Thursday, December 25, 2025

TOM LUONGO: End the Poo-ification of America.

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: ,

IF YOU WERE BORN IN THE UNITED STATES, THIS COUNTRY IS YOUR INHERITANCE

Now, it's true that some people don't want what they've inherited.  If they get a house they can't live in or maintain, people will sell it.  Same with an RV or a beach house.  Some people want nothing to do with this country.  That's fine.  

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: ,

SAMA HOOLE: Every traditional culture fermented their food. Kimchi. Sauerkraut. Kefir. Aged cheese. Fermented fish. It preserved food. It improved digestion. It provided probiotics naturally. Modern humans throw away food that's "expired" after 3 days.

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , ,

Wednesday, December 24, 2025

A CHRISTIAN MESSAGE FROM KIERS STARMER?

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , ,

Do you know that the US is the world's leader in beef production efficiency?  It produces 18% of the world's beef with only 6% of the world's cattle.  In fact, compared to other countries, it takes them 2 and a half or more beef cattle to produce the same amount of beef as one US beef animal.  And the US produces over $27 billion pounds of beef a year and has the lowest emission intensity per pound of beef produced.  There's your AG fact for the day. 

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: ,

ERIC DAUGHERTY: 🚨 HOLY CRAP! New reports allege up to $76.5 BILLION OR MORE in fraudulent spending in California

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: ,

— Val (@ValZimmer2) : John Enders talks about his viral isolation experiment and control studies. Breakdown of the cell produces cellular debris. The different cellular debris produces different symptoms

Okay, so diseases are not a function of viruses or bacteria, but a function of the breakdown of a cell.  Breakdown of a cell can be seen to be similar or identical in terms of symptoms, like Measles symptoms, for example.  So what cells break down under measles?  Or what cells break down under scarlet fever to produce those symptoms which are different from chicken pox, different from Gonorrhea, and so forth? 

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , ,

SIGHTBRINGER: For 40 years, the Fed’s real power has not been rates. It has been legitimacy. Trump is tearing that membrane.

This is Trump rejecting the idea that unelected institutions should be allowed to suppress national growth to preserve theoretical stability. He is choosing volatility over stagnation. Momentum over control. Power over process. That path creates booms. 

It also creates fractures. --SIGHTBRINGER

⚡️What you are seeing is a direct assault on the post-Volcker monetary regime. And it is intentional. This is a signal. Here is the structure underneath it. 1. Trump is openly breaking the Fed’s myth of neutrality For forty years, the Fed’s real power has not been rates. It has been legitimacy. The belief that: • monetary policy is technocratic • markets are managed by experts • politics stops at the Fed door Trump is tearing that membrane. By saying “anyone who disagrees with me will never be Fed Chair,” he is doing something far more disruptive than threatening independence. He is declaring that the Fed is already political. He is just willing to say it out loud. Once that happens, the spell is broken. 2. He is reframing markets as a political instrument, not a natural force Trump’s core claim is simple. Markets are behaviorally managed systems. They respond to incentives. They respond to fear. They respond to rate expectations. When good economic data causes markets to sell off, it reveals something rotten in the system. That rot is rate repression logic: • growth triggers tightening • success gets punished • expansion is capped preemptively Trump is rejecting that logic entirely. He wants markets rewarded for strength. He wants inflation managed after growth, not before it. He wants risk-taking restored as a national objective. This is a return to explicit growth primacy. 3. This is a regime shift toward fiscal dominance, openly stated The old model was: • Fed first • Treasury adapts • markets price policy restraint The new model Trump is pushing is: • growth first • markets absorb volatility • Fed follows the political mandate That is fiscal dominance without euphemism. Rates become a tool. Markets become a scoreboard. GDP becomes the legitimacy engine. This is how emerging powers behave. Trump is attempting it inside a reserve currency system. That is explosive. 4. The real target is time, not inflation Trump is obsessed with one thing he never names directly. Time. High rates stretch time. They delay investment. They freeze projects. They slow capital velocity. Trump wants to compress time. He wants projects funded now. Markets moving now. GDP compounding now. This aligns perfectly with the broader acceleration era: • AI compresses development cycles • capital rotates faster • political patience collapses • long-term credibility matters less than short-term momentum In that world, a central bank designed for slow decades becomes a liability. 5. This increases tail risk across every asset class If Trump succeeds, here is what follows: • higher inflation tolerance • higher equity volatility • steeper yield curves • weaker long-end bond credibility • stronger real assets • capital flight into things the Fed cannot print Gold. Bitcoin. Equities with pricing power. Anything tied to growth velocity. The Fed becomes reactive. Markets become political. Risk becomes explicit. No more adult supervision theater. The real truth: This is Trump rejecting the idea that unelected institutions should be allowed to suppress national growth to preserve theoretical stability. He is choosing volatility over stagnation. Momentum over control. Power over process. That path creates booms. It also creates fractures. But once a country decides that growth is a political mandate rather than a monetary byproduct, there is no going back. The system changes character. And everyone holding “safe” assets needs to understand what that actually means now.

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , , ,

NGOs POST BAIL FOR REPEAT OFFENDERS!!!

Posted by at No comments:
Posted by at No comments:

Tuesday, December 23, 2025

SCOTT ADAMS: Newsom’s task force wants to redistribute farms from white owners to non-white farmers. How much do you think the efficiency of the farms is going to decrease if you take the experienced farmers and block…

🚨South Africa-style land grabs are coming to California. Newsom’s task force wants to redistribute farms from white owners to non-white farmers
@ScottAdamsSays
"How much do you think the efficiency of the farms is going to decrease if you take the experienced farmers and block them from owning farms or decrease their impact on the farms... and move the farms to people who didn’t have as much experience.

What is going to happen to the price of food? It only goes one way. Nobody doubts how that’s going to turn out." 

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , , , ,

DAVID SANTA CARLA: The elderly are showing signs of black fatigue.

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: ,

DESMOND SHUM: METHODOLOGY [of influence]: GENTLENESS AS A WEAPON

Preferred targets sit in the middle—large enough to matter, small enough to stay below the radar. The Party does not want heroes. It wants conduits.

Sociology Over Ideology

This is not a political influencer program. It is a social penetration strategy, distributing influence quietly through everyday trust networks. --Desmond Shum

Inside the Machine: A Rare Recording Reveals How the CCP Recruits Influencers youtu.be/rV7JFmz6Ca0?si A Chinese YouTuber with roughly 350,000 subscribers in the military-affairs space recently released a recording of a conversation with a Chinese Communist Party (CCP) recruiter. The audio offers a rare, unfiltered look into how China’s overseas influence campaigns actually operate. This is not the old model of “external propaganda”—no slogans, no red banners, no embassy tweets. What emerges instead is a market-driven influence operation built on a simple premise: credibility is scarce, and the Party is willing to pay for it. 1. WHO THE CCP RECRUITS AND WHY The recruiter describes a system that resembles risk-managed talent acquisition more than political vetting. The goal is influence that is useful, controllable, and durable. The Goldilocks Rule: Influence Without Exposure The CCP’s first rule is blunt: avoid obvious targets. High-profile dissident influencers—such as Wang Zhian (YouTube), Li Laoshi “Not Your Teacher” (X), Wen Zhao (YouTube), and Toronto Fanglian (YouTube)—are ruled out. Not because they criticize the CCP, but because they are already “tagged”: •too visible •too aggressively critical •too politically exposed •too difficult to manage Preferred targets sit in the middle—large enough to matter, small enough to stay below the radar. The Party does not want heroes. It wants conduits. Sociology Over Ideology The talent pool described is sociological rather than political: •Italy-based music influencers •Japan-based food YouTubers •Philadelphia-based blue-collar and car-mechanic creators This is not a political influencer program. It is a social penetration strategy, distributing influence quietly through everyday trust networks. The Party does not need admiration. It seeks to gently steer opinion. 2. METHODOLOGY: GENTLENESS AS A WEAPON Invisible, Long-Term Discipline The guiding principle is low-visibility persistence—“润物细无声” gentle rain moist everything, not sudden impact: •no abrupt tonal shifts •no one-off campaigns •no visible coordination The objective is endurance. Limited Criticism, Strategic Assistance •minor criticism of the Party is allowed •policy complaints are acceptable •one red line is absolute: no direct attacks on Xi Jinping Controlled dissent builds credibility. Excess dissent disqualifies. In the platform era, influence must be indistinguishable from independent commentary. 3. MONEY—AND THE UNSPOKEN INCENTIVE The financial structure is explicit: €40,000 per month, with a 30 percent cut for the recruiter. Money is only half the leverage. The recruiter also hints at reduced harassment of family members inside China—being “on the list rather than outside it.” He insists this is not a threat. It simply describes the environment. In such a system, cooperation functions like an insurance premium—paid quietly. 4. THE MODERN CCP INFLUENCE MODEL One line captures the logic: “The Party-state looks at the numbers.” Not belief. Not loyalty. Metrics. Views. Reach. Narratives that travel without fingerprints. Traditional propaganda is abandoned because it is too obvious. The modern preference is for ambiguity, credible messengers, cultural entry points, and erosion rather than persuasion. The goal is not conversion. It is drift. CONCLUSION

What makes this transcript unsettling is not its brazenness, but its restraint. The CCP is not trying to win arguments outright. It is content to let doubt accumulate and confidence erode, allowing “neutrality” to do the work slogans once failed to accomplish. Influence here is not about persuasion—it is about drift. And drift, over time, is far harder to see, let alone stop. 

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , ,

VIKTOR ORBAN: We have to trust that the people will enforce peace from the bottom up. This is the only thing we can trust.

00:00.  Who has wanted war so far?  Some European politicians have wanted war, thinking that a country with nuclear weapons can be defeated through a conventional war.  Good luck with that.  Also, those who manufacture weapons always want war or some kind of armed conflict.  These are the arms manufacturers.  And now a 3rd group has appeared: Now the bankers also want you to continue, because, otherwise, how will they get their money back?  They can only recover their money if Russia is defeated militarily.  That is how it all comes together.  So I want to tell everyone not to trust that European politicians are sensible enough not to drag us into a war.  They are not sensible enough for that.  The only ones you can trust are the European people.  You can trust the people in Szeged, in Hungary, in Slovakia, in Croatia, in Italy.  We have to trust the people who will hold similar gatherings.  Let's not be mistaken: so far, this is only happening in Hungary.  In 6 months, there will also be large anti-war gatherings in Germany and in France.  We have to trust that the people will enforce peace from the bottom up.  This is the only thing we can trust. 

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , ,

STEVE GRUBER: Chuck Schumer, the author of this bill that made what we're doing with Venezuela drug boats fully legal. We don't need permission from the rest of the world. Chuck Schumer gave us that in 1986.

from Steve Gruber,

1:17.  The Democrats are on the wrong side.  There's John Fetterman, the only honest Democrat.  I can't believe we're sitting here having that conversation. John Fetterman, the guy who . . . look, I was not a fan.  I thought he was compromised.  He had the stroke.  He couldn't speak right.  He turns out to be the one guy you can count on from the Democrats to at least be honest.  Now, he's a Democrat but he'll tell you the truth.  He went into that classified intelligence briefing and came out, unlike other Democrats, and told the truth about what he had seen, why is legal . . . Oh, and by the way, right here, this in front of me, this is the Maritime Drug Laws Enforcement Act of 1986, authored by a member of Congress in 1986 from the state of New York.  His name: Chuck Schumer.  He wrote the law that passed almost unanimously that makes it legal to blow drug boats out of the water.  It happened in the 80s a lot, 90s a lot.  Go ahead, look it up, folks, Chuck Schumer, the author of this bill that made what we're doing with Venezuela drug boats fully legal.  We don't need permission from the rest of the world.  Chuck Schumer gave us that in 1986.


Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , ,
Posted by at No comments:
Labels: ,

from Bill Warner @ Political Islam. 

00:00.  Whenever you're dealing with an apologist for Islam or even a Muslim, when you bring up Jihad, almost immediately they kick back to you, 

Well, what about those terrible Crusades?  Why they're the moral justification for Jihad.  I mean we're just as bad as they are, so let's not talk about Jihad, okay?  Let's talk about the Crusades.

Well, what we'd like to talk about here are facts and it turns out I sat down and put together some work and I created a database of some 548 battles that Islam fought Jihad, battles against classical civilization.  This isn't even all the battles Africa civilization of Rome and Greece

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , ,

DID J.D. VANCE JUST LAUNCH A SOUTH AFRICAN STYLE RACIAL WAR?

This is the South Africa moment.  The Twitter sphere is lit up with all this anti-white hatred and bigotry.  The hot racial wars are beginning.  Just as white people thought that ICE was doing them a favor, it turns out it was just seeding resentment and violence towards the lights even though many of the agents were Mexicans with masks.

Posted by at No comments:

Monday, December 22, 2025

WALL STREET APES: How hard could ICE be cracking down in California if one single Walmart has 10 tents for illegal vendors right in the open….. It’s worse than Mexico.

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: ,

ASHLEY RINDSBERG: also true with Al Jazeera, which is a Qatari-controlled outlet considered to be generally reliable. That gives it a higher ranking in the reliability rating than many American conservative news outlets which have proper editorial structure and accountability.

3:29. Wikipedia has definitely been taken over by woke activists.

Why would they lean left?

Academic by Nature when you take something academic minded, and Wikipedia editors are very academic minded, they're naturally going to draw from that pool of academia, which is left-leaning.

3:45.  People on the right are more likely to earn their living building things, or farming, fishing, serving in police and military organizations.  People on the left are more likely to be academics, reporters, lawyers, people who write for a living.  That gives them an advantage competing on Wikipedia.

4:05.  The real barrier is to understand all the parliamentarian maneuvering, all the rules, lawyering, all this kind of stuff that really takes years to understand it, to win a single debate about a single sentence.

4:20.  In addition, Wikipedia has simply declared most conservative media generally unreliable.  That means editor should not cite Fox News, The Federalist, The Daily Wire, the New York Post. By contrast, Wikipedia not only calls CNN reliable, it deems MSNBC, Vox, Slate, The Nation, and Mother Jones, reliable. If you're a leftist that's what you think.

4:47.  They consider FOX in their bones to be unreliable, never to be used on a variety of important topics.

4:54.  And FOX is unreliable sometimes, but so is MSNBC and CNN.

5:00.  And the New York Times, and any other rated reliable website or news outlet that it's listed.

5:06.  However, . . .

MSNBC, The Nation, or Mother Jones, however far left you go, it's still going to be considered generally reliable.  This is also true with Al Jazeera, which is a Qatari-controlled outlet considered to be generally reliable.  That gives it a higher ranking in the reliability rating than many American conservative news outlets which have proper editorial structure and accountability.

5:32.  Wikipedia's bias is also revealed in their choice of subjects.  After the murder of this Ukrainian refugee.  

A grizzly stabbing in Charlotte, North Carolina.

Wikipedia editors wanted this article about her deleted.

An editor has nominated this article for deletion. . . . arguing that the topic, may not meet Wikipedia's general notability guideline.

5:51.  Erase this story, because this story was a story about race, about who gets to be acknowledged as a victim.  This was a white woman killed, murdered by a black man, and Wikipedia very quickly tried to delete that article saying it wasn't notable.

6:06.  This is just one murder.

6:08.  But when you look at other instances of single crimes or crimes that end up in the news cycle, they do stay on Wikipedia and there's not an effort to delete them.

6:18. Also although the killer had been arrested 14 times.

6:22.  Wikipedia wouldn't allow him to be named on the website.  They said we have to protect his identity, because he's a suspect.  He's not been convicted.  Fair enough.  The problem is when you look at another case on the right,

A 17-year-old from a neighboring state is now under arrest tonight accused of firing on demonstrators.

Kyle Rittenhouse who was a minor.  They named him dozens of times.

6:45.  And Rittenhouse has never been convicted.

6:48.  But Wikipedia had no problem putting his name out there for the world.

6:51.  And people point out the unfairness and inconsistency but nothing changes.

6:56.  There is a point where public pressure and the culture actually does sway Wikipedia.  Iryna Zarutska is a good example because there was an outcry about this and eventually Wikipedia did allow that article to stay, but on a whole, you're absolutely right.  Nothing changes.

7:13. Another example of Wikipedia bias from the Israel-Palestine conflict.  You say pro-Hamas editors push propaganda.

7:22.  40 or so editors who I call the "Gang of 40," they've made 1 million edits to 10,000 articles.  [Ashley Rindsberg, Chief Investigative Officer, Neutral pov.com.]  They're removing mentions of terror attacks by Hezbollah and Hamas. This is a systematic coordinated effort.

7:36. Right before the presidential election, Wikipedia created a page called "Donald Trump and fascism."  

7:42. It's not if that is not an election interference, I'm not sure what is.

7:46.  The Guardian, the left-wing newspaper, in the same day published the same thing, "Is Donald Trump a fascist?" September 21, 2024.

7:50.   And they cited heavily a Harvard scholar who has ties to an Obama appointee but you as a user of Wikipedia will never see all this chain of sourcing.  You just see the final product.  They called him first a fascist,

Trump and his allies . . . have been compared to previous fascist leaders . . . 

and then they sort of evolved the messaging to call him an authoritarian.

8:17.  But isn't that fair?

8:19. The problem is that on Wikipedia you only get one side of it the worldview presented doesn't allow for other perspectives to be included and what you're reading about some of the most important topics of today.

8:29.  If you look up Fidel Castro's successor, who repressed Cuba for years, you don't get authoritarian.

8:35.  Not one mention of the term authoritarian on Raul Castro there's not one mention of the word authoritarian on the entry for Ayatollah Khomeini.  At least on the leader of China's page Wikipedia some foreign diplomats consider him to be an authoritative

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , ,
Subscribe to: Comments (Atom)