New Northern Ireland Health Bill Is Full-On Tyranny

It's really interesting that the dystopian nightmare scenarios tend to emanate from Britain and its commoneealth nations. This is utterly bone-chilling stuff.     https://t.co/CwoWIwmqpK

— Alex (Sasha) Krainer (@NakedHedgie) October 9, 2024

I pray that people have noticed by now that the state uses the health sector as its primary tact to introduce tyranny and mass murder.  The state gets a high percentage of compliance from health edicts and fiat because people associate healthcare with early childhood experiences where they're obedient to a mother's instructions; so that scenario still exists in people's memory and the state exploits that.  Now not everybody complies, of course, but the fact that they're able to get such a high percentage of compliance says that most people are kind of, you know, in a child like, victim consciousness obedient posture when it comes to the state.  Like "law-abiding citizens" is a euphemism for obedient child.

The advantage of living in the United States is the Constitution that puts, albeit thin, restraints on government tyranny.  Though I am sure that any of us can point to a score of violations or exemptions to that claim.  The 4th Amendment in the US requires police to get a warrant to search property, yet when it comes to your vehicle out on the road in the middle of nowhere, they apparently have free range.  So the Constitution may not restrain the state, but it at least allows redress in court; that is if you have the money to sue the state, county, or city.

Detaining and quarantining individuals for up to 28 days.  Liz Evans' article, mandating the wearing of medical clothing such as face masks, forcibly entering premises and confiscating belongings without a warrant and in this Northern Ireland bill it talks about agents, agents of Northern Ireland Public Health officers or anyone the officers have designated anyone or many individuals.  So people can literally pitch up at your doorstep, break down the door, drag you out, take things from your house, examine things without a warrant.  They can require your children to be kept off school.  They can close your business and keep adults off work.  They can breach medical confidentiality and privacy and share your data with other patient medical information with various State bodies, which may or may not be working for the government directly or indirectly.  They can require an individual to answer questions regarding their health status; so there goes medical confidentiality.  They can require a person to attend training or advice sessions.  They can legislate as to where the person may go, or with whom the person has contact; that's the same as the Scottish one.  There goes your freedom of movement and freedom of assembly.  

It is real it's already in Scotland

Where did all of that building material disappear to?

[RG911Team] This is not a joke.

The government really claims that the Twin Towers turned from 110 stories to 3 stories in under 12 seconds - due to fire.

If you believe that, we have a bridge to sell you. pic.twitter.com/hHq7APHyBV

— Richard Gage, AIA, Architect (@RichardGage_911) October 9, 2024

DR. HAL HUGGINS: You're not going to get over cancer unless you get cholesterol levels above 200

h/t @BradfordT19 pic.twitter.com/7hWtalNoAJ

— 💯 Cary Kelly 💯 (@CaryKelly11) October 8, 2024

Dr. Hal Huggins, 1937-2014.  

The food we eat is the culprit or the cure.

The three pillars of the advice of these 11 women with type 2 diabetes were, "Don't count your calories.  Just control your carbohydrates, prioritize protein, and don't fear fat, especially the fat that comes with that protein." 

Hey @tiktok_us why in the heck would this video on a scientific study about diabetes be flagged as a community violation and result in my account being banned? pic.twitter.com/zPvaqZSrPh

— Dr Shawn Baker 🥩 (@SBakerMD) October 8, 2024

Type 2 diabetes and the preceding insulin resistance is entirely a disorder of lifestyle and primarily nutrition.  The food we eat is the culprit or the cure.  They were given the advice, "Don't count your calories.  Just control your carbohydrates, prioritize protein, and don't fear fat, especially the fat that comes with that protein."  That is the three pillars of the advice these 11 women with type 2 diabetes were given.  After 90 days, with all the same clinical assessments that had been used originally to confirm their type 2 diabetes, and myriad cardio-metabolic markers, every single one of them had improved with never a pill popped, never a drug injected, they had no evidence of the type 2 diabetes.  

SHARYL ATTIKISSON: But no matter how they crunched the numbers, they got the same disappointing result: flu shots had not reduced deaths among the elderly, January 24, 2006

Admittedly, it doesn’t work, but get your shot today! https://t.co/BbXHQ4hFXr

— Roman Bystrianyk (@RBystrianyk) October 8, 2024

From January 24, 2006.

From women entering menopause and may even increase their risk of heart disease in contrast to study for years ago found that for women in their 60s who've already gone through menopause and take hormones do increase their risk of heart attack and stroke now those conclusions still stand.

00:20. The CDC is taking a closer look at how best to protect seniors from the flu.  The agency is holding a symposium about that and other issues this week.  It all follows a series of studies that question the effectiveness of flu shots given to older people.  Here is Sharyl Attkisson with our report.

Millions of seniors swear by their annual flu shot.  After all, 90% of people killed by the flu are 65 or older.  But CBS News has learned that behind the scenes, Public Health officials have come to a new and disturbing conclusion: mass vaccinations of the elderly haven't done the job. Dr. Walter Orenstein was among the first to notice the problem when he headed up the Centers for Disease Control's National Immunization Program.  He says it's now become a consensus among Public Health experts.

What is absolutely clear is that there is still a substantial burden of deaths and hospitalizations out there that have not been prevented through the present strategy.

1:24. Here's what scientists have found.  Over twenty years, the percentage of seniors getting flu shots, 1980-2001, increased sharply from 15% to 65%.  It stands to reason that flu deaths among the elderly should have taken a dramatic dip, making an X graph like this.  Instead, flu deaths among the elderly continued to climb.  It was hard to believe, so researchers at the National Institutes of Health set out to do a study, adjusting for all kinds of factors that could be masking the true benefits of a shot.  But no matter how they crunched the numbers, they got the same disappointing result: flu shots had not reduced deaths among the elderly.  It's not what health officials had hoped to find.  NIH wouldn't let us interview the study's lead author, so we went to Boston and found the only co-author not employed by NIH, Dr. Tom Reichert.

We realized that we had incendiary material.

Dr. Reichert says they thought their study would prove vaccinations had helped. 

We were trying to do something mainstream, that's for sure.

Were you surprised?

Astonished.

Did you check the data a couple of times to make sure?

Well, even more than that.  We've looked at other countries, now, and the same is true.

That study soon to be published finds the same poor results in Australia, France, Canada, and the United Kingdom, and other new research stokes the idea that decades of promoting flu shots in seniors and the billions spent haven't had the desired result.

The current head of National Immunizations, Dr. Anne Schuchat, confirms CDC is now looking at new strategies but stopped short of calling the present policy a failure.

There's an active dialogue into how we can do better to prevent influenza and its complications in the elderly.  Dr. Anne Schuchat

So what's an older person to do?  The CDC says they should still get their flu shots, that it could make the flu less severe or prevent other problems not reflected in the total numbers.  But watch for CDC to likely shift in the near future more toward protecting the elderly in a roundabout way by vaccinating more children and others around them who could give them the flu.  Sharyl Attkisson CBS News Washington