Trump Wants to Give Cops Immunity

https://t.co/t0EIjPnrJ7

— Salvatore (@Enzospirit1) May 14, 2024

 

Trump wants additional federal indemnity protections for all police officers.

We're going to rebuild our cities.  We're going to bring them back like they used to be.  We're going to make them safe places again. We're going to give our police their power back, and we're going to give them immunity from prosecution so they're not prosecuted for doing their job.

We're going to indemnify them; in other words, we're going to hold them guiltless even when they commit their crimes, so they don't lose their wife, their family, their pension, and their job.  Maybe cops need to lose their wife and their family and their pension, and their job.  And maybe, just maybe, cops who commit criminal acts against Americans that they're supposed to be protecting and serving, maybe they need some jail time, Trump.  

So if you're voting for Donald Trump, you're voting for somebody who wants to hold cops guiltless when they commit crimes against the rest of us.  Trump is for heroes or Extreme Risk Protection Orders, ERPOs, or Red Flag Gun Laws. Red flag laws are anti-Second Amendment Laws.  

Trump:  We are outraged and sickened by this monstrous evil.

Offering a solution to stopping gun violence . . .

Trump:  that is why I have called for Red Flag Laws, also known as Extreme Risk Protection Orders

So when you're supporting Trump, or Biden or any presidential candidate, you got to know that those presidential candidates, and that's including Trump, are against the Second Amendment.  If they are against the 2nd Amendment, they're against your right to protect yourself, your fundamental, unalienable right to protect yourself.  And let me just remind you, the very first Red Flag Law that went into effect in Maryland resulted in the death of Gary Willis, who wanted to defend his home and the cops took his life anyway.  That's what Trump is for.  So if you are for Trump, you're for Red Flag Laws, which means you're against the 2nd Amendment.

Trump banned bump stocks, and a lot of people are like, "Who cares?  That doesn't matter.  I don't even know what bump stocks are.  I never even heard of them until I found out that Trump banned them."

Do you realize that banning bump stocks means a criminalization of hundreds of thousands of Americans who own bump stocks?  So what Trump did when he banned the bump stocks, he criminalized hundreds of thousands of Americans that he's supposed to be there protecting and serving, which is a violation also the Second Amendment.   [Ah, news flash: that's not Trump's job, nor the Fed's job to protect any of us unless from a foreign invader.] If you're voting for Trump, you're voting for "I like taking the guns first, due process second."

or might it take the firearms first, and then go to court because that's another system . . . because a lot of times by the time you go to court, it takes so long to go to court to get the due process . . . procedures.  I like taking the guns early, like in this crazy man's case that just took place in Florida, he had a lot of firearms--they saw everything--to go to court would have taken a long time.  So you could do exactly what you're saying, but take the guns first, go through due process second.

"Take the guns first"?  "Take the guns first" is what a tyrant would say.  If you're voting for Trump, if you're voting for Biden, you're voting for tyrants.  And don't give me this lesser of the two evils nonsense.  If you choose the lesser of two evils, you're still making the decision to choose evil.  Is there not another choice?  Like how about doing the righteous thing, doing the good thing, doing the noble thing and not voting for evil at all?

Carlin:  I don't vote.  If you vote, you have no right to complain.

Another thing is with the national debt, Obama increased the national debt $8.6 trillion in 8 years.  Trump increased the national debt $8.4 trillion in 4 years.  Is this me saying "that makes Obama better than Trump"?  Not at all.  If you are increasing the national debt what you are actually doing is diminishing the value of every Americans Time and Labor it used to be before Trump got elected he was for quantitative tightening in other words stop printing money and make sure that the money we have the M2 money supply actually retains its value so that every unit that Americans earn is actually worth something, and then when he became president he moved away from quantitative tightening to calling for massive quantitative easing.

I personally think the Fed should drop rates.  I think they really slowed us down.  There's no inflation.  I would say in terms of quantitative tightening, it should actually now be quantitative easing.  Very little if any inflation, and I think they should drop rates and they should get rid of quantitative tightening, you would see a rocket ship. 

In other words, print the money.  Lower the interest rates.  Let's get this economy going, which basically he's saying "I don't give a damn about your time and labor, Americans.  I'm going to diminish it and devalue it."  And this $8.4 trillion doesn't even take into account the $6.2 trillion that he signed away from Americans toward the banking cartel, toward big Pharma Industrial complex, toward the military industrial complex in a way from Americans.  

Listen to this.  He's going to sign, with one signature, he's going to sign away $6.2 trillion, while mainstream media says it's just $2.2 trillion.  Listen to this now.

I'm going to sign this, and it's a great honor.  $6.2 trillion.  I've never signed anything with a "t" on it I don't know if I can handle this one.  We can't chicken out at this point.  I don't think so.  Huh?  All right.  Thank you all.

Now we're going to watch them sign this 5,100 page document that nobody read.  Watch what he does when he gets rid of the pen.  Watch the second person he gives the pen to.  

I wanted that to be a nice signature. 

First pen goes to Mitch McConnell.  Second pen goes to who?  Goldman Sachs bankster Treasury Secretary, Steve Mnuchin.  It is a big club, and you ain't in it.  This is the Rothschild's banking cartel, taking firm control, even more firm control, over America and Americans.  So when you're voting for Donald Trump, you're probankster; you're also pro military industrial complex, because Trump gave the Pentagon one of the biggest increases it has seen in decades.  Remember we were warned by Eisenhower of the dangers of the military industrial complex.  

LATYPOVA: they are running a military coup. We don't have constitutional government, he . . . [General Talley] claims control of "the whole of government."

"These people who are pushing the [COVID] needles, they're murderers—de facto they're murderers. Now, the question is, was it somebody forced them, paid them, blackmailed them...that's part of the investigation. But they did commit many, many murders..."

Retired pharma R&D… pic.twitter.com/hDRRBtWXgz

— Sense Receptor (@SenseReceptor) May 14, 2024

The Department of Defense claims that they are in charge of all of government.  I just published on my Substack they have this phrase called "Whole of Government" approach.  So in one press conference, which was about 45 minutes, General Talley who is the main spokesman for the Operation Warp Speed, repeats "whole of government" about 12 times.  It's like a tick.  It's like Tourette's, and it's a very curious Tourette's because they are running a military coup.  We don't have constitutional government, he . . . the military guy claims control of "the whole of government."  So in the United States, we don't have anymore the three branches that check and balance each other.  We have a military operation that has subsumed whole of government, all of the federal agencies.  So that's my primary focus is the medical system that they are using to commit this mass murder, the federal dollars, and the military structure that they're using to do this.  

Now who is controlling them?  That becomes a little fuzzier because I don't have documentation anymore . . . 

00:00 to 16:12  Lawyer Todd Callendar and Dr. Lee Vliet. 

Who is Christine Brady?

UN Troops Being Brought in as Migrant Refugees

The illegal immigration is not just about election fraud, for that is baked into the system and doesn't require any outside help.  The threat outlined in the video and below reminds me if the threat posed to America back in 2011, the operation referred to as Green Helmets, where the U.N. cites climate change as the cause of supply chain disruptions and food shortages and their justification fir intervention.  But let's hear what Ferguson has to say about the Black Watch Regiment.

UN Troops Being Brought in as Migrant Refugees pic.twitter.com/yI8YBUtzcP

— Greg Reese (@gregreese) May 14, 2024

FERGUSON, This isn't just refugees coming in.  These aren't people fleeing from some kind of a war zone.  These are predominantly men aged between 25 and 35, young fighting age man as my old boss Nigel Farage once referred to them, and I think he's right John.  What do you think is going on here mate?

OLOONEY. So I can tell you that these are U.N. soldiers and they will be deployed by the W.H.O. when they announce the next pandemic lockdown.  They've been trained by British soldiers.  They've been trained by the Black Watch Regiment.  [Black Watch is a devoted regiment of the Crown; I doubt very much they are a threat to British rule.] They were trained in Antalya, Turkey [this doesn't make much sense given that Turkey is an ally of Britain] and in the east of Ukraine.  They are predominantly down to sergeant ranks.  They're then shipped to France.  They all signed [Britain's] Official Secrets Act [1911, 1920, 1989], then they are ferried over.  If you were fleeing war and tyranny, I don't know about you, but I would certainly take my wife and children with me.  They're my most precious, the most pride my prized asset.  You know, they're everything to me.  If you're going to war, you go to war with the lads.  They're going to be deployed.  They will be deployed.  

FERGUSON. The Black Watch are a very famous yellow regiment.  Are they actually going along with this?  

OLOONEY.  They've got no choice.  I kind of said, you know, "Why are you doing it?"  and he said "Soldiers follow orders."  What you're going to see is the following.  We'll have a minister somewhere in cabinets, suddenly come up with a great idea on how we're going to get these guys to contribute to help us.  And they're going to put them in uniforms.  A couple of people have told me that these uniforms are burgundy.  Others have told me that they're U.N. blue.  I really don't know.  I guess we'll see when they deploy them.  They are going to be deployed.  Because otherwise if they announce another lockdown, what would everyone say?  They'd say bullocks and go about their business, wouldn't they?  They're going to need armed young men in uniform to try and enforce it.  Why do they import young men from the East?  Because traditionally if you want to kill and tyrannize white people, you put black soldiers in because there's a cultural dissociation [suddenly culture matters to these people, meaning the MI6?], and that's their method.  That's the way these globalists are going to do it. 

Next, we have Ferguson underscoring this strategy with a fine detail about the plausibility of an invasion evoking our over-200-year-old birth and origin of the American Revolution, whereas a minute ago he had no clue what the migrants were ir what they're about.  Now, he's providing historical evidence and precedent for its likelihood?  This couldn't be an MI6 staged conversation from across the pond to scare Americans?  Yeah, so UNLIKE the British. 

FERGUSON. In America, when it was a colony  of the United Kingdom of Britain, there was a revolution against British colonial rule.  And a lot of people don't realize but it was only 3% of those people in America that overthrew the British forces and basically got rid of them.  3% of the population, John.

OLOONEY. I look forward to it.  I'm ready, I'm ready.  I can't wait because I know it's going to be the beginning of the end for them.  I do foresee victory.  I see that at a very great cost.  But we will see it.  And people, I think the world will become closer than ever when we do see victory.  It's going to come on the back of a load of blood, and, unfortunately, it has to.  Once people of all colors come together and recognize their common enemy, we'll walk over these people in 10 minutes.