CONGRESSWOMAN CYNTHIA MCKINNEY, 2005: serious financial management problems at the Pentagon: Fiscal year, 1999, $2.3 trillion missing. Fiscal year, 2000, $1.1 trillion missing, and DOD is the number reason why the government can't balance its checkbook?

[RG911Team] In 2006, this woman asked three questions that sent shivers down the spines of the Deep State.

Does anyone understand why these 9/11 questions were so dangerous? pic.twitter.com/nq62GB4A5o

— Richard Gage, AIA, Architect (@RichardGage_911) February 29, 2024

[RG911Team] In the full clip, Congresswoman Cynthia McKinney also questions US military leaders on child sex abuse in defense contractors and the trillions of dollars unaccounted for at the Pentagon. Link:

 

From Georgia, Ms. McKinney . . .

Here is the cast of characters in House Armed Services Budget Committee, March 10, 2005.

The distinguished Congresswoman from Georgia, Ms. Cynthia McKinney.

The U.S. Secretary of Defense, Donald Rumsfeld. 

Tina W. Jones, Comptroller of the U.S. Defense Department. 

4-Star General U.S. Air Force, Richard Myers.

Chairman of the Defense Budget, Mr. Duncan L. Hunter from California.

MCKINNEY, Thank you, Mr. Chairman.  Mr. Secretary, I watched President Bush deliver a moving speech at the United Nations in September 2003 in which he mentioned the crisis of the sex trade.  The President called for the punishment of those involved in this horrible business, but at the very moment of that speech DynCorp was exposed for having been involved in the buying and selling of young women and children.  While all of this was going on, DynCorp kept the Pentagon contract to administer the smallpox and Anthrax vaccines and is now working on a plague vaccine through the Joint Vaccine Acquisition position program.  Mr. Secretary, is it the policy of the US government to reward companies that traffic in women and little girls?  That's my first question.  My second question is according to the Controller General of the United States there are serious financial management problems at the Pentagon to which Mr. Cooper alluded.  Fiscal year, 1999, $2.3 trillion missing.  Fiscal year, 2000, $1.1 trillion missing, and DOD is the number one reason why the government can't balance its checkbook?  The Pentagon has claimed year after year that the reason it can't account for the money is because it's computers don't communicate with each other.  My second question, Mr Secretary, is who has the contracts today to make those systems communicate with each other?  How long have they had those contracts, and how much have the taxpayers paid for them?  Finally Mr. Secretary, after the last hearing I thought that my office was promised a written response to my question regarding the war games on September 11th.  I have not yet received that response, but would like for you to respond to the questions that I've put to you today and then I do expect the written response to my previous question hopefully by the end of the week.

RUMSFELD, 2:10. Thank you representative first the answer to your first question is no absolutely not the policy of the United States government is clear unambiguous and opposed to the activities that you described the second question, . . . 

MCKINNEY, 2:32. Well how do you explain the fact that DynCorp and its successor companies have received and continue to receive government contracts? 

RUMSFELD, 2:41. I would have to go and find the fax but there are laws and rules and regulations with respect to government contracts and there are times that corporations do things that they should not do in which case they tend to be suspended for some period there are times then that under the laws and rules and regulations, they're passed by the Congress and implemented by the executive branch that corporations can get off out of the Penalty Box if you will and be permitted to engage in contracts with the government they are generally not barred in perpetuity.

MCKINNEY, 3:19.  This contract with this company was never in The Penalty Box.  If you could proceed to my second question, please.

RUMSFELD, 3:27.  The second question I forgot what the second question was thank you Miss McKinney I appreciate the question I appreciate your interest in the Department's Financial condition and we are working very hard on that program I've just come back recently.

MCKINNEY, 3:55.  I understand you're working hard on it but my question was who has the contracts how long have they had that contract and how much money have we spent on it?

TINA JONES, 4:02. In general we spend about $20 billion in the department on Information Technology systems the accounting systems are part of that I can get you the exact number for the record of what we spend on our current what we call Legacy systems and those that we are moving toward 

MCKINNEY, 4:21.  And who has the contracts 

JONES, 4:23. That would be a multitude of individuals 

MCKINNEY, 4:25.  Could you name some, please?

JONES, 4:26. Well I think off the top of my head I would rather not . . . I would rather provide that for the record. 

MCKINNEY, 4:32.That's not privileged information, is it?

JONES, 4:34. I'm sure it's not.

MCKINNEY, 4:36.  Please . . . We still have time, so, please . . . .

JONES, 4:39. I would be glad to provide for the record and I don't want to talk from the top of my head and be incorrect.

RUMSFELD, 4:44. On your first question I'm advised by Dr Chu that it was not the corporation that was engaged in the activities you characterized but I'm told it was an employee of the corporation and it was some years ago in the Balkans that that took place 

MCKINNEY, 5:00. It's my understanding that it continues to take place

RUMSFELD, 5:01. Is that right?  

MCKINNEY, 5:02. Yes . . . 

RUMSFELD, 5:03. Well if you can give me information to that effect

MCKINNEY, 5:05. I am sure that you are interested in all of the information that I have and I will be more than happy to provide it to you but I would also like to get information from you for example the information that I just requested about who has those contracts

RUMSFELD, 5:35. We'll get back on both of the first two questions but the congresswoman has raised the other question twice now and I'd like to have General Myers respond because you mentioned it in the last hearing and I think it would be helpful to get the answer even though we are unread if you don't mind Mr chairman 

MCKINNEY, 5:52.  But I would like to have the answer in writing as well as I thought my office was promised.

MYERS, 6:00. Okay I don't know about the promise Congresswoman, but could you repeat the question to make sure I'm answering the right question this is a 9/11 question.

MCKINNEY, 6:06. The question was we had four war games going on on September 11th and the question that I tried to pose before the secretary had to go to lunch was whether or not the activities of the four war games going on on September 11th actually impaired our ability to respond to the attacks.

GENERAL RICHARD MYERS, 6:30. The answer to the question is no did not impair our response in fact General Eberhart who was in the commander of the North American Aerospace Defense command he testified in front of the 9/11 Commission I believe, I believe he told him that it enhanced our ability to respond given that Norad didn't have the overall responsibility for responding to the attacks that day that was an FAA responsibility but they were there were two cpx's there was one Department of Justice exercise it didn't have anything to do with the other three and there was an actual operation on going because there was some Russian bomber activity up near Alaska . . . 

MCKINNEY, 7:08.  So let me ask you this then.  Who was in charge of managing those war games?

CHAIRMAN HUNTER, 7:15.  Ah, General, why don't you give the best answer you can here in a short period of time and the Gentle Lady wants to get it written answer anyway and then we can move on to other folks.

GENERAL RICHARD MYERS, 7:26. The important thing to realize is that North American Aerospace defense command was responsible these are command post exercises what that means is all the battle positions that are normally not filled are indeed filled so it was an easy transition from an exercise into a real-world situation that it actually enhanced the response.  So otherwise it would take somewhere between 30 minutes and a couple of hours to fill those positions in those battle spaces with the right staff officers.

MCKINNEY, 7:53. Mr chairman I'm begging your Indulgence was September 11th declared a national security special event day 

MYERS, 8:00. I'd have to look back I do not know.  You mean after the fact, or before?  

MCKINNEY, 8:04. No.  Because of the activities going on that had been scheduled at the United Nations that day.

MYERS, 8:10.  I'd have to go back and check.  I don't know.

Why does the escorting officer put Doucet between himself and Plauche? And the cops weren't tried for conspiracy to commit murder? And the cameraman is unfazed.

That looks too much like the cops set Doucet up. Note the accompanying detective eyeball Plauche.

— St. Michael, the Archangel (@aveng_angel) February 29, 2024

It is horrible what Doucet did to Plaunche's son, Jody, who later wrote a book on the whole crime revenge drama.  And though I might even defend Plaunche's actions after having read a little of what took place, the fact that you've got the police operating in a conspiracy against your life is as bad as it gets.  Gary Plaunche murdered Doucet on March 16, 1984, for Doucet's sick molestation of Gary's son, Jody.  Wikipedia summarizes it,

Plauché, a native of Baton Rouge, Louisiana, was separated from his wife, June, at the time of the shooting. During 1983 and 1984, his 11-year-old son Jody was taking karate lessons with an instructor, 25-year-old Jeffrey Doucet. Unbeknownst to Jody's parents, Doucet had been sexually abusing the boy for at least a year. On February 14, 1984, Doucet kidnapped Jody and took him to a motel in Anaheim, California, where he sexually assaulted and molested him. Jody, the focus of a nationwide search, was eventually found after Doucet allowed the boy to place a collect call to his mother from the motel. California police raided the motel and arrested Doucet without incident.

On March 1, 1984, Jody was returned to his family in Louisiana. In an interview with a news television crew, Gary, having heard reports that Doucet had sexually assaulted his son, stated that he felt a sense of helplessness.

“Why, Gary, Why?”: The Jody Plauché Story https://t.co/yDL7Lyzfgr via @amazon

— St. Michael, the Archangel (@aveng_angel) February 29, 2024

therapeutics that replenished the Bifidobacteria, such as vitamins C and D and ivermectin improved patient survival rates

Brilliant work by Gastroenterologist Dr. Sabine Hazan. COVID genetic vaccines are killing the very bacteria necessary for a healthy gut microbiome— your largest immune organ by many estimations.   https://t.co/LZrrjnNwVv

— Dr. Janci (@JanciToxDoc) February 29, 2024

Gastroenterologist and CEO of ProgenaBiome, Dr. Sabine Hazan, has said that the COVID-19 vaccine may cause immunosuppression by reducing good Bifidobacteria in the gut. She showed that after COVID-19 mRNA vaccination, Bifidobacteria levels dropped by half among her trial participants.

Bifidobacteria are essential for boosting intestinal immunity. Dr. Hazan’s earlier work showed that people with reduced Bifidobacteria in the gut were at risk of severe COVID-19 infections, and therapeutics that replenished the Bifidobacteria, such as vitamins C and D and ivermectin improved patient survival rates. She also told how her clinical trials on COVID early treatment were sabotaged during the pandemic . . . 

Illegals demanding MORE free housing shut down a Seattle City Council meeting

BREAKING: Illegals demanding MORE free housing shut down a Seattle City Council meeting pic.twitter.com/XkhhFADDXj

— End Wokeness (@EndWokeness) February 28, 2024

Thank you to Steve Bartin.   

HATECRAFT TO ACCOMPLISH THE POLITICS OF COMPLIANCE

Watch this phenomenal presentation by James Lindsey @ConceptualJames on the The politics of Compliance: The target is You!

Presented at ICS at CPAC pic.twitter.com/g5n1p2YFrO

— Edward Dowd (@DowdEdward) February 28, 2024

00:25. A quote from a lesser known dictator and that's Mao Zedong.  In 1957, he not so famously said, "Not to have correct political opinions is like not having a soul."  And I think that that is kind of a banner for the lives that we've been living for the last few years and that's very unfortunate but it's also very telling.  My talk is titled, "The Target Is You."  What I want to talk about is actually "The Politics of Compliance" is the name I've given this and it's actually derived from a strategy that Mao Zedong used, but to make the politics of compliance work the target is actually you.  And I don't just mean you with the wrong political opinions who don't have souls.  I mean everybody.  There are generally three categories of people when it comes to the politics of compliance: 1) there are the people who are complying; 2) there are the people who are refusing, and 3) there are the people who aren't sure.  And all three are targeted by the politics of compliance roughly the same way with the same Dynamic the goal is of course to get the compliant to feel better than everybody else but also frustrated with everybody else it is to convince those who are not sure to join the programming to begin to comply and it is to use the people who refuse to comply as the wedge around which the entire thing turns.  In fact, it's to dehumanize them and motivate the other two groups to try to destroy them.  So Mao Zedong simply took over China with a very small number of conceptual concepts that I'm lumping together in what I'm calling the politics of compliance.  He separated the population into two broad categories I just mentioned.  I just mentioned three, well he cut it into two.  It was an oversimplification, and those two categories are the people, and the enemies of the people.  Not to put too fine a point on it, that's what he called them: the people and the enemies of the people. And what he said is who are the people?  Well, he gives this kind of historical record in 1957 as to who counted as the people, and when.  And there's a consistent running theme through his 8 or 9 different examples of different historical periods of the Chinese story, whether it's the Japanese or the Sino-Japanese War, the second one, whether it's the period of building socialism after he took power in 1949, whether it's during his 1st, 2nd, or 3rd-Year Plan, and the examples all have the single theme of THE people are the people who agree with Mao, and THE ENEMIES OF THE PEOPLE are the people who don't agree with Mao.  And it turns out to be really that simple the people at the period of building socialism are those who support the building of socialism and the enemies of the people are those who resist the building of socialism.  He says it explicitly that clearly.  

3:20. And this sets up a dynamic I think the best name for it is Hatecraft, and here is how it works.  The goal of this split is to say that there is a correct perspective on all things, a sacred science (see #5), as Robert [Jay] Lifton described it, and that's called The People's perspective, or at least it was in China.  We could call it whatever, "the critical race perspective on Race"; we could call it "the queer perspective on sexual politics"; we could all imagine a bunch of examples under COVID, "the public health perspective," I guess would be the right name for it.  I see Red Hats in the crowd, you're not allowed to have those.  That's the deplorable side of a different perspective.  But this is the general idea.  There are people who do the right thing.  There are people who do the wrong thing, and the goal is to bring people into the people's perspective, which is also called agreeing with the tyranny.  

4:10. And what you do in order to achieve this idea is that you separate the population into two broad categories, The People and The Enemies of the People.  And then you say,

What we want is unity.  We want Unity but there are certain elements in the population who are preventing us from unity and moving into the future that we can be having, and it's their fault.  The people want to move forward, and the enemy of the people is stopping them.  The people want to open their businesses and go back about their lives, but the people who won't wear masks or take a shot or socially distance or close down their lives or whatever else in the COVID department, are stopping them.  We want to open the country back up, but we can't because there are anti-vaxxers.  They are the problem.

That is hatecraft.