doing this, if you're transitioning, you need to do this because it's about you . . . 

Now this is one of the most powerful modern frames.  So the frame assumes that authenticity equals truth, but authenticity and Truth are not the same thing.  I can sincerely feel something; I can authentically believe something that tells us the belief is sincere.  It tells us nothing that whether the belief is true.  

Because it's the only option for you . . . 

Okay, the biggest hidden assumption appears here.  If you're transitioning you need to do this because it's the only option for you.  So there is an embedded assumption transition is an appropriate or necessary solution.  That assumption is inserted before it is examined.  An NLP practitioner would call this a presupposition because the audience is encouraged to accept the premise in order to process the sentence. 

And because you are fighting like hell too be the truest version of yourself possible not for any . . .

So the question of whether someone is a woman quietly becomes "Are they being true to themselves?" Those are completely different questions.  The audience is invited to answer the second question because it feels kinder.  But answering the second question doesn't answer the first. This is a classic NLP move replace a difficult factual question with an easier emotional question.

or for any other reason.  And actually there's something about that that I want to say.  I got a comment on Facebook the other day on one of my reels, and it was essentially somebody calling me selfish for transitioning.  Yes.  I am doing this for me.  That's the point.  You should do things for you. 

Yes, "I am doing this for me" this functions as a conversational shield because once something is framed as "I'm doing this for me," any criticism can be portrayed as attacking personal happiness rather than examining the claim itself.  But many actions done for me still affect others.  Whether something is personally fulfilling is separate from whether it is socially true, socially beneficial, or should require other people to participate. 

If you are a CIS hetero-man and you want to have bigger muscles because you . . .  

This is an analogy design to transfer emotional acceptance from one category to another we see this all the time.  The problem is this.  Building muscle doesn't require society to redefine what a man is.  Transition does involve claims about sex categories, language, spaces, records, Sports, prisons, and social recognition.  So the analogy works but it focuses on personal choice while omitting, while omitting, the social implications.  

You want those for you, go for it, my man.  Get the protein, hit the gym, whatever.  If you want to have bigger muscles so that somebody else thinks you're hot or cool, maybe don't do that.  Maybe think about that a little bit.  And then if you decide it's for you, go for it, man, go for it.  But if you're doing anything for the approval of others, you got a really think about that.  First, living for the approval of others is an addictive thing and it is always disappointing.  You have to live for yourself first. There is nothing selfish about living for you.  You are the only person inhabiting your head and your body.  It's got to be for you.

5:14.  Okay.  Did you notice how every factual question got replaced with an emotional one?

"What is a woman?" becomes "Are you happy?"

"Is it true?" becomes "Is it authentic?"

"Should society recognize this claim?" becomes "Why are you judging me?"  

The conversation quietly shifts from reality to feelings, from evidence to Identity, from facts to personal validation.  Once you see this substitution, you can't unsee it.  And that's exactly why I wrote Breaking the Spell.  It's not about telling you what to think it's about teaching you how to spot the hidden assumptions emotional pivots presupposition and linguistic sleight of hand that shape conversations before the debate even begins.  If you want to learn how to see the machinery underneath the words, grab your copy of breaking the spell and join the many people learning how to think clearly under social pressure.

 

MJ MURPHY: And this creates a bizarre situation where a majority can behave like a minority, not because they're outnumbered but because they're disconnected.

The Bystander Majority pic.twitter.com/JpoFGzC3Uz

— MJ Murphy (@hothingsgirlsay) June 21, 2026

2:49  And this creates a bizarre situation where a majority can behave like a minority, not because they're outnumbered but because they're disconnected.  They are disconnected and this matters.  Why?  Why does it matter?  Because movement can appear to come out of nowhere when one person speaks, and then another, and then another, and suddenly everyone says, "Wait, where, where did all these people come from?"  They didn't come from anywhere. They were always there.  You just couldn't see them.  The silent majority isn't silent because it doesn't exist.  It's silent because each person thinks they are the only one. 

So loudest people in a room are not necessarily the most numerous.  The most confident people are not necessarily the most correct.  And the most visible opinion is not necessarily the most popular.  Sometimes all you're seeing is a handful of people who are willing to speak while everyone else stays quiet.  That's why one honest question can change everything, not because it can change minds, because it reveals minds.  The moment one person speaks, others realize I'm not the only one and that's when the illusion breaks.  That's when the spell breaks.  So if you've ever felt like you're the only one seeing something, the odds are you're not.  The question is, how many other people are sitting quietly waiting for someone else to say it first?  The question is at the heart of everything I am teaching and breaking the spell, "How social pressure creates false consensus and how many people mistake silence for agreement."

Hamtramck, Michigan Bans the Pride Flag

This. pic.twitter.com/54ReCymt7f

— MJ Murphy (@hothingsgirlsay) June 23, 2026

Hamtramck is named for the French-Canadian soldier Jean-François Hamtramck, the first American commander of Fort Shelby, the fortification at Detroit. It was originally known as Hamtramck Township.

TOM LUONGO: and yet, until the old system is thrown off completely, it's just another case of "Meet the New Boss, Same as the Old Boss!"

and yet, until the old system is thrown off completely, it's just another case of "Meet the New Boss, Same as the Old Boss!" https://t.co/4mnBjpHqaV

— Tom Luongo (@TFL1728) June 22, 2026

THE FACTS DUDE: Jacob Rockwell was fined for running a red light in Pensacola, Florida. Only thing is Jacob wasn’t in Florida, he was in Alabama.

The fact that you can’t appeal the ticket with the city/their courts is mind-boggling. He’s right; we’ve outsourced our government to a foreign billionaire.  --Donnagirl

pic.twitter.com/sDyP8V0qCo

— Lisalovesshells (@lisalovesshells) June 22, 2026

MJ MURPHY: Find out why when he says he was raped…..I say….”I don’t care”

My response to the man in my comments may shock you.
Find out why when he says he was raped…..I say….”I don’t care” pic.twitter.com/i1ggvdbIkS

— MJ Murphy (@hothingsgirlsay) June 22, 2026

ELIZABETH AUSTIN: obscenity is NOT protected by the First Amendment.

#OverturnMiller and make porn illegal again. Contrary to popular myth, obscenity is NOT protected by the First Amendment. https://t.co/SAyxdFDRlq

— Elizabeth Austin (@lazarusatgate) June 21, 2026

From US Law Explained,  

Key Takeaways At-a-Glance:

The Miller Test Defined: Miller v. California established a three-prong test to determine if content is legally obscene and therefore unprotected by the first_amendment.

Community, Not Country: Miller v. California famously declared that two parts of its test must be judged by “contemporary community standards,” meaning what is considered obscene in rural Texas might be different from what is acceptable in New York City.

The SLAPS Safety Valve: Miller v. California created a critical protection for legitimate works by stating that material cannot be obscene if it has Serious,  Literary, Artistic, Political, or Scientific value (the “SLAPS” test)

LIFE THRU BOOK: Dante's point was that fraud attacks something even deeper than the body: our ability to know what is true. Violence destroys lives but deception destroys the trust that makes civilization possible.

Yes - now recognize the role of philosophers and academic theorists (8th Circle falsifiers all) and the role of Education Pedagogues in directly attacking students’ ability to know what is true and the complicity of expedient adults across the professions to fail to call out lies… https://t.co/atQc3no6kv

— CJ the palmer worm; wife,mother, researcher. (@thepalmerworm) June 21, 2026

LINUXHIPPIE: There's no voting our way out of this, there just isn't.

And we wonder how we got here.....

There's no voting our way out of this, there just isn't. https://t.co/CaRAU8aKqC pic.twitter.com/vRXTsT4Veb

— Linuxhippie (@linuxhippie) June 22, 2026

From Reduxx.info on New Zealand sexologist, John Money,

Dr. John Money, a sexologist and psychologist from New Zealand who practiced at Johns Hopkins, is considered the first to coin the terms “gender identity” and “gender role,” describing the “internal experience of sexuality” and the “social expectations of male and female behavior” respectively. These concepts are prominently featured in trans activism today, and are used to bolster claims of “gender fluidity.”

Millstones fix this.

The only thing that stops evil wicked men from injuring others are good men.

We are well past time this stuff needs to end.

It doesn't matter how it gets done at this point, it just needs to get done.  https://t.co/VuJmM2evtU

— Linuxhippie (@linuxhippie) June 22, 2026

Why can't Los Angeles put out fires?

Why can't Los Angeles put out fires?  City officials offer a ton of explanations but no answers.

Why can't LA officials put out a *simple* building fire?
LA remains disastrously unprepared for... everything.

Day 5: Boyle Heights cold storage facility is STILL on fire. Noxious fumes across the city. Air like a chem bath.

Mayor Bass: "we are concerned about the biohazard… pic.twitter.com/tFQBkzFriQ

— Annie Jacobsen (@AnnieJacobsen) June 21, 2026

In California, we don't have the isolated fires or an extra inch of rain after a couple of days of a storm.  No.  In California, we have state of emergencies.  So the local cities Los Angeles, Sacramento, San Francisco, Fresno, San Diego, they're all plugged into the state of emergency to get funds.  Uh-oh, a little rain.  State of emergency!  

Oh no, a structure fire.  State of Emergency!

Karen was sipping cocktails in Chicago when the Boyle Heights Fire erupted, just as she was sipping cocktails in Ghana when our Palisades Fire erupted. I warned you all...what happened to us will happen to all of LA. That smoke choking out LA is full of lead. Don't breathe it! https://t.co/U0DSMqRhL0 pic.twitter.com/HnBLFvl2uj

— Spencer Pratt (@spencerpratt) June 21, 2026

White woman in Texas who stood up for herself after a pair of Muslim women antagonized her in a grocery store so they could record her reaction has been doxxed and fired and is now receiving hundreds of death threats.

The White woman in Texas who stood up for herself after a pair of Muslim women antagonized her in a grocery store so they could record her reaction has been doxxed and fired and is now receiving hundreds of death threats.

It would be a shame if we raised her some money. pic.twitter.com/c260rTfDoZ

— Right Angle News Network (@Rightanglenews) June 21, 2026

ssss