Steve Falconer and Alex Michael @ Spacebusters.
Their songs have a terrific anti-war register. Makes sense. Hard to deny that we are at war, 5th dimensional warfare, which is endless warfare.
Thursday, July 3, 2025
GORDON DUFF: 4CHAN HACKED, MOSSAD EXPOSED: THE DIGITAL HONEYPOT THAT CREATED Q-ANON AND POISONED THE AMERICAN RIGHT
"Q" is Mossad. A reminder: https://t.co/8BkveJQMPE
— HealthRanger (@HealthRanger) July 3, 2025
"4CHAN HACKED, MOSSAD EXPOSED: THE DIGITAL HONEYPOT THAT CREATED Q-ANON AND POISONED THE AMERICAN RIGHT," Gordon Duff, The Intel Drop, April 15, 2025.
IJERPH: main takeaway from the current review is that approximately 1,000 hours or more of lifetime cellphone use, or about 17 minutes per day over a 10-year period, is associated with a statistically significant 60% increase in brain tumors."
"Our 2009 review, published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology, found that heavy cellphone use was associated with increased brain cancer incidence, especially in studies that used higher quality methods and studies that had no telecommunications industry funding."… https://t.co/g4WeQoPP5J pic.twitter.com/kn4FJzpaY0
— 7SEES (@7SEES_) July 3, 2025
Our 2009 review, published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology, found that heavy cellphone use was associated with increased brain cancer incidence, especially in studies that used higher quality methods and studies that had no telecommunications industry funding." "Mobile Phone Use and Risk of Tumors: A Meta-Analysis," Seung-Kwon Myung, et al., Journal of Clinical Oncology, October 13, 2009.msk@ncc.re.kr
"Last year, we updated our review (mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/2), published in the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, based on a meta-analysis of 46 case-control studies — twice as many studies as we used for our 2009 review — and obtained similar findings. Our main takeaway from the current review is that approximately 1,000 hours or more of lifetime cellphone use, or about 17 minutes per day over a 10-year period, is associated with a statistically significant 60% increase in brain tumors." MDPI, Publisher of Open Access Journals.
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.
Why I don’t use Wi-Fi. Hardwire your home with Ethernet cords pic.twitter.com/bj4aMkviuS
— Matt From Cultivate Elevate (@CultivateElevat) July 3, 2025
Remedies? Mesima,
CHASE HUGHES: The reputation and behavior of that group is that person's identity.
Without any of your memories who are you? You get left with this truth of losing yourself and there's no way back, there's no coming back, and this is what it's like for somebody that has dementia. The death that we are all afraid of is the death of the identity, the death of self.
If you imagine how many times you've heard a person ask what's his story we feel more at ease when we have a story which is why it's terrifying to start developing dementia I didn't know who my wife was for an extended period of time this was 12 months ago some kind of a story gives us this feeling that we know who we are it's understandable that if we struggle with identity, we face a lot of social consequences. If we struggle with identity, we will always face social consequences.
1:48. So we're going to talk about identity tonight and we'll also talk about how can we hack it in ourselves how can we hack it in other people then from a profiling perspective how am I going to identify someone else's identity who they really are deep down and you can do this in less than a minute and a half and you can identify identity in a deeper level than probably their therapist.
2:18. We have this guy named Henri Tajfel. He invented this thing called, Social Identity Theory. This theory breaks down how we categorize, identify, and compare ourselves to other people. So categorization means religion, title, degrees, certifications, awards, nationality, military service.
Then we have identification. Once we categorize the world into groups, then we identify ourselves within those groups and these groups from sexual orientation to religious beliefs, professions. We choose our cars, our clothing, our accessories to express our group membership.
And then we get into comparison comparison makes her identities more obvious this is where Us Versus Them tactics and US versus them mentality comes into place one experiment that doctor to give points on a test two people who they thought were in their group. This is how Hitler was able to commit crimes so that's the basic essence of social identity Theory those three elements there.
CORE IDENTITIES
Let's talk about these core identities.
The first one is the 1) HISTORICAL identities in our background or upbringing, our family heritage, life events, my journey, "I've been through this." It's how a person perceives the past and how it influences their entire life.
2) ROLE-BASED is the various roles that we play throughout our lives, like I'm the CEO, I'm a senior vice president, or I'm a parent, I'm a sibling. I'm a friend. So somebody's talking about a role in their life, we understand the moment that I hear "roles" what the expectations of that person are, that's what they're wanting to do, that's what they want to be seen as. If I can get them to agree that because of their identity [that] this decision is a good idea, I have agreement. The cognitive dissonance associated with that identity is so strong that they're not going to deviate from it. So if I know how to align a message with their identity, then I can build cognitive dissonance around almost any decision I want to.
3) MEMBERSHIP IDENTITY
This identity is how people see themselves as part of a group. It's a community thing. It's a culture thing, organizations, social groups. So this is the way that people think and behave based on shared values but anytime I'm guiding somebody down who has a "membership identity," I always want to build the walls of cognitive distance around the social expectations of the reputation or the behavior of that group. The reputation and behavior of that group is that person's identity.
Let's just go through a few sample scenarios. If I am in a business negotiation, for example, I'm going to engage somebody's role-based identity, role-based to establish a lot of respect and understanding. I don't want historical unless I really need to form a relationship with this person. If I'm a family therapist, I'm going to focus on historical identity so I can unravel the dynamics of the family. If I'm a leader at a business, I'm going to leverage member identity to foster some kind of cohesiveness in a little group of people.
How do we leverage that identity?
The formula is a 4-step formula that spells out the word I.D.E.A.
Step #1 is identify, the dominant identity. So I want to pinpoint which types, like historical role-based or membership that person is expressing most strongly. I want to listen I want for linguistic indicators. I want to observe emotional emphasis. Are they referencing their past? Are they talking about their role? Are they highlighting a group?
The D in I.D.E.A is deepen. We are going to affirm the importance of their identity. So we're reflecting their language a little bit, their tone, but we really want to let them know that we think their identity is very important. So we want to say something like, "You know, I think it's truly incredible how much pride you take in your heritage. I think that dedication is to __________ is really rare and super admirable. Then we align with that, so we're feeding that need, we're feeding that identity and making that identity important and validated.
The E in I.D.E.A. is empower. So we're highlighting how their past strength and experiences are relevant to right now. We might say something like, "You know, you've overcome so much in the past, and this challenge is just another opportunity to really prove your resilience." And if it's a "membership Identity" person, I might say something like, "This is a decision that I think is going to make a huge difference for the community, and I know how committed you are to their success." So I'm pulling out identity. I'm putting the identity up here, and I'm saying here, let's make this decision because look what you just agree to right here.
7:34. So the a of I.D.E.A is align. One way that I used to do this, I don't do it very often anymore, is I'll tell a story. If it's historical [identity], I'll say something like, "All these people have seen experiences like yours just lead to remarkable clarity in similar situations." If it's role-based [identity], I'll say, ". . . and I think everybody knows the best managers that people can work with always find that small decisive action always has the biggest impact." Membership-based identity, I'll say, "You know, groups like this tend to follow the quiet confidence of somebody who is truly invested in the future." I'm identifying this dominant identity. So historical, role-based, membership. I'm deepening that connection kind of bringing it more into the light and showing them that I know who you are and it's awesome. It's great. Then I'm empowering it, I'm framing their actions as a way to express that identity. So doing this with me is a perfect way to express that identity. It's a natural expression of who you are as a person. And then aligning. I'm aligning the request with their future vision of themselves or their group.
Henri Tajfel, Social Identity Theory.
and notice how Trump is not doing anything about this. I made the point the other day and I will make it again. Trump controls Israeli politics now.
I'm disappointed in Iran. They turned out to be bluffing the entire time. Maybe I'm going to be wrong about that, but as of right now the facts on the ground state pretty clearly that Iran was a paper tiger. --Tom Luongo
7:40. And my position is very clear now. Iran never gained a nuclear weapon because they never wanted to gain a nuclear weapon but not for the reasons that Alex and everybody else have been talking about, the fatwa, no, it has nothing to do with that at all. It's clear that these guys are in bed with freaking GCHQ on both sides. It's the search for the nuclear weapon. It's the striving for it that is the casus belli, not the actual nuclear weapon. If they wanted to make a nuclear weapon, they would have done so 20 years ago. Hell, f*cking North Korean made one. And if the Russians wanted them to have a nuclear weapon, they would have had one. If the Chinese wanted them to have a nuclear weapon, they would have had one. My logic here is not wrong. My logic here just comes to a different conclusion than your logic, and we're going to find out who's logic is correct, and there's no amount of brow beating me into submission on this. Because at the end of the day, I understand the strategy of bitches like Christine Lagarde and Andrew Bailey and all the rest of them, and Tony Blair and Benjamin Netanyahu. The goal is chaos. Of course, they want regime change in Iran. Of course, it's playing out like a certain freaking script, and notice how Trump is not doing anything about this. I made the point the other day and I will make it again. Trump controls Israeli politics now. The British are trying to resurrect, you know, Reza Pahlavi. It's not working. The Russians are going after the NGOs in all of the -stans. They are arresting people. Aliyev in Azerbaijan is trying to prop up his failing regime. He's been caught with his hands in the cookie jar, helping Israel attack Iran from the north, and betray Russia at the same time. He knows he's in trouble.
After all of the drama on the slack server for the last couple of days, again I think it's funny that everybody thought I would be upset about this, "Don't tell Tom." I don't give a s***. I hope you all found your soulmates being juiceburgs together it's Grand I always want people to find there in the world and if you're not part of mine it's great I don't want you to be in that in this club.
11:27. This is my position because I'm trying to end this nightmare. We have been blackmailed by these evil freaking people for 85 years, 80 years, since the end of World War II, the Cold War, Cold War Redux, the Lost 90s in Russia, all of it. It's all Downstream of this when you stop to really do the math about how much money is spent trying to deal with minimizing the threat and of nuclear weapon proliferation, and the amount of money that's spent on defense and espionage and cloak-and-dagger stuff, all of it, the Congressional hearings, and the lost wages, all of it, the SG&A costs, [Selling, General, & Administrative Costs] and every corporation in the world. It's trillions upon trillions upon trillions of dollars every year. And who does that serve? Level up and see through the b*******. The way to end all this is to start cleaving Gordian knots. Your move, or you get a B2 up your ass. Your move, or we fly in some F-22s. Your move. If you want to know why I have anger in my voice, I'm disappointed in Iran. They turned out to be bluffing the entire time. Maybe I'm going to be wrong about that, but as of right now the facts on the ground state pretty clearly that Iran was a paper tiger. That's what we have and I've been pretty clear, I don't like Israel. I'm trying not to use the word "hate" because I don't want hate to be the operative means by which I do analysis because that's a bad way to do analysis . . . because you know that whole anger-fear-aggression path that leads to the dark side, like it's real, folks. Hate makes you powerful, like yeah. I'm just not playing that game. So I want Israel to pay for their crimes, all of them, including the ones where they got us involved and s*** that poured moral stain all over me because I wound up paying for it. I'm angry about that. I really wanted to Iran to really knock their freaking teeth in. Really did. A little angry about that. A little sad, sad that I was actually sucked into that b******* for a few years. That being said, they hit them hard enough and hit us hard enough because of the perilous state that our actual military supply lines are in and our ammunition supply lines are in, which has a nugget of truth to it, which is not . . . not untrue that we can't sustain that war for that long. But we can sustain it longer, long enough to get rid of the assholes who were "fighting the good fight of the resistance." I love Star Wars but it's a bad metaphor for this. We're not the Empire, they're not the Rebellion or the resistance. That's not the way this works. Okay so let all that go and let's move forward and say you know what I don't want to be blackmailed by evil f****** shitbags anymore you guys want to fight amongst yourselves for resources you want to text us for military's and all that great great you developed weapons now where you only have to fight each other we're back to where the wars are fought by the King's armies. And only the king's armies need to be targeted, and the civilians can be left alone. You know, gentlemanly warfare. Lob ballistic missiles and drones at each other's ammo dumps and weapons development sites and research departments and Skunk Works and all the rest of it and their barracks. You sign up for the military, your life is forfeit. My dad was NYPD. I never once was under any illusions about the fact that my dad had to put himself In harm's way in order to protect and serve. And I found it offensive the older I got here in the United States, as time went on, we sat here protecting cops. F*** protecting cops. Cops are forfeit in service of protecting and serving civilians. If you've read this month's newsletter I think you understand my perspective on this if you haven't read this month's newsletter maybe consider spending an extra $7 a month on it, or $8 bucks, whatever it is.
17:50. I've just come into a different state of mind about all of these things watching this play itself out brought a lot of clarity I'm tired of watching the Vorlons in the Shadows manipulate us into fighting their f****** wars for them. I want a new way even for people like us.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)