2,433 fetal deaths in VAERS. More fetal deaths in the past 11 months than in the past 30 years.

Why, are we pushing an experimental vax on pregnant women, with no long term data?? Why???? https://t.co/2qrCHMN5K7

— UTvalkyrie (@UTvalkyrja) November 9, 2021

from Brian Shilhavy @ Global Research.  Thank you, Lew Rockwell.

 

CATHOLIC FRANCIS COLLINS & 9TH COMMANDMENT

Here's my conversation with Francis Collins (@NIHDirector), director of the NIH and one of the most impactful science leaders in history. I asked the difficult questions and Francis answered with humility and brilliance. This conversation gave me hope. https://t.co/BcA7kXrTiY   pic.twitter.com/cIpjT4A9Yh

— Lex Fridman (@lexfridman) November 5, 2021

The only value I found in this interview is to watch a leading government official lie, lie, lie with the complicity of a young journalist who got the interview on the promise to not contradict, drive down, or ask any real meaningful questions but instead to allow the interview to be constructed as a kind of defense used to legitimize mass murder.  But he's a catholic, so that's okay.  Does Collins violate the 9th Commandment?  To ask it is to answer it.

Collins lies brazenly, shamelessly, and repeatedly in the interview,

You should have asked him about the ninth commandment (eighth commandment in some faiths) and the "sanctity of truth."

— Richard H. Ebright (@R_H_Ebright) November 6, 2021

From the start: 

Science at its best is our social hope. So it’s been difficult for me, as it has during the pandemic, to become a source of division.  What I would love to do in this conversation with you is to touch on some difficult topics, and do so with humility and empathy so that we may begin to regain a sense of trust in science.  And once again science can become a source of hope.  Is that okay with you? 

I love the goal. 

Let’s start with some hard questions. 

You called for thorough, expert-driven, and objective inquiry into the origins of COVID-19, so let me ask, “Is there a reasonable chance that the COVID-19 gene leaked from a lab?

I can’t exclude that.  I think it’s fairly unlikely.  I wish we had more ability to ask questions of the Chinese government and learn more about what kind of records were in the lab that we’ve never been able to see.  But most likely, this was a natural origin of a virus probably starting at a bat perhaps traveling at some other intermediate, yet-to-be-identified host and finding its way into humans.

Richard H. Ebright cites example after example of Francis Collins, a Catholic, lying.  

2:47

I think we might know if we find that intermediate host. With SARS, it was 14 years before we figured out it was the civet cat

people’s immune cells are taken out of their body and treated with a genetic therapy that revs up their ability to discover the cancer that that patient currently has maybe even at Stage IV, and then give them back, as those old Ninja warriors go after the cancer and it sometimes works dramatically.  That’s gain-of-function.  You gave that patient a gain in their immune function that may have saved their life.  So you’ve got to be careful not to say that gain-of-function is bad.  Most of what we do in science that’s good involves quite a bit of that.  And we’re all living with gain-of-functions every day.  Taking off his glasses, he says, “I have a gain-of-function because I’m wearing these glasses; otherwise, I wouldn’t be seeing you as clearly, I’m happy with that gain-of-function.”

6:30

so, that’s where a lot of confusion has happened.  The kind of gain-of-function, which is now subject to very rigorous and very carefully-defined oversight, 

6:37  is when you are working with an established human pathogen that is known to be potentially causing a pandemic, 

6:44  and you are enhancing, or potentially enhancing its transmissibility or its virulence.  We call it EPPP, Enhanced Potential Pandemic Pathogen.  

6:59  That requires this very stringent oversight, worked out over 3 years by the National Science Advisory Board on Biosecurity that needs to be looked at by a panel that goes well beyond NIH to decide “are the benefits worth the risks in that situation?”  Most of the time, it’s not worth the risk.  Only 3 times, in the last three or four years, have experiments been given permission to go forward—they were all on influenza.  So I will argue that if you’re worried about the next pandemic, the more you know about the coming enemy, the better chance you have to recognize when trouble is starting.  So if you can do it safely, studying influenza or coronaviruses—like SARS, MERS, and SARS-CoV-2—would be a good thing to know about.  But you have to be able to do it safely because we all know--lab accidents can happen.  I mean look at SARS where there have been lab accidents and people have gotten sick as a result.  We don't want to take that chance unless there's a compelling scientific reason.  

8:11   That's why we have this very stringent oversight.  The experiments being done at the Wuhan Institute of Virology as a sub-award to our grant to Eco-Health in New York 

8:24   did not meet that standard of requiring that kind of stringent oversight.  I want to be really clear about that because there's been so much thrown around about it.  

8:30  Was it gain-of-function?  Well, in the standard use of that term that you would use 

8:48

8:53

9:11

9:13 9:16, 9:22, 9:30, 9:37, 9:56, 10:04, 10:19, 10:21, 10:33, 10:41, 10:50, 11:13, 11:50, 13:11, and 13:34 (and that is just the first 15 minutes).

And the last people you want to listen to on SARS-2's origin are the virologists, since Fauci controls their industry

Lab origin? "You don't need a weatherman to know which way the wind blows."
And the last people you want to listen to on SARS-2's origin are the virologists, since Fauci controls their industry.  https://t.co/AiMbvdhrt0 https://t.co/kiAe7bZPRA

— MERYL NASS, MD (@NassMeryl) November 4, 2021

BREAKING REPORT: Florida to Dump OSHA for New State Regulating Authority...

BREAKING REPORT: Florida to Dump OSHA for New State Regulating Authority...

— Chuck Callesto (@ChuckCallesto) November 8, 2021

Once a drug is fully licensed, it is subject to liability. One thing that was necessary in order to push mandates forward was for the government to say it had a licensed product.

"Pfizer/BioNTech’s Comirnaty COVID shot was approved (licensed) by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration on August 23, 2021, but only for adults, and only when carrying the Comirnaty label. No other COVID shot has been FDA approved. . ."

"you're the guinea pigs, and they're not collecting the data."

"You can attempt to sue the [vaccine] company that made the product if you're convinced that it was improperly made, but the Secretary of HHS has to give you the permission to sue."

  

Dr. Meryl Nass, M.D. begins her presentation at the 2:30 mark.  Find more on her here.  

All of the COVID vaccines and most of the COVID treatment products have not been approved.  Approved means licensed.  All except one, which the Pfizer vaccine for adults 16 and up got approved, i.e., licensed on August 23, 2021, but every other vaccine, and for every other age-group, and the boosters have only been authorized under emergency use authorizations.  There's a critical difference.  Once a drug is fully licensed, it is subject to liability.  One thing that was necessary in order to push mandates forward was for the government to say it had a licensed product.  So before the EUA, you had licensed drugs and you had experimental drugs and nothing else.  You had no gray areas.  These are still experimental drugs.  Under Emergency Use, EUA, you can't force people.  You have to offer them options, tell them what their options are, and they have the right to refuse.  So since that is part of the statute, the federal government can't get around it, so they wanted a licensed product to avoid the provisions of the statute and enable them to impose mandates.  So they must have put pressure on the FDA, and the FDA gave them what they wanted, which was a license for the Pfizer vaccine only, called Corminaty on August 23, 2021.  FDA has become clown world.  What they do now is to perform a charade of all of the normal regulatory processes that they are expected to do, and I just want to tell you [that] you're the guinea pigs, and they're not collecting the data.  Nobody should be getting these shots. 

Pregnant women are now the new gold rush for vaccines.  Because once a company is absent of any liability, the profitability of the product increases dramatically.  But products under EUA, and this is based on the 2005 piece of legislation, have their own special government program for liability, called the Counter-Measures Injury Compensation Program.  And this is a terrible program.  Is this the PREP Act?  No.  It's a subset of the PREP Act.  the Prep Act enabled the Counter-Measures Injury Compensation Program to be created by Congress.  Congress has to allocate money for it.  So if you're injured by an Emergency Use Authorization vaccine, you don't get any legal process.  The companies have had all of their liability waved.  There is a single process that is administrative, administrated through HHS where some employees there decide whether you deserve to be compensated or not, and the maximum money you can obtain is about $370,000 if you're totally disabled or die.  And the money is only to compensate you for lost wages or possibly medical bills that haven't been paid.  And in the 15 to 16 years that this program has existed, they've only paid out 29 claims, two for each year of its existence.  And so far, though they've had hundreds and hundreds of claims from COVID vaccines, they haven't paid out a single one.  And that is very important because the statute of limitations is just 1 year.  So it's getting close to running out for people who were vaccinated early, and if you don't apply, you'll lose your opportunity to get anything from this program.  In fact, it's really an opportunity to apply and get nothing, because almost nobody gets paid, and then you have nowhere to go.  There's no further appeals process.  You can ask them to compensate you just twice, and if they say no, that's it.  You can attempt to sue the company that made the product if you're convinced that it was improperly made, but the Secretary of HHS has to give you permission to sue.  You have to prove that there was willful misconduct, and no one has ever achieved that bar so there has never been a lawsuit under this. 

11:07  So anyway if you get a vaccine under EUA, you've got nothing, you're going nowhere.  If you're injured, you're on your own.  So what happened is President Biden and his administration decided it was going to be very important to institute mandates for these vaccines.  Now we don't know why that is; it doesn't make sense.  Large numbers of Americans are recovered and have durable, long-lasting immunity, much stronger than what you would achieve from the vaccine, which is limited only to immunity against spike.  Wears off over the next few months that would permanently limit the kind of immune response you would make were you to be infected with COVID again.  So there's absolutely no good reason to vaccinate some who has recovered.  And several bad reasons that you can harm them.  There's a higher rate of injury in the recovered if you vaccinate them.  And you may damage their immune response later.  

12:15  But for reasons best known to itself, the Biden administration was so certain it needed to vaccinate everybody but it has used illegal means to tell federal employers that they will lose federal contracts if they don't force their employees to be vaccinated immediately and must fire them if they're healthcare workers, for example, or government employees, or the military if they have not been vaccinated.  Now, obviously, that is creating a great deal of chaos, particularly in the healthcare industry, particularly in my state, where these draconian rules went into effect on Friday, and many fire departments, police, EMTs, nurses, and doctors can no longer work in Maine.  

13:06  One thing that was necessary to push mandates forward was for the government to say that it had a licensed product.  Because the statute that enables the Emergency Use Authorization, EUA, to be issued . . . so before the Emergency Use you had "licensed drugs" and "experimental drugs" and nothing else.  There were no gray areas.  So when they brought these in, they were still experimental drugs under emergency use.  You can't force people.  You have to offer them options.  Tell them what their options are and they have the right to refuse.  So since that is part of the statute, the federal government can't get around it.  So they wanted a licensed product to avoid the provisions of the statute.