IMTIAZ MAHMOOD: Imagine you are a dental hygienist and live in Sweden. You are employed to help “migrant children” with their dental issues. As part of your job you examine the wisdom teeth development of the kids and you notice that 80% of those “kids” have fully formed wisdom teeth, implying they are not kids at all but adults older than the age of 18.

No matter how many examples people get that their own states are behind this revolution, they remain convinced there must be some sort of mistake - surely no state would on purpose destroy its own people.

Solzhenitsyn explains how Russians believed there must be some mistake. https://t.co/sRcQkAT4HY

— Wanjiru Njoya (@WanjiruNjoya) June 24, 2026

Imagine you are a dental hygienist and live in Sweden.. You are employed to help “migrant children” with their dental issues. As part of your job you examine the wisdom teeth development of the kids and you notice that 80% of those “kids” have fully formed wisdom teeth, implying they are not kids at all but adults older than the age of 18. You tell the Swedish Migration Agency and they advise you to put it in writing. When you send exact details, with examples of specific patients you are suspended, investigated, and fired for disclosing private information relating to patients. This happened to Bernt Herlitz in 2017.

When he appealed the unfair dismissal, he ultimately lost and was fined about $50,000. He and his family faced financial hardship and almost lost their home, until some generous benefactors raised money for him. Bernt remains unemployed today, despite staff shortages for dentists in his area in Gotland. At the time, Sweden scoffed at the tests and claimed they were “discriminatory” but since then they have quietly brought in mass dental testing, for those whose age is in doubt, by the National Board of Forensic Medicine.

Bernt deserves a medal. Not vilification and unemployment 

CLASH REPORT: Israeli Diaspora Affairs Minister Chikli claims the Muslim Brotherhood plans to turn the United States into a "Muslim state" within 100 years. He says these "plans" have been discussed in mosques in Michigan, and says Israel is aware of them.

It won't take 100 years. --Diana West

.@realDianaWest Start the "100-year clock" in 1953 with Muslim Brother Said Ramadan (in yellow outline, 2nd from right) as part of a Muslim delegation meeting with the feckless Eisenhower as a "bulwark against Communism, but abetting Islamization strategery" & that's <3-decades… https://t.co/XQstsStMWq pic.twitter.com/0SGdZNYkUS

— Andrew Bostom, MD, MS (@andrewbostom) June 24, 2026

It won't take 100 years. https://t.co/HNKVCuHTTM

— @realDianaWest (@realDianaWest) June 24, 2026

Amichai Chikli. 

AESTHETICA: The best thing the Trump administration could do in response to communist terrorists being elected by NYC dems is to just denaturalize and deport them using the Immigration and Nationality Act and the Communist Control Act of 1954.

This is a fine idea. Plenty of laws are on the books that simply aren’t being used. https://t.co/amun0TQ9tg

— J Michael Waller (@JMichaelWaller) June 25, 2026

from Aesthetica,

The best thing the Trump administration could do in response to communist terrorists being elected by NYC dems is to just denaturalize and deport them using the Immigration and Nationality Act and the Communist Control Act of 1954. They are completely within their rights to do this. It will create a national scandal that will force mainstream democrats to defend these radical communists which they don't want to do, they want to ignore them.

Most importantly it sets a precedent and severely hampers the long term plans of the DSA Communist left. 

pic.twitter.com/Ca2RPk5O2C

— MJ Murphy (@hothingsgirlsay) June 25, 2026

MJ MURPHY: Dude. The real disgrace would be telling women their boundaries don't matter. Dignity is not hatred. Privacy is not bigotry. Safety is not discrimination, and protecting sex based spaces does not ruin lives.

Another male crying victim for being excluded from a female sex based space. pic.twitter.com/ORDF7WOw8M

— MJ Murphy (@hothingsgirlsay) June 24, 2026

TRANS KANSAS LAWMAKER SLAMS BILL BANNING BIOLOGICAL MEN FROM WOMEN'S BATHROOMS

Thank you, Mr Speaker.  On its face, this bill obviously discriminates against transgender people.

00:09.  No, it separates bathrooms by biological sex. That is how bathrooms have operated for generations.  Protecting female spaces is not discrimination. It's recognizing sex differences.

In ways that make our lives exponentially more difficult and dangerous . . . 

00:29.  Dangerous for whom?  Women are statistically at far greater risk of sexual assault than men. Sex-segregated bathrooms exist because of that reality. Not because of cruelty.

Good morning seriously it is yet another way of policing women and our bodies . . .

00:52.  Sir, women are not being policed.  Women are asking for boundaries.  Female privacy is not oppression, it's a basic civil right.

In the absence of men and masculinity being subjected to the same scrutiny. 

01:10.  No, Sir.  Men's spaces are not the issue because men are not physically vulnerable to female in the same way females are vulnerable to males.  That's not ideology.  That's biology, Sir.

There's no outrage about trans boys playing in sports.

01:31.  And that's because female athletes lose opportunities when male bodies compete in women's categories.  The performance gap matters.  That's why this debate exists.  

There's no hand ringing about husbands and Sons sharing their bathrooms with trans men.

01:54.  Correct.  Because women are the sex with higher rates of sexual victimization.  Policy follows risk.

This is about blaming women for the bad behavior of men.

02:11.  No sir.  It's about not forcing women to absorb the consequences of male behavior.  Women didn't create male violence.  We shouldn't have to surrender our spaces to accommodate it.

And we may be done with this travesty in the Statehouse but now we've just Unleashed it upon our families and our friends.

02:40.  No, sir.  What's being unleashed is clarity.  Bathrooms are separated by sex.  That standard protects everyone without requiring women to override instinct or privacy.

And our colleagues, and this is an embarrassment and a disgrace, and it is going to no doubt ruin lives.

03:03.  Dude.  The real disgrace would be telling women their boundaries don't matter.  Dignity is not hatred.  Privacy is not bigotry.  Safety is not discrimination, and protecting sex based spaces does not ruin lives.  It maintains clear, neutral standards that protect everyone's rights without forcing women to surrender theirs.  Calling this "life ruining"?  Come on, that's dramatic.  No one's life is ruined by not entering a woman's restroom.  Women's rights however are eroded when male access becomes mandatory.