Sunday, July 14, 2024

ARMSTRONG: with the Democrats trying to pull [Trump's] Secret Service protection and denying RFK Jr Secret Service protection, one must face the reality that there is a very dark side to Washington that never sees the light.

Thank you to Martin Armstrong's "Trump Beware--This May Be Only the First," found at Armstrong Economics. 

They tried to get Gorbachev to join NATO, which set off the coup against him in Russia, ending with Yelsin becoming Russia’s leader. When they tried to blackmail Yeltsin to stick in their puppet, Boris Berezovsky, that is when Yeltsin turned to Putin because the Communists were also trying to impeach him. Putin was neither an oligarch nor a communist. That is why Hillary blamed Putin for interfering in the 2016 election, for they had interfered in the Russian 2000 election.  --Martin Armstrong

The country is so polarized by this demonization of Trump that, beginning with Hillary calling half the country “deplorables,” what has set in motion is the decline and fall of our country. It was McCain who handed the fake dossier Hillary paid to have written against Trump all because the two of them were Neocons, and as I have reported before, I was asked to invest $10 billion into Hermitage Capital to take over Russia, which Edmond Safra and Bill Browder owned. This has always been these Neocons and their hatred of Russians. They have been waging endless wars with no victories, and more than 50% of the national debt is all because of them and their abuse of American power. We are still paying interest in the funding for every war, including World War II, because they NEVER pay anything off.
They tried to get Gorbachev to join NATO, which set off the coup against him in Russia, ending with Yelsin becoming Russia’s leader. When they tried to blackmail Yeltsin to stick in their puppet, Boris Berezovsky, that is when Yeltsin turned to Putin because the Communists were also trying to impeach him. Putin was neither an oligarch nor a communist. That is why Hillary blamed Putin for interfering in the 2016 election, for they had interfered in the Russian 2000 election.

Donald Trump MUST be careful. I question how someone could be on that roof in shooting distance without the Secret Service’s awareness. Just because Trump has survived one assassination attempt, with the Democrats trying to pull his Secret Service protection and denying RFK Jr Secret Service protection, one must face the reality that there is a very dark side to Washington that never sees the light.

Most people are not aware, but there have been multiple attempts against other presidents also during periods that have often been disconcerting. The assassin was 20-year-old Thomas Matthew Crooks, who Secret Service agents killed at the scene after the shooting. He had donated $15 to a progressive Democrat movement. The FBI identified him as a resident of Bethel Park, Pennsylvania – about 35 miles south of Butler, where Trump was holding his rally.

There were 2 tries against Abraham Lincoln with the second one succeeding.

There were also 2 attempts against William Howard Taft in 1909 and again in 1910.

There were also 2 attempts against Franklin Roosevelt.

There were 2 against Harry Truman as well as against Richard Nixon and George W. Bush.

Gerald Ford had 3 attempts on his life. 

Even Jimmy Carter had 2 attempts.

The record for attempted assassinations is held by Obama, with 8 attempts on his life. Even Bill Clinton had 5 attempts. We must be aware that the Democrats have so polarized this election with hatred that we must be deeply concerned that if Trump is assassinated, this country will be torn apart.  

Armstrong points out that political assassinations of leaders or presidents were a 19th-century idea, called "Propaganda of or by the Deed" that required physical violence to inspire revolution.
The very idea of assassinating leaders such as President Lincoln and President McKinley was part of an international trend that began during the 19th century and was based upon the theory that some dramatic deed was necessary to spark a revolution. It was called the "Propaganda of, or by, the deed,” and it advocated physical violence in a dramatic, provocative public act perpetrated against political enemies to inspire others to act in a popular mass rebellion or revolution. This was a political philosophy that was part of the radical thought process that was emerging with Marxism. Still, it was not precisely advocated by Marx, who was generally a revolutionary.

There have been four Presidents assassinated and three who were wounded, with two misses since 1865. 

1865, Abraham Lincoln, April 14th

1881, James A. Garfield, July 2nd

1901, William McKinley, September 6th

1912, Theodore Roosevelt, October 14th (wounded)

1933, Franklin D. Roosevelt, February 15 (5 shots fired missed)

1963, John F. Kennedy, November 22nd

1975, Gerald Ford, September 5th, and 22nd (missed)

1981, Ronald Reagan, March 30 (wounded)

2005, George W. Bush, May 10 (hand grenade thrown but was dud). 

2024Donald Trump, July 13th (wounded) 

DUMB GUY: I don't understand why our monetary system is privatized by a bunch of people who live in Brussels and Switzerland. If there's nothing backing the money . . . I don't want cocaine or child sex

Saturday, July 13, 2024

TRUMP IS SHOT AT


Let the theater begin.

John Jay Singleton.  

Calls from people trying to open accounts I'm always focused on private property and data so when I'm dealing with Caleb and Brown or Coinbase or the bank. I like Caleb and Brown by the way, so I'm going to be biased.  I get commissions from my referrals, okay.  So I'm a little biased.  However, I do like their service.  I wouldn't work with them if I didn't like the type of service they provide.  But they are kind of caught in the middle, as it were, because the government wants them to investigate and collect data on the owners of their account holders.  So they're asking for information just like Coinbase is asking for financial information, source of funds, source of wealth, for the signer, for the account holder.  Realize what's going on.  I'm telling you this because I want you to understand the language here.  A lot of times you forget that you're opening an account for another party,  your LLC.  And then you are being asked for financial information about yourself.  Your response should be, 
What legal duty do you have to investigate my financial wealth when I'm not the account holder?

Then ask,

What financial duty do you have to investigate the financial source of non-account holders?  And if you do have a legal duty, no problem.  I would like you to cite your legal duty.  Cite the law.  Because I want to read it. 

Step one, that's how I respond.  I don't just give them what they want and then beg for mercy.  I say, well, okay, I understand.  If you have to do something, show me the law that requires you to do it.  I'm a non-party.  I'm not an account holder.  My company is, and yeah I own it, but I don't have the contract with you, my company does.  The ownership of the company can change at any time.  That's why this is an issue.  The other thing is, let's say I'm going to give it to you.  Realize that the information you're requesting from me now is subject to a non-disclosure agreement in which there are substantial penalties for disclosing the third parties.  We can remedy that if you'll indemnify me against the penalty.  That means you pay the penalty for me because I'm going to have to pay the penalty. Did I tell you how much it was?  No I didn't.  Do you want to ask? Do you even have the ability to do that, right?  Let's just start there.  This is called negotiating with somebody that's not in the room.  You pull this trick on them too.  Make them negotiate with someone who's not in the room.  My company has substantial liquidated damages for disclosing information and that is what you're asking me for is a trade secret.  I don't have to tell you why, just know that it's a trade secret.  There's another reason why we say trade secret but we can get into that maybe I can give you a summary of what you're looking for tell me what actual legal Duty you have cite the law and you're not trying to be combative you're just saying look I'm with you I'm trying to work with you because I like your service tell me what legal Duty you actually have because you may not have read the statute you're just telling me what your boss told you to tell me so I read the statue and it says oh right here it says you need to do this this and this okay I'll do that for you or I will give you a summary. 


THE FEAR: The Greenland ice cap is losing around 30 MILLION tonnes [British, that ought to tell you something] of ice an hour due to the climate crisis. THE MATH: it would take a little over 11,035 years for the entire ice sheet to melt at current melt rates

THE FEARThe Greenland ice cap is losing around 30 MILLION tonnes of ice an hour due to the climate crisis - 20% MORE than what scientists originally thought.

THE MATH:

Hi again Mike. 👋 The Greenland ice sheet is estimated to contain 2.9 million gigatons (Gt) of ice, or 2.9 million billion tons. 🧊 If the ice sheet is losing 30 million tons of ice per hour, that works out to 720 million tons of ice per day and 262.8 billion tons of ice per year. 🫠 That sounds pretty scary until you do the math and find that it would take a little over 11,035 years for the entire ice sheet to melt at current melt rates. But, we will likely be well on our way into the next glacial maxima by then, so the ice sheet isn’t going anywhere. Has global warming melted your vanilla ice cream any?