"Pfizer/BioNTech’s Comirnaty COVID shot was approved (licensed) by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration on August 23, 2021, but only for adults, and only when carrying the Comirnaty label. No other COVID shot has been FDA approved. . ."
"you're the guinea pigs, and they're not collecting the data."
"You can attempt to sue the [vaccine] company that made the product if you're convinced that it was improperly made, but the Secretary of HHS has to give you the permission to sue."
Dr. Meryl Nass, M.D. begins her presentation at the 2:30 mark. Find more on her here.
All of the COVID vaccines and most of the COVID treatment products have not been approved. Approved means licensed. All except one, which the Pfizer vaccine for adults 16 and up got approved, i.e., licensed on August 23, 2021, but every other vaccine, and for every other age-group, and the boosters have only been authorized under emergency use authorizations. There's a critical difference. Once a drug is fully licensed, it is subject to liability. One thing that was necessary in order to push mandates forward was for the government to say it had a licensed product. So before the EUA, you had licensed drugs and you had experimental drugs and nothing else. You had no gray areas. These are still experimental drugs. Under Emergency Use, EUA, you can't force people. You have to offer them options, tell them what their options are, and they have the right to refuse. So since that is part of the statute, the federal government can't get around it, so they wanted a licensed product to avoid the provisions of the statute and enable them to impose mandates. So they must have put pressure on the FDA, and the FDA gave them what they wanted, which was a license for the Pfizer vaccine only, called Corminaty on August 23, 2021. FDA has become clown world. What they do now is to perform a charade of all of the normal regulatory processes that they are expected to do, and I just want to tell you [that] you're the guinea pigs, and they're not collecting the data. Nobody should be getting these shots.
Pregnant women are now the new gold rush for vaccines. Because once a company is absent of any liability, the profitability of the product increases dramatically. But products under EUA, and this is based on the 2005 piece of legislation, have their own special government program for liability, called the Counter-Measures Injury Compensation Program. And this is a terrible program. Is this the PREP Act? No. It's a subset of the PREP Act. the Prep Act enabled the Counter-Measures Injury Compensation Program to be created by Congress. Congress has to allocate money for it. So if you're injured by an Emergency Use Authorization vaccine, you don't get any legal process. The companies have had all of their liability waved. There is a single process that is administrative, administrated through HHS where some employees there decide whether you deserve to be compensated or not, and the maximum money you can obtain is about $370,000 if you're totally disabled or die. And the money is only to compensate you for lost wages or possibly medical bills that haven't been paid. And in the 15 to 16 years that this program has existed, they've only paid out 29 claims, two for each year of its existence. And so far, though they've had hundreds and hundreds of claims from COVID vaccines, they haven't paid out a single one. And that is very important because the statute of limitations is just 1 year. So it's getting close to running out for people who were vaccinated early, and if you don't apply, you'll lose your opportunity to get anything from this program. In fact, it's really an opportunity to apply and get nothing, because almost nobody gets paid, and then you have nowhere to go. There's no further appeals process. You can ask them to compensate you just twice, and if they say no, that's it. You can attempt to sue the company that made the product if you're convinced that it was improperly made, but the Secretary of HHS has to give you permission to sue. You have to prove that there was willful misconduct, and no one has ever achieved that bar so there has never been a lawsuit under this.
11:07 So anyway if you get a vaccine under EUA, you've got nothing, you're going nowhere. If you're injured, you're on your own. So what happened is President Biden and his administration decided it was going to be very important to institute mandates for these vaccines. Now we don't know why that is; it doesn't make sense. Large numbers of Americans are recovered and have durable, long-lasting immunity, much stronger than what you would achieve from the vaccine, which is limited only to immunity against spike. Wears off over the next few months that would permanently limit the kind of immune response you would make were you to be infected with COVID again. So there's absolutely no good reason to vaccinate some who has recovered. And several bad reasons that you can harm them. There's a higher rate of injury in the recovered if you vaccinate them. And you may damage their immune response later.
12:15 But for reasons best known to itself, the Biden administration was so certain it needed to vaccinate everybody but it has used illegal means to tell federal employers that they will lose federal contracts if they don't force their employees to be vaccinated immediately and must fire them if they're healthcare workers, for example, or government employees, or the military if they have not been vaccinated. Now, obviously, that is creating a great deal of chaos, particularly in the healthcare industry, particularly in my state, where these draconian rules went into effect on Friday, and many fire departments, police, EMTs, nurses, and doctors can no longer work in Maine.
13:06 One thing that was necessary to push mandates forward was for the government to say that it had a licensed product. Because the statute that enables the Emergency Use Authorization, EUA, to be issued . . . so before the Emergency Use you had "licensed drugs" and "experimental drugs" and nothing else. There were no gray areas. So when they brought these in, they were still experimental drugs under emergency use. You can't force people. You have to offer them options. Tell them what their options are and they have the right to refuse. So since that is part of the statute, the federal government can't get around it. So they wanted a licensed product to avoid the provisions of the statute.
