Showing posts sorted by relevance for query masks. Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query masks. Sort by date Show all posts

Thursday, November 11, 2021

Face masks make you suggestible; they make you more likely to follow someone else’s direction and do things you wouldn’t otherwise do.”

Monday, July 17, 2023

NYU Professor, Mark Crispin Miller, Forbidden From Teaching Course on Covid Propaganda!

Propaganda does not have to be false, but it does tend to be a little simplistic. 

He was going to be the subject of an expedited review at the request of his department colleagues and he attached their letter to him.

None of them had talked to him directly.  This is about 25 of his Department colleagues.  He hadn't heard from any of them.  They sent this letter to the Dean accusing him not only of telling his students not to wear masks in violation of university policy, and they said that a New York State law and there was no such law . . .

and I am not intimidated by students who were wearing masks in class, but we were online so nobody was wearing a mask.  But they then jumped into the wild blue yonder by accusing him of explicit hate speech, attacks on students and others in their [school] community; advocating for an unsafe learning environment; assailing his students with non-evidence-based theories, which means conspiracy theories; and microaggressions and aggressions.  So, this was like the censorship Trifecta.



I was a Covid heretic because I questioned masking.

I had sinned against Woke etiquette, right, and hate speech, and I can explain what they meant by that.  And I was guilty of conspiracy theory.  I mean this was really an amazing document.  

The Dean went ahead and ordered the review, saying that he had no choice because the university's lawyers had told him he must, which is, I think, probably significant.  Let's put that aside.  

Meanwhile, I wrote back to my colleagues.  I rebutted their letter point by point.  I asked for a retraction and an apology.  They ignored me.  I sent a follow-up letter.  I asked the same thing.  I said by November 20, please retract this and apologize; there's not a word of truth to it.  They ignored me, so I sued them for libel.  And the libel suit is ongoing.  And one of the reasons I wanted to talk to you is I wanted to discuss the status of that suit.  

What is the status?

Well, they got themselves a lawyer, and they filed a motion to dismiss.  Ordinarily, judges rule on motions to dismiss right away, but the judge in this case waited a whole year.   And when he finally ruled, he ruled that we had not proved actual malice, which kind of blew my lawyer's mind because it was abundantly obvious that there was malice here.  So we had to appeal.  We appealed.  We appealed to the Intermediate Appellate Court.  They got back to us a few months later.  They agreed that there was actual malice, but, and this is what was really surprising, but really dangerous.  They ruled that what my colleagues wrote about was pure opinion and therefore protected by the 1st Amendment. 

So what you're saying isn't protected by the 1st Amendment, but when they falsely accuse you of doing something, that's protected by the 1st Amendment even though the things that you were saying have the science on your side and you were correct.  

All I was doing was recommending that people read the science  What's dangerous about this suit is that the decision has set a precedent, whereby anyone in the United States who is accused of libel, and point to this decision and say, "This is just my opinion."  So you can say, I know for a fact that Jimmy Dore has sex with goats and he has child pornography on his computer.  This is a fact.  I know this," and then you sue me for libel, as you have every right to do, and I'll point to this case and I'll say, "Well, this is my opinion."  And the court will say, well, yeah, there's a precedent for this, and so it is.  So it means that the have-not, those who are weaker in the system, are now at a real serious disadvantage because if this decision stands it will be possible to dismiss any libelous suit on those spurious grounds.  Now, we have appealed again.  We have appealed to the Court of Appeals in Albany, which is the highest court in New York State, and we don't know yet if they're going to take it.  If they don't take it, it's over.  I will have lost.  That decision will stand as a precedent, and my colleagues will have got away scot-free, although what they wrote about me meets the classic definition of defamation.  They made claims that they claim were factual claims, but now they'll be able to say that this is just our opinion, our point of view.

Wow.  That's quite a story.  I've heard other stories like this from Dr. Jay Bhattachara and Dr. Khierarty.  They were shocked to see their own colleagues turn their back on the value of protecting ideas through vigorous debate and freedom of speech, and they all turned their back on it and tried to cancel you, they canceled them.  And they tried to get some people fired.  Well, you're not allowed to teach that course anymore.  

Well, that's right.  I'm not allowed to teach the course on propaganda.  I have friends and acquaintances throughout the hemisphere who've been fired for various, you know, for Covidian sins, sins against so-called social justice.  This is a very, very . . . we're at a frightening place right now it seems to me.  Free speech and academic freedom have never been more at risk.  And all those Democratic essentials that concern free speech and open debate are now treated as crimes.  I'm sure you've noticed that the media coverage of Robert F. Kennedy's campaign.  My mind is blown by the shrillness and unanimity of the media, of our free press, the liberal media, and every single outlet out there, every single newspaper, every single magazine, every TV network, they're all saying the same things, which is a clear indication of propaganda.  And it's all hysterically negative about Bobby Kennedy's inclination to question or complicate official narratives, whether it's on vaccination generally or the Covid vaccine or Ukraine, or school shootings, you name it because he departs from the permitted narrative, he is a thought criminal.  He is a domestic terrorist.  He certainly should not be allowed to debate with Joe Biden.  You know, Peter Hotez, the fraud who is telling us all to get vaxx'd and boosted for 3 years, the guy, everything he's said has turned out to be dead wrong, he tweets a Vice article attacking Bobby and Joe Rogan.  They invited him on to debate, and, of course, he weasels out, but the media is treating him as courageous, saying he should not debate him.  He's a victim of harassment, no doubt, by white supremacists.

. . . and Russia.  

But I can't believe, I'm in my early 70s, I've seen a lot of things.  I never thought I would see the Western press across the board treat debate in a political campaign as a no-no.  This is really reminiscent of the press under Dr. Goebbels.  Now, having said that I can be accused of trivializing the Holocaust, I guess. 

They did that to Bobby Kennedy.  He said that about Anne Frank.  

Right, right.  He said that if Hitler had had the kind of sophisticated surveillance capabilities that they have now, she and her family would not have been able to hide out in the secret annex, right?  He was immediately accused of trivializing the Holocaust, even of Holocaust denial.  And he apologized, which I thought he shouldn't.  I did a Substack post about it.  It's not for me to say what he should do but the fact is that he did nothing wrong, said nothing wrong.  God knows, he said nothing hateful or even incorrect.  But we've come to the point where you really have to watch what you say and that is reminiscent of life under totalitarianism. 

Thursday, August 22, 2024

Harry Fischer: Boots on the ground in medical hell

Real paramedic experience, recent convo: PARAMEDIC/ME: We don’t put cloth masks on asthma patients who are wheezing and working to breathe. That's so stupid.

RN: In my ER, we do. I don’t want them spreading Covid!

PARAMEDIC/ME: That’s harming people. I will never let you put a mask on someone having an asthma attack! RN: You’re just a paramedic, you’re basically a tech!

PARAMEDIC/ME: You have techs. I’m paid far more than a tech and I can do things you’re not allowed to do. Like intubate and make my own decisions. RN: I will not let someone harm my ER with COVID!

PARAMEDIC/ME: You are an idiot for placing a mask on someone wheezing! You're harming people! ___________ We had a very heated discussion. These people are insane. If you’re working to breathe. I’m not going to put cloth over your face. Duh. That’s how crazy this is. God bless

Sunday, May 8, 2022

COVID masks did not reduce transmission or deaths and may have exasperated the virus.

Friday, May 27, 2022

DAMNING: more people died because bureaucrats followed the *political* science, not the past 50 years of real science, which always confirmed masks don’t stop viruses.

Saturday, June 12, 2021

LAUSD + UTLA = GULAG MADNESS

 


UTLA is remarkably evil.  One wonders how much power in the state of California that they wield?  It never feels like they're protecting their paid constituents, the teachers, but instead are acting like surrogate masters of the state. 

Masks will remain on for students and staff at Los Angeles schools this fall and coronavirus testing will continue for all, under a tentative agreement announced Thursday between district officials and the teachers union. 

If you can, find a way to boycott LAUSD and UTLA.  Do not patronize their services or join their forces.  Please.

Clearly, LAUSD's top priority is not about higher learning; instead, it is about complying with state actors who have designs to enslave your children.  The district and the union is mandating that testing, apparently for both student and teacher, will be done twice a month.

The mask mandate would continue regardless of whether employees or students are vaccinated, with rare potential exceptions for students with disabilities. And the coronavirus testing would take place at least once every two weeks. That’s a possible step back from the current practice, which has required testing every week since campuses gradually reopened in April. 

Some schools used to have drug-sniffing dogs or metal detectors for weapons.  Today, they have screeners for symptoms.  This is the new gulag.  

Daily screening for symptoms also would be required for students, staff and visitors before entering a campus. This screening has typically consisted of a temperature check and a verbal self-affirmation of good health. The district also has an online Daily Pass that allows for the same affirmation, but people haven’t been required to use it. 

Monday, August 2, 2021

Joe Biden’s top COVID advisor just went on CNN and admitted the masks people are wearing don’t work against COVID

Tuesday, July 19, 2022

Remember, the state wants you sick. Well, they want you dead but they'll start with getting you sick. Masks make you ill.

Sunday, May 1, 2022

"mind-blowing how cheap [but not effective] masks are"



 

Wednesday, July 31, 2024

ROMAN BYSTRIANYK: This tells us that other societal and personal health factors are the most important – not any microbe.

We are still stuck in the idea of the “out there” something (bacteria, virus, etc.) we encounter, and then we get sick and die. No other factors are really ever considered, and the solution has been to use vaccines, masks, isolation, etc., to protect us from this outside enemy. Yet, the data show a decline in deaths by nearly 100% with or without a vaccine for all infectious diseases from the mid-1800s to the mid-1900s. This tells us that other societal and personal health factors are the most important – not any microbe. We don’t need to be protected; we must work towards health – whole foods, clean drinks, exercise, sunshine, destressing, etc. It’s like we are stuck in Newtonian physics despite the discovery of Einstein’s relativity and quantum mechanics. Many doctors in the later 1800s and early 1900s understood this, but they were overrun by the PPP of medical men – Profits, Prestige, and Power. 

Friday, July 16, 2021

"LA is the most anti-science area in the country."

Thursday, May 28, 2020

COVID-19: Genocide of the Old and Sick

Mass media, government
The gov't of Italy foolishly responded by sending sick people into nursing homes.  
Bloomberg's Tomara Remondini and Marco Bertacche wrote that in Italy "99% of Those Who Died from CoronaVirus Had Other Illnesses, Italy Says."  That's a Bloomberg headline.  So it's not like some organs of the major media and some journalists aren't trying to set the record straight.  It's just that the connected media, CNN, ABC News, etc. generally explode their stories on the scene with general hysteria anyway that almost any story sounds like it's an epidemic of some sort.  
The folks dying with the Coronavirus were already very sick.  And putting sick people into a nursing home where you've already got sick people is a recipe for disaster, a situation that anyone would recognize as dangerous except for Governors Cuomo of New York, Whitmar of Michigan, Newsome of California, and the governor of Washington state.  
There was never any reason to think that this virus was a threat to young, productive, working-age citizens.  
The idea was that sooner or later, people were going to get exposed to the CoronaVirus and that by locking down the entire population, the government thought that they could slow down the spread of the virus.  But the reality is that outside from a few locations, like New York City, there never was a major surge.  Check out this chart.  To me, it is the most damning of evidence as to where the "hotspots" or dangerous zones are: 
Thanks to Robert Wenzel for the article where this image is found.  Check out the share of deaths from Coronavirus in nursing homes.  
And then there was this:
This is a holocaust of the elderly and sick.  Thanks to Daniel McAdams' piece "COVID-19: Genocide of the Old and Sick."  It's not the young, the productive, or healthy working people who are dying.  If that's the case, then why is it the young who are complying to the letter of the recommendations with things like social distancing or wearing masks?  Masks cover up smiles.  They make a person seem threatening.  Think of doctors or surgeons.  These guys are not your friends.  

Thursday, September 22, 2022

POLAND: A lawyer is asked to put on a mask and this happens

The memes in this thread are pretty good.  I don't like wearing masks.  Too evocative of violence.  And if someone argues that masks are somehow beneficial for my health, they need to prove it incontrovertibly.  And because they can't, and because I don't like wearing them, I don't wear them.  If that causes some to be anxious, good.   

Monday, July 18, 2022

"He’s lied about masks, lied about his funding of gain of function research, and created hysteria. He should be fired now!"



 

Thursday, January 27, 2022

Masks for Kids = Abuse

Wednesday, December 8, 2021

GOVERNMENT WHISTLEBLOWER: "Masks were to soften you up for Plan B.”

Saturday, August 14, 2021

Babies born in the Covid pandemic 'have lower IQs', research says (masks reduced mother's oxygen?)

Wednesday, November 25, 2020

Nathan Crabbe of the Gainesville Sun says wearing masks help protect the economy." LOL

This is an excellent interview.  Find the time to watch it.  Check out Jennifer Cabrera's sites linked at Tom Woods' Show notes.  death certificates have a part I and a part II, anything the doctor things was a co-morbidity that didn't lead to the death.  If covid is in part 2, that death is now a covid death.  doctors giving guidance to a covid death. Doctors 

Gainesville Sun or Miami Herald, the latter wanted to smear her to influence the governor to lock down Florida even further as some states are doing with a slight rise in cases.  

The Herald and the Sun both speak about economics all the time but don't have a single economist on the staff.  

Columnist of the Gainesville Sun said, "If we'd all wear masks it would help the economy."


People will definitely freak when they read this.  I freaked.  My Adam's Apple literally gulped.  But Kyle Lamb is a respected Data Analyst and comes highly recommended by one of the few reporters who is covering so much data on COVID.  Though this chart is not directly related to Cabrera's conflict with the Miami Herald or the Gainesville Sun, it is compelling and absolutely has disturbing implications (meaning that it contradicts and exposes lies regarding the COVID narrative) about the COVID narrative across the country and worldwide.  

Check out the kind of nonsense in reporting on COVID that goes on in Florida.  I am sure that it is just as bad in other states.  And remember that it was Governor DeSantis of Florida who opened up his state, so these stats, particularly that high number for November, is designed to put pressure on him to lockdown again.  This is war.

Thursday, December 1, 2022

Bill Gates & Globalists Wanted to Vaccinate 7 Billion People Worldwide. If It Weren't for the Russians, They May Might Have Achieved Their Objective.

The globalists fully planned on holding all the cards and having full control over this system and the fact that the Russians played along and launched their vaccine first completely collapsed this agenda. 

Tom Luongo and Alex Krainer provide terrific insights on global players, their advantages, disadvantages, and how their respective histories play a role in how they're position themselves against their people and challengers, their competing strategies, etc.  

2:55  Alex says he doesn't know what going on with China--their lockdowns, zero COVID policies, quarantine camps, etc.--he says because he does know that the west is flush with disinformation and misinformation about China.  Says that a lot of the information is coming through the Epoch Times.  Journalists are quoting Epoch Times at face value.  Epoch times is controlled by Falun Gang, which is extremely anti-Chinese Communist Party, or CCP.  Says he can't trust them.  He's been trying to follow actual, genuine Chinese sources, and several westerners who live in China, and what I'm gathering from then is that things are not at all the way that things are being presented in the western media.  What's going on with the zero COVID policy, not sure, but the policy is stupid or it's about something else.  He was surprised to see Russia fall lockstep in line with the World Health Organization, and Bill Gates, and everybody, and take this COVID thing at face value, seriously--do the lockdowns, the masks, the vaccines, everything as the WHO dictated.  You already had the president of Belarus, Lukashenko, who said, "This is all bullshit.  We're not doing this."  At intelligence services, Russia and Belarus are quite tight.  So what was the Russian game?  It became clear the day they launched their Sputnik V vaccine, the first one to launch in the whole world.  The Russians were the first, and they made it immediately available to the whole world.  They gave other countries permission to produce it if 

5:55  The vaccines themselves are secondary.  More importantly, the vaccine was supposed to be the stepping stone toward the COVID passports, which were supposed to be universal.  Look at what Klaus Schwab and Bill Gates have said.  They fully planned on having monopolies on the vaccines.  So western pharmaceutical companies were going to have a monopoly, and they were going to vaccinate 7 billion people.  Remember Bill Gates saying, "Nothing is going to return to normal until 7 billion people get vaccinated."  That would have meant 7 billion vaccine certificates linked to Moderna, Johnson & Johnson, etc.  Once you have the vaccine certificates in place, there's a whole other administration and bureaucracy, IT administration of these rules.  Monopolies over the vaccines would also give them administration over the system.  

Now, if countries adopted Sputnik V, the Russian vaccine, that completely throws a spanner into the globalists' pandemic agenda because now they either have to include Russians in the administration of this system, or they have to give up control over the countries that opt for Sputnik V.  Now, you no longer have monopoly.  What the hell do you do now?  Had the Russians not played along and taken the whole thing seriously, . . . had they said, "No, no, no, we're not buying this.  This is a hoax," then their Sputnik V vaccine wouldn't have been credible.  "Wait, you have a vaccine, but you said the whole thing was a hoax?"  So the Russians had to play along, be part of the system in order to throw a spanner [British for wrench] into it, because it's not just whether you or I couldn't get onto a plane or go into a pub or into a theater, it's much bigger than that because that system you could use to destabilize governments, to trigger social uprisings, you could use it in all kinds of nefarious ways once you have power to control whether in some countries people may travel. people may leave their homes, people may go to work, children may go to school, and so forth.  The globalists fully planned on holding all the cards and having full control over this system and the fact that the Russians played along and launched their vaccine first completely collapsed this agenda.  That's how I work out the Russian agenda.  I don't know how to work out the Chinese agenda.  It's way out there.  

10:03  Krainer thinks that the zero COVID policy in China may be a ruse to shake out foreigners out of China.  This is such heavy-handed harassment that I know people who've said, like, "Okay, enough.  We're packing up.  We're leaving China.  We're not going to live here." It's not zero COVID, because zero COVID is an impossible objective.  

11:00  When Sputnik V was announced, Tom called it the biggest geopolitical tool.  

Friday, January 6, 2023

Wear masks to save public health agencies?

I laugh when people say they don't like talking politics.  For this interview here shows just how vacuous the COVID cult is in luring more innocents to get a shot, a shot that sheds.  The shot is the killer, not SARS-CoV-2.  Though SARS