Tuesday, November 8, 2022

The political coup is in full swing

America needs election reform to bring our elections into the 21st century of ease & transparency. But this would mean to take from Democrats one of their control operations

Ventilation, especially for a frail person, is a very aggressive procedure.

Dr. Yeadon explains that 

Following the Wuhan protocol, I learned this from friends in Northern Italy, that's where it started in Europe.  They were told that the Wuhan protocol said that the sooner you get your patients sedated and ventilated, the better your chances of saving their life.  So people would turn up having a panic attack, they thought they were having respiratory symptoms, and rather than take a proper history, they sedating and ventilating them and over 90% of them would be dead within 10 days.  Ventilation, especially for a frail person, is a very aggressive procedure.  When it's lifesaving, it's worth those risks.  When you're right it's worth those risks.  But if you arrive and you're free breathing and your airwaves are open, you never do what they did unless they had 60% burns and are in agony, then you probably would do it.  But none of the others.  And I know here, where I am in Florida, literally, within a couple of kilometers from here, the Sarasota General, Memorial General, whatever it is, I know a person who was very senior in the Emergency Room, or A&E, he was busy trying to save lives at the front end, but people who were admitted weren't coming out again.  And after a while he explored it and ended up in a shouting match with his clinic colleagues, and more or less said, like I've said, "What the hell are you doing ventilating people with open air waves and conscious?"  

"Well, we've got to do it.  This is what we've been told." 

They were given money to put people on ventilators.  They were given money if they got Remdesivir.  They were given money if they died after a diagnosis of COVID.  So they followed the money and gave up.


CHRIST DISPUTED WITH DOCTORS

Questioning doctors is enshrined in our faith.  Go and do likewise.

Read this, please.

However, after a day’s journey they looked for him among the group – only to discover he was not there. A frantic search then began and they returned in panic to Jerusalem. As St Luke tells us: “After three days they found him in the temple, sitting among the teachers, listening to them and asking them questions.” (Luke 2:46).

When his mother asked Jesus why he had behaved that way, upsetting both her and St Joseph, he responded: “Why were you searching for me? Did you not know that I must be in my Father’s house?” (2:49) These are the first recorded words of Christ. His answer reveals both his sense of duty to God and his close relationship with his Heavenly Father.

Further, Pope St John Paul II once reflected on the hidden message of this event, which took place immediately after the Passover. He said: “Through this episode, Jesus prepares his Mother for the mystery of the Redemption. During those three dramatic days when the Son withdraws from them to stay in the temple, Mary and Joseph experience an anticipation of the triduum [three-day period] of his Passion, Death and Resurrection.”



Biden's IRS Army in Jeopardy?



Biden’s IRS army of 87,000 new armed recruits is coming under fire by the Republican party. Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) and Sen. Jon Thune (R-SD) are working on a bill that would require Congress to approve IRS spending. Both men also sit on the House-Senate Joint Committee on Taxation. Biden would like to spend $80 billion on his IRS army over the next decade to shake down American taxpayers.

Our bill will ensure that the IRS is answerable to the American people in how it uses this money and will force it to forfeit funds every day it’s not in compliance,” Grassley said. “If our bill becomes law, the Biden administration’s IRS would have to answer to the American people, not Washington bureaucrats,” Thune added. The American people fund the IRS, and it is only right that they vote on how their money is spent. In fact, they should vote on whether there is a need for the IRS at all.

If the bill passes, the IRS must explain how they use their money every year. Funding to the IRS would be withheld if they failed to comply. If Congress turns red this November, this measure is likely to pass. This would be a great first step in a long overdue overhaul of the entire US tax system, which is designed to be as complex as possible so that the government can squeeze funds out of every citizen.