[citizens have ] at least a general understanding of these movements and that they are operating in their community and they even know some of the organizations, Islamic Society of North America, ISNA, Muslim American Society, CAIR, Muslim Student Association, Islamic Circle of North America, ICNA, and they understand they're hostile, and that's the difference . . . . --John Guandolo
Thanks to @Bannons_WarRoom #IslamKills https://t.co/3m8SPbUtY5
— John Guandolo (@JGuandolo54271) February 6, 2026
Out of necessity because they've recognized their leaders aren't doing it I can tell you that over the last 20 plus years of actually training FBI, CIA, DHS, local and state law enforcement, 100% of them, 100%, over the years, at the end of the training, I asked two questions, "Did you know this information, so this is about Sharia, about the Muslim Brotherhood Network, and how they actually operate, "Did you know this information before you came in?" No, 100% have said no, we did not know this, and this includes FBI joint terrorism task force, agents, and officers, it includes DHS, name it, but when I asked the second question, "Do you believe this is critical to protecting your community," 100% said yes.
Whereas when we go in and teach citizens 10 years ago, 5 years ago, and today, today it's even much more so. They walk in with at least a general understanding of these movements and that they are operating in their community and they even know some of the organizations, Islamic Society of North America, ISNA, Muslim American Society, CAIR, Muslim Student Association, Islamic Circle of North America, ICNA, and they understand they're hostile, and that's the difference . . . . Is the way this war works, You just said it when you have jihadi's advising presidents, Governors, State legislatures, pastors, Chambers of Commerce, how to defeat jihadis, it's no wonder that the leadership remains clueless. They're just staggeringly ignorant of the Islamic threat, and of sharia, of the Muslim Brotherhood, the other movements and networks because that's the intentional target of the information operation from the enemy's perspective. So we've been looking we have this narrative that there are these competing versions of Islam, and this was true under Bush, and what America needs to do is get the good Muslims to help us understand the bad Muslims. Except there's only one Islam, one Sharia and that's it. So are there Muslims who don't want to adhere to Sharia and wage Jihad? Yes. But what they believe doesn't constitute a different version of Islam they're just outliers and according to Sharia they are apostates and they should be killed so we can't base National Security decisions foreign policy and domestic counterterrorism strategy based on someone who calls himself a Muslim number one and doesn't follow Sharia and number two in fact 100%, we're leaning on to get advice from in DHS, FBI, our General officers in the military, etc., are Muslim Brotherhood. They're hostile. They're jihadis in suits claiming to be nice people and presenting a very friendly image when, in fact, they're not. And that's why I say this is much more a counterintelligence espionage and subversive movement because they're still doing it. They're in this Administration doing it, and it creates havoc because you have what appears to be competing versions of Islam and you get people who are in national security positions saying, "Well, what Saudi Arabia does is different from what Jordan does. It's different from what Indonesia does." It's all based on Sharia, and so just because they don't dvance Sharia at the same level, well, that's part of jihad. You can only go as far as and fast as you're able to do without losing too many members of the Islamic community who don't get it. And so there's a requirement to educate the Muslim population and you can't go so fast in advancing these Jihad that you expose your hand to the non-Muslims on what you're actually doing.
