Can Ivermectin Treat Cancer? - 9 Papers Reviewed

Can Ivermectin Treat Cancer? - 9 Papers Reviewed https://t.co/mPWUUbWVtv

— Kelly DNP🩺 Functional/Integrative Med (@kacdnp91) October 17, 2023

Papers reviewed:

• 2023 Sep.23 - Man-Yuan Li et al - Ivermectin induces nonprotective autophagy by downregulating PAK1 and apoptosis in lung adenocarcinoma cells
• 2023 May - Samy et al - Eprinomectin: a derivative of ivermectin suppresses growth and metastatic phenotypes of prostate  cancer cells by targeting the β-catenin signaling pathway
• 2022 Nov - Lotfalizadeh et al - The Anticancer potential of Ivermectin: Mechanisms of action and therapeutic implications
• 2022 Oct - Jian Liu et al - Progress in Understanding the Molecular Mechanisms Underlying the Antitumour Effects of Ivermectin
• 2022 Jun - Daeun Lee et al - Ivermectin suppresses pancreatic cancer via mitochondria dysfunction
• 2021 Aug - Shican Zhou et al - Ivermectin has New Application in Inhibiting Colorectal Cancer Cell Growth
• 2021 Jan - Mingyang Tang et al - Ivermectin, a potential anticancer drug derived from an antiparasitic drug
• 2019 Sep Intuyod et al - Anti-parasitic Drug Ivermectin Exhibits Potent Anticancer Activity Against Gemcitabine-resistant Cholangiocarcinoma In Vitro
• 2018 Feb - Juarez et al - The multitargeted drug ivermectin: from an antiparasitic agent to a repositioned cancer drug

IVERMECTIN

I did write to BuyIvermectinForSale.us on January 7, 2024, about the different uses between Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine, and I received this reply, 

Because Ivermectin is the best option for COVID-19 treatment, and Hydroxychloroquine is a prescription drug used to treat many autoimmune disorders. It was first used to treat malaria.

So that might help.   

Running low on your medication? Order a refill online and have it delivered to your home. #USA #UK #goodmoring #SaturdayVibes #SaturdayMorning

Site - https://t.co/qMfgpbOQra pic.twitter.com/fKE5WwzygE

— ivermectin-suppliers (@jams_caro) August 19, 2023

Get your Ivermectin from one of these Tennessee pharmacies. 

Not sure if this is kept up to date, but this is a good list to start your hunt for OTC IVM in TN 🧡 https://t.co/EuYb8T2SuL

— HarrietteTheSpy (@TheSpyHarriette) August 31, 2023

Buy Ivermectin, Ziverdo kit, and HCQS online

Another Ivermectin site from India. 

Another Indian supplier.  This place promises a 7-day shipment to the U.S.  Hard to know.  

INDIAN

GoodRx sells Ivermectin.

AMERICAN

Tennessee: The Phoenix Pharmacy, Knoxville, TN.  865-692-1603.  This place ships ONLY IN TENNESSEE and they only sell 3mg for $5/tablet.  That will get expensive.

Brand Name:

3mg: $5

6mg:

12mg:

Village Pharmacy OTC version requires a doctor assigned to that pharmacy with a collaborative agreement.  They do not ship out of state.  865-579-4547.  

Rocky Hill Pharmacy.  865-337-5887.  Have not called this pharmacy, because the gal at the Village Pharmacy suggested that I phone the pharmacies on the border, like Chattanooga and Nashville.  That page has no pharmacies listed in Chattanooga; a few in Nashville.  

Joshua Brown Pharmacy.   

FountainRx in Nashville.

Health & Wellness Compounding Pharmacy.  

Smokey Mountain Pharmacy.

In Chattanooga: 

Medicine Counter Pharmacy.  9-7; 10-2.  423-680-7373.  

Do you sell Ivermective w/o a prescription?  Yes, up until September 30, 2023.

Do you ship out of state?  Yes.

Brand name?  No brand name.  They compound it, meaning that they make it in-house. 

Dosage that you sell?  By weight.  Check their website.  gomedicinecounter.com  Click on the link below the Ivermectin capsule image.

Their website provides a dosage table by weight.  

Hamilton Discount Pharmacy.  9-7; 10-2.  423-892-5955.  

Stop-n-Go Discount Pharmacy. 8-8; 10-6.  423-468-7161.  

45 studies using Ivermectin late in the game, 41% improvement in outcomes, meaning they didn't die.

“The people who are still dismissing ivermectin are lazy.” Spoke with Aussie Chris Smith @tntradiolive about ivermectin and my fight with the Texas Medical Board. (1/2) pic.twitter.com/GgI7wbtYvL

— Mary Talley Bowden MD (@MdBreathe) August 4, 2023

See this post with Dr. Bryan Ardis for Ivermectin resources. 

1:22. I admit I was scared to use it initially.  The way I put my mind at ease was by researching it, and I went to the FDA's website to look at the original studies where the drug became approved for human use.  And I looked at their safety data and there's something called the LD50 which is a benchmark number for a drug's toxicity.  And LD50 means, okay, what dosage of the drug will kill 50% of lab animals.  For Ivermectin, you'd have to give about 100 times what we're giving to approach the LDC what we are giving to approach the LD50. And I researched deaths, either accidental or intentional overdose of Ivermectin, and could find nothing.  No case reports.  So, the people who are dismissing Ivermectin are just being lazy.  

And the Texas Medical Board is being lazy because they're not taking you to task over the science of your claims.  They're taking you to task because you didn't tow the government controlled line during the pandemic.

They're making accusations that are not true.  They're making it sound like I just marched into the hospital and started writing orders for a patient that wasn't mine without having privileges, which is not how it happened at all.  Everything I did was part of a lawsuit that the patient's wife was bringing against the hospital, and I was the expert witness.  I was the one they granted me privileges and then I would be writing the prescriptions.  But they're making it sound like if I had gone in there and written orders without permission; that would be a bad thing but that's not what happened.  

DR. ELIZABETH EADS: "the combination of Fenbendozale, Ivermectin, and apricot seeds, i.e., B-17 cures cancers. Not all cancers"

Here is Dr. Elizabeth Eads, [5:00-6:00] who has learned from a series of studies out of Europe that the combination of Fenbendozale, Ivermectin, and apricot seeds, i.e., B-17, cures cancers. Not all cancers, she qualifies that point. But there are 63 papers confirming this fact.  She specifies that this combination treats breast cancers, prostate cancers, and colon cancers.  And I like the dig she makes on Obama, passing the bill to unleash government propaganda through HR 4310, the National Defense Authorization Act, signed by Obama on December 29, 2012.  So basically, Section 1078 of that Bill authorizes the use of propaganda inside the U.S.A. which had previously been banned since 1948 when the Smith-Mundt Modernization Act, 1948, was passed.  What does this mean?  [8:00] It means they legalized propaganda, legalizing mainstream media, Big Pharma, hospitals, doctors, and publications to put out campaigns against Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin, calling it "Horse Paste."  They weren't allowed to call it Ivermectin.  Who prevented people from calling Ivermectin?  Claiming that Hydroxychlorine was calling heart arrhythmias.  Chlorine Dioxide, they termed it "bleach."  Shout out to Pierre Kory, because the war on Ivermectin is beautifully laid out with all the evidence, and all the studies supporting this propaganda this study from Desort and Henin, The SAIVE Trial is a trial.  "Exposure to that Ivermectin reduced exposure to SARS-CoV-2 by 72%.  Not sure what that means exactly.  I'd be more interested to know what Ivermectin does to the spike proteins from the vaccine.  Hel-lo.  It is telling, however, that all of the Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine papers under the propaganda law were suppressed.  Then how did they get out then?   

12:00  Underlying cause of cancer falls into 3 categories: 1) EMF radiation, radiation, in general; 2) pesticides, glyphosate, benzine, and environmental toxins; 3) parasites.  All of this has been proven in the literature, so you have to attack all three of those causes/categories in order to treat cancer.  She includes the brand Root Spray and Clean Slate.  She also incorporates the blocking of all radiation radiation.and EMF and using products, topical products like Ozone Blocking, EMF-blocking scaler wave stickers.  They block EMF in your phone, your iPad, your cell tower, anything to block the EMF radiation that is bombarding us everyday.

13:35. Lee Merritt recently raised an interesting point going back to when they started to lay the electrical grid and wiryy for the TELEGRAPH. Everywhere where those wires were being laid down, usually along railroad tracks, there was an increased incidence of sickness in people living nearby.  Scientists have been tracking radiation exposure, and EMF exposure, all the way back to the telegraph.  Negative frequencies, whether in music or in warfare, we know that during World War I and World War II, they used negative musical frequency, called The Devil's Tone to injure and make the enemy hyper-aggressive and make them docile and actually surrender.  And then for each pandemic marching through the years, Dr. Lee Merritt lays out a correlation the increased amount of radiation exposure and disease.  So there's a great correlation.  You know, she's from the military, she has a Navy background.  She was an orthopedic spinal surgeon in the Navy and she sat on a lot of these military committees, so she has a lot of data.  But she has correlated the electromagnetic radiation frequency and disease in the human body whether that's acute sickness or illness or cancer she has correlated that and she's out there and she's really outspoken about the importance of Americans decreasing their exposure to EMF radiation and there are great papers on the frequency rate, papers supporting the 5G.  T there is evidence in Wuhan and Lombardi after they turned on those 5G towers is when most of those "Covid" cases occurred. So perhaps it was just a high amount of 5G exposure causing illness and sickness and toxicity in the body that killed a lot of those patients and not necessarily the bioweapon that was also distributed to people In Lombardi and Wuhan and New York City.

16:36. In your February interview you said something that some people thought was outrageous but you don't lie.  For example,  this explosion in cancers, you got the goods on to tell us there's also a video out by Dr. Bischoff. [Taking vitamin D3, Omega 3s, and exercise may reduce invasive cancers by 61% in adults 70 years old and up.] You can see him give his dissertation from cancer.org the Cancer Society Prevention Society.

17:00  At least a billion dead or disabled by Covid-19 bioweapon vaccine.  Are you sticking by that, or do you have more to back that up?

17:10  I am sticking by that.  Actually, it's going to be higher than that, 1.2 billion.  A paper recently came out submitted by Dave Hodges shows 600,000 Americans per year are dying from Covid shots.  And that data is supported by Stirling and Ed Dowd.  What they did is look at the actuary numbers in the insurance, life insurance numbers, because you know, because we don't have good data sets from the hospitals because they're not reporting vaccine injuries; they're not reporting vaccine status; they're not correlating the deaths with mRNA vaccines.  They're doing that on purpose.  

18:05  You're saying that the data they're getting of 600,000, that's just low because the hospital is shading that.  

18:16  I am sure it's slightly hire because we don't have the data set from the hospitals.  When we're talking about 600,000 excess deaths/year [Josh Stirling, an insurance analyst presents this number at the 6:49 mark] and we're not done with 2023 yet, that could potentially be 1.2 billion.  

18:34  A year?

18:35  Correct.  

18:40  That seems like a lot, right?  That's 1.2 billion globally.  There are 13 billion injections at least.  That's the number. These are the CDC numbers.  And there are at least 676 million injections alone.  676 million injections, CV19 bioweapon injections, in America alone.

19:05  So the UK has really good data set from their Dept. of Health and they have projected recently in a UK study that they've had 5, they're on their 5th or 6th booster.  They're projecting a population decrease by 2025 of 77%.  

20:35  Ed Dowd says that the number of injured is exponentially higher than those who are dying.  What do you think about the disabilities and deaths in the U.S. for 2023?  Ed Dowd said we lost 30% of our workforce in 2022.

20:54  It's going to be in the high millions. 600,000 and we're not done with 2023.  You double that and that's what, 1.2 million and that's underreported.  So millions.  Remember that the spike protein and the bioweapon nanotechnology remain in the body for we don't know how long.  There's no endpoint.  The reason you're getting these super cancers is because you have spike proteins being manufactured with no off button.  And so you have a delayed effect in auto-immune disorders and cancers.  What happens is that the spike protein dysregulates your T-cells, your B-cells which fight foreign bacteria, viruses, and cancers, and the complement system.  It interrupts that.  And then you have the SV40 that was discovered in the Moderna and Pfizer vials by Kevin McKernen who worked on the human genome project, who is a microbiologist.  So you have these foreign proteins with DNA, this monkey SV40 which he discovered in over the legal amount allowed to be as a contaminant in the vials, and multiple vials he looked at.  So you had these DNA proteins getting into the cells and introducing this monkey DNA, the SV40, which is also dysregulating your normal T-cells, normal B-cells, and complement which normally attack and eat cancer.  They're actually causing cancers.  And it's been suggested that these SV40 lead to cancers such as mesothelioma, lymphoma, and brain cancer.  And there's a direct correlation.  So there's no endpoint to the mRNA mechanism, the nanotechnology that has clearly been proven by the patents which are on Karen Kingston's substack.  And there's no turn-off switch for the spike protein.  The spike protein remains in the body for 1-3 years that we've seen so far. 

23:54  It doesn't dissipate?

23:55  No, that's my point.  

24:00  Is this why people are prescribing Ivermectin is it because it binds, this is what Dr. Pierre Kory told me, is it because it binds to the spike proteins and removes them?  Dr. Peter McCullough is also prescribing Nattokinase because it dissolves the spike protein.  Bind, remove, dissolves, sound like a pretty good one-two punch.  Are those two great things to have if you're going to preemptively attack spike proteins if you've been vaxx'd or if you're being shed on?

24:40  Absolutely.  Look, Nattokinase has been used as a food supplement in Japan for years.  And the life expectancy in Japan is really long, it's over 100 years old.  Nattokinase boosts the immune system.  It makes the red blood cells in your blood, whether it's venous or arterial, it doesn't matter.  It makes them less sticky, and it decreases the incidents of blood clots.  But also it's been shown by Peter McCullough and his team, to sweep out the spike protein, so I highly recommend the use of Nattokinase, Ivermectin, and some kind of chelation.  I love the Root Spray and Clean Slate.  Ivermectin has been proven to decrease the effects of spike protein.  Decrease the effects of and limit viral exposure and the entrance of the virus into cells and block the mechanism of the virus sticking to the ACE2 Receptors and the spike protein sticking to the ACE2 receptors, which are all over all the organs in the body.  So I use a combination of products.  I also use dimethylglycine or methylene Blue to turn off the mRNA.  It demethylates the mRNA that is outside the cell.  There's no product that we know that stops the mRNA mechanism inside the cell at this point.  But I use that whole combination to lessen the effect of the spike protein.  

26:55  No treatment that we know of for the q dot nanoparticles that Karen Kingston describes.  

27:05  That's not shed on you, that's actually injected into the 200 plus million Americans . . . that is not a shedding issue.  That's an issue of injection, correct?

27:17  No.  Actually, the nanoparticles can be shed during transmission as well and they can jump from person to person.  And that's been seen in the DoD literature and supported by James Giordano, who is Advisor to U.S. Military Intelligence community.  In fact, he wrote that "neurotism technologies and neurotechnology nanoparticles, such as NeuroLink, Neurolace should not be considered for their mass destruction effects."

27:57  What would Elon Musk say about that? It's a bio weapon, right? These are all bio weapons, right?

28:05. These are definitely bioweapons.  If you go to Karen Kingston's substack, she has put out . . . she has done some great work in Florida.  She has put out 12 Points.  She set up a document that has laid out 12 talking points to send to your County Commissioner to get rid of these mRNA shots.  And in Point #12, I am going to read it, it says biological weapons are weapons of mass destruction.  Allowing their use on civilian populations is a 1st-degree felony in the state of Florida.  And she goes on to say that mRNA vaccines contain neurotechnology that is patented for use as a bioweapon.  She has the receipts on her website.  And this document can be downloaded off of her substack and used for any county in any state.  This is specific to Florida, but she has a letter on there where you can plug in your County Commissioner's name and office.  In the letter, you can tailor that letter to your own county commissioner in any state.  I actually sent it to my county commissioner here in Florida.  

29:40  Are they going to do anything about it? 

29:42  Yes, Collier County has passed legislation that protects its citizens against mandates, and these mRNA vaccines.  It also talks about informed consent and there are other counties in Florida that are going to pass legislation against these mRNA technologies., mandates, and against the lack of informed consent.  It's a beautifully written document and everybody should download that.

30:25  Karen Kingston was on the cutting edge of this from the very beginning.  

If you want to get Ivermectin without a prescription,

there are places in the United States.  See here.  If you order from outside the U.S., say, from India, it will take at least 1 full month before you receive it in your mail.  

$70 for 90 Count.  Well, it was $70.  Today, Sunday, May 19, 2024, it's $90 for 90-count.  

FenLAB Phenbendazol 220 | mg | >99% | 90 | ct https://t.co/eg4yYaGn12 via @amazon

— St. Michael, the Archangel (@aveng_angel) May 20, 2024

HOW IVERMECTIN WORKS AGAINST SARS-COV-2: ivermectin comes along and stops any further transfection and tags the already transfected cells for removal by the immune system....

IVERMECTIN INHIBITS NUCLEAR IMPORT!!! IT STOPS mRNA FROM GETTING INTO THE CELL!!! 

God how did I miss the nuclear import thing.... It'd stop you from being further permanently transfected by anyone you come in contact with who's had a recent booster and it should potentially even fix the apoptosis problem and clear out the transfected cells....

— Hippopotamus Rising (@HippopotamusRi1) December 3, 2022

Fuhhhkkkkk. We win. It explains why it reverses paralysis, parkinsonsesque/psychosisesque/schizophrenicesque adverse reactions

— Hippopotamus Rising (@HippopotamusRi1) December 3, 2022

Spike is being produced constantly in the brain/spinal cord and then causing constant exponentially increasing inflammation and then ivermectin comes along and stops any further transfection and tags the already transfected cells for removal by the immune system....

— Hippopotamus Rising (@HippopotamusRi1) December 3, 2022

Frickkkkkkk!!!! That's part of why Fulvic works that I hadn't realized!!!
It also binds the spike and would flag transfected cells for removal!
Not nearly as strong of a binding but there's no reason to think it wouldn't have a similar impact

— Hippopotamus Rising (@HippopotamusRi1) December 3, 2022

https://t.co/uaMWXwYKKX

— Hippopotamus Rising (@HippopotamusRi1) December 3, 2022

NoFluxGiven writes, 

I believe Dr Paul Marik and Dr Been agree, and one of the reasons IVM is the foundation of the I-RECOVER protocols by the http://flccc.net. 

Combined with fasting, red light therapy, and Methylene Blue to effectively stop replication and degrade the spike. Nailed it! 

https://t.co/cjh39iAzKZ

— Мария Иванова (@MariIva09434672) December 3, 2022

HOW TO GET IVERMECTIN:  If you're wondering how to obtain Ivermectin, one responder wrote

7 dollars...duramectin...farm and fleet type stores...horse on package..one click per 50 pounds..no problem..you're welcome...

— MamaDL (@dl_mama) December 3, 2022

Here is one farm & fleet store.   

Study shows remdesivir as primary COVID treatment is a total bust

Fauci perfect record intact.

"Routine use of remdesivir may be associated with increased use of hospital beds while not being associated with improvements in survival."https://t.co/WcPZ2RO6QV

— Phil Kerpen (@kerpen) July 15, 2021

by Daniel Horowitz for The Blaze, reposted at the Ron Paul Institute

Sixteen months into this virus, our government has nothing to offer us in terms of treatment in the hospital but remdesivir at $3,100 a dose and zero treatment options at the critical early-stage, when serious complications can be pre-empted. Now, a new study from the University of Iowa shows what we knew all along – that remdesivir failed to reduce mortality one iota. Why are we to believe the same government entities about embracing the clot shots and shunning so many other cheaper and effective treatments after spending billions and losing countless lives on a failed drug?

After 62 studies, 32 of them randomized controlled trials, establishing ivermectin as an effective treatment and an even more effective preventative to keep people out of the hospital in the first place, our government refuses to endorse its use and Big Tech continues to censor it. They claim they need more studies. Yet not a single randomized controlled trial showed remdesivir to be effective before they dove in headfirst and the NIH made it the only approved antiviral treatment for COVID. Now, a University of Iowa study published in JAMA Network Open on Thursday has shown that remdesivir was a complete bust.

Among the 2,334 US veterans studied in 124 hospitals, a higher share of remdesivir patients (12.2 percent) who took part in the study died than patients in the control group (10.6 percent). Moreover, on average, remdesivir patients spent six days in the hospital, while control group patients spent only three.

Previously, last October, the World Health Organization found that use of remdesivir in 11,000 patients across 400 hospitals in the world failed to lower the mortality rate or truncate time of stay in the hospital.

Take a look at this chart of treatment protocols for COVID hospital patients from the NIH, and you will see that aside from remdesivir, the only other treatment they offer is dexamethasone as the corticosteroid of choice to treat inflammation.

Again, dexamethasone was approved after just one randomized controlled trial last year, when ivermectin had over two dozen. This new study from the University of Iowa seems to show that dexamethasone is also a bust because outcomes did not improve among those who received that steroid along with remdesivir, as opposed to the control group that did not. In other words, after 16 months of research by doctors on numerous helpful antiviral and anti-inflammatory drugs, as well as more effective corticosteroids, the government has ensured that we have not advanced one iota in treating this virus. This is truly criminal and probably the gravest scandal of COVID.

Contrast this to ivermectin, which is available for $25. A Cochrane-standard (the highest level review) meta-analysis of ivermectin against COVID-19 by Bryant-Lawrie, which has been published in the American Journal of Therapeutics, concluded that ivermectin reduced fatality in hospitalized patients by 62%. But more important is getting people to use this immediately in an outpatient setting and, for vulnerable people, even preventively. The study found that "ivermectin prophylaxis reduced covid-19 infection by an average 86%."

Fair use excerpt. Read the whole article here. 

The Story Of Ivermectin And COVID-19

NCBI explains that 

Ivermectin proved to be even more of a ‘Wonder drug’ in human health, improving the nutrition, general health and wellbeing of billions of people worldwide ever since it was first used to treat Onchocerciasis in humans in 1988.

The narrator explains that Ivermectin, discovered in the 1970s, treats river blindness caused by a parasitic worm and caused untold suffering and even death in Central and Southern America and much of Africa. 

Instead of Ivermectin, Fauci endorsed Remdesivir, which has a lousy effect on mortality.  In fact, in the study that initially began to examine mortality, Fauci switched the results or endpoint of the study from Remdesivir’s impact on mortality to Remdesivir’s impact on “time it takes to recover.”

So why would Dr. Fauci and NIH continue to endorse a drug that costs $3,100 per course of treatment [unlike Ivermectin, which is narrowly free] and that has shown to have no impact on mortality?  Who makes Remdesivir and how are they related to who gets to decide which drugs can be used to treat COVID-19? 

Remdesivir is made by Gilead Sciences, a pharmaceutical company located in Foster City, CA.  From 1997-2001, the chairman of Gilead was Donald Rumsfeld, one of the architects of the War in Iraq.  

When Ford lost the 1976 election, Rumsfeld returned to private business and financial life, and was named president and CEO of the pharmaceutical corporation G. D. Searle & Company. He was later named CEO of General Instrument from 1990 to 1993 and chairman of Gilead Sciences from 1997 to 2001.

During the same period, one of the board members of Gilead was George Schultz, a long-time Bush Family ally who was instrumental in convincing George W. Bush to run for the United States.  

In order to understand why the NIH treatment panel is so pro-Remdesivir, it’s essential to understand the financial ties between Gilead Sciences and members of that treatment panel.  Looking at the treatment panel’s financial disclosures, you will see that no fewer than 7 members disclosed financial support from Gilead Sciences.  Interestingly, the 3 co-chairs who select the other members of the panel, do not disclose support from Gilead.  However, two of the Chairs, Roy Gulick and Henry Masur, both receive financial support from Gilead.  Even more interestingly, the third co-chair, Clifford Lane was actually was one of the authors of the NIAID study on Remdesivir, but you won’t see his name in the list of the article’s authors.  You have to look at the financial disclosure form that accompanied that article.  

It’s also worth noting that 7 out of 12 of these co-authors on that study disclosed funding from Gilead Sciences.  The significance of this cannot be overstated.  Two of the three chairs of the NIH COVID-19 Treatment Panel, the people who put the panel together, received financial support from Gilead Sciences, while the other was intimately involved in the study that attempted to and failed to prove that Remdesivir was an effective treatment of COVID-19.  

Given these professional and financial ties, is there any way that we could reasonably expect them to impartially judge the best treatments for COVID-19?  Or choose panel members who advocate for repurposing cheap, off-patent drugs that would completely undercut the market for one of the main products of a company with which they enjoy close financial and professional ties? 

This seems like good news.

Curious what Ivermectin skeptics have to say about these results.

Thanks to Ryan Dawson.  https://t.co/QvGIEbwq1S

— Stephen W. Carson (@RadicalLib) September 5, 2021

FDA’s VAERS Shows 70 deaths with Ivermectin since 1996. Compare that to the 3,882 deaths associated with Acetaminophen, the active ingredient in Tylenol

Dr. Ben Carson: FDA Violated Law with Relentless Crusade Against Ivermectin

"In display of insatiable arrogance, FDA refused to be satisfied with authority over market entry and labeling, & instead tried to commandeer the role of doctors in treating their patients as well" pic.twitter.com/BBN335N4uN

— Asher Media 🇺🇲 (@AsherPostsUSA) July 19, 2022

Is Ivermectin Safe? 

Ivermectin is known to be safe. 

For perspective, the FDA’s Adverse Events Reporting System shows 70 deaths sith Ivermectin since 1996.  Compare that to the 3,882 deaths associated with Acetaminophen, which is the active ingredient in the drug, Tylenol during this very same period.  The FDA has the authority to approve drugs like Ivermectin that can first enter the market in the United States.  That much is true.  They get to decide what labeling they will use.  Doctors can then prescribe those drugs however they think necessary, including for “off-label” uses that differ from what the FDA originally approved.  The FDA has openly acknowledged that the off-label use of approved drugs is not illegal but a necessary and important part of the practice of medicine.  For example, an estimated 21% of all prescriptions are for off-label use here in the United States, and that number jumps to 32.6% in adult intensive care units. 

So now let’s shift back to the OpEd.  

According to Dr. Ben Carson and Mr. Gray, the FDA’s actions violate both fundamental ethics and the law.  But why?  According to these two gentlemen, Congress was explicit in the Food, Drugs, and Cosmetic Act that the FDA was not to interfere in the practice of medicine which includes prescribing drugs off-label.  However, the FDA has relentlessly publicly bashed what has been a solid anti-parasitic drug because it was used by hundreds, if not thousands, of doctors, across the country during the pandemic.  Moreover, the FDA pressured the umbrella boards and licensing organizations which in turn pressured their members on a state-by-state basis to avoid the drug.  And so in the eyes of the public, this was clearly interpreted by many Americans as banning the use of the drug, which wasn’t and cannot be the case here.  The agency displayed insatiable arrogance.

“In a display of insatiable arrogance, the FDA has refused to be satisfied with its authority over market entry and labeling, and instead tried to commandeer the role of doctors in treating their patients as well.”  Dr. Ben Carson & Boyden Gray Op-Ed. 

"I did everything I could to protect her but I still couldn't protect her from these evil people that murdered her"

Here is the interview.

Hospitals were getting a $39,000 dollar kickback for putting patients on a ventilator, so when we said we didn't want her on a ventilator or her to be given Remdesivir, whatsoever, they immediately made a sign, DNR, Do Not Resuscitate.  So they knew that my mother was going to die, so for people complaining at home, you know, the arm-chair conspiracy theorists, they want people to die because this is the problem: they were not able to get Emergency Use Authorization on the vaccine if there is any sort of remedy for COVID0-19.  If there's any available remedy.  Now, you can technically call Ivermectin an available remedy.  Because of that, because Ivermectin actually works against COVID-19, it would have negated the vaccine, they denied people like my mother Ivermectin.  And then they use Remdesivir when they know from the studies that half the people die from the trials, they gave it to people like my mother behind our back, knowing they had the legal liability to give it to her whatever they wanted because that was the government protocol for COVID, so they murdered my mom right in front of my face slowly . . . .  

She died on October 21, 2021, thirteen days after his birthday.  Really sad.  I still have the last gifts my mother gave me--the notes and cards.  She was my biggest fan, watched all the stuff, and then 2 weeks later, she's dead.  Life is fragile.  I didn't expect to lose my mom.  She did everything.  She wore a mask.  She got vaccinated because she would have lost care from her doctor, she didn't even tell me about it, only told her sister.  She didn't even want me to know because I was so anti-vaxx.  So once again, they killed with the vaxx, they killed her with Remdesivir, they killed her with the protocols.    

My mom was in an accident when I was younger, and my mom was on disability, I took care of my mom, I took care of my mom.  I TOOK CARE of my mom, that's why I feel immense guilt.  I did everything I could to protect her but I still couldn't protect her from these evil people that murdered her.

How could you give her Remdesivir when we both told you not to give it to her?  Did they wait until she was asleep and then give it to her?  Did you figure out how they gave it to her without her consent?  I was very lucky to be in the room with her for 4 hours a day of visitation.  But, Dan, there are so many wires, so much stuff going in and out of there.  And because of intubation, they have what is called a C-Pap machine almost, it just blows in the air.  It was very uncomfortable.  One is Remdesivir, and one is steroids, I don't know.  It doesn't matter.  We told them no Remdesivir, no Remdesivir whatsoever.  My mom was fine.  The only reason she went to the hospital is that she was that she got it too fast, she hit her head and almost fainted.  She did not really even want to go to the hospital.  Long story, short, she called the hospital, and they told her that her breathing is fine.  And the second time, she got up so fast she hit her head and got nervous, thinking that she should go into the hospital because she'd never fainted like that before.  And the next thing you know, those first two days she and I were sitting there, having a conversation, drinking McDonald's milkshakes, and once they started administering Remdesivir, my mom's entire organs filled up with fluid and she died in my arms 5 days later.  

And when you asked to give her Ivermectin at Baylor University Hospital, 

They had 11 different cords going into my mother, they told you it wasn't part of the protocol because it wasn't part of the government, or what was their excuse?  They looked at me like I was a tinfoil hat conspiracy theorist like I was They may as well have thought I was QAnon when I asked for that in that hospital. 

The worst of it all was when I was talking about Ivermectin, they had the police escort me out because those nurses were so nervous because those nurses said I was going to do something to them after my mom died.  I'm just saying that's how they treated me.  I would never hurt a nurse, but they were so nervous because they were treating me like absolute crap, like I was an anti-vaxxer, making me feel guilty while I was watching my mom die.  The last thing I'm going to say is nothing scares me, Dan.  When I go into a protest with Antifa, I could care less.  I watched my mom die.  I was so scared to go to that hospital every single day.  So nothing will ever be as bad as 

John Zingsheim survived a 10-month stay in the hospital after finally being treated with Ivermectin.  

[Ivermectin] has saved untold people from going blind; its discoverers won the Nobel Prize.

I am NOT in favor of prophylactic ivermectin but the bluecheck/public health spin that it has no human uses as a medicine and is mainly a horse dewormer is nonsense.

It has saved untold people from going blind; its discoverers won the Nobel Prize.

They lie about everything. pic.twitter.com/ycBTf75jnk

— Alex Berenson (@AlexBerenson) August 22, 2021

Also, Ivermectin is inexpensive.

Ivermectin, a #drug used to fight parasites in third-world countries, could help reduce the length of infection for people who contract #coronavirus for less than $1 a day.

By @MaayanJaffe https://t.co/ysyop9uNHR

— The Jerusalem Post (@Jerusalem_Pxost) August 21, 2021

The absurdity of the CDC's warning from the use of Ivermectin is astonishing.

A quick look in the scientific literature

Published in 2020

"Caly et al. 10 report a 5,000-fold reduction in SARS-CoV-2 RNA levels, compared with those in controls"  https://t.co/OKsI5apnGl

— Ibra A Taher (@Ibra_Taher) August 23, 2021

"Along with ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine, Rodgers was treated for COVID-19 with monoclonal antibodies, zinc, and vitamins C and D."

Not completely sure how the marketing of Ivermectin works against the vaccine campaign, but clearly if Ivermectin's reputation survives as a cure for the SARS-CoV-2 virus and or COVID, wouldn't that throw into question the origin story of SARS-CoV-2 or COVID from being a virus that originated in some exotic wet market out of China to that of a parasitic worm contracted from some unclean source?  If Ivermectin is a horse dewormer or a dewormer of any kind and it works to cure COVID 100%, wouldn't that make the cause of COVID not a virus but a parasite?  When they claim dewormer, they're conceding that the cause of COVID is a parasitic worm. 

The tweet below comes from World Net Daily covering Aaron Rodgers's recent interview with Pat McAfee.  Author Art Moore explains that 

Along with Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine, Rodgers was treated for COVID-19 with monoclonal antibodies, zinc, and vitamins C and D. The Packers star told McAfee the treatment was recommended by podcaster and friend Joe Rogan, who recovered quickly from his own bout with COVID-19.

"I'm not some uneducated person who's throwing stuff out there," Rodgers said. "If you want to rip on me because I took horse dewormer, and whatever else you want to talk about, that's fine. But I also got better in 48 hours. And I had symptoms." 

Back in October 2021, Dr. Judy Mikovits called the vaccines a synthetic virus. More recently, we've learned that it is a synthesis if virus and parasite.  What an awful combination.  

.My house's dewormer? Yep....that and Hydroxychloriquine (fish tank cleaner) But WAIT.....Who recommended people swallow flashlights & ingest bleach; THEN start a program and dubbed it "Operation Warp Speed"? Hint: NOT DR. FAUCI. pic.twitter.com/GmT13H6hym

— Doxiemama16 🇺🇸🇮🇹🇬🇧 🏴‍☠️ (@taraclocastro) December 6, 2021

EARLY TREATMENT, EARLY TREATMENT. FDA BLOCKED EARLY TREATMENT

By Dr. Meryl Nass

South Africa acted to prevent its citizens from accessing ivermectin for COVID on Christmas Eve, 2020. This was ten days after Pfizer-BioNTech COVID vaccines rolled out in the US. Was it a coincidence?

South Africa’s government did this by directly banning the drug’s importation in the midst of a serious COVID wave. The government was taken to court, and after a few months, the people won, and the drug returned to the shelves.

In the US, starting in early 2021, a variety of methods were used to stop use of ivermectin for COVID, but all of them were indirect and covert. There was no clear action one could bring to a court. Instead, roadblocks were placed in the way of importing the drug, but importation was not banned outright. FDA claimed ivermectin was a “horse dewormer” in tweets and its website—and the tweeter was congratulated by the acting FDA Commissioner, FDA’s top official. But FDA never issued an official warning regarding safety, did not add a warning to the label, never recalled a single lot nor took ivermectin off the market.

I detailed the many methods that were used to stop doctors prescribing the drug in an earlier substack article. The point I want to make here is that none of the strategies that were used to choke off its use employed the normal, legal mechanisms for taking a dangerous drug off the market. Instead, hidden hands used underhanded methods in order to wrest control of medical care away from the doctor and patient. In place of patient autonomy, a single COVID protocol was imposed on all Americans. A protocol crafted opaquely by one of Tony Fauci’s handpicked, Pharma-conflicted teams of experts.

Americans pay, on average, $13,000 per person per year for healthcare. We have just lost the right to direct how that money is spent. It is critically important for the country to understand this. We are experiencing a hostile takeover of the $4.1 trillion dollar US healthcare industry under the guise of COVID. Will we stand for it? We must quickly grasp that the right to choose our own healthcare was just usurped by a mafia fronted by people in white coats who pose as medical experts.

Ivermectin is today’s example. What will it be tomorrow? How much is choosing your own healthcare worth to you?

Below is my prescient article from 14 months ago.  

Continue reading . . . 

2/3 of the world's non-commercial biological research is funded by just three bodies: The Wellcome Trust in the UK, the NIH, specifically the NIAID under Tony Fauci, and the BMGF

"Thought control" https://t.co/5uspDdCPPu

— DD,RN (@Faithfulone77) February 25, 2023

United States with one of the most-funded healthcare systems in the world.  What we find is that mortality is among the worst in the world.  

If you look at these innumerable failed policies, there's only one way to understand them.  They are literally written by pharmaceutical companies.  They can design trials to fail to disprove the use of cheap medicines, and they can make things appear that they don't work.  

I sit as a non-voting member of the action committee for drugs within NIH

BUSTED: 8 NIH Coronavirus Treatment Experts Disclosed Financial Ties to Gilead 

Unfortunately, it's imminently possible to manipulate the outcomes of a clinical study.  If you want a study to fail, that's dead easy.  

A Large Study Finds that Ivermectin Does Not Reduce Risk of COVID-19 Hospitalization, New York Times, 

Now their fourth "negative study" of Ivermectin in a major medical journal, and each time there's a major media frenzy.  

"Ivermectin Doesn't Work: Yet Another Study Shows No Efficacy in Reducing COVID Disease Progression," Molly Walker, MedPage Today, March 7, 2022.

Yet Another Negative Ivermectin Study, This Time in the NEJM,

People need to understand that academics have been threatened with losing their position, and threatened with getting no further research grants if they speak out against the narrative.  Guess why that is?  2/3 of the world's non-commercial biological research is funded by just three bodies: The Wellcome Trust in the UK, the NIH, specifically the NIAID under Tony Fauci, and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation

BMJ Investigation Raises Questions for The Wellcome Trust on Possible Conflicts of Interest, Dawn O'Shea, March 4, 2021.

Ten Experts on NIH COVID-19 Panel Have Ties to,  Companies Involved in Coronavirus Treatment

Bill Gates and His Coronavirus Conflicts of Interest, Cheryl K. Chunley, The Washington Times, Thursday, April 2, 2020.

There's this pattern that's consistent with a concerted effort to mislead the public by withholding information using modern technology, social media censorship, really, let's call it what it is: thought control.  

"Big Pharma and Healthcare: Unsolvable Conflictof Interest Between Private Enterprise and Public Health," Mayer Brezis, PubMed.gov.

"Anti-Vaxxers Have a Dangerous Theory Called "Natural Immunity."  Now It's Going Mainstream," Kiera Butler, Mother Jones,May 12, 2020. 

"The New York Times Writes Hit Piece on Dr. Robert Malone," The Inmate, April 4, 2022. 

"Federal Government Using Social Media Giants to Censor Americans," Editorial Board, New York Post, September 6, 2021.