Saturday, March 28, 2026

STEPHEN COUGHLIN: 18 U.S.C. § 111 makes it a federal crime to forcibly assault, resist, oppose, impede, intimidate, or interfere with designated federal officers or employees while they are performing official duties.


@linuxhippie. Clearly, the Philly DA Larry forgot his ConLaw class on the Federal Pre-emption clause of the Constitution.

He also seems to have forgotten that Title 18 USC Section 111 makes it a felony for him to interfere with a federal officer in the execution of his office. Question? Has the FBI or DHS ALSO forgotten Section 111? Because, from where many stand in the cheap seats, the moment a state or local actor interferes with a federal officer in the conduct of his duties, those persons should be arrested, as should any and all individuals ordering that activity. And yes, it's really as simple, and as simply clear, as that. From the AI distillation of Section 111:

18 U.S.C. § 111 makes it a federal crime to forcibly assault, resist, oppose, impede, intimidate, or interfere with designated federal officers or employees while they are performing official duties. Penalties range from 1 year (simple assault) up to 20 years (use of a deadly weapon or infliction of bodily injury.

For Larry Krasner's political grandstanding,

ARTURO MCFIELDS YESCAS: During the 10th Summit of the Community of Latin American and Caribbean States, organized by Colombia, Xi Jinping had hoped to deliver a virtual address to 33 heads of state from the Americas. But the event managed to attract only three Latin American presidents.

Just a few days ago, China suffered yet another major political defeat. During the tenth Summit of the Community of Latin American and Caribbean States, organized by Colombia, Xi Jinping had hoped to deliver a virtual address to 33 heads of state from the Americas. But the event managed to attract only three Latin American presidents. This was a significant embarrassment, given that this organization is China’s version of the U.S.-created Organization of American States. "China Is Losing Ports, Power, and Presence in Latin America," Arturo McFields, The Hill, March 25, 2026.

TRANSODIUS: California is a bigger national security threat than Iran is.

For your Stockholm Syndrome / That makes us Dhimmi in our home / O, you know where you can shove your Palestine

O, you know where you can shove your Palestine.

You can stick it where the sun don't shine

For your Stockholm Syndrome 

That makes us Dhimmi in our home,

O, you know where you can shove your Palestine

Friday, March 27, 2026

EYAL YAKOBY: Outside of City Hall in Philadelphia, masked Islamists light dozens of American flags on fire.

MAG 1775: Church of England primary school in Lincolnshire. Seven-year-old kids kneeling toward Mecca. Then told to “have a go” on prayer rugs to Allah.Not Christian prayers. Islamic ones. In a Christian school.

REP. PRAMILA JAYAPAL: REPARATIONS FOR ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS?! 😳

REPARATIONS FOR ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS?! 😳

Rep. Pramila Jayapal calls for taxpayer-funded reparations for illegal immigrants, saying: “The people that have been inflicting this harm need to be prosecuted… And we are going to have to have some form of reparation.” 

Where in the World Is American, Calla Walsh? O, in Beirut where she's a contributor to Press TV, an Iranian State Outlet Sanctioned by the United States.

STEPHEN COUGHLIN: the objective of feminism is the destruction of families.

the "Open Marriage" narrative designed to liquify relationships. --Stephen Coughlin

As you watch the video clip below, one of many suddenly appearing in unison, consider this question, and do so in a dialectical frame. Is the clip a rejection of the Intersectional "Me Too" active measure, which was directed at (primarily young) women, or is it a purposefully planned continuation of it, directed at (primarily young) men? Recollect that, whether Plato (in The Republic), or de Sade (in Juliette), or Engels, or NOW in the 60s, or DSA today, the objective of feminism is the destruction of families. (While this point is terribly easy to prove, just watch the blowback.) Was the (real) objective of the "Me Too" movement to "empower" women or to antagonize men? Notice the trajectory of the supporting narratives, the Karen narratives that will become intersectional, and the "Open Marriage" narrative designed to liquify relationships. As one checks out the "Manly Mentor" clip, because it is such a foreseeable outcome to the prior narratives, is it a continuation or rejection of the "Me Too?" Then, as you ponder your answer, does it have the effect of making marriageable men reconsider the value proposition of a marital relationship? Is it a coincidence that this type of video to men comes out on social media at the same time we see a parallel explosion on social media of seemingly weak Christian men marrying porn stars? Could that make a reasonable young man ponder, "Do I really want this?" I picked this video clip, but could have chosen any number of them from just today. In dialectical attacks, those running them control both sides of the equation.

LEUVEN, BELGIUM: "Leftist Rats, Roll Up Your Mats."

Leuven, Belgium

WANJIRU NJOYA: He was given the keys to the Cathedral by the priests. They put him in charge of locking up and gave him verger duties. After he set it on fire, destroying the organ and organ loft, Fr Maire offered him a safe haven in his home to await trial.

JOHANNES M. KOENRAADT: Almost all North-West Europeans and their descendants can digest milk. I produced this mini-doc to explain why White people are the pastoralist supremacy.

Thursday, March 26, 2026

Save the nation. Remigration.

14th Amendment was for free citizens.  

SUSAN KOKINDA: IT'S OVER: Trump and Iran Just Shut out the UK and NATO



President Trump is not only dealing with the right people in Iran, he's dealing with the right people in the region, the ones who matter in this conflict: Pakistan, the Gulf States, Turkey, and back channels into Iran itself.  Now look at who is not in that room, who he is not dealing with: the United Kingdom, the European Union, NATO.  Not only are they not in the room, but the British, the Europeans, and their insane Green policies are literally out in the cold and with them their proxy war in Ukraine. But that's not what the mainstream media says.

3:00.  And then the president acknowledged Pakistan's role by reposting Prime Ministers Shehbaz Sharif's statement which said, 
Subject to the concurrence by the United States and Iran Pakistan stands ready and honored to be the host to facilitate meaningful and conclusive talks for a comprehensive settlement of the ongoing conflict.
Now, look at that roster: Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Turkey, the Gulf States, all of these countries are members of Trump's Board of Peace, the architecture he began building with the Abraham Accords and now operating at full speed under the pressure of a shooting War, while still lining up billions in investment for rebuilding Gaza.  And that pressure is doing something else entirely, something the media is completely ignoring.  Iran and it's proxies in neighboring countries are being isolated and defanged.  In early March, the Lebanese government banned Hezbollah and told it to turn over its weapons.  Then the Palestinians Authority publicly condemned Iran and sided with Saudi Arabia. Did you catch that?  The Palestinian Authority condemning and Iranian attacks on Gulf States and, reaffirming solidarity with Saudi Arabia and Hamas Iran's own proxy in Gaza, is now seriously considering a disarmament proposal from Trump's Board of Peace.

JOHN A KONRAD: And if I do get the call, it will be months before we are landing tanks.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

Trump is NOT escalating this into a major ground war. Let me spell this out with crayons. I’m a US Merchant Marine Captain, O6 (not O3) equivalent. We are a tiny forgotten service with one MF overarching specialty: moving escalatory armies overseas. It’s true a general like McChrystal has far more knowledge about what to do AFTER his tanks roll off our ships. But BEFORE those tanks roll off? They are OUR cargo. We are the specialists. We climb all around those tanks. We secure them, move them, deliver them. Our Commandant, who I talk to every single week, is in charge of that lift. Not whatever general is waiting on the pier. Right now we are in the BEFORE stage. I absolutely 💯 know more about this than any general because I have spent decades training and living the life for THIS MOMENT. When generals want to move escalatory army divisions overseas, they call us. We don’t specialize in every branch. Naval, Air Force, USMC, Special Forces movements have their own lift pipelines. We can help, but that’s not our core mission. But if you want to escalate a war with heavy ground forces? I get a call. The Air Force has already called us to move more bombs into theater. So yes, the air campaign can escalate. But there are ZERO plans to escalate this into a large scale ground invasion. ZERO. This cannot be done by airlift. The USAF can’t even get their own bombs overseas right now, let alone divisions of army units. And if I do get the call, it will be months before we are landing tanks.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​ So I repeat… this CAN NOT turn into a major war without my phone ringing. You can send Marines and air assault units without tanks to do raids but a major landing force like McChrystal is talking about just is not happening. Not yet. Not for months, if ever.

And when it does happen I will tell you because you can’t move Army divisions in secret. Not since the Army, in a moment of idiocy, sold off its Merchant Marine preposition fleet last year. 

JOHN A KONRAD: Worse, all the King’s navies combined, UK, Australia, New Zealand and Canada, can only field about 3 ready destroyers at any given time. China has 40+.

HAL CRANMER: high LDL is linked to longer lifespan

Almost exclusively everyone who moves into my place is on a statin. It's one of the first medications I work to get them off of.

I show their doctors the research - high LDL is linked to longer lifespan, and the triglyceride-to-HDL ratio is a better indicator of heart disease than LDL alone. As long as the family backs me up, I can usually get them off. We've de-prescribed statins from a lot of residents and they're doing fine. I can't think of the last time I've had a cardiac event in one of my assisted living homes.

She's just old and ornery because it's her land. Anybody who's got a grandmother, you don't sit in her chair, you don't drink out of her coffee cup, and you leave her stuff alone.

New Report in America shows nearly 100% of produce tested was positive for pesticides, including forever chemical