Tuesday, September 9, 2025

WANJIRU NJOYA: Battle Hymn of the Republic is not a Christian anthem.

Battle Hymn of the Republic is not a Christian anthem.

The mostly-peaceful abolitionists of Massachusetts were not Christians, they were intellectuals who believed in Transcendentalism, Rationalism and The Doctrine of Necessity. --Wanjiru Njoya

You should know that Julia and Samuel how were not Christians as we think of Catholics, Baptists, Methodists, Presbyterians and so forth.  During the 1850s & 1860s, the Howes were in lock- step with most Unitarians of the northeastern states of that era and thereby embraced a very free-thinking, Transcendentalist, pretend-Christian theology.  As was customary with Unitarians in Massachusetts during that era, the Howes’ belief in God in Jesus Christ (as we know it from the Christian Bible) was rather confused with Transcendentalism, Rationalism, and The Doctrine of Necessity.  Such confused religious belief was commonplace among Massachusetts intellectual who had embraced the Republican Party.

from Poetry Archive,

"The Battle Hymn of the Republic" was written in 1861 when Mrs. Howe, in company with the Secretary of War, visited the military camps near Washington.  When the review was over, the soldiers thronged about the camp singing, "John Brown's Body."  Mrs. Howe, as she afterward related, was greatly stirred by the incident, but impressed by the inadequacy of the words to so fine a martial air.  That night she awakened with the first stanza of the "The Battle Hymn of the Republic" complete in her mind and before morning the entire poem had taken shape.

VICTOR DAVIS HANSON: “It is lawful to be unlawful—if you’re Joe Biden, according to the courts. But it is unlawful to be lawful—if you’re Donald Trump.”

It is not a legal paradox; it is Bolshevik Justice, which has nothing to do with the law, and everything to enforcing revolutionary agenda.  --Diana West

Thank you to Diana West.  Note that this tweet is from May 2, 2025, a full 4 months ago. 

But what happens when a new president tries to undo that damage done? According to Hanson, the courts have flipped the rules. “The incoming administration who wants to rectify that abuse, in other words, it wants to enforce the law and say that you came in illegally and you shouldn't have because of the prior laxity of this government, now you've got to leave because you're still breaking the law.” But the courts are not applying the law evenly: “And they’re stopping these deportations for the most part.” Hanson concluded: “It is lawful to be unlawful—if you’re Joe Biden, according to the courts. But it is unlawful to be lawful—if you’re Donald Trump.” In other words, the rogue judiciary can pick and choose when the law applies or not.

BIASED? THERE'S NO BIAS. SHOW ME THE BIAS. since 2015, the share of directors donating to Republicans has plummeted to 5%, while the share donating to Democrats has risen 35%

WOW! President Trump just released a video from the Oval Office addressing the [murder] of Iryna Zarutska, pledging to take on vioIent criminals

HAL CRANMER: another “ex-resident”. After putting in a lot of hard work: - A low-carb diet - strength training - Aerobic exercise - red light therapy - brain games - a bunch of hyperbaric oxygen - EWOT - Saunas