Thursday, December 31, 2020
Monday, December 28, 2020
Two lawsuits . . . challenge the root of the problem: the emergency itself.
Ever since the world became
aware of Covid-19 in early 2020, we have warned of the possibility that the
government response may turn out to be worse than the condition itself.
Many have described this
response as a form of medical tyranny, sold to us as a temporary measure for
the greater good. Two weeks to flatten the curve they said.
Four months into the
lockdowns, some of us half-jokingly said things like, “I hope they lift the
lockdowns before the 4th of July, so we can celebrate our freedoms.”
Now we find ourselves eight
months into a two-week lockdown with no end in sight, despite the fact that a
federal judge in Pennsylvania ruled the shutdowns were unconstitutional. The
Michigan Supreme Court also ruled that the Governor’s emergency orders had violated
the Constitution. So why hasn’t anything changed?
In this interview, Spiro’s guest Dr. Pamela Popper discusses two new lawsuits that she believes could end Covid-1984. The two lawsuits, one in Ohio and one in New Mexico, challenge the root of the problem: the emergency itself.
Will the Karens stop socializing personal responsibility? Physician, heal thyself.
The fact that Americans are following the mask mandate is the best example of an American psychosis. Notice how the store clerk offers her a mask AFTER she's already told the clerk that she's not going to wear one. This is a clear example of these Karens presuming that they know more about disease, health, and immunity than you do.
At the 00:12 second
mark, the masked woman says,
Whenever there's a flu, there are only two or three patients in the ICU at a time. Literally, the entire hospital is a COVID unit and this has never happened.
The trouble with remarks like these is that they lack context and authority. Everyone is trying to grasp some authority in their efforts to police and force others to comply with their desired aversion to any risk. They've been given just enough information to turn them into street epidemiologists, but that just ain't working.
I was in a grocery store last summer that required masks. I wore a mask because there was something in the store I wanted. But I wore the mask off my nose. The clerk who knows me and has been friendly with me says, "You know, the masks only work if you wear them properly." I looked at her with her mask covering her face and said, "Well, you're wearing a mask, aren't you." That absolutely crushed her. She replied, "That's not how it works," as though wearing the mask was a charade and the game in which "we're all in this together" comes with a set of prescribed rules. Suddenly, the health benefits of the mask were reduced to a charade. So the wearing a mask was a game, and wearing them properly meant following certain rules set by SOME unknown authority. This is American psychosis.
The lead up to this current medical psychosis began the day that Donald Trump was elected. The barrage of attacks against him have been unremittant--from the Russian collusion to the Russian hoax to Stormy Daniels to his dodging impeachment, his attackers have been legion and unrelenting. The four years since his election consisted of a psychosis that only primed Americans for further derangement during the 2020 COVID.
Are more people waking up? pic.twitter.com/pbwBck8tPc
— 🌴 Josh Lekach 🌴 (@JoshLekach) December 27, 2020
Asymptomatic spread has been shown to be a myth.
Correct. Asymptomatic means you're healthy. Period. Dot.
00:24
Fewer deaths overall in 2019 than there were in 2018.
I think she misspoke. I think she wanted to compare 2020 deaths
to 2019 deaths, meaning that there were fewer deaths in 2020 than in
2019. To the point, she's asking, "Where is the
pandemic?"
All they've done is recategorize all the deaths. This is not what they're telling us what it is. It's a lie.
Then at the 00:53 second mark, in walks, a mummified American or
zombie, holding out a mask, her voice muffled by her virtue-signaling deviant narrative and
deadened by her following orders given to her by the media. The masked
woman has adopted an uncritical narrative that she feels compelled to force on
others FOR THEIR OWN GOOD. When will these Karens stop socializing
personal responsibility? the woman offering a mask is wearing both a
plastic visor AND a mask. Oh, God. What a frightened kitten.
Has she ever heard of zinc, vitamin D or vitamin C?
1:00
For everyone to put all this stuff on their face when they're healthy is insanity.
And then the real idiocy erupts with the statement, "You're
willing to risk people's lives?" That is the most evil statements
I've heard surrounding this cold virus.
I'm not risking anyone's life. I'm healthy!
True.
How do we know that you're healthy?
What a monster. That masked monster is only baiting the
young gal and forcing her to defend herself, while not crediting a single point
that she's making. Truly mummified women in masks.
Look at me.
Asymptomatic spread is not a thing. They've already shown there is not
asymptomatic spread. I don't have symptoms. I'm fine. I'm not
a carrier of a disease. This is what I am saying--they're treating us
like we're diseased. You just said, "How is this treating you like
you're diseased, but you're It's not just the mask. It's the
social distancing. It's the lockdowns. It's everything. I'm
not doing it anymore. I'm not doing it anymore. I'm done.
And here is the coup de grace by the masked Karen,
You're not in a position to be careful with other people's health.
That masked mummy is psychotic, either that or a criminal She would do well in the
old Soviet Union.
And then the nastiest of the nasties,
You're moving tomorrow, right?
I guess that the masked moron is giddy with destroying civilization.
Saturday, December 26, 2020
"Attorneys have been threatened NOT TO HELP PEOPLE"
Attorneys have been threatened NOT
TO HELP PEOPLE?!?!?!?
If a company is private and is
entitled to creating any policy it wants, then why are companies complying with
CDC recommendations? By deferring to a
pseudo-government/private entity, the CDC, companies put more muscle behind
their policies whether it’s a mask mandate, six-feet apart, or taking 2 Tylenol
as a condition for entering their store.
Is this a way to give any policy
they create more weight
33 mins.
Why are they citing the CDC and the
public health orders, that are not even laws, that they have to comply
with? You guys got to think this
through, and I hope that the sheriff is listening and I hope the police are
listening: you guys are part of the problem.
Think! And I know you know what
the truth is anyway. I know you do, and
you’re just afraid to lose your job and that is pathetic. You should be fired!
You are practicing medicine without
a license.
35 mins.
Is it fancy pants and
lollipops? Is it a bribe that you’ve
received? Is it a promise for a
promotion? Do they have something on
you? Have you compromised yourself? Whether it’s sexual, whether it’s theft, I just
don’t know. What I do know is that each
of you is . . . what I can’t reconcile in my mind is how you can sell out your
own children and grandchildren, throw them right under the bus.
38 mins.
How much money do you think they
got in April from the disaster funds?
Palm Beach County with a 2020 population of 1,510,660 received $261
million. Over a quarter of a billion
dollars. That’s just to start in April. I don’t know what else they received. Chapter 252: Disaster funds. In Florida statutes. You’ve got the Florida mutual aid plan. You’ve got FEMA. Emergency Management Systems Compact. Emergency Use Authorization. The CARES Act. Other things, including insurance
monies. That’s what they’re doing. They’re bailing themselves out.
If these counties rescind any of
the mandates, they need to return the federal relief funds.
40
just file a complaint. And submit
it to whom? They will try to head you
off by sending you on a fool’s errand.
49
The department heads are lying.
The judges are lying. They’re all
lying. They’re overtly lying and they
know it. They know the law. It’s no mystery.
Start with an administrative
agency, the Human Rights Commission. You
have something like this in every state.
The state agency is not going to help you at all. They’re part of the problem; they’re
perpetuating the problem. But you still
have to do that, because the court can’t hear it. Because the court’s gonna say, “you still
have to do something with the state agency; otherwise, I don’t have
jurisdiction.
Don’t listen to these people; go
ahead and make your complaint.
If your gov’t agency is acting
outside of its mandate, that means that they’re not immune.
52
The Uncle Odd Show’s “Notice of Liability.” Notice of liability is conditional acceptance
of their offer. A mandate is an offer. They have to prove, 1) that the virus exists,
2) that social distancing is medically effective, and 3) that masks work. And they have 21 days to be able to do
that. When they don’t, which they won’t,
then you send out a second notice, because that’s the honorable thing to do. You give them another 14 days to comply. The 14 days will pass and they will not have
responded. At that point, at the end of
the 14 days, they will be in default. So
I’ll send a notice of default. There are
8 or 9 steps to this process, but the end of that it will be their conditional
acceptance of my notice of Liability.
Now they are liable. Their office
is liable. And they are liable as a man
or a woman, where I understand it, I can file liens against their office and
against them personally.
SOURCES
"Vaccination does not confer a true, genuine immunity. . . . It only drives the disease deeper into the interior and causes us to harbor it chronically instead . . . "
The positive benefits of vaccines are always presented as a slam dunk. Vaccine expert, Dr. Richard Moskowitz, MD and Homeopath, points out that
the price we have to pay for these antibodies is the persistence of viral elements in the blood for long periods of time, perhaps permanently, which in turn carries with it a systematic weakening of our capacity to mount an acute response, not only to the measles, but to other infections as well.
A brilliant analysis of vaccination, by Richard Moskowitz, MD, and homeopath
by Jon Rappoport
December 24, 2020
(To join Jon Rappoport's email list, click here.)
BACKGROUND ON VACCINES
In the age of COVID, vaccination
looms large. As in mandatory. And of course, toxic.
I’ve already covered two new
vaccine technologies, one of which has already been pushed forward, to
“protect” people from a virus that has never been properly proven to exist.
DNA vaccines, aka gene therapy,
permanently alter recipients’ genetic makeup in unknown ways. RNA vaccines
(Pfizer’s and Moderna’s, just approved for COVID) can cause auto-immune
reactions—which means the body attacks itself. [1] [2]
In this piece, I want to take a
look at a few fundamentals about vaccination. In particular, the claim that
vaccines have done a fantastic job of reducing case numbers of diseases, and
therefore all criticisms of these injections are irrelevant.
WHO IS DR. RICHARD MOSKOWITZ?
From his bio [3]: “Richard
Moskowitz was born in 1938 and educated at Harvard (B.A.) and New York
University (M.D.). After medical school, he did 3 years of graduate study in
Philosophy at the University of Colorado in Boulder on a U. S. Steel
Fellowship.”
“He took his internship at St.
Anthony’s Hospital, Denver, and has been practicing family medicine since 1967,
as well as attending about 800 home births. With a background in Oriental
medicine and other forms of natural healing, Dr. Moskowitz studied homeopathy
with George Vithoulkas in Greece and Rajan Sankaran and others in India.”
In 1987, while writing my first
book, AIDS INC., I had a long conversation on the phone with Richard about
vaccination. It was my first trip exploring vaccines as a form of immune-system
suppression.
I had already seen that AIDS was
actually a lumping together of various immune-system problems, none of which
needed HIV as an explanation.
I still recall that phone
conversation with Richard Moskowitz. I came away from it with an idea about how
vaccines could be touted and trumpeted as the reason for vastly reducing cases
of diseases, when in fact the reduction of visible symptoms was occurring—a
very different thing.
If vaccines were lowering
immune-system response, then the acute, vigorous, and all-out inflammatory
reaction to germs would be eliminated. And it IS that acute reaction which
creates the visible symptoms (rashes, spots, etc.).
Vaccination equals no cases of
measles, the experts say. But really, as a result of vaccination, it’s just the
visible rash that is missing, while something more dangerous, out of view, is
going on in the body.
I’m printing here an excerpt from
Richard’s article (written years ago), The Case Against Immunizations. The
article is based on a classical view of germs and the action of the human
immune system. The pros and cons of germ theory itself are a different matter,
about which I’ve spoken and written in other places. [4] [5]
Note: Although the RNA COVID
vaccines deploy a technology different from classical vaccines, they still rely
on antibody response as the key to “producing immunity.” But that response is
only one of many natural reactions in the body which maintain health and ward
off disease.
From Dr. Richard Moskowitz’s
brilliantly articulated article, The Case Against Immunizations: [6]
“It is dangerously misleading, and indeed the exact opposite of the truth, to claim that a vaccine renders us ‘immune’ to or protects us against an acute disease, if in fact it only drives the disease deeper into the interior and causes us to harbor it chronically instead, with the result that our responses to it become progressively weaker, but show less and less of a tendency to heal or resolve themselves spontaneously. What I propose, then, is to investigate as thoroughly and objectively as I can how the vaccines actually work inside the human body, and to begin by simply paying attention to the implications of what we already know. Consider the process of falling ill with and recovering from a typical acute disease, such as the measles, in contrast with what we can observe following administration of the measles vaccine.”
“…Once inhaled by a susceptible individual, the [measles] virus undergoes a prolonged period of silent multiplication, first in the tonsils, adenoids, and accessory lymphoid aggregations of the nasopharynx; later in the regional lymph nodes of the head and neck; and eventually, several days later, it passes into the blood and enters the spleen, the liver, the thymus, and the bone marrow, the ‘visceral’ organs of the immune system. Throughout this ‘incubation’ period, which lasts from 10 to 14 days, the patient typically feels quite well, and experiences few or no symptoms of any kind.”
“By the time that the first symptoms of measles appear, circulating antibodies are already detectable in the blood, and the height of the symptomatology coincides with the peak of the antibody response. In other words, the ‘illness’ that we call the measles is simply the definitive effort of the immune system to clear this virus from the blood. Notice also that this expulsion is accomplished by sneezing and coughing, i. e., via the same route through which it entered in the first place. It is abundantly clear from the above that the process of mounting and recovering from an acute illness like the measles involves a general mobilization of the immune system as a whole, including inflammation of the previously sensitized tissues at the portal(s) of entry, activation of leukocytes, macrophages, and the serum complement system, and a host of other mechanisms, of which the production of circulating antibodies is only one, and by no means the most important.”
“Such splendid outpourings indeed represent the decisive experiences in the normal physiological maturation of the immune system in the life of a healthy child. For recovery from the measles not only protects children from being susceptible to it again, no matter how many more times they may be exposed to it, but also prepares them to respond promptly and effectively to any other infections they may encounter in the future. The ability to mount a vigorous acute response to infection must therefore be reckoned among the most fundamental requirements of health and well-being that we all share.”
“By contrast, the live but artificially attenuated measles-virus vaccine is injected directly into the blood, bypassing the normal port of entry and set[ting] up at most a brief inflammatory reaction at the injection site, or perhaps in the regional lymph nodes, with no local sensitization at the normal portal of entry, no ‘incubation period,’ no generalized inflammatory response, and no generalized outpouring. By ‘tricking’ the body in this fashion, we have accomplished precisely what the entire immune system seems to have evolved to prevent: we have placed the virus directly into the blood, and given it free and immediate access to the major immune organs and tissues, without any obvious mechanism or route for getting rid of it.”
“The result is the production of circulating antibodies against the virus, which can in fact be measured in the blood; but this antibody response occurs as an isolated technical feat, without any overt illness to recover from, or any noticeable improvement in the general health of the recipient. Indeed I submit that exactly the opposite is true, that the price we have to pay for these antibodies is the persistence of viral elements in the blood for long periods of time, perhaps permanently, which in turn carries with it a systematic weakening of our capacity to mount an acute response, not only to the measles, but to other infections as well.”
“Far from producing a genuine immunity, then, my suspicion and my fear is that vaccines act by interfering with and even suppressing the immune response as a whole, in much the same way that radiation, chemotherapy, corticosteroids, and other anti-inflammatory drugs do. Artificial immunization focuses on antibody production, a single aspect of the immune process, disarticulates it, and allows it to stand for the whole, in much the same way as chemical suppression of an elevated blood pressure is accepted as a valid substitute for genuine healing or cure of the patient whose blood pressure has risen. It is the frosting on the cake, without the cake. The worst part of this counterfeiting is that it becomes more difficult, if not impossible, for vaccinated children to mount a normally acute and vigorous response to infection, by substituting for it a much weaker, essentially chronic response, with little or no tendency to heal itself spontaneously.”
This is an explanation of
vaccination which chops down the claim that vaccines are wonderful because they
eliminate cases of disease.
With experimental RNA COVID
vaccines, who knows how long the injected RNA lingers in the body, and what
effects it produces over time? The relatively short clinical trials certainly
don’t offer useful conclusions. [7] [8] The CDC blithely assures us that once the
injected RNA offers “instructions to cells of the body,” the cells destroy the
RNA. Sounds magical. The cells wait, receive instructions, THEN destroy the
messenger.
And again, as I stated above, RNA
technology has, in the past, caused auto-immune reactions, in which the body
basically attacks itself.
SOURCES:
[1]
https://www.denverpost.com/2020/12/09/pfizer-covid-vaccine-allergic-reactions/
[3]
https://healthy.net/author/richard-moskowitz-md/
[4]
https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2016/08/08/what-youll-never-read-about-virus-research-fraud/
[6]
https://vaccineimpact.com/2015/richard-moskowitz-m-d-the-case-against-immunizations/
[7] https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020/12/21/why-you-shouldnt-believe-the-covid-vaccine-is-effective/