Thursday, August 3, 2023

Dr. Suzanne Humphries on the History of Vaccination

 
Thank you to Wejolyn for the video. 

My journey into Illusions started in 2009 when my patients began having kidney failure, so I didn't start in the realm of autism until very recently.  In the beginning, I asked my patient why are you here?  Which dialysis unit are your from?   

And he said, "What are you talking about I've never been on dialysis before.  I never had kidney problems before that shot." 

And that was the beginning for me.  I said, "What shot?"  From there on in the amount of resistance, and "What about smallpox?", "What about polio?" that came at me turn me into the library and into the books that started me on doing research because I knew this guy was right.  And during that time I found problems with my patients who had chronic kidney disease were worsening after vaccination.  And I found that if you ask a simple question to all patients, which should be part of every doctor's history and physical examination, which is "when was your last vaccine?" that very revealing connections can be made.

So because I knew nothing about the content or the history of vaccines when the problems happen and the backlash toward me occurred in the hospital in 2008-2011, I really had nothing to fight back with back then.  If I had known then what I am going to tell you today, I could have easily beaten the arguments that were tossed at me.  Earlier this year when I was in the UK, I visited a place called Leicester that I discovered, while I was writing Dissolving Illusions with Roman, which for the history buffs amongst you, is actually the linchpin of the anti-vaccination movement.  The people of Leicester after years of fighting further human rights overturned compulsory vaccination in 1889.  Most people probably think that the smallpox vaccine was invented by Edward Jenner but it wasn't.  I'm not going to talk about that today or the successful very careful inoculation to the wealthy was going on in the Ottoman Empire long before Jenner, or that when that practice was brought to England, the doctors did it all wrong and actually created infectious Bedlam.  Smallpox vaccines are lauded as one of the success stories of eradication right that's totally false and any slight potential benefit if it ever existed was certainly not worth the imprint this vaccine has left upon humanity.  The sum total of the smallpox vaccination was a horrific, painful, deadly nightmare for too many recipients.  I think eradication would have occurred even earlier than 1979 if vaccination was stopped earlier.  Today I want to talk about why smallpox is important to understand even in today's struggle against vaccine religious zealots and it probably won't be for any reason that you will have likely thought of this building you see behind me is a men's prison today.  But in 1871 was a prison of fathers that refused to vaccinate their babies and couldn't afford their fines and so they were incarcerated to serve out their sentences.  [6:00]  In 1871, the town of Leicester had 200,000 people, no sewage no clean water putrid drains and 110% vaccination rate.  Nope you heard that right: everyone was vaccinated with a few who had extras just for good measure.  In the year 1871, one of the most severe epidemics of smallpox on record occurred during an era of meticulously documented statistics, and it happened 33 years of official compulsory vaccination.  3,000 cases of smallpox occurred in 1871, and 358 people died.  Until that point, even though parents hated vaccines and we're horrified at the side effects and deaths of their children from it, they believed the disease was worse than the vaccine.  1871 put a stop to that thinking.  And Leicester residents began to rise up and say, "We are not going to continue to sacrifice our children to a deadly and disgusting vaccine that doesn't even work." The response to the 1871 epidemic by health officials was to write stricter laws and appoint even more vaccination officers, because, like today, the problem is not allowed to be the vaccine. It was the people who just needed more doses of the vaccine.  Prosecutions in the  town increase from 2 in 1869 to over 1100 by 1881.  The total for the 12 years being over 6,000.  Of these, 64 had involved imprisonment and 193 seizures of property to obtain money owed for fines.  By 1889, only about 15% of babies in Leicester were vaccinated.  [7:50]  and the number of parents in front of the court were so many that this prison could never have held them all apart from which the court were so badly clogged up that hearing the cases became a legal impossibility.  How did that happen?  Parents stripped away the blinders the medical and public health systems had put over their eyes and for once believe their hearts.  In 1889, 110 districts had effectively annulled compulsory smallpox vaccination because the so-called anti-vaccination movement was a united force to be reckoned with.  Over 100 Parliamentarians in the House of Commons were anti-vaccine, and there was simply no way the legal system could deal with the parents all over England refusing to be vaccinated.  But 1871 was not the start of the so-called anti-vaccination movement.  It started very shortly after Edward Jenner came out with his disgusting vaccine made of horse or cow puss and initially didn't even contain the smallpox virus. 


This 1802 etching shows a horned monster being fed baskets of infants and excreting them to symbolize vaccination and its effects

Within a few years, parents were totally disillusioned with the whole idea as seen in this document published in 1817 only 20 years after the cowpox vaccine development.  

From an Appeal to the Public from John Birch Esq., 1817 on the Hazard & Peril of Vaccinations 

. . . fills them with alarm and they say they are in the most fearful state of suspense dreading last what they were persuaded to do in the hopes of saving their children from one disease may not prove the means of plunging them into another at once novel and malignant

Parents were already filled with alarm and fear, knowing full well the sickness and death that vaccines were causing in their perfectly healthy children doctors were also reporting serious illnesses like sepsis, serious skin disorders, and actual smallpox in their well-vaccinated children.  Yet the generian community committee accused those doctors who dissented and reported problems with the cowpox inoculation of having acting perversely and disingenuously misrepresenting cases according to their standard of proof.  The generic committee never factually answered the questions that the anti-vaccine doctors posed.  Instead, they smeared and spat venom in the direction of anyone who doubted the vaccination process.  This all becomes very obvious when you mine the medical literature of the time, but that's not something that my former colleagues, nor my critics today, ever bothered to do.  Instead, they carry on the 200-year-old tradition of bitterness, unfounded accusations, and nonsense about vaccine risks and effectiveness.

Wednesday, August 2, 2023

If cashew acids do this to your skin, imagine what they do to your gut microbiome

Wejolyn writes,

Nuts are a scam. There’s no way indigenous people ate hundreds of nuts the way people do today. The damaging aspects here- the skin and the acids from these cashews. Even if nuts are soaked & sprouted for digestion- they still do not digest & eliminate well. I see them daily -… https://t.co/8PXHHaRK4BWejolyn πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ (@Wejolyn) August 2, 2023

The Aged Rick Santorum Couldn't keep his promises. Then turns on Trump. You always knew Pence was a "Never Trumper"

How could he?  No, not Mike Pence, but Donald Trump.  How could he pick Mike Pence?  Talk about your terrible branding.  I thought Trump knew something about branding.  Oh, well, so we put up with an aged Rick Santorum for 4 years only to learn that he is the scum of scum.  The sin if scum.  

Tuesday, August 1, 2023

"Crystal Mall in Connecticut, worth $150 million in 2012, recently sold for $9.5 million Older low-end malls are worth at least 50% and sometimes more than 70% less than they were when mall valuations peaked in late 2016"

Here is the direct link to the interview with Dr. Paul Thomas and Dr. Janci Chunn Lindsay.  

You are the director of Toxicology and molecular biology for Toxicology Support Services your background is in Biochemistry that was one area where I struggled with because I just tried to memorize my way through and you probably really understood it.  But you've worked at the Cancer Center there you got over 30 years of scientific experience in the area of Toxicology which is so important in our world today and you've been involved in vaccine work in the past specifically some concerns that you have about the COVID vaccine and how it might be affecting the reproductive system of individuals who get that shot let's jump off there what are your concerns?

4:57. Of course the first thing is that these have not been studied for any length of time that is suitable to determine the true harms that could come from using this technology which is gene therapy.   We've gotten to calling them the genetic vaccines.  They do have a vaccine technology in a manner that you are asking in your body to attack the immunogen that you're hijacking your cells to make based on the sequence that is injected in and travels to all the cells in your body.  The problem is is that it travels to all the cells in your body, and it crosses the blood brain barrier.  We see from the Pfizer bio-distribution that was obtained in a FOIA request from Japan that the lipid goes to really every compartment of the body but the endocrine glands and the bone marrow preferentially: so, the pituitary, spleen, the pancreas, the ovaries, the testes, and it takes up residence there in those cells.  And, of course, whatever cell takes up the genetic message will then start producing the spike protein, and all of these vaccines instruct the body to produce the spike protein and to display it on the surface of the cells.  But then we are also wanting our body to attack the spike protein to develop an immunological response, and the logical result of that is that we are asking our body to destroy the cells that are displaying the spike protein all over our bodies.  If those are preferential in the testes or the ovaries, there's a huge problem.  With that the Moderna bio-distribution study which is hidden in the pharmacokinetics section of their application to the EMA shows the same thing although they only used male rats.  So they do show the message going to the testes.  Now these experiments would take a day at most, and after they got this message going to the testes, do you think they set up another experiment with 5 or so female rats to see if it also went to the ovaries?  No, they didn't.  No they did not.  Why?  Why did they not do this?  And the other really weird part about the Moderna submission to the EMA and their studies is that they found lymphocytopenia they found thymic embolution.  They found a splenomegaly.  A 30% reduction in T cells following the administration of the vaccine.  And after every one of these things where they also found thrombosis, increase in clotting indicators . . . after all of these they said but we don't feel that this is relevant to humans.  But we don't feel that this is . . . without the second part of that statement what should have been, "because of X, Y, and Z."  Very weird.  

Bypassed ongoing animal studies basically introduced to a human population without any real long-term look about what this might mean.

Absolutely.  And they use the wrong species to study the wrong in points.  It's really only appropriate to use primates in your final studies in order to try to approximate what might happen in humans, unless you're going to use humans as a guinea pig, which it seems exactly what they are doing and had intended to do. Doctor's word in Eden doctors Roxanna Bruno and myself have been very concerned that there would be a cross reaction because they share a lot of the amino acids similarities similar to the spike protein and the reason it has been chosen is the immunogen and that is the only similarity between humans and Old World primates they did the reproductive studies in rodents well this isn't going to tell us anything because they don't have the same since it and protein and we did see in that study from Singapore that every single one of the 15 women that were examined and it had received the Pfizer vaccine developed Auto antibodies to hurt one's own