Monday, April 6, 2026

AMY WAX:

Posted by at No comments:
Epstein with Gates created the funding structure through DARPA and DOD for COVID.
Posted by at No comments:

Sunday, April 5, 2026

if they have to make up 50 different things to attack a trait, but they lose 10% each time, they know that they have 10 different intersectional attacks on one target ultimately it'll be a trend down.  --Stephen Coughlin

If you grew up in the United States in the past 50 years, then you know about the Trail of Tears.  It's one of those stories that is beaten into our collective consciousness.  Starting in grade school we're taught in no uncertain terms that Native Americans were forcibly removed from there ancestral lands by the US government between 1830 and 1850 and that thousands of natives died in the process.  The government did this so that white men could seize Indian land and the valuable resources that it sat on.  In case you miss that lesson in the classroom, you might have caught it in the 2006 documentary narrated by James Earl Jones, or the sprawling National Park with signs that the Indians did not want to leave, or the endless amount of online propaganda about it.  Much of what they're saying is a myth.  As it turns out, none of the Cherokee Indians who travel the Trail of Tears had ever heard of the Trail of Tears.   That's because from 1830 to 1850 almost no one used the phrase.  The term was popularized a full 7 decades after the Cherokees moved to Oklahoma and even then it wasn't truly household name.  That didn't happen until the 1960s more than a century after it took place.  But it isn't just the name that's at issue here, it's the details that are so often omitted from the actual story.  

1:19.  The story begins in 1830 when President Andrew Jackson signed the Indian Removal Act.  The law did not authorize the US government to forcibly remove them, instead the law authorized the president to negotiate legally binding treaties with the various tribes in which those tribes would be awarded compensation and a new territory west of the Mississippi in exchange for voluntarily vacating the territory that they currently lived on.  In accordance with that law many Indian tribes agreed to terms to relocate. The first major treaty was the Treaty of New Echota in 1835.  In school this treaty is presented as a fraudulent agreement in which a tiny number of Cherokees signed away all Cherokee lands in the Southeast allowing the US government the Cherokee to Oklahoma salting the deaths of 4,000 Indians.  Well, every aspect of that narrative is false.  The first lie is that 4000 Indians died that figure comes from a letter written by Dr elizer Butler a member of the American Board of the American Board of Commissioners for foreign missions

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: ,

JARED TAYLOR: Why Have Young Women Gone the Wrong Way?

Thank you to Jared Taylor.  His articles.  His books.

Why is there a big and growing sex difference?  
Journalist Helen Andrews, "The Great Feminization," Helen Andrews, Compact, October 16, 2025.

3:49.  Ms. Andrews says that women evolved to solve conflicts not openly or through tests of strength, but by undermining and ostracizing each other.  And women now dominate universities.  They've also poured into law schools and journalism.  Once there are enough of them, they run things according to squishy emotion rather than hard facts and they stamp out dissent.  That's what we saw in those student attitudes.  Women are the ones who want to ban ideas that might hurt feelings.  Feminized college turns young women into hard lefties, and feminized media keep them that way.  Someone who writes at X as Vittorio has a different theory that starts out in a similar way women evolved to fear social exclusion because if you're pregnant or nursing a child and get kicked out of the group, you die.  Men are more independent and they take more risks.  Also, in every culture ever studied men have a higher tolerance for disagreement.  A committee meeting doesn't have to be a group hug.  In fact, it better not be if anything's going to get done.  Women love consensus.  And Vittorio argues that social media are the biggest, most ruthless, consensus machines ever built.  You can see what everyone believes in real time, disagreement is visible, measurable and punishable at scale.  And once everyone got a smartphone, social media could hound you always . . . everywhere.  This constant scrutiny by potentially everyone in the world overwhelmed the people who are most vulnerable to criticism most fearful of not fitting in namely young women.  Social media surely contributed to the rise in mental distress from 2011 to 2021 with a sharp rise in 2016.  As you can see, it's been worse for the youngest group, 18 to 25, and the numbers are a lot higher for girls.  This is prevalence of major depressive episodes for adolescents in 2021.  The other data are interesting but look at the sex differences, a shocking 29.2% for women and 11.5% for men.  These are major depressive episodes and women are twice as likely as men to suffer from anxiety.  Women complain more than men, and an increasingly woman-dominated power structure not only takes women's complaints more seriously, it shares them.  This is how we get safe spaces trigger warnings, hysterical MeTooism, kangaroo courts for mail students who look at a co-ed the wrong way, and the absurd idea that being fat is healthy and sexy.  The only way to enforce this stuff is through censorship.  This is the staff of hate a German nonprofit that claims to strengthen democracy by keeping people like me off the internet.  I count 4 men and 15 women.  And of course the big boss is a woman. Here are the no fewer then eight photos of Miss Von Hodenberg that she invites you to download.  It's hard to get more female than that.  And censors now wear hip clothes, not commissar uniforms.  

7:46.  And so to return to the survey from Wisconsin, no fewer than 39.3% of co-eds think a campus speaker should be disinvited, that is to say, told to stay away after he was invited if some students would find his views offensive.  

Helen Andrews thinks it will all get worse.  Older men will age out of their jobs and once the English Department or the newsroom reaches a certain level of estrogen poisoning, only sissy boys will stay and they'll go along with the girls.  Right thinking right thinking white men will tune out the news, despise the left, stop going to college, and have a hard time finding girlfriends.  How can anyone marry when feminism teaches women that if they think they want children it's only because the patriarchy brainwashed them, and that true fulfillment is working an HR or a progressive non-profit.  And even when they are 35 and childless and have been taking antidepressants for 15 years, they still won't admit that they're Republican voting father was right.  Steve Sailer thinks the sex divide can also be thought of as a marriage and babies divide. Married white women are a lot more likely to vote Republican, especially once they have children.  They start caring about schools, policing, lower taxes, traditional values.  And in 2024, 56% of White married women voted Trump.  That's pretty close to the 59% of white men who did.  Single white women voted only 47% for Trump but the tragedy remains for young white men today traditionally it was women who wanted to marry and have children.  Now it's white men who want to have families and rear happy, proud children, and many can't find healthy minded women.  Many women do return to good health once they become mothers, but for now a lot of them are just impossible.  It's understandable why so many white men lash out at liberal women, but they are victims of a sick and cruel system, a system that hijacked the best part of their nature, their kindness, and their caring, and turned it against everything that it is also in their nature to love their men, their families, and their race.  Sometimes destructive forms of insanity fall out of fashion.  Trans identification really is in free fall.  Same for non-binary.  Let's hope single white women begin to come to their senses but whatever happens White women must not be our enemy.  They need us, and we need them.  They are our troubled unhappy sisters.  They will never be happy until they are cured, and the best cure is a strong patient white man.  
Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , ,

STEPHEN COUGHLIN: Intersectionality is a Marxist term that covers for the dialectical attack process. Intersectionality is a mechanism of intentional cultural genocide.

Stephen Coughlin @ Unrestrained Analytics.

2:25. Once they've eaten the fruit they're not in play.  Arguably the main point of penetration for Marxist activities May well be in religious organizations it's in hollowing them out have the inability to fall back on over time.

The people who run Marxism would rather be rulers in hell than subject in heaven that is so important to take in they would rather be in command of a s*** Heap that they own then have the most elegant life not being in charge of it.

3:16.  What did Mark say in 1837 I wish to avenge myself against the one who rules above.  Thus Heaven I have forfeited I Know It full well.  My soul once true to God has chosen for hell this point is like being a self-confessed Satanist Satanism is itself operates on a dialectical formula it's the same formula that Marxism operates on and it's the same formula other things operate on like angles metaphysical worldview.

If someone says that they're a witch you just treat them like the Witch and then you start attaching them thing to them things that which is due and you incorporate it that's your analysis because failing to do so maybe to miss things that come in through that.  Once you start incorporating this very close long-term association threat analysis we're not going to incorporate crap. We're going to get into it because the people who are operating against us are informed by it.  And if we understand how that might influence it if you're doing real threat analysis, you have to account for it.  And that's as far as we will go.

4:41.  Critical theory is a Neo Marxist principle that envisions the total dissolution of the existing order through a series of escalating dialectical negations over time.  On the street side, it's cancel culture.  Critical theory is Marxism.  It's not a version of Marxism.  It's not a form of Marxism.  Intersectionality isn't something Marxism participates in.  That's a very platonic statement.  It is Marxism.

Intersectionality is a Marxist term that covers for the dialectical attack process.  It is a popular branding that provides an academic veneer, allows it to pass itself off as a science and supports pseudo science narratives that conceal hostile intent through the systematic negation of targeted cultural, religious and personal values along critical theory lines of attack.  Intersectionality is a mechanism of intentional cultural genocide. With a America as a repressive intolerant regime wherever there is an "other" with a competing value, a negative value, that value will be scored as holding a liberating tolerance that will then be pitted against an American value in a dialectical process of negation.  The dialectical process was use "the other" to generate as many liberating values as there are American values to be negated.  To identify as an American, racism will negate that.  Love America, xenophobia will negate that. Secure the Border, the right to the migrant will negate this.  Believe the Constitution as the supreme law of the land fascism will negate this if American institutions of Higher Learning were built by immigrants of European stock White Privilege will negate this.  If you are biologically male and call yourself a man genderism will negate that.  So you're saying that this is how it works what we are talking about is a liquification of reality every one of these intersectional attacks is an attack on your identity so those things that are under direct attack so that you are not allowed to identify yourself it is a total attack on identity and in theory once every one of these is taken out you are whatever we say you are including if we have to make you say you are that yourself.  You have a canceled culture.  These are attacks on identity that cause you not to lose your way, but to erase it from your own knowledge.  Us drifting is a deliberate attack.  Nobody forgot anything.  This stuff has been removed from your vocabulary.  Now there's another aspect to the opposite.  It's just made up. It's just made up.  So if they lose, all they lose is a made-up narrative.  But every time you lose, you lose something so if they have to make up 50 different things to attack a trait, but they lose 10% each time, they know that they have 10 different intersectional attacks on one target ultimately it'll be a trend down.  What they are trying to do right now is replay the Weimar Republic when they thought they were going to take control in Germany and what you see them doing on a slow roll is actually try to make sure of the stakes of the Weimar Republic aren't repeated and using Nazis to kind of bootstraps themselves up by calling them the bad guys the Nazis got the upper hand on them.

I can't tell you how much time we lost going to Capitol Hill saying if we could just get this member of congressman to understand us, we could change.  And almost invariably, a couple of years later, they knew what we were saying and they were batting for the other team. You can't go to the second cause if the first cause can explain it.  Why did they do that? Well, because they did it.  If we could just explain it when they do this, bad things happen, they'll stop.  But you haven't exhausted the fact that the reason they did it is because bad things happen. You just can't accept the fact that the person you elected to stop it is okay with that. 

The difficult thing we have is that everything is so obscured it's so difficult to figure out the actual cause was and then we get wrapped up in why did they do that?  Well, you know, the simple answer is they want to negate everything.

9:08.  It's just semantic Marxism.  If you control the language, you control the conversation, you'll control the outcome.

Catastrophic Failure: Blindfolding America in the Face of Jihad, Stephen Coughlin, 2015.

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , ,

TOM LUONGO: Macron is siding with Iran because he still believes that he and his Davos cronies can destroy the US in the Straits and here at home.

Yeah, they are staying full on globalist and we are moving on. But, that move assumes that the "Iran" he was negotiating with can 1) survive Trump and 2) enforce a toll on the Strait. Neither of those things are good bets despite the propaganda fog we live in here on Twitter. So, parse it out and Macron is siding with Iran because he still believes that he and his Davos cronies can destroy the US in the Straits and here at home. You want to talk about national pride circling the wagons around the leader in a time of crisis being an advantage for Iran?

Have you met Americans? 

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: ,

TOM LUONGO: The ENTIRE Bannonite crowd is a bunch of grifting intelligence operatives selling you something that isn’t true so they can maintain the status quo after they destroy Trump.

The ENTIRE Bannonite crowd is a bunch of grifting intelligence operatives selling you something that isn’t true so they can maintain the status quo after they destroy Trump. It’s the worst combination of greed, corruption, and intelligence shaping out their right now. They built your trust during the interregnum under the Biden Junta. They built in distrust and played on your skepticism to make you feel intelligent. They produce “content” non-stop to keep you glued to their shadow play they project on the cave wall. And when Trump won they took credit for it. But the minute the reality of the situation on Capitol Hill existed, the backbiting began. Starting with the low-levels guys (Barnes, Frei, Massie) and it built all last year Tucker weaved it into his guest list. Candace went off the deep end. They platform stenorious sounding experts, former military and intelligence ‘analysts,’ and create literal morons like Brandon Weichart and Rich Baris out of whole cloth. It’s a circle jerk to keep you in the cave. It’s a technique as old as the hills. And now, they are trying to tell you that the US militay is incapable of blowing up a handful of F-4s, some Catamarans, and missile silos. Remember, folks, 10 years ago they wanted you to believe that we can read license plates from space but we couldn’t find a convoy of Toyota Hiluxes with chain guns mounted in the trunk and blow them up with, well, anything in our arsenal. We just had to accept that ISIS was here forever. Same with the IRGC. Same grift, different decade, same assholes. Don’t hate me because I was right about every single one of these grifting assholes. If you need to hate anyone hate the guy in the mirror who you’re really mad at. I’ll be over here cashing my $7000 checks, smoking my cigars, getting ready for the next battle. Because, unlike most people I want to WIN.

Posted by at No comments:

Saturday, April 4, 2026

TOM LUONGO: Everything Obama did as president was to undermine American ability to fight when the time came. Trump has fully exposed the depth of the rot in US institutions

People keep asking me for a concise summary of my worldview. Here it is. Then think through SOFR replacing LIBOR “Higher for Longer” from Powell forced The BoE and subsidiaries to become the largest holder of USTs 10/7 was City of London betraying Israel using Netanyahu’s hatred of Iran against him to spiral us to WWNext. Everything Obama did as president was to undermine American ability to fight when the time came. Trump has fully exposed the depth of the rot in US institutions Now he’s being railroaded into having to suspend the Constitution to fulfill the MAGA mandate b.c there is no moving forward with our current Legislature and Judiciary. Last night, he told you the chaos in the ME is not his responsibility. He’s called Europe’s bluff, Lloyd’s bluff. You want Gulf oil, “Go take it, or buy it from us.” Bibi is pissed (if he’s still alive). The “Iran” we have contended with, for Britain’s profit, is gone. 

Long live Iran. Everyone, please, take Trump’s deal. It’s the key to humanity’s future. 

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: ,

TOM LUONGO: So, I think they betrayed Bibi over 10/7, telling him it would be a little event that he could attack Hamas over, and it became a nightmare scenario.

Bibi is pissed because he wants to ensure that there is zero threat from Iran in the future... and Trump just said, I'm pretty much done.

Now, Bibi is complicated, because in my read of events, he was a 'loyal' Israeli and a loyal London agent of chaos pre-10/7, because that's how Israel secured itself against angry Arabs. But, as the article points out, Israeli support is waning in the US, generationally, and London had to move quickly. So, I think they betrayed Bibi over 10/7, telling him it would be a little event that he could attack Hamas over, and it became a nightmare scenario. Afterwards he would not be placated. It's why he attacked Qatar while Trump was negotiating peace, because Qatar organized 10/7 for CoL. I may have a few bits wrong here, but the general framework fits events. He's pissed at EVERYONE. And it makes him dangerous if Trump pulls out too early. Because they could just nuke Tehran.... starting this whole thing up again. I hope he's dead, honestly.
Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , ,

STEPHEN COUGHLIN: Because democracy refers to Marxist states or counter-states. The United States is a Republic.

Because democracy refers to Marxist states or counter-states. The United States is a Republic. The distinction between a Democracy and a Republic goes all the way back to Plato's Republic and Aristotle's Politics. So, why do Republicans, who have been apprised of this, support Democrats in calling America a democracy?

The "D" in Republican stands for "controlled opposition." 

Unconstrained Analytics by Stephen Coughlin.

Catastrophic Failure: Blindfolding America in the Face of Jihad, Stephen Coughlin, 2015.

from the Amazon blurb, 

After the events of September 11, 2001, Stephen Coughlin was mobilized from his private sector career to the Intelligence Directorate at the Joint Chiefs of Staff to work in Targeting. Thus began his education in terrorism. In the years that followed, Coughlin earned recognition as the Pentagon’s leading expert on the Islamic-based doctrines motivating jihadi groups that confront America. He came into demand as a trainer and lecturer at leading commands and senior service staff institutions, including the National Defense University, the Army and Navy War Colleges, the Marine Corps-Quantico, the State Department, and the FBI. So effective were his presentations that some in the special operations community dubbed them “Red Pill” briefings, a reference to an iconic scene in The Matrix. It’s an apt metaphor: Once the facts and doctrines are properly explained and understood, there is no going back. This was more than our enemies – and, it seems, our leaders – could tolerate. 
Beginning in 2011, the Muslim Brotherhood convinced the White House to ban Coughlin and put an end to his briefings. The move was in keeping with shariah concepts of slander that seek to blindfold America to certain realities that render us defenseless against a threat made existential by the very ignorance it gets our leaders to enforce. 
In times like this – when the White House’s former counterterrorism strategist can declare it unconstitutional to allow national security analysts to look to Islam to understand jihad – there’s an urgent need to pull away the blindfold so we can see and confront the threat. Such is the goal of Catastrophic Failure. The book, drawn heavily from Coughlin’s “outlawed” briefings, is a comprehensive assessment of Islamic law and doctrine known to form the basis of hostile threat strategies directed against America and the West, the challenges they present, and the ideologically induced breakdown of fact-based decisionmaking that is nothing short of professional malpractice by our national security elites.

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: ,

ERIC DAUGHERTY: Gavin Newsom's California Medicaid program alone has reportedly lost $146 BILLION to FRAUD. Fraud raids are now RAMPING UP and arrests are happening The Trump White House anti-fraud task force has already suspended HUNDREDS of hospice fraudsters.

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , ,

BEN STEIN: Television tends to lower the standard of national culture by taking time that people might otherwise spend reading or doing almost anything

and instead subjecting them to this kind of alternate reality, which is a reality in which nothing is difficult, there is no thought, there is no analysis.  Everything is done by scripts, squealing automobile tires, and you have to say to yourself, look at a generation that's gone, grown up watching nothing but television.

00:00. The book points out, and I point out to you Miss Fuldheim, that TV is highly stereotypical, homogeneous, and ideological, and . . . what the results of that will be, I'm not quite sure.  I do think that it is worth noting that the most powerful medium in the history of the world is controlled by a very small, idiosyncratic, homogeneous group of people.  I mean I think if . . . the people who write and produce for TV. What I notice on television is that there are certain characteristics that certain people, certain stereotypical people, have on television.  For instance all businessmen if it's an adventure show are evil murderous hypocritical cheating scoundrels if it's a situation on television . . .

She wants to know if you know a businessman who is not a murderer . . . .  (Laughter)

That it seems to me is not a true delineation of them. And similarly on television all small towns are evil, vicious places where the big city innocent goes, his car breaks down, and it gets caught in a web of murder and kidnapping, extortion.  

And all military men are if it's an adventure show are planning for a Neo-Nazi takeover and if it's a sitcom there buffoons.

On crime shows, the criminal is almost always a middle class well to do personally of the majority group.  There are almost no poor people portrayed as committing crimes.  The criminals, even if a poor person has committed a crime, he has been forced into doing it by a businessman or some other middle-class seeming person.  

There are no useful or vital religious figures on television.  They're all either buffoons or helpless fuddy-duddys.  There is this kind of overwhelming stereotyping of certain power centers and power groups in the society as either bad or foolish.  Let me just say that even the people who make television, even the Gary Marshalls and Norman Lears of Hollywood, do not really dispute that this stereotyping goes on.  The point is just that there is an enormous amount kind of background noise on these TV shows which is a full alternate reality, a fully alternate reality, or alternative reality of American life.  People watch TV so much that it's like a second life for them.  And in this second life, conditions are very different from what they are in real life, that is, in real life one occasionally finds a businessman who is not plotting to murder his go-go dancer girlfriend on TV.  If a standard episode of stars on TV a standard episode of Barnaby Jones or Starsky and Hutch will be that a go-go dancer has been murdered and there are three suspects.  One is her boyfriend, who has just gotten out of jail after serving 20 years for murder, and the other one will be the janitor he cleans up the club and he is a heroin addict and the other one will be the head of the local utility company who stops in there for a drink on his way to the train.  Now invariably the killer will be the head of the local utility company and this is a reality which it seems to me on TV which it seems to me tends to screw up most people's perceptions of real life.

I watch M.A.S.H., I watch Barney Miller. Dorothy Fuldheim, 1893-1989, TV Commentator.  

Well, M.A.S.H. is a perfect example of what I or what the book is about because one of the parts of the book is that in on television military men are in two different categories if they are enlisted men or draftees they're saintly virtuous people if they are professional Military Officers they are killers their whole aim in life is to kill.  

That's not true of M.A.S.H. 

Oh, it is absolutely true of M.A.S.H.  In M.A.S.H., the people who are the heroes . . . 

No it isn't the officer in charge is a very nice guy.  He writes his wife every week.

But he is a draftee.  All the people in the mobile surgical hospital are draftees.  The people who come over from headquarters are only concerned with bombing civilians.  M.A.S.H. is the absolutely pluperfect example of how on television a professional Army man is one inch away from being an S.S. Officer.  I think to whatever extent public television or these infrequent high culture events on commercial television occur there is an enormous backlash going in the other direction which is a television tends to lower the standard of national culture by taking time that people might otherwise spend reading or doing almost anything and instead subjecting them to this kind of alternate reality which is a reality in which nothing is difficult, there is no thought, there is no analysis, everything is done by squealing automobile tires.  And you have to say to yourself, look at a generation that's grown up, watching nothing but television, what must they think of people who are businessmen?  What must they think of professional Military Officers?  What must they think of bureaucrats?  What must they think of clergyman after being exposed?  Almost exclusively . . . 

Of anybody who voted for Nixon would be another example.  Buckley, douche.

I don't think that television has done it at all.  

One must not forget also that in these poles that are taken about the standings of their and their respect respectability of various occupational groups the groups that are demeaned by the television consistently get lower and lower ratings and I don't know whether there's cause and effect or not

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , ,

J. MICHAEL WALLER: They are readying for the next stage of insurgency right under our noses.

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , ,

NYT: We need a new definition of death.

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: ,

Friday, April 3, 2026

J. MICHAEL WALLER: Excellent Good Friday call for the compromised King Charles III to abdicate. He doesn’t stand by the crosses on the Union Jack.

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , ,

JOANTHAN TURLEY: We have become the world's ship of fools. I mean you have China that is virtually mocking us. They have hundreds of these companies that solely arrange to have Chinese citizens to give birth in the United States

It's done in the open and it's making us into a laughing stock but it also has robbed us of control of what it means to be a citizen in this country.  --Jonathan Turley

Why can't the media and press ever condemn this action as, oh, I don't know, ILLEGAL!!!  Instead, they present it in a sizzling, shocking register, where for some who watch this will see this as an opportunity instead of against the law.

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: ,

Diller's wife Stephanie says her husband died a hero and lived as one too.

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: ,

Keely Hodgkinson wins Women's 800 meters final at the Summer Olympics, Paris, 2024.

The race is the Women's 800 metres final at the 2024 Summer Olympics (Paris 2024) on Monday, 5 August 2024 held in the evening at the Stade de France, Saint-Denis, north of Paris, France.

Keely Hodgkinson.   

Dang!

Keely Nicole Hodgkinson (born 3 March 2002) is an English middle-distance runner. She is the reigning Olympic champion at 800 m after winning the gold medal at the 2024 Summer Olympics. In total, she has won two Olympic medals having also won silver at the same distance in the 2020 Games. She is also a two-time European champion in the 800 m and has won two silver medals and a bronze in the same event at World Championship level. Hodgkinson is the world record holder over the 800 m indoors, the 2026 world champion indoors and she also holds the world indoor best for the 600 metres. She is both the British record holder and the sixth fastest woman ever over 800 m outdoors.

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , ,
Subscribe to: Comments (Atom)