Saturday, June 7, 2025

DEBBIE LERMAN: So the lockdown-until-vaccine response, which is a military response, it is not a public health response

The Deep State Goes Viral: Pandemic Planning and the COVID Coup, Debbie Lerman, May 2025.

Say it loud, say it proud: "WHATEVER IT WAS, THE VIRUS DIDN'T KILL THE WORLD—**THE RESPONSE** KILLED THE WORLD." "The lockdown-until-vaccine response, A MILITARY RESPONSE...killed millions...we have to look for the origins of the response...[not] the origins of the virus." This clip of Debbie Lerman, a 2023 Brownstone (@brownstoneinst) Fellow and retired science writer, is taken from a UKColumn () interview with Jerm Warfare () posted to Odysee on June 5, 2025. PARTIAL TRANSCRIPT "The whole point of my book and my research and everything, the message that I'm trying to get across is it doesn't matter what the virus was. It could have been real, it could have been fake. It could have been from a lab. It could have been from a raccoon dog. Whatever it was, the virus didn't kill the world. The response killed the world. "So the lockdown until vaccine response, which is a military response, it is not a public health response, killed the world. It killed millions of people who were injured and killed from the vaccines. It also killed people in hospitals. It killed people who were isolated. You know what it did? It deprived children of their ability to develop normally and of socializing, and it increased every kind of disease and depression that you could possibly imagine. "But that means what? That means if we say the virus didn't kill the world, it doesn't matter whether there was or wasn't a virus, because the response would have been the same. Okay? There would have been the same. So we have to look for the origins of the response. We can't look for the origins of the virus.

"We can. We can argue all day long. Do viruses exist? Do they not exist? We can argue. Did it come from a lab or did it not? Was it Fauci's lab? Was it Baric's lab? Was it China? Doesn't matter."  

SASHA LATYPOVA: COVID is part of an ongoing global military campaign on behalf of the controllers of the "Resilience" agenda, aka Agenda 2030

Pepijn van Houwelingen who previously asked questions about the mystery surrounding the NATO truthfulness goals speaks of a “huge black hole in our democracy ”. He emphasizes that NATO's resilience goals are not limited to military matters, but include many policy areas such as climate and public health. In principle, any ministry can have to deal with it. With a cabinet that carries out a secret agenda, the House of Representatives is insufficiently able to carry out its controlling task, says Van Houwelingen. He promises to set “a battery of follow-up questions ”. Other parties in the House of Representatives have so far been silent on the subject. FVD has twice requested a debate, but this was not supported by other parties in the Chamber.          --Sasha Latypova


ADMF, Advanced Development and Manufacturing Facility.  

The vaccines, the lockdowns, the 6' distancing, masks, et al are all under the category of "countermeasures," a military term to describe tools to defend against a threat. 

When Col Matt Hepburn told Astra Zeneca’s and other pharma executives that the DOD will be “predicting” the pandemic viruses and the pharma companies will be showered with money from the DOD to make vaccines in 60 days, he was enticing them into a cartel to commit mass murder and injury by poisoning. Which they have done in the past 3-4 years. Now, we are at a different phase of this game, and AZ is out. The remaining contestants in this fake competition are going to be chasing these “quick, change the variant!” games, while the US military cartel will be making cash by front-running these changes. Where do you think Peter Marks gets the “current pandemic variants” from? A few rounds of this game, and the only one standing will be Moderna as a front for US Gov/DOD/CIA pumping toxic mRNA sludge from Resilience via “resilience sites” onto the world.

Friday, June 6, 2025

DR. THOMAS SEYFRIED: Cancer is a mitochondrial metabolic disease, not genetic

I chew, you chew, we all chew, but maybe we should eschew plastics in chewing gum

NICK HUDSON: You can know with absolute certainty that you are dealing with a scam when dissent is suppressed

00:00.  Do you think there is a [parallel] because between both COVID and climate change?

00:08.  Yes.  Let's take a step back.  The general rule of thumb that I believe everybody should adopt is that if any problem is being presented as a global crisis, then it is a scam.  And the pattern that we are confronted with is really the fabrication of global crisis, the presentation either of  non-existent problems or small local problems as being general global crises. That fabrication followed by the assertion that the only solutions that are permissible are global ones that require a global  authority, global control, that is the general pattern that we are up against.  The COVID policy response was one of those.  Look at what happened to countries like Sweden or Tanzania, who tried to push back against the orthodoxy, the new orthodoxy.  And the climate crisis, the climate change crisis, is another example, where we are told that the biggest threat to the world is this molecule, CO2, and that an increase in the level of the molecule will cause an increase in temperature, and that that temperature increase will be bad for us.  And that's the only thing we can do is consume fewer fossil fuels and less energy.  That's fitting the pattern exactly.  The other things you can observe is instead of presenting science as an ongoing, evolving activity, it is presented in terms of static knowledge, consensus, and you see the cancellation and censorship of dissident voices rather than engagement with them.  These patterns are proof of a scam.  That is what people need to understand.  Whenever something is presented as "the science," as a consensus, it is a scam.  You do not have to go and get engaged in all of the minutiae of the scientific principles and the models and the measurements at all.  You can know with absolute certainty that you are dealing with a scam when dissent is suppressed.