Showing posts sorted by relevance for query Ivermectin. Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query Ivermectin. Sort by date Show all posts

Tuesday, September 27, 2022

"if [Scott Atlas] is using the U.S. data to make that assumption, he has no idea of the core of the fraud and the rot. That is corrupted data and it's used to fuel a narrative."

So, it's really about how this is not being talked about.  And I don't really know when this censorship is going to change.  I don't know what's going to make it . . . if a drop in life expectancy is not a story, our media has failed.  Dr. Pierre Kory

Dr. Pierre Kory's website

The FLCCC's Total19CriticalCare.

His Substack page.

And Twitter page.

This makes me weep.

The fraud committed to drive propaganda giving people a narrative to think a certain way or take a specific action temporarily kills my spiritual battle, my raison de etre.   It's one thing to have a sense of the general fraud, but learning about the specific fraud committed by institutions that have traditionally been associated with helping people recover is almost too much.  Initially.  But new information helps to set new resoluteness. That is where we are at. 

This talk is about excess deaths, but the reasfarcicvau surprised me.  Yes, all roads point to the vaccines, but what paved the various roads was the censorship, and that censorship is ongoing.  The censorship helped create the narrative that vaccines weren't all bad, that, in fact, they can save lives.  They don't.  They ruin lives, and then kill you.  

WOODS:  Trying to reconcile with this problem, namely this excess deaths problem that seems to be popping up in country after country.  

KORY:  The data is screaming from so many sources and so many countries with massive amounts of death, and it's just not talked about.  And that's an extension of what I've seen in COVID, right?  If it goes against the policies, and therefore the narratives, it's suppressed.  And I could never imagine such censorship of such an important topic [excess deaths] that is so pervasive, that it's global.  You know the communication media systems, and I've read one article that said that most of all media is owned by 1 of 6 companies, so there's this huge consolidation in media, and I don't know if they send out memos throughout those corporations, but the level of censorship is astonishing.   And so on the topic you're asking me about, I mean I don't even know where to start.  

I would say one of the most shocking and first explosions of data was when the CEO of One America, which is a 200-year-old life insurance company with $100 million in assets or even more, the CEO, J. Scott Davison, went out in public and gave an interview and said that they've had an unprecedented rise in life insurance claims from the ages of 18 to 64, so working age Americans, on a year-to-year basis that a 10% rise in that age group is a 1-in-200 year event.  And he was reporting a 32 or 38% rise in life insurance claims of young working age people.  And if you look, an investigative journalist did a follow-up on that CEO and reached out to that company, they were very forthcoming, and they were very communicative, and they even provided the journalists with a mortality chart from the CDC.  From the CDC, you can see what the mortality was in 2019, 2020, and then 2021, at the end of Quarter 1, you see this sudden rise, a steep slope in mortality of 18-64 year-olds, and all you have to ask yourself is "What happened at the end of Quarter 1, 2021?"  I have seen coverage of this issue, but the articles all bring up alternative explanations.  I'm referring to the vaccination program.  There's nothing else that could match that historic rise.  It can't be deaths from alcoholism, addiction, and suicide: we've had those for years.  I don't know why it would suddenly rise at the end of Quarter 1, 2021.  I've seen people try to blame it on lockdowns.  Lockdowns were largely over in most places.  Especially in the U.S.  We weren't locking down in 2021.  So that's just life insurance. 

There's another piece of data that is even more shocking: the life expectancy in the United States, this is census and publicly available data, it was 79-years-old in 2019.  Average life expectancy of every American was 79 in 2019.  Now, it's 76.  Even a 1/10th or 2/10th change in the average life expectancy indicates a lot of deaths.  Now, you have 3 years that have been shaved off of the pandemic.  In 2020 and 2021 were massive, and yet the other thing to consider is how do you drop the average life expectancy from 79 to 76?  It's not the dying off of the elderly.  They would not impact that average very much.   It has to be young people and very young people.  This is an unprecedented change . . . really a barometer of the health of our country:  3 years average life expectancy and no one is talking about it? And then you can go into [the data sets for] the pilots and the athletes, cardiac arrest thing, out-of-work, you know, it's a scary idea that they vaccinated a whole generation of pilots and with the instance of heart disease, I mean it's really worrisome . . . what if they have an accident in the air.  So, I think the bigger story is not about the data--you can pull data from anywhere.  Even in the UK, in their publicly available health data, you can see the all-cause mortality in the vaccinated is far higher than the un-vaxxed.  So, it's really about how this is not being talked about.  And I don't really know when this censorship is going to change.  I don't know what's going to make it . . . if a drop in life expectancy is not a story, our media has failed.  

WOODS:  As a non-expert, how am I to adjudicate when I haven't studied any of the relevant subjects, I have no credentials, and most of the people who have are telling me the opposite of what you're telling me, so why should I believe you over what they're telling me? 

KORY:  Here's my advice to that person.  I totally appreciate that situation, because as a self-described expert . . . if you want to know what the truth is, you need to look at who is speaking that supposed truth.  At this point in the pandemic, given the colossal and historic amounts of fraud, and the evidence of capture of the regulatory agencies, and the silencing of academia.  No doctor can speak out against these policies.  If they have concerns about theses vaccines, they will lose their job.  Now you have California passing legislation that's going to punish and literally take away the license of a doctor who publicly disagrees with supposed scientific consensus.  So, in that environment, I think you can only listen to those without a conflict of interest.  What does that conflict of interest look like?  If you're employed by a media organization, if you're employed by a healthcare agency, a hospital, or a university.  Those are conflicts of interest because just by the way society is now structured they cannot speak freely.  So whatever they say is going to be highly palatable to the narrative and to the policy.  So for someone to speak freely, you need to listen to  someone with no conflicts of interest, who is expert in the topic area or at least appears knowledgeable, they have to be able to debate, and to be able to share and cite data.  The person who wrote that, should think about what the agencies are doing.  The agencies are willing to share data.  The problem is that it's actually corrupt data.  And it's also on record with the New York Times, and other papers, that the CDC admits that they haven't been sharing and withholding data, and so I really do feel bad for the average citizens because you really do hear two very different conclusions, particularly on the vaccines--everything is rosy, it's "safe and effective," you can give it to pregnant people, and, yes, we think it's smart to give it to toddlers.  And then on the other side, we are calling it a humanitarian catastrophe of massive deaths directly related to the vaccine, and I have a lot data to back that up.  So, let's say you're looking for a neutral party.  Recently, I've been giving the example of Denmark.  So here in the United States we have gleefully vaccinated toddlers.  Thankfully, very few parents are brining their toddlers in for a vaccine.  I think it's something like less than [2%].  But look at Denmark.  They do not recommend vaccination for anyone under 50.  And they long ago banned Moderna for anyone over 30.  And in this country, we don't care.  Any of the vaccines are good for anybody.  Denmark is the leader in the world for pulling back from this vaccine: they still offer the vaccines, but they're not pushing them; in fact, they've outlawed them for certain sectors of their society.  We have to realize that it's a war of information.  

The other side has mass powers of censorship.  And really what's worse is propaganda.  The ultimate source of all the propaganda and censorship, and I think it begins at the medical journal level.  And I have a lot of evidence to show, particularly on the topic of Ivermectin, but you can apply it to the vaccines.  In fact, vaccines are the converse of Ivermectin.  So, these journals have suppressed the evidence of efficacy of Ivermectin, and Hydroxychloroquine, and at the same time they've suppressed the evidence of the toxicity of the vaccines.  I think if it wasn't for the collusion of the medical journals rejecting positive studies of Ivermectin, retracting published studies of Ivermectin, so that the only thing that appears in the high-impact journals are trials where Ivermectin is tested with no significantly statistical benefits that are shown even though there are benefits.  So the headlines race around the world that Ivermectin doesn't work, yet we know that there are 92 controlled trials with 125,000 patients in them and it shows repeatedly reduced death, hospitalization, time 'til recovery, time 'til virus clearance, yet if you just look at those high-impact journals, you would never know that.  So, I'm calling that the fraud begins at the medical journal level because if you don't have that curated science, that really manipulated science that shows up in the journals, you can't launch these narratives.  You can't launch a narrative that Ivermectin doesn't work because if they were really freely and openly publishing submissions of good quality that show benefits to any medicine, not just pharmaceutical products, you would have a much more balanced view of what's therapeutic here, but they don't do that.  There are frightening papers, all on preprint servers, showing the massive toxicity of these vaccines.  And you can just see it in VAERS, the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System.  You don't even need a newspaper then.  But I would also recommend that your friend, or the newspaper, ask themselves, why our health agencies, our government is not talking about VAERS?  It was built to look for toxicity signals.  They started skyrocketing within weeks of the rollout and they're at unprecedented levels.  And we know that the only thing wrong with VAERS is its under-reporting factor.  We've had almost 2 million adverse events, 40,000 deaths reported in the U.S., and that under-reporting factor is probably on a scale of 30x to 40x.  I think it's pretty easy to tell who's lying and who's actively suppressing really important information, and I will tell you, it's all to one goal: it was to support the vaccine campaign.  And when that started, that censorship, that ignoring, that curating, literature that gets published that only shows that they're "safe and effective," that was done with the noble lie, where they withhold information from you for your own good, so that it will prompt you to get vaccinated because they're afraid that if they show all the data, it would increase vaccine hesitancy.  And vaccine hesitancy was known as probably one of the main barriers to the planned pandemic response in the simulation exercises that were done in the years leading up to the pandemic.  You can look at the records, you can look at the documents.  Vaccine hesitancy appears multiple times.  They always had a plan to create a pandemic and to vaccinate the world, and their one worry was vaccine hesitancy.  And in my experience, from where I sit, the two main things that would absolutely crush vaccine hesitancy is information about the efficacy of generic repurposed drugs, because if you know there's a safe, available alternative you will turn to that rather than the experimental vaccine.  And the other thing that has been censored is any mention of the toxicity, and now it's farcical, like that spoof headline.  I think it's somewhat funny but what I find terrifying are the real headlines where they literally try to explain these incredible amounts of sudden cardiac arrests, athletes on the field, the pilot issues, and all of the data screaming about all cause mortality, and then you see headlines about climate change being the cause of it.  I've seen ridiculous ones that you would think are spoofs but they're real [headlines].   

WOODS:  Or you're sleeping on the wrong side.

KORY:  Interesting connection is that you do see articles about this condition called, SADS, right, Sudden Adult Death Syndrome.  I happen to be somewhat of an expert in cardiac arrest as an ICU doctor for years I trained teams on how to respond to cardiac arrest and I've given lectures about the history of CPR, you know, the incidents of cardiac arrest in the community and they're nowhere near the numbers now.  And so a really disturbing analogy is that with this vaccine campaign, suddenly we're seeing unprecedented numbers of people dropping dead--athletes, broadcasters, many of them are on television!  Totally healthy people, they're at a podium, they collapse.  They're at a broadcast desk, they collapse.  They're at a wedding, they collapse.  Even in the stands at football stadiums.  I remember there was one game where I watched.  There was one Saturday where they're all playing, there were 4 cardiac arrests: 2 on the field, 2 in the stands.  And some of the coaches actually spoke out, and in their decades, they had never seen 2 cardiac arrests in a game on the same day, and then 2 others in the field.  A number of games were stopped because people were arresting, and that's not a story?  And so the thing about the SADS story is that there had been people for years . . . .  Remember SIDS, Sudden Infant Death Syndrome?  Well, that kind of started in the 80s and it tracks very well with the explosion of vaccines.  So if you look at this weird syndrome called SIDS, which has happened to so many babies, and the system and the public Iiterature officially does not have a cause, I would argue that vaccines look like the cause of SIDS and I  definitely know that the vaccines are the cause of SADS.  

WOODS: I got to ask you that so many people want an answered and you hinted at it when you said it must be difficult to be a layman when on the one hand you've got propaganda 24 hours a day, "these things are safe and effective." And you have just the exact opposite coming at by people who are just as qualified and who seem just as passionate saying something really, really terrible is happening because of these very things that somebody just told you were safe and effective.  And so what I want to know is somebody like Scott Atlas . . . I feel like Scott Atlas is a good guy.  I had him on my show.  I think he did a lot of good things and he stood up to a lot of idiots and took a huge amount of abuse, but he came on this show and said "that the data show that the vaccines do have an effect on lowering severe illness and death."  He said "that's what the data shows." 

KORY:  He's wrong.  He is wrong.  He needs to share that data on which he's sharing that opinion.  If you look at the granular public health data from any country that is transparently sharing--UK comes to mind, Israel comes to mind--for a long time per 100,000 more patients who were in the hospital were vaccinated than unvaccinated.  So that's one data source that can very quickly refute what he said.  

WOODS:  It's just that we heard for so long that the unvaccinated are killing themselves in the hospital.

KORY:  Thomas, let me finish because here's something that I can guarantee you he doesn't know and only a few people do, and I am one of them.  Why am I one of them?  I am an ICU doctor.  Particularly in 2021, I was working in an ICU up until November 2021.  And what I noticed, and I found very curious, was that nobody in the ICU was vaccinated.  And you'd open up their chart and look at their medical record and right there under demographic--name, location, age--you saw their vaccination status, and there were two categories: one was VACCINATED, and the other was UNKNOWN.  Everybody was UNKNOWN.  So I'm sitting there with these two realities: seeing the data from other countries where the vaccinated are filling the hospital ICUs, and I am looking at the US and nobody in the ICUs was vaccinated.  And I discovered what it was.  The way they documented the vaccination status on the admission to the hospital was completely unprecedented.  In the past, if you brought in a vaccine card, right, for your childhood vaccinations or you just got a vaccine and had a card, it was immediately entered into your record, and there would be a record there and anyone could look up your record and anyone could see the vaccine. During COVID in most of the major health systems, and I validated this with colleagues and other people I talked to in other large health systems is what happened with COVID when a patient arrived the hospital, they did take a history, they did ask if you were vaccinated.  However, if you were vaccinated anywhere but in a system physician's clinic, guess where that information went?  It went into the Nursing Admission note and that's where it stayed.  It did not dhow up.  It did not trigger a vaccination status and that is demonstrably now.  I've talked to a number of nurses who've told me that in their systems the same thing was true.  The vaccination status showed up in a Nursing Admission note and then on that first screen . . . it did not register vaccine.  The only way to be vaccinated was if you got your shots in a clinic within that health system.  In the entire year of working ICU in 2021, only one patient ever was admitted to my ICU with fully vaccinated status.  Every single other one was UNKNOWN. if you look into their records, dig deep into the Nursing Admission note, you will find that they're vaccinated.  So what I would tell Scott Atlas is that if he's using the U.S. data to make that assumption, he has no idea of the core of the fraud and the rot.  That is corrupted data and it's used to fuel a narrative.  Wouldn't you think, Thomas, if you're trying to propel a vaccine campaign, don't you think that it would be in your interest to not have the vaccinated show up in hospitals so that you could falsely present the vaccines as protective against outcomes and death?  And I'm sorry.  He's not aware of the depth of the fraud on that data.

WOODS:  I'm just flabbergasted at the whole thing, and I'm somebody who's not exactly been naïve, you know, in the past about the way the world works.  But I think anybody, no matter how cynical, has to be left aghast at what may, in fact, be happening here.  There had to be some people who innocently believed what they were told within the medical establishment, and they were told that the experts say, "You got to give this thing to people, and it's going to save their lives and put an end to this thing."  There had to be a lot of innocent people who didn't know any better.  But on the other hand, innocent is a funny word.  It was kind of their obligation to look into the information and not just take people's word for it.  

KORY:  I want to say I identify with you.  I have to say that when the pandemic started, I had no knowledge of how controlled and corrupted the high-impact journal was.  I always looked them throughout my career as an example of what the best science is and had always assumed that they would evaluate the merits of trials and only put the best quality and important trials.  I didn't know that it's a completely censored environment.  I didn't know that it's controlled by the pharmaceutical industry, and the depth of that control is absolutely terrifying.  I did not know that 2 years ago.  I will tell you where I started, Thomas.  Up until the pandemic, I read the New York Times everyday, believed every word . . . I thought that the New York Times was the paper of record, literally the pinnacle of journalism, and if I wanted to get the straight dope, an accurate assessment of a situation, the New York Times would provide that for me.  Just like what I now know about the journals, I had to learn that the New York Times writes narratives, and those narratives are in service of very powerful forces.  I cannot read the New York Times.  And how did I find that out, Thomas?  I found that out because I became an expert on Ivermectin.  And I had to watch lies, clear lies being written all over newspapers coming out of mouths of broadcasters, they were fed lies, mistruths, half-truths, and distortions.  And what I saw was that there's no such thing any more as a science reporter.  There's no such thing.  They will present whatever science, however they want as long as it furthers a narrative, and once I started seeing that happening in the New York Times, I was terrified that the population believes this narrative that's just spewing from everywhere.  That was my first awakening, Thomas, was that they lie.  And then the next lie I had to witness was with the vaccines.  And I just saw repeated lies, "safe and effective," "safe and effective."  I saw newspaper articles well into 2021, which literally had this statement, "There's not been one proven death as a result of the vaccine."  I would literally read that in the newspaper, knowing then at that times that many tens, if not, hundreds of thousands had died at that time.  

Thursday, September 29, 2022

"And you know what, the average hospital bill is about $400,000 to $500,000 per COVID patient. Hospitals get 20% bonus on the entire hospital bill"

The speakers are Dr. Paul Marik [more here] and Steve Kirsch.

And you know what, the average hospital bill is about $400,000 to $500,000 per COVID patient.  Hospitals get 20% bonus on the entire hospital bill. 

5:30  If you don't go along with their protocol, you'll be terminated, and they'll find anyway to terminate you.  And we should know, that there are probably financially incentives.  If you're diagnosed with COVID, you get a bonus.  If you're intubated, you get a bonus.  If you prescribe this ridiculous drug, Remdesivir, which increases your risk of death, you get a 20% bonus.  So there are enormous financial incentives for them

. . . just for prescribing a drug?

5:55  Yes, for prescribing Remdesivir, you get a 20% bonus on the entire hospital bill.

Who's paying that, the U.S. government?  Yes, so these are Medicare patients.  If you're a Medicare patient, you get a 20% bonus . . . 

On the entire bill?

On the entire hospital bill . . . .  And you know what, the average hospital bill is about $400,000 to $500,000 per COVID patient.  

6:27  Wow, so we're talking a significant incentive for the hospital to say "follow the protocols."

6:35  Yes, there's a lot of small chain involved.  And that's why they don't like troublemakers who are going to interfere with their bottom line.  I mean the patient outcome, whether the patient lives or dies, is completely irrelevant.  It's all about the bottom line and profiteering and making money.  

7:02  So, a lot of people think that we should be incentivizing hospitals to save lives and that hospitals should get $100,000 if they saved a COVID life.  If someone checked in and is suffering respiratory distress, and the hospital is able to save that patient, they should get like a $30,000 bonus.  They should incentivize the outcomes that you want, right?  

Boy, is that a telling remark! 

7:26  Yes, so it's upside down.  You actually get incentivized if patients die, which is completely opposite of the traditional Chinese Medicine.  In fact, if patients did badly, these practitioners weren't paid.  They weren't incentivized if they patient did badly.  We actually have a system where the hospital actually profits when a patients gets intubated, going on a ventilator, and dying. 

7:52  So, what woke you up, what made you realize that the vaccine that you were asked to take and that you willingly took, what caused you to shift from being a believer in the safety of the vaccine, of the COVID vaccine, to now speaking out against the COVID vaccine?  What was the moment that did that, or did that happen over time?

8:14  Yeah, so when the vaccines came out, I was vaccinated in December 2020.  Firstly, I had no option, because I would have been terminated.  Secondly, at that time, I believed the narrative.  What can I say?  I am like most doctors who've been brainwashed and indoctrinated, so I did believe the narrative.  And then with time, it took time, Pierre figured this out much quicker than me.  I was still a little bit on the fence, but with time it became clear.  First, we had no idea what's in these vials.  We have no idea what's happening.  They were inadequately tested and they lied to us, and it became clearer with time that this was one big massive lie, that they were neither safe, nor effective.  And as more and more data came out, and we saw from the VAERS data and multiple databases that they had lied to us and then it became clear.   

9:20  So was it the accumulation of data that you were observing and instead of just reading the conclusions of the paper, you were looking at the underlying data.  And were you seeing that first 

14:05. Like, can you practice medicine today?  Did they take away your licenses, or what did they take away from you?  

14:10. Yes, so you know, this all happened independently, Dr. Peter McCullough, Dr. Brian Tyson, Dr. Ryan Cole, Dr. Urso, it's not like we conspired together.  We just independently came to the same conclusion.  If you look at the data, there's no other conclusion to see.  My end result was basically the hospital [Sentara Norfolk General Hospital in Norfolk, Virginia] terminated my career for good. 

14:40. You can't go to any other hospital because you're essentially blacklisted at this hospital which means you can't get into any other hospital?  

14:47. Yeah, so they reported me to the National Practitioner Data Bank, and once you get into the data bank as a devious, deviant, bad-actor doctor, it's almost impossible to get out of it.  Also, they reported me to the Board, and then the Board of Medicine came up with their own concocted charges against me.  So, this is the problem if you try to speak out, try and speak the truth.  The Board of Medicine accused me of prescribing Ivermectin to a bunch of patients who were injured.  The truth of it is I've actually been able to prescribe Ivermectin.  Ever.  And the patients they claimed I treated are non-existent patients, so that tells you how far the virginia Board of Medicine will go to accuse me of prescribing Ivermectin to non-existent patients.  I mean I never wrote a scripp for anyone.  

15:50. So how did those non-existent patients actually do?  Did they show you the medical records of those patients?  

15:58. No, no what they do is the same thing as sham peer review.  They accuse you of a crime but they don't give you the evidence.  So in my sham peer review they accused me of 7 outrageous charges but they were unable to provide any evidence, any evidence actually to support the charges that they made.  One of the charges was that I forced a nurse to give a patient a medication to which the patient was allergic.  Now, I mean can you imagine something that outrageous?  They were unable to provide any evidence that I'd actually done such a thing but I was assumed guilty as charged and I had no legal representation, and based on these bogus charges they withdrew my hospital privileges.

16:48. Is there a public record of this so that the public can get this record and look at the name of the patient . . . and maybe it's redacted.  Is there a way that this can be verified independently by a 3rd party or is it all done behind closed doors?  

17:07. So, if it's done behind closed doors, i was never given the name of the patient.  So believe it or not, I was accused of this crime but the name of the patient was never disclosed to me, nor was I given any information regarding the patient.  And it's meant to be privileged and confidential but obviously I am not going to hide it because it's an outrage, it's immoral, it's evil.  So, no, I have written a little story about this because it's an outrage.  I have shared this story with a number of representatives in the Virginia Legislature who know about this.  And Robert Malone knows about it too.  He's actually . . . he's doing a book and in his book he's going to cover this whole nasty episode.  But this thing, it's not unknown.  I was ignorant and never knew about it, but if you actually look unto it there's this thing called sham peer review, it's well-known.  And it's what hospitals do to get rid of doctors they consider to be troublemakers.  

18:17. So there's no public record, no record at all of who your charges, who your patients were supposedly?  And why did they not reveal to you the name of the patient who you prescribed the ivermectin to because that's your patient. There's no confidentiality there, so why would they not want to reveal that name to you?  

18:40. That was the Board.  The Board of Medicine 

Sunday, January 22, 2023

Charles Hoffe is being prosecuted in Canada for recommending ivermectin, and for telling patients that the vaccines are dangerous.

Yeah, this guy, the guy who sounded the alarm of harm early and often, is on trial in Canada for recommending Ivermectin.   

Sunday, June 20, 2021

IVERMECTIN: "evidence justif[ies] the global adoption"

 

Thursday, October 6, 2022

COLBERT: Did Ivermectin do anything [for your bottom line]? FAUCI: No.

To say that Dr. Anthony Fauci is a liar falls flat because the extent of his lies, the millions of people he's responsible for murdering and maiming, is beyond the pale.  

Dr. Pierre Kory says that Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine were the two saving agents early on that could have helped both the COVID sufferers and those suffering from the crippling side effects of the vaccines.  Yet, here he is saying that these two drugs don't work, and that the only drug that should be given is Remdesivir, a drug he conducted trials on and that killed 50% of its participants and for which he has a vested, meaning profitable, interest in.    

Wednesday, January 26, 2022

"It would undermine the indiscriminate vaccine, vaccination policy for every single human being, including extremely low-risk people"

Fauci is an out-and-out criminal.  Check this out,

Fauci has been desperate to even confiscate Ivermectin shipment into the USA because his only solution is not treatment, but vaccination. Ivermectin is being used outside the USA and the studies are positive. Numerous doctors have been calling for real studies on this drug. New research out of Israel has found that administering the anti-parasite drug ivermectin to COVID19 patients may help to drastically reduce the duration of infections – and all for less than $1 a day.  

My personal skepticism derives not from vaccines, I had my children vaccinated. My concern is (1) I know that Klaus Schwab told people a virus was coming in advance, and I was given the very code used to justify lockdowns and the computer program was a joke. Bill Gates-funded that code. In fact, not a single program funded by Bill Gates which made these dire forecasts was ever correct. Once governments were BRIBED by lobbyists to mandate vaccines around the world, and the media has joined in along with people like Howard Stern and Neil Young, I cannot see where any rational person would trust Big Pharma or government. Now that the politicians got involved, they are putting everyone’s life at risk because politicians will NEVER admit they EVER made a mistake.

Saturday, December 25, 2021

68-YEAR-OLD, BAD COVID, TOOK WEEK'S WORTH OF IVERMECTIN: NEXT DAY, WAKES UP 100%

The Zelenko Protocol is here.  

You can order Ivermectin through this site, PushHealth.com, and pick it up at your local pharmacy.  

Monday, November 21, 2022

So all those pharmacists refusing to fill prescriptions and doctors getting threatening letters from insurance companies after prescribing Ivermectin... those were all because of "recommendations"?

Friday, March 22, 2024

🚨🚨🚨 Ivermectin is often recognized – 2nd to penicillin – for having the greatest impact on human health.

Thursday, June 13, 2024

JOHN BEAUDOIN: they made an example out of [Meryl Nass] in Maine. They suspended her license. Why? Because the governor's sister, Dora Anne Mills heard Meryl Nass mentioned the word Ivermectin on the radio

The CARES Act, again a central, centrally planned device.  It's a behavioral modification device, and it modifies the behavior of the hospital administrators.  The CARES Act funds through cms.gov.  If you type into duckduckgo search cms.gov and NCTAP program, that's the COVID payout program, you'll find a 20% adder for the use of Remdesivir, Barisythinib, and it's not expressly stated.  But I talked to an accountant within the system, and she said "Oh, ventilators too."  I'm like well it doesn't say that.  She said, "No, no, that's in the program too."  So it's not just getting $400 a dose for Remdesivir.  If you have a million dollar ICU stay over a month, then the entire hospital bill gets jacked 20%. That's an extra $200,000 to run Remdesivir through your veins just based on a positive test walking in the door. 

So they got 60% compliance through solicitation, right?  So they solicited administrator; that's an inchoate crime term. solicitation right like conspiracy the solicitation gathers in estimating let's say 60%.  You get 60% compliance.  Well, that's not enough.  You know, there's 40% that are going to speak out and they're going to crush the whole program.  Well, they get the next 30% through coercion.  You get the Federation of State Medical Boards, FSMB, American Board of Internal Medicine, ABIM, American Board of Family Medicine, ABFM, American Board of Pediatrics, ABP, and all the other boards to coerce.  And if you go on the web right now you can look up joint statements ABIM, ABFM, and ABP.  And what will come up is a joint statement from 2021 from the CEOs of those three certification boards.  These are NGOs.  These are not even the government.  They are not State Licensing boards but you can't operate in a hospital without having board certification from ABIM, the American Board of Internal Medicine.  So the joint statement says any doctor spreading vaccine misinformation will have his license suspended or revoked.

01:57.  Misinformation?

Yeah, and they don't define it.

02:00. Or just stuff that they don't like?

Stuff that they don't like.  Exactly.  That's exactly right yeah.  So they basically get a bunch to comply, another 30%.  So now they're up to like 90% compliance well over the 10% stragglers.  Then they go out and make examples of a couple of people who are pretty well known, like Meryl Nass, who wrote some books on anthrax.  And she's very well known, and they made an example out of her in Maine.  They suspended her license.  Why?  Because the governor's sister, Dora Anne Mills, heard Meryl Nass mention the word Ivermectin on the radio.  So they made an example out of her publicly.  They made an example out of Dr. John Littell [who was kicked out of a meeting where hld of the benefits of Ivermectin, treating patients with Hydroxy, and excess miscarriages] in Florida very publicly, and a number of other doctors.  So that gathers in another 5%.  So 60, 35 now you're up to 95%, 

02:45.  And can I say there was a tweet by another doctor who was being just decimated by the Texas Board of Medicine.  Her name is Mary Talley Bowden, and she tweeted,

If I had vaccinated the 6,000 patients I treated for COVID, I would have made $1,500,000.

Saturday, September 18, 2021

Medicare Pays Doctors a 20% Bonus If They Give Hospitalized Patients Remdesivir

from Rumble

Ivermectin has been a human medicine for 34 years. 

It's been used to treat Yellow Fever, Dengue, Coronaviruses, and more.

The real Delta is the antibody-dependent Enhancement or the reactions to these vaccines, but they don't want people to say that.  

Fauci knew that Remdesivir was a killer.  It was tested for Ebola in Africa.  It led to death.  It shuts down the kidneys.  It floods the lungs with fluids. The patients, their advocates, as well as their loved ones are losing total control.  

Remdesivir kills the kidneys and a quarter of animals in trials.  It was such a deadly medicine in the Ebola trials.  They give it at the wrong time.  It may have efficacy in the first couple of days when the virus is replicating, but when people come to the hospital they're past the viral replication stage and you have to treat inflammation.  At that point, you should be focused on giving them anti-inflammatories.  Giving them Remdesivir actually gives them a higher chance of them going into organ failure.  Physicians aren't reading the data on Remdesivir and are still willy-nilly giving something that is highly, highly toxic is mindboggling to me from a medical point of view and a scientific point of view.  It doesn't make any sense whatsoever.  

Doctors do know.  There's a 20% bonus if a doctor sticks a needle in an arm and gives them Remdesivir.  Welcome to hospitalized care via CDC protocols.  It's in the Medicare documents.  Hmm.  This article corroborates almost verbatim Dr. Cole's point exactly

Hospitals will receive an additional payment when treatment includes Veklury (remdesivir) or COVID-19 convalescent plasma to treat patients diagnosed with COVID-19. Like a new technology add-on payment, the cost of the drug won’t be entirely folded into the MS-DRG.

The only hitch is hospitals must ensure they make a connection to the Medicare bonus for COVID-19 inpatients, said attorney Daniel Hettich, with King & Spalding in Washington, D.C. “You have to be eligible for the 20% add-on to get the new therapeutic add-on,” he said. “If you don’t have a positive test, you don’t qualify for the new treatment add-on payment.”

It's incredible.  Check out this documentary on Ivermectin to learn how Remdesivir was privileged over Ivermectin.  

These murder-for-money schemes are essentially bailouts for hospitals, who turn around and bribe their employees--nurses, aides, orderlies, etc.--with high-dollar salaries.  I know for a fact from one nurse recruiter that Massachusetts was paying over $7,000 clear per week in one city there.  

That same article also explains the coercive push behind the vaccines.  The government is paying the hospitals to give the vaccines for free. 

The interim final rule, which implements section 3713 of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act, also said Medicare, Medicare Advantage (MA) and commercial payers must offer FDA-approved vaccines free to patients. Medicare and MA will pay hospitals, physicians, pharmacists and others a fee for the administration of the vaccine and a fee for the vaccine itself. A provision in the Affordable Care Act that requires coverage of preventive care without cost sharing provided a “pathway” to sweep in private payers, said Valerie Rinkle, president of Valorize Consulting. CMS also revised the Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement model because of the public health emergency (PHE). 

These details of the CARES Act were lost on the American people who were dazzled by the incredulity of $1,400 government checks.  So while Americans were all so giddy about where they'd planned to spend their newly created dollars, big pharma was designing how to whip up a propaganda campaign to get more Americans filled with toxic spiked proteins.  Note the date when Trump signed the CARES Act and how it corresponded with the nationwide lockdown.  

On March 27, 2020, President Trump signed the bill into law. With most forecasters at the time predicting that the U.S. economy was either already in a recession or heading into one, policymakers crafted legislation that dedicated historic government funding to support large and small businesses, industries, individuals, families, gig workers, independent contractors, and hospitals. 

California's Stay-at-Home orders were announced on March 19, 2020.  Here's a timeline that, if for nothing else, helps keep track of the events that you've already come to forget.  This table also gives you the start and end dates of the lockdowns in different states and counties.   

Toward the end of the interview, Stew Peters kind of throws up his hands and asks, What do we do to get our medical freedom back?  "Where is the neutrality in medicine?"  Ha!!!  First, if he is asking how we force the hospitals to rewrite their ethics so that they serve the health of people in their care, ah, good luck with that.  Like any other business, hospitals work for a profit.  They have protocols, and those protocols are set by the CDC.  So already when you go into a hospital, you're walking into a dead zone that operated remotely.  The staff simply follows the protocols because if they didn't, or if they don't, they'd get fired.  So there's that tether.  Don't expect to have your health restored in a hospital.  A friend insists that America has the best emergency medicine.  I say prove it.  Compared to what? 

Dr. Cole says that monoclonal antibodies save lives.  

  

 


Wednesday, November 2, 2022

Remdesivir increases the risk of death by 3%, the chances of renal failure by 20%, and costs $3,000/course. Ivermectin reduces the risk of death by 50% and costs the W.H.O. two cents

It should be clear by now that when you put your trust in doctors using hospital care, those doctors are not using their best tested, studied options or practice.  No.  Unfortunately, they're merely following the orders from on high, even from international bodies, far removed from local knowledge, local, standard, and tested care.  So when you think you are under the care of an expert, ah, your doctor is only an expert at following the orders of outside agencies.   

If you look at the 4 independent studies, including the large studies by the W.H.O. it shows the opposite effect.  Remdesivir increases the risk of death.  Let me say that again.  Remdesivir increase the risk of death by 3%.  It increases your chances of renal failure by 20%.  This is a toxic drug.  But just to make the situation even more preposterous, the federal government will give hospitals a 20% bonus on the entire hospital bill if they prescribe Remdesivir to Medicare patients.  [Oh, so the federal government is trying to kill elderly patients.  Huh.]  The federal government is incentivizing hospitals to prescribe a medication which is toxic.  So it should be noted that Remdesivir costs about $3,000 a course.  Dr. Kory spoke about Ivermectin.  Ivermectin reduces the risk of death by about 50%.  It costs the W.H.O. $0.02.  Two cents.  So as regards Dexamethazone,  This is the wrong drug in the wrong dose for the wrong duration of time yet every clinician in this country will absurdly use this homeopathic dose of Dexamethazone.  Why?  Because the NIH tells them to do this.  So what the NIH and other agencies have ignored are multiple FDA-approved drugs.  These are FDA-approved drugs.  These are not experimental drugs, which are cost-effective, and safe, and have unequivocally, unequivocally been shown to reduce the death of patients in the ICU and in hospital . . . .

Monday, April 11, 2022

COVID-19 deaths is Sepsis from hospitalization. Know which hospital in your area has the lowest MRSA infection

Thanks to Wayne Lusvardi @ LewRockwell.com.

Back on March 11, I wrote a preliminary article on the causes of the death of Bill Sardi, a fixture on Lewrockwell.com and across the nation on natural approaches to health and an ardent antivaxxer. At that time, I believed the public needed an explanation of his death, especially if it was attributed to Covid-19 as Bill asserted Coronavirus-19 was a “hoax”. I was careful to say at that time: “The above is a preliminary opinion subject to change when there is better information and the availability of medical records for review”.  My best non-expert assessment then was that Bill died of pulmonary embolism coupled with coronary artery disease, pneumonia and hypoxia. I offer here an update now that an official death certificate showing the causes of death has been obtained.  Moreover, Bill Sardi’s death reveals the actual cause of death from the bugaboo Covid-19 as Sepsis from hospitalization.

The official causes of Bill Sardi’s death are listed as follows:

Immediate cause: Sepsis
Sequential underlying causes: Pneumonia, Covid-19
Other significant conditions: Coronary artery disease, Pulmonary embolism

I spoke with a doctor who requested to remain anonymous about the above causes of Sardi’s death.  He said listing COVID-19 as the third cause of death is highly impossible given that Bill Sardi had four consecutive negative PCR antibody tests, two before entering the hospital and two after admission.  Reportedly, Sardi had a positive PCR test after about two weeks in the hospital but that could have been because of Sepsis staph infection (mostly incurable staph), not Covid-19.

Covid-19 is All About Sepsis

Sepsis is reported to be the leading cause of death in hospitals and is typically attributed to bacterial infection.  Sepsis is associated with co-morbidities (diabetes, coronary artery disease, kidney failure, etc.), but sepsis can be acquired in hospitals independent of co-morbidities of the elderly, such as in children.

According to Jean-Louis Vincent, MD, PhD, Belgium, Covid-19 cannot be distinguished from sepsis.  Sepsis can be acquired from staph (superbug MRSA – Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus) infections that typically develop when a patient’s lung is ventilated for a lengthy period.  Tracheotomy is one possible method of circumventing mechanical ventilation and was considered for Bill Sardi, but then never implemented. The long-term prognosis of tracheotomy is not positive, however. Moving Sardi out of the hospital to another hospital with a lower Sepsis infection rate was advocated by Front Line Doctors and Sardi’s advocates, but the opposition of the person with medical Power of Attorney for Sardi thwarted that effort.

Antibiotics supercharge staph germs.  Another way to say this is the only way to get MRSA-Sepsis is to be exposed to antibiotics.  Deadly staph bacteria normally reside on the top of one’s skin and is harmless unless one is stuck with an un-swabbed needle, a urinary catheter is inserted, or the lung is put on a ventilator.  Or if a patient is awake and alert and served meat that has been raised on antibiotics, deadly bacteria may also develop. The longer one stays in a hospital the greater the likelihood of deadly sepsis. So, the selection of a hospital with a low MRSA infection rate is all-important.

The French medical diagnostic experts Bio-Force (bioMerieux) report that one hundred percent (100%) of Covid-19 non-survivors had Sepsis and “viral infections do not generally cause sepsis”.  Contrary to the official notion that the bugaboo Covid-19 is a virus, sepsis is a bacterial disease, not typically a viral disease.  So, the cleanliness of a hospital matters when hospitalized with the bogey Covid-19.

Both Sides Get It Wrong About Covid-19

The public do not get their medical knowledge or opinions by reasoning; they catch them by social contagion, typically along politicized social class lines separating the Knowledge Class and the Working Class.  So, the Left believes that Covid-19 is a real virus that has caused death rates to rise and that vaccines are its only antidote.  The Right believes that COVID-19 is a hoax, is not contagious and vaccination is a social marker (or secular circumcision) for those inside the government club. The Left pushes vaccines, boosters, hospitalization and Remdesivir. The Right pushes avoidance of vaccines, Remdesivir and hospitalization and prevention by hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin.  Both do not address the potential danger of the MRSA infection rate of different hospitals as all-important.

The case of Bill Sardi illuminates that COVID-19 is a hoax, as he claimed it was and that the cause of all COVID-19 deaths is Sepsis from hospitalization.  There is some evidence, however, that Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin prevent death from Sepsis.  But Hydroxchlorquine and Ivermectin are advocated as a preventative not for critical care.

The HAT Protocol has been shown to have success in treating Sepsis and entails: hydrocortisone (a steroid hormone), intravenous Vitamin C (up to 6,000 mg/day without conversion to oxalate) and Thiamine Vitamin B-1 (Thiamine). No treatment protocol, however, may be able to overcome the Sepsis superbug.

The reality that both sides ignore is that there is no effective medical treatment for Sepsis (MRSA or staph) once acquired in a hospital. But hospitals do not want to be accused of doing nothing, so they throw the proverbial “kitchen sink” of (deadly) drugs and tranquilizers, treatments (ventilation, intubation) at the patient.  Once hospitalized one’s survival rate depends more on the highly variable infection rate of Sepsis from hospital to hospital than from Covid-19.

The selection of a hospital is often made by the local Fire Department ambulance dispatcher depending on which hospital has a bed in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) at that time, not necessarily by the patient or alternate person with medical Power of Attorney (POA). Below is the infection rate for Pomona Valley Medical Center Hospital where Sardi died compared with other nearby hospitals:

Link – https://data.cms.gov/provider-data/dataset/yq43-i98g

Pre-Covid in 2019 Pomona Valley Medical Center Hospital was widely known to have a poor infection grade (see: Pomona Valley Hospital Still Struggles with Infection Rates, Daily Bulletin newspaper, May 7, 2019).

What does the MRSA Sepsis infection rate mean and how is it calculated?  It means the clinical disease rate per 1,000 patient days or: total positive clinical cultures (or MRSA BSI) divided by total inpatient days, times 1,000 days. Most readers eyes will gloss over the numbers and want to know what it means.    But Huntington Hospital had an effectively zero Sepsis infection rate for MRSA Sepsis.  As one anonymous doctor told me: “if Sardi had been brought to Huntington Hospital in Pasadena instead he would probably still be alive today”.  Pomona Valley Hospital has a total of 91,704 patient days per year tentatively indicating 84 sepsis deaths per year if I have calculated this correctly.

Pomona Hospital has a Total Performance Score (TPS) of 24.75 while the average is 37. Huntington Hospital has a TPS score of 79.4 and nearby Arcadia Methodist Hospital 72.2.

The moral of this story is that it is the hospital MRSA infection rate that is apparently more important than whether a patient was given the potential “deadly” Remdesivir or denied Hydroxychloroquine or perhaps even ventilated.  All such treatments are included in the Standard of Care, so hospitals have no liability for using them within established dosages and procedures in life-or-death situations; unless the designated POA objects to their use.

This also means that those persons designated as having medical Power of Attorney, at minimum, must have enough knowledge to steer the patient to a hospital with the lowest MRSA infection rate available. The Hospital Acquired Condition database can be accessed at https://data.cms.gov/provider-data/dataset/yq43-i98g

Nothing in this article should be construed as medical advice and is entirely subjective opinion.

Saturday, September 17, 2022

Adults Need 50 ng/ml Vitamin D Daily. That Translates to 5,300 IU

The goal then for a daily healthy immune system is 50 ng/ml.  For a translation, that means 5,300 IUs of vitamin D.

20 ng/ml . . . 1000 IU
30 ng/ml . . . 2200 IU
40 ng/ml . . . 3600 IU
50 ng/ml . . . 5300 IU
60 ng/ml . . . 7400 IU

70 ng/ml . . . 10100 IU 

Check this out:

Everyone needs at least 50 ng/mL 125nmol/L 25-hydroxyvitamin D for their immune system to function properly.  Without proper vitamin D3 supplementation, most people's 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels are 1/2 to 1/10th this - greatly raising the risk of severe symptoms from COVID-19, Kawasaki disease, Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome and sepsis.

Here are the live links that appear in the above graphic. 

1.  Serum Vitamin D levels are associated with increased COVID-19 severity and mortality independent of visceral adiposity | medRxiv

That article explains that to fight any disease, you need a minimum of 50 ng/ml of vitamin D to have a fortified immune system to fight anything.  Most people don't think vitamins work.  They won't turn you into a Popeye, though some can, but they'll give you immunity so that you can stay productive.  

2.  Greater risk of severe COVID-19 in Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic populations is not explained by cardiometabolic, socioeconomic or behavioural factors, or by 25(OH)-vitamin D status: study of 1326 cases from the UK Biobank - PubMed (nih.gov)



4.  Vitamin D status of children with paediatric inflammatory multisystem syndrome temporally associated with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (PIMS-TS) - PubMed (nih.gov).  The idea here is the same in the others above--that vitamin D deficiency outcomes are worse.  Don't know how to put it any plainer.  The last line in the abstract reads, ". . . public health measures to improve vitamin D status of the UK BAME population have been long overdue."  So, it looks like in the UK, they're trying to make vitamin D a prescription of public health policy. 

5.  Nutrition to reduce COVID-19 serious harm and death (aminotheory.com).  This paper argues for vitamin D to improve against COVID-19.  C19 and Ivermectin.  But how does one get IV without a prescription?  Is an airport in Mexico the only way?


It offers a good link here:  
For links to the most pertinent research on why vitamin D (and Ivermectin) are effective at reducing severity of COVID-19, as well as reducing transmission, please see this page on my other site.  https://vitamindstopscovid.info 

6.  Everyone needs at least 50ng/ml 125nmol/L 25-hydroxyvitamin D for their immune system to function properly (vitamindstopscovid.info) 

7.  Nutrition Matters | Robin Whittle | Substack