In the comments, tell me what new skills you acquired during the pandemic to improve your talent stack. (Watch this.)
— Scott Adams (@ScottAdamsSays) October 11, 2021
This was impressive.
Mainly acquired new hobbies
— Andrew Paoni (@andrewpaoni) October 11, 2021
Ham radio
Started buying rental properties
Build a chicken coop, now have 9 chickens
Became a bee keeper
Ran 600 miles in 2020
Moved to more virtual meetings and presentations and had my 2 best years ever.
STORY AT-A-GLANCE
So far, the CDC has not determined that any death was directly caused by the COVID shot, but that doesn’t mean the injections haven’t killed anyone. Calculations using VAERS data suggest the COVID shots have resulted in 212,000 excess deaths in the U.S.
An estimated 300,000 Americans suffered permanent disability from the COVID shots, and anywhere from 2 million to 5 million may have suffered adverse reactions
If you’re under the age of 50, your risk of dying from the vaccine is greater than your chance of dying from COVID-19
Dr. Peter Schirmacher, chief pathologist at the University of Heidelberg, who is recognized as one of the top 100 pathologists in the world, autopsied 40 patients who died within two weeks of their COVID jab, and found 30% to 40% of the deaths were conclusively due to the shot
One top neurologist claims to have 2,000 reportable vaccine injuries in 2021, compared to zero in the last 11 years. In all, 5% of her existing patients now have suspected vaccine injuries, but she has only filed two VAERS reports due to the complexity of the filing
Yesterday, October 8, 2021, I published
a Highwire exclusive interview with Deborah Conrad, a physician’s assistant who
is blowing the whistle on COVID jab injuries, and the fact that these injuries
are rarely reported because of a faulty VAERS database design.
Today you’re in for yet another
bombshell video: “Vaccine Secrets: COVID Crisis.” It’s the first episode of
“The False Narrative Takedown Series,” produced by Steve Kirsch, executive
director of the COVID-19 Early Treatment Fund.
“Vaccine Secrets” complements and
supports everything Conrad shared in her interview, so I highly recommend
saving these files on your computer and watching both of them. Both are
available on Bitchute.
HOW MANY HAVE DIED FROM THE COVID JABS?
According to Kirsch, the COVID shots
have already killed an estimated 200,000 Americans, a far higher number than
the 15,386 deaths reported to the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System
(VAERS) as of September 17, 2021.1 You can find all the
research for Episode 1 of the “False Narrative Takedown” series on SKirsch.io/vaccine-resources.2
As noted by Kirsch, Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention director Dr. Rochelle Walensky claims no causative link
has been found for any of these deaths. She’s not lying, per se. But she’s also
not telling the whole truth.
So far, the CDC has not determined that
any death was directly caused by the COVID shot, but that doesn’t mean the
injections haven’t killed anyone. In this episode, Kirsch sets out to determine
whether evidence of causality exists, and if so, what the actual death toll is
likely to be.
CAN VAERS DATA DEMONSTRATE CAUSALITY?
The big disconnect, Kirsch points out,
is that the CDC insists that VAERS, as an early warning system, cannot prove
(or disprove) causality. Kirsch argues that this is false. The idea that VAERS
cannot show causality is part of how and why the CDC can claim none of the
deaths is attributable to the COVID shot.
To prove his point, Kirsch gives the
following analogy: Suppose you give a two-dose vaccine. After the first dose,
nothing happens, but after the second dose, people die within 24 hours of a
deep vein thrombosis (DVT). When you look at the VAERS data, what you would
find is no reports associated with the first dose, and a rash of deaths after
the second dose, and all within the same timeframe and with the same cause of
death.
According to the CDC, you cannot
ascribe any causality at all from that. To them, it’s just random chance that
everyone died after the second dose, and from the same condition, and not the
first dose or from another condition.
Kirsch argues that causality CAN be
identified from this kind of data. It’s very difficult to come up with another
explanation for why people die exactly 24 hours after their second dose.
For example, is it reasonable to assume
that people with, say, undiagnosed heart conditions would die exactly 24 hours
after getting a second dose of vaccine? Or that people with undiagnosed
diabetes would die exactly 24 hours after their second dose?
Why not after the first dose, or two
months after the second dose, or any other random number of hours or days, or
for other random cause of death? Why would people randomly die of the same
condition at the exact same time, over and over again?
VACCINE PROGRAM NEEDS TO BE HALTED IMMEDIATELY
According to Kirsch, the vaccination
program should be immediately halted, as the VAERS data suggest more than
200,000 Americans have already died, and more than 2 million have been
seriously injured by the vaccines. Interestingly enough, Kirsch and his entire
family took the COVID shot early on, so he’s not coming from an “anti-vax”
position.
Ending the vaccinations would not spell
disaster in terms of allowing COVID-19 to run rampant, as we now know there are
safe and effective early treatment protocols that everyone can use, both at
home and in the hospital. These treatments also work for all variants.
According to Kirsch, the CDC, the U.S.
Food and Drug Administration and the National Institutes of Health are all
“spreading misinformation about the vaccine versus early treatment.” In a
nutshell, these agencies are saying the complete opposite of what is true —
classic Orwellian doublespeak.
They claim the COVID shots are safe and
effective, when the data show they’re neither, and they say there is no safe
and effective early treatment, which is clearly false. At the same time, our
medical freedoms are being stripped away under the guise of public health — all
while an immense death toll is allowed to take place right before our eyes.
Kirsch is so confident in his analyses,
he’s offered a $1 million academic grant to anyone who can show his analysis is
flawed by a factor of four or more. So far, no one has stepped up to claim the
prize. He’s even offered $1 million to any official willing to simply have a
public debate with him about the data, and none has accepted the challenge.
As noted by Kirsch, “we’ve replaced
debates as a way to settle scientific disagreements … with government-driven
censorship and intimidation.” Medical recommendations are now also driven by
the White House rather than medical experts and doctors themselves.
FALSE NARRATIVES OVERVIEW
In this episode, Kirsch goes through
five false narratives about COVID jab safety, namely that:
1. The shots are safe and effective
2. No one has died from the COVID shot
3. You cannot use VAERS to determine
causality
4. The SARS-CoV-2 spike protein is
harmless
5. Only a few adverse events are
associated with the shots and they’re all “mild”
He also reviews the five false
narratives about what the solutions are:
1. Vaccines are the only way to end the
pandemic
2. Vaccine mandates are therefore needed
3. Masks work
4. Early treatments do not work
5. Ivermectin is dangerous
COVID SHOT KILLS 5 TIMES MORE PEOPLE THAN IT SAVES
Kirsch cites information from Dr. PeterSchirmacher, chief pathologist at the University of Heidelberg, who is
recognized as one of the top 100 pathologists in the world.
Schirmacher did autopsies on 40
patients who died within two weeks of their COVID jab, and found 30% to 40% of
them were conclusively due to the shot, as there was no other underlying
pathology that could have caused the deaths. Now, he did not rule out that 100%
of the deaths could have been caused by the shots. He just could not
conclusively prove it.
There’s also Pfizer’s six-month study, which
included 44,000 people. During the blinded period of the study, the deaths were
just about even — 15 deaths in the vaccine group and 14 in the control group.
So, one life was saved by the shot.
But then, after the study was unblinded
and controls were offered the vaccine, another three in the original vaccine
group died along with two original placebo recipients who opted to get the
shot. None of these deaths was considered related to the Pfizer “vaccine,” yet
no one knows what they actually died from.
So, the final tally ended up being 20
deaths in the vaccine group and 14 deaths in the control group. What this tells
us is the Pfizer shot offers no all-cause mortality benefit. The shot saved one
life, and killed six, which gives us a net-negative mortality rate. The reality
is that five times more people are killed by the shot than are saved by it.
HOW TO CALCULATE EXCESS MORTALITY
In the video, Kirsch explains how
anyone can calculate the number of COVID shot deaths using VAERS data. What
we’re looking at here is excess deaths, not background deaths of people who
were going to die from a natural cause, such as old age, anyway. In summary,
this is done by:
1. Determining the propensity to report
2. Determining the number of domestic
deaths in the VAERS database
3. Determining the underreporting factor
for serious events
4. Determining the background death rate,
i.e., all deaths reported to VAERS by year
5. Calculating the number of excess deaths
Lastly, you would validate your
findings using independent methods or comparing it to what others have found.
Step-by-step instructions and calculations can be found in the document called
“Estimating the Number of Vaccine
Deaths in America.”3
MORE THAN 200,000 HAVE LIKELY BEEN KILLED BY THE JABS
Between the documentation on his
website and the video, you get a detailed in-depth understanding of how to do
this and how Kirsch came to the conclusions made. Here, I will simply provide a
summary rundown of Kirsch calculations and conclusions:
1. Propensity to report = same as in
previous years
2. Number of domestic deaths in the VAERS
database = 6,167 as of August 27, 2021
3. Under-reporting factor for serious
events = 41 (i.e., for every 41 events, only one is reported)
4. Background VAERS death rate = 500 per
year (this background death number will be subtracted twice, as most COVID jab
recipients are receiving two doses. This gives us a very conservative estimate)
5. Excess deaths calculation = (6,167 – 2
x 500) x 41 = 212,000 excess deaths
Using the same calculation methods,
Kirsch conservatively estimates more than 300,000 Americans have also been
permanently disabled by the COVID shots. These estimates have been validated by
four teams of researchers using other methods. (None of them used VAERS data.)
If you’re under the age of 50, your
risk of dying from the vaccine is greater than your chance of dying from
COVID-19.
Kirsch also demonstrates another
calculation to show the COVID shots kill more people than the actual COVID-19
infection does. That calculation also shows that if you’re under the age of 50,
your risk of dying from the vaccine is greater than your chance of dying from
COVID-19, so it makes no sense from a risk-benefit perspective to get the jab
if you’re younger than 50.
What’s more, since your risk of natural
infection exponentially decreases over time (as natural herd immunity grows,
your chance of infection approximately halves each year), the risks of the
COVID shot rapidly outgrow any potential benefit with each passing year.
EXAMPLES OF ADVERSE EVENTS
Kirsch has also analyzed adverse events by symptom, calculating the rate at which they occur after the COVID shots compared to the average rate seen for all other vaccines combined from 2015- to 2019 for ages 20 to 60. Here’s a sampling:4
|
Pulmonary embolism occurs at a rate
473 times higher than the normal incidence rate (i.e., if there was one
pulmonary embolism event reported in VAERS on average for all vaccines, there
were 473 events following a COVID injection) |
Stroke, 326 times higher |
|
Deep vein thrombosis 264.3 times
higher |
Appendicitis 145.5 times higher |
|
Parkinson's disease is 55 times higher |
Blindness 29.1 times higher |
|
Deafness 44.7 times higher |
Death 58.1 times higher |
Interestingly, the most common cause of
death in children aged 12 to 17 who got the COVID shot was pulmonary embolism.
This was determined by the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices
(ACIP) after analyzing the deaths of 14 children. Coincidence? Or evidence of
causality?
ANECDOTES AND OTHER DATA CONSISTENT WITH HIGH DEATH RATE
Kirsch also cites anecdotal data that
can clue us in to what’s happening. One top neurologist claims to have 2,000
reportable vaccine injuries in 2021, compared to zero in the last 11 years.
In all, 5% of her existing patients now
have suspected vaccine injuries. Yet this neurologist has only reported two of
them because she got so frustrated with the VAERS system. So, in this
instance, the under-reporting rate is not 41, but 1,000. And she’s not alone.
This is another classic real-world illustration of what the PA Deborah Conrad
shared in yesterday’s article.
Canadian physician Dr. Charles Hoffe
has also reported that 60% of his COVID jabbed patients have elevated D-dimer
levels, which is indicative of blood clotting, and levels in many cases
remained elevated for up to three months.
This too is evidence of causation, because your D-dimer level is a marker for blood clotting. Even if you don’t have obvious symptoms of clotting, it can indicate the presence of micro clots. Hoffe discusses this in the video below.
Dr. Peter McCullough has also reported
that troponin levels are elevated in many vaccinated patients. Troponin is a marker
for heart damage, such as when you’re having a heart attack or myocarditis
(heart inflammation). A level between 1 and 4 is indicative of an acute or
recent heart attack. In case of a serious heart attack, troponin can remain
elevated for five days.
In many patients who have received the
COVID jab, the troponin level is between 35 and 50(!) and remains at that level
for up to two months, which suggests massive damage is occurring to the heart.
Yet this is what they’re routinely labeling as “mild” myocarditis. There’s
absolutely nothing mild about this level of heart damage.
NO RATE OF INJURY OR DEATH IS TOO GREAT
Unbelievably, there seems to be no
ceiling above which the death and disability toll is deemed too great. Why
aren’t the FDA and CDC concerned about safety when more than half a million
side effect reports have been filed? How come nearly 15,000 reported deaths5 haven’t
set off emergency alarms and in-depth investigations? Historically, 50 deaths
have been the cutoff point at which a vaccine is pulled.
Considering the unprecedented risks of
these shots, I urge you to review as much data as you can before you jump on
the booster bandwagon. Based on everything I’ve seen, I believe the risk of
side effects is likely going to exponentially increase with each dose.
If you need a refresher on the potential mechanisms of harm, download and read Stephanie Seneff’s excellent paper,6 “Worse Than The Disease: Reviewing Some Possible Unintended Consequences of mRNA Vaccines Against COVID-19,” published in the International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research in collaboration with Dr. Greg Nigh.
Freedom: NWO Canada vs Communist Regime pic.twitter.com/g14VHaQZdL
— Wake Up From COVID (@wakeupfromcovid) October 9, 2021
Men think in herds; they go mad in herds,
while they only recover their senses slowly,
and one by one.
--Scottish poet, Charles MacKay, from his Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds, 1841.
Sometimes you get the feeling that there is a whole industry almost waiting for an epidemic to occur --British Epidemiologist, Tom Jefferson
Scott W. Atlas
Sucharit Bhakdi
Jay Bhattacharya
Sunetra Gupta
Scott Jensen
Martin Kulldorff
Michael Levitt
Paul E. Peterson
Ellen Townsend
Mike Yeadon
At the 13-minutes mark, he cites the criminal action of Canadian physician, Bruce Aylward, who is on the W.H.O.'s leadership team. That should tell you all you need to know about Bruce. "Everybody should copy China's response." Here is a transcript of Nick's presentation.
Where on earth does the story come from? Bruce Aylward will go down in history as a criminal of immense stature. He takes a delegation to China, spends a few days there and returns and says to the world that everybody should copy China’s response. There was no substantive reason for him to say that. The entire basis for saying this was the doctrine of universal susceptibility. It was clear that in China not everybody had died – therefore, lockdowns work. It is so silly. Before covid, this is repeated wherever you look in any country’s pandemic respiratory virus guidelines.
And toward the end, Hudson cites the Great Barrington Declaration, penned by a few from the list above. Read it. Then sign it. Please.
