Thursday, September 30, 2021

[Psychiatrists] from the euthanasia program[s] [in Germany] helped set up [the] extermination camps [in the east]

Wirth's successor at Hartheim, Franz Stangl, later became commandant of Treblinka.  Asked how he became inured to killing people, Stangl explained that he had been trained by doctors in the euthanasia program in 1940

Rosonoff later raises the question whether or not eugenics itself smacks of "nazism and fascism" (p. 812), but concludes that the ethics of eugenics are "scientific" rather than political in origin.

How many times have we heard White House Press Secretary, Jen Psaki, tell her audience that COVID was not political, but only a program to protect the American people?  That they rely not on politics, but on science. 

Trying to give COVID of 2020 to 2021 a historical context, most people, most media, and pundits are framing its importance to the wrong event.  Too many like to compare COVID to the Spanish Flu of 1918.  The more accurate historical frame should be the WWII holocaust, mainly for the role that psychiatry and medical experts played in delivering so many Germans and Jews to their deaths.  Check out what Peter R. Breggin wrote about the role played by psychiatry in that holocaust.  

German psychiatrists proposed the extermination of mental patients before Hitler came to power. Then in Nazi Germany, organized psychiatry implemented involuntary eugenical sterilization and euthanasia, ultimately killing up to 100,000 German mental patients. The six psychiatric euthanasia centers utilized medical professionals, fake death certificates, gas chambers disguised as showers, and the mass burning of corpses. Psychiatrists from the euthanasia program also participated in the first formalized murders in the concentration camps. Inmates were “diagnosed" on euthanasia forms and sent to the psychiatric euthanasia centers. These facilities late r provided the training, personnel, and technology for the large r extermination camps. Medical observers from the United States and Germany at the Nuremberg trials concluded that the holocaust might not have taken place without psychiatry. This paper summarizes psychiatric participation in events leading to the holocaust and analyzes the underlying psychiatric principles that anticipated, encouraged, and paved the way for the Nazi extermination program. 

This was something.  

The crematorium ovens had been active up to the arrival of the American soldiers, with an admitted 350-400 cremations during the first 6 months of 1945. But unlike the extermination camps, which shut down with the impending arrival of allied troops, the psychiatrists had maintained their extermination program.

Abrams reported that a psychiatrist who led him through the hospital showed no remorse. He was not a Nazi party member, and believed that he had acted in the name of medicine. The nurses belonged to religious orders. The psychiatric director of the institution hanged himself in reaction to Abrams' arrival. 

We've all heard of Nazi death and concentration camps in Poland and Germany during WWII, but how many of us have heard of psychiatric extermination centers?  They were Hartheim [where 18,000 people were murdered], Hadamar, Sonncenstein, Grafeneck, Brandenburg, and Bernbcrg.

When one of the Berlin professors approved euthanasia, the sentence was carried out. Chronicity and incapacity for work were key criteria. The selected patients were then shipped to holding facilities and then ultimately to one of the six psychiatric extermination centers - Hartheim, Hadamar, Sonncnstein, Grafeneck, Brandenberg, and Bernbcrg [5]. Up to 100000 German psychiatric inmates were killed before Hitler ended the official program late in 1941 [6,7]. 

Aktion T4 was a campaign of mass murder by euthanasia.  

The euthanasia centers were structured like medical schools. That's frightening. 

In The Murderers Among Us [11], Simon Wiesenthal observes that the psychiatric euthanasia centers were structured like medical schools: Hartheim was organized like a medical school--except that the "students" were not taught to save human life but to destroy it as efficiently as possible. The deaths of the victims were clinically studied, precisely photographed, scientifically perfected. 

That is something.  Here's your COVID alert.  Remember how the hospitals were fudging the COVID deaths to make the tally seem worse than it actually was to justify continued fear and further measures, like masks, extended lockdowns, and now vaccines?  [check out the first video and the comments below for a refresher] The psychiatrists and doctors running the psychiatric extermination centers did exactly the same thing. 

The presence of physicians and other health professionals in the euthanasia centers gave a false security to the victims who did not realize their fate until the very end. Faked death certificates were intended to disguise the deaths as natural in origin in order to hide an inmate's fate from his or her family and the public. 

One question arises is, how was it that these psychiatric executioners were so hardened, what made them continue with their enterprise given what they were doing to their fellow citizens?  

How had the perpetrators of the holocaust become emotionally hardened to performing their grim tasks?
Machines broke down, but the people handling them never did. How could it be that the people operating the gas chambers and ovens were more reliable than the machines? Had they been trained mechanically and psychologically to stand the terrific strain? The question bothered me for years. All facts pointed toward the conclusion that special cadres of technically skilled and emotionally hardened executioners were trained somewhere. Castle Hartheim and the other euthanasia centers were the answer. (p. 315) 

Continue reading Breggin's "Psychiatry's Role in the Holocaust," 1993 . . .

A Sign for Cain: An Exploration of Human Violence, Fredric Wertham, 1966.  

Nazis had a phrase which covered all abuses by the state, "fur Ihre Sicherheit" . . . "For your safety."

12 Reasons NOT To Speak Up!

I actually believe that there are cases and instances where you should not speak up, where discretion is the better part of valor.  Do you speak up when you learn some compromising detail of a friend or family member?  Do you speak up when you learn some compromising detail of an enemy, or even a stranger?  Maybe that latter one you might because you feel like you have no skin in the game and it's an easy way to win and show your power to crush some anonymous person.  Wow, what courage.  And that's what the call to speak up is really about: it's either your conscience or someone else, an ally, that is asking you to act courageously.

There are lots of injustices in the world that need attention that is true.  If someone is being physically harmed by another person, then, yes, by all means, speak up.  If someone is being psychologically abused, then, yes, by all means, speak up to bring restitution to the victim.  But besides exercising your mouth during speech, you should also exercise your brain and think before you speak.  And measure the risks to you and to the person you're talking about and how your audience will react.  Will your audience be offended as much as you are?  Did the person you're talking about offend some kind of community standard for which you and your life is the exemplary standard-bearer?  Is it worth it to you to bring the community down upon one individual and that once that individual has been dealt with you and your life has been restored?  Just because you're encouraged to speak up doesn’t mean that your speech edifies your audience.  They may not care as much as you do about someone else's activities unless they're being directly harmed, assaulted or stolen from.  How involved or invested are you in someone else’s life?  

The other thing to consider is that people are petty.  They don't require much of an ethical standard for them to destroy and degrade other people.  And those who like to destroy others will do so just because it's a lift to their perceived power or self-esteem, which is even more of a banal motive.  There's that song by Band of Horses, called The Funeral," about a guy who hates the ethics of small talk and other people's expectations of you at social gatherings.  It's the lyrics that are stark, 

I'm coming up only to hold you under
I'm coming up only to show you wrong
And to know you is hard, we wonder
To know you all wrong, we warn

Ooh, ooh
Ooh...
Really too late to call, so we wait for
Morning to wake you, it's all we got

Danny MacAskill made that song famous by his 2009 video of him pulling bike tricks around Edinburgh.

The lines are interesting for they tend toward mean interpretation of others and events.  The speaker is talking in general about his performance at informal and formal social events.  His line of "I'm coming up only to hold you under" is in itself vicious envy with the subsequent line "I'm coming up only to show you wrong" tempered by argument; it's less violent.  

I'm coming up only to hold you under
I'm coming up only to show you wrong
And to know you is hard, we wonder

The 3rd and 4th line seem to temper his opening envy, 

And to know you is hard, we wonder
To know you all wrong, we warn

"We wonder" is the narrator admitting that he doesn't have any social skills to know someone, so instead of getting to know another he is left to wonder, left to construct the details of someone else's life in the abstract.  And conceding the limits of this form of acquiring knowledge of another person by saying, ". . . To know you all wrong," meaning that in conjecture people get it wrong, that we mistake someone for who they are. 

I am not a fan of this.  I am not forgiving of these kinds of errors.  

Back to the speaking up.  The real courage required to speak involves taking on the government or corporation oppressors.  Speaking against these folks, whistleblowing against these institutions is different that spreading destructive and unproductive gossip about a coworker, friend, or family member.  Betraying your family, why, that's just shitty.  Likewise is betraying a friend.  But I've seen one coworker gossip about another and the gossip left her crushed and she quit her job.  I knew the gal who quit.  Whether what was said about her was true or not, I found her to be a competent and decent woman.  

Too many folks think they need to be cruel to gain respect from others as though cruelty is a kind of virtue.  In war, maybe.  Least that's what the American soldiers in Vietnam admitted from those involved in the My Lai Massacre.  

There is that famous phrase, “

“The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.” 

I don't even think that most young people today know this phrase or understand it.  It’s a quote routinely attributed to Edmund Burke. Apparently, he never uttered these words.  It looks like the quote can be traced back to the utilitarian philosopher, John Stuart Mill, who delivered an 1867 inaugural address at the University of St. Andrews and stated: 

“Let not any one pacify his conscience by the delusion that he can do no harm if he takes no part, and forms no opinion. Bad men need nothing more to compass their ends than that good men should look on and do nothing. He is not a good man who, without a protest, allows wrong to be committed in his name, and with the means which he helps to supply, because he will not trouble himself to use his mind on the subject.”

CONTEXT IS EVERYTHING

Understand the context here.  This was said on the cusp of the revolutionary war, a statement that was made to indict the complacency of fellow citizens to rise up against a tyrannical government.  This is not one person indicting another and challenging him to a duel.  This is not someone making a speech to incite a mob to go kill a single man.  This is not the context of a fight between two individuals.  But in today’s social justice world, its acolytes adopt this mob-like tactic to every personal grievance, to every personal offense.  It’s that jealous boyfriend who writes on a freeway wall, “Jeffrey Sucks Dick.”  We don’t care.  But in today’s social justice world, corporate heads are now forced to care and delegate to managers to make sure they care about the slightest offense to one of the little women at the water cooler. 

So think first before you speak.  Think about what the pay-off is.  Think about what you gain by it.  Think about who it hurts and if that punishment is just or equal to the offense or crime.  It’s just as Carl Jung said, "Thinking is difficult, that's why most people judge."  And it was English writer, Graham Greene, who said, "We'd forgive most things if we knew the facts."

Tuesday, September 28, 2021

A man walking his dog is detained. Arresting officer felt good about it.

This Will Not Stand

Big Pharma's Biggest Whore

This is not us Vs the anti vaxxers, it’s the public vs the authoritarians

Are the spike proteins toxins flooding our environment eventually going to make us all sick?

This is a real thing, where unvaccinated people are getting sick from being around or living with vaccinated people, and it doesn’t matter which vaccine was injected into a friend or a loved one. 

Something that is in the vaccines or something that a person’s body does in reaction to the vaccine is making people sick.  I’ve asked around a bit and no one is certain.  A lot of people cite the spike proteins, but 

There are plenty of people who witness to this phenomenon but no one can point to anything specific molecule or the mechanism by which the unvaccinated are getting sick from the vaccinated.  This is not just paranoia, nor is it a wild reverie of a hypochondriac.  

From Pfizer's own documents--stay away from the vaxxed

At the 36:50 mark in this HamEggsnSam video, the host says that his hearing in one ear went deaf due to being clogged up.  After he took Niacin, it cleared up.  

At the 6-minute mark of this video, the host divulges that he, an unvaccinated, had a weird biological reaction from someone who was vaccinated.  

On page 25 of this 42-page review of the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines, Seneff and Nigh at least concede that there is something going on with transmissibility.  

One researcher I spoke with gave this reply to my concerns, 

But I have to tell you, being around the vaccinated seems to be causing problems for others around them. 

How, why, what? 

That section about vaccine shedding on page 25 reads like this: 

2.  Vaccine Shedding    There has been considerable chatter on the Internet about the possibility of vaccinated people causing disease in unvaccinated people in close proximity. While this may seem hard to believe, there is a plausible process by which it could occur through the release of exosomes from dendritic cells in the spleen containing misfolded spike proteins, in complex with other prion reconformed proteins. These exosomescan travel to distant places. It is not impossible to imagine that they are being released from the lungs and inhaled by a nearby person. Extracellular vesicles, including exosomes, have been detected in sputum, mucus, epithelial lining fluid, and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid in association with respiratory diseases (Lucchetti et al., 2021).A Phase 1/2/3 study undertaken by BioNTech on the Pfizer mRNA vaccine implied in their study protocol that they anticipated the possibility of secondary exposure to the vaccine (BioNTech, 2020). The protocol included the requirement that “exposure during pregnancy” should be reported by the study participants. They then gave examples of “environmental exposure during pregnancy” which included exposure “to the study intervention by inhalation or skin contact.” They even suggested two levels of indirect exposure: “A male family member or healthcare provider who has been exposed to the study intervention by inhalation or skin contact then exposes his female partner prior toor around the time of conception. 

This is not conspiracy stuff; this is real.  Pinning down what's causing the unvaccinated to become sick from the vaccinated is what's required next before this can be rectified.  I think it's causing severe and debilitating immune responses.  But that's my first brush.  

What is CIRS?

Chronic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (CIRS) is a progressive, multi-system, multi-symptom illness characterized by exposure to biotoxins. The ongoing inflammation can affect virtually any organ system of the body and if left untreated becomes debilitating.

All California prison guards, staff must get COVID-19 vaccine, federal judge rules

"Do as they say for the common good"

Well spoken NBA players have more [refined discussions] on vaccine policy than govt. public health professionals.

Then there's the Washington Wizard's player, Bradley Beal, who is not vaccinated and explains effectively by way of questioning his audience if they've been vaccinated.   

"I want to be very clear: life for the unvaccinated will be very difficult indefinitely"

Pastor Artur Pawlowski returned to Canada today to face 6 years in prison - for opening his church

Is This What Is Meant By the New Math?

Monday, September 27, 2021

The Unaccountable, Untouchable Fauci

ESG extorts corporations into the globalist agenda.

This is literally about wearing paper masks

For more about Australia's crazy COVID police, check out this post.  

AUSSIE COP QUITS

Sunday, September 26, 2021

U.S.: Teachers Always Rate Children As "Improved" When They Lose Their Spontaneity on the Drugs [i.e., Ritalin]


Find Peter R. Breggin’s articles for free here.  

Glyphosate binds to aluminum inside vaccines and helps bring aluminum into the limbic system

Here is Ardi's interview with MIT Senior ResearcherStephanie Seneff.  Her website is here.  If you want a better understanding of the short and long-term consequences of the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines, be sure to read her review of these vaccines here.  On her Facebook page, she cautions the reader, 

Dr. Greg Nigh and I worked very hard--with three rounds of review and six reviewers--to publish this LONG paper on the unforeseen, unpredictable short-term and long-term consequences of the mRNA vaccines against COVID-19.  Be forwarned. 

Sounds ominous.  

14:40.  It turns out that Glyphosate can actually chelate, or bind to, aluminum inside vaccines and help bring aluminum into the limbic system of the brain.  

Seneff points us to a Canadian doctor, Dr. Chris Shaw.  

Any "expert" who denies the overwhelming evidence of durable and long-lasting immunity after COVID-recovery is no longer a credible expert.

Saturday, September 25, 2021

FRENCH PARADOX: Cheese and cream may indeed ward off heart problems

Who is Leana Wen?

Our job here on earth is to behave as morally and ethically as we can

It's not in our hands whether we succeed in life, it's in our hands how we live it.  

  

It took him 4-5 years to stop lobotomies in the west. No difference between lobotomy and every other treatment in psychiatry. Electro-shock treatment is a closed head lobotomy with electricity.  And the drugs, which are neurotoxins, all impair frontal lobe function.  That's how they all work.  

Our job here on earth is to behave morally and ethically as we can. 

Michelle Carter is a real sparrow who has been attacked by a lot of hawks.  

He's been surprised by what he's been able to accomplish.  She's stopped all of the lobotomies in the western world.  He's been able to get a lot of the FDA products labeled.  

On the one hand, he is appalled by what is going on in the world.  But he also knows that he doesn't get to determine his effect.  By chance, societal pressures, and higher powers.  It's not in our hands whether we succeed in life, it's in our hands how we live it.  

Frightening people is a creation of the pharmaceutical industry and psychiatry.  That's a false approach to the problem created by threats to shut up healers, like Breggin.  With lobotomy, he was accused of taking away the last resort treatment for people who needed it.  How dare he.  How dare he scare people.  We were doing lobotomies in the prisons here. And I called a psychiatrist I knew from my training, and I said to him, "Will you back me on this?" and he got enraged with me, saying you're scaring the prisoners.  I work with prisoners.  Of course, I want the prisoners to be aware of the dangers of lobotomy if a local surgeon comes by wanting to help them out.  

Good reason to be frightened about all psychiatric drugs, especially long-term.  Long-term, they behave like any other neurotoxin.  A neurotoxin is a drug that impairs brain function.  And these not only impair brain function, but the highest functions, all of them impair frontal lobe function, where all of the--what we think of as a human is expressed through.  And they impair the temporal lobe and the amygdala where so much more goes on like memory and emotional control.  They impact on the limbic system and the basal ganglia.  Because the brain's an integrated system, that all gest into motor control, deeper kinds of dementia, so . . . .  No, people need to be concerned and we have a moral obligation that if we have this information to share it.  And I believe the best information to give people is the truth.   

As of now, the main problem with people hearing the information about how harmful the anti-depressants are is that they shouldn't try to come off them quickly because they're not only dangerous to take, they're dangerous to come off of.  People can get deeply depressed and self-punishing and suicidal.  They can get violent and angry, they can even get manic, the opposite of what you'd expect coming off of the anti-depressants.  So that's what they need to know.  Does that frighten people?  Well, I don't know.  It certainly should inform them about the risks of starting the drug and of stopping.  And then there are huge risks in starting, because in the first few days you have this huge amount of adverse effects, occurring after one, two, and three doses.  I've written about this, describing the effects of Paxil, so it's dangerous to start them, dangerous to stop them.  You should not be on these drugs long-term.  They're disabling long-term, sexually disabling.  They're disabling feelings, creating apathy, and the person doesn't even know what's happening to them.  

Psychiatric Drug Withdrawal: A Guide for Prescribers, Therapists, Patients, and Their Families, Dr. Peter Breggin, 2012.

DR. VERNON COLEMAN: “Any Doctor, Teacher Or Health Worker Promoting The Jab To Children Should Be Arrested For Attempted M"

Find more from Dr. Vernon Coleman at his website, vernoncoleman.org.  

"Doctors have been turned into ethically impoverished mercenaries."  


Australia. A Horror Documentary.

PETER HOTEZ PREDICTION: 85-90% of the US would need to be vaccinated in order for us to “get past” COVID. RESULTS: 85.1% of all adults in Maine are at least partially vaccinated and hospitalizations are nearly as high as they’ve ever been.

And who, pray tell, is this genius, Peter Hotez?   He is Dean for the National School of Tropical Medicine.  And this makes him an expert on COVID or vaccines?  Why is it that all of these county, national, and local health experts appear so unhealthy like they never exercise or get any sun? 

NO ONE [is] coming 2 get us out of this mess.

Australia Has Fallen

Somewhere, somehow, this young woman has a brother, a boyfriend, husband, father, cousin, some man who will want to punish these cops.  

Friday, September 24, 2021

4,500 doctors and other medical professionals were paid some $20 Million for speaking on Pfizer’s behalf

This story is a bit old, 2010, but still relevant

NORWAY: REOPENING BACK TO NORMAL

Fauci sits on the board of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation?

I did not know that Fauci was on the board of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation Special Leadership Council for their Decades of Vaccination Initiative, stated that the Trump Administration would be hit with a surprise outbreak back in 2017.  

ISRAEL: Vaccine Passport Revoked After 2 Shots

POWERFUL: A War for the World

24 attorneys general threaten Biden admin with lawsuit over vaccine mandate

Thursday, September 23, 2021

71% of Black people were unvaccinated when NYC mayor de Blasio instituted his covid vaccine mandate.

Wednesday, September 22, 2021

Has BLM Finally Joined the Right Fight?

People still believe it’s unthinkable that your ability to purchase food will be dependent on bio-security compliance . . .

Microchips Follow the Vax Pass . . .

Lockdown All of Society, Rob People's Freedoms Just to Accommodate Hospitals? I Thought Hospitals Accommodate Society . . .

Did health officials inflate the success rate of the vaccine by embedding natural immunity into the data?

"anti-psychotic drugs . . . are just lobotomizing drugs . . ."

Most of these drugs create biochemical imbalances in brains that don't have any biochemical imbalances.

Wow.  If you're not scared to death by the list of drugs that cause brain damage and replace your natural goodness and decency with more violent and addictive inclinations or compulsions, then there's nothing that I can do for you.  Here is a shortlist of the drugs that Breggin mentions: Seroquel, Abilify, Motuda, Rispiradol, and others.  These are very damaging to the brain, causing damage to a part of the brain called the Basal Ganglia, which leads to a condition called tardive dyskinesia.  This condition shortens the life span by 20 years because it causes cardiovascular problems.  Not good.

The newer antipsychotic drugs destroy your metabolism, leading to metabolic syndrome and causing too many to become obese and develop diabetes, pancreatitis, and elevated cholesterol.  Most of these drugs create biochemical imbalances in brains that don't have any biochemical imbalances.  For obesity and diabetes, take resveratrol.  And the brand that I recommend is Bill Sardi's formula, Longevinex



For sleep, take Melatonin and GABA.  If you want energy, take vitamin D, C (which extends your lifespan by 5 to 7 years), and zinc.  Avoid this other brain-damaging crap.  


At the very end of his presentation, Breggin tells us that he's created a guide for getting off of these drugs.  So you're not alone.  That guide comes in the form of a book that you can see below, or you can rely on his pdf, which is free.  

Tuesday, September 21, 2021

MURDER SUICIDE COUNTED AS COVID DEATH

 

little clots in the capillary network are microscopic and they are scattered, so they're not going to show on any scan.

12:51:  Virtually impossible to prevent an infection that comes from the airwaves.  What you can do after that bug has entered your airway epithelial cells is to prevent it from disseminating by the body into the bloodstream.  This is what, for instance, the vaccination against pneumococci or meningococci aims at--to prevent the dissemination in the blood.  Now, this virus does not disseminate in the blood.  It kills people because it's in the lung and the lung suffers.  So how can anyone think that by vaccination of oneself that one can be protected against infection of the lungs?  This is completely naive.  And I wonder that my American associates, physicians, colleagues don't stand up and tell you guys about this.  Why do you have to wait for me to come around and tell you this?  I learned this from the American teachers, from American textbooks.  

Now, the second thing is this:  if you're under 70 years of age, you're going to have a really, really difficult time dying of COVID 19.  

The Moderna vaccine has 40 trillion messenger RNA molecules in it.  So when someone gets the shot, you're getting your genes re-wired.  These are wrapped in a lipid capsule that enables them to be absorbed into the cells.  This is injected into the deltoid muscle of the arm.  Like I said, only 25% of the vaccine actually stays there, and the rest is taken up by the lymphatic system and fed into the general circulation or blood vessels.  And so it circulates around the entire body, And I think every doctor knows that absorption occurs in the capillary networks because that's where the blood slows right down.  It goes through so these nanocapsules containing these trillions of messenger RNA molecules are absorbed into the lining around the capillaries, what medically we call the vascular endothelium.  So these little packages are absorbed around the vessels, the packages open, and the body recognizes these messenger RNA strands as a gene and gets to work making COVID spiked proteins.  So in a virus, those COVID spiked proteins form part of the viral capsule.  The problem is that they're not in a virus; they're in the cells around blood vessels.  As a result, they become part of the cell wall of that cell.  So normally, the cells that surround your blood vessels have to be smooth to have good and unimpeded blood flow.  But as soon as you've got all of these little spike proteins that become part of the cell wall become a rough surface.  It's going to be like very coarse sandpaper.  It's now what the platelets are going to interpret as a damaged vessel.  It's no longer smooth.  So clotting is inevitable because platelets that come down that vessel are going to hit a rough spot and act like "this must be a damaged vessel, this vessel must be plugged up to stop the bleeding."  Clots are inevitable because of these spiked proteins in the capillary networks.  I set out to then try and prove this.  Could this theory be correct?  And so these little clots in the capillary network are microscopic and they are scattered, so they're not going to show on any scan.  It's too small and too scattered.  It's not like the big clots that cause strokes and heart attacks.  They're too small and too scattered.  So how on earth can we know if the person has clotted?  And the only way to find out is with a blood test called a D-dimer.  So the D-dimer is a blood test that shows up a recent clot.  It won't show up an old clot, it will show up a new clot.  And it doesn't tell you where the clot is; it only tells you that the clotting process has been activated.  

If you want healthy capillaries, you'll need to take vitamin C and Niacin. 

If you want to prevent blood clots in all blood vessels, then you'll need Nattokinase. 

After recording 500 cases of paralysis and 53 deaths from the 1976 Swine Flu Epidemic vaccine, that vaccine was pulled off the market.

Dr. Ben Edwards.  Trained as a family physician.  Did my undergrad at Baylor, UT Houston Medical School, and then Waco for Family Practice Residency Training, where I was chief resident.  I spent the first 7 years in private practice at Garza County Health Clinic in Post Texas as the only physician in the County.  For the last seven, eight years I've had my own practice with Veritas Medical in Lubbock, Abilene, and San Angelo.  Thank you for the opportunity to testify today.

I'd like to begin with a reminder to everyone about the definition of evidence-based medicine that Sackett-Straus et al laid out back in 2000.  stated that the elements of evidence-based practice are: 

1) the integration of best-researched evidence with clinical expertise and patient values.  Patient values trump clinical expertise, and clinical expertise trumps scientific evidence. 

I'm also concerned that the forced and coerced COVID19 vaccination would, in my opinion, be a violation of the Nuremberg Code [who in our legal system would dare prosecute any violation of the NC?], the UN International Covenant on civil and political rights, Article 7, the UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Article 3, and UNESCO's Article 6 of the Universal Declaration of Bioethics and Human Rights.  In addition, I have some concerns similar to what Senator Hall already mentioned.  According to the CDC's Vaccination Adverse Events Reporting System, which I have some updated numbers from last night when I downloaded these:

4178 deaths are now being reported on VAERS.  To give some context over the past 20 years, all vaccinations combined, there was a reported 4,182 deaths over the past 20 years.

In the past 4 months, we are now sitting on 4,178 deaths associated with the COVID vaccine reported to VAERS.  This includes a 15-year-old boy in Colorado, two sixteen-year-old girls in Wisconsin, a 17-year-old girl in Wisconsin, and a 17-year-old boy from New Hampshire all healthy.

Evidence is pretty clear that VAERS grossly underestimates the adverse events that are reported.  A study commissioned by the Department of Health and Human Services in 2010 and carried out by Harvard University, concluded that only about 1% of adverse reactions were ever reported to VAERS.  A similar study in 2015 by Shimabukuro et al came to a similar conclusion.  A 1995 report by the CDC also found that certain adverse reactions to vaccines are reported about 1% of the time.  Even vaccine manufacturers themselves have estimated a 50-fold under-reporting of adverse reactions.  So I have grave concern about under-reporting about these adverse reactions to VAERS and even at that, we're over 4,000 now in deaths.  To give you some context, as Senator Hall already mentioned the 1976 Swine Flu Epidemic, after recording 500 cases of paralysis and 53 deaths, the vaccine was pulled off the market.  Personally, I've received numerous reports from family members of my patients, close friends of my patients that within hours to days of receiving the vaccine, they've suffered from a stroke, heart attack, pulmonary embolism, blood clots, sudden death, and as far as these family members knew none of these were reported by the medical staff as being associated with the vaccine.  So my concern is that indeed there is vast under-reporting.  Lastly, I would say of Harvey Rich's data that 53% of Texans have natural immunity   Studies have shown a 2-to-3-fold increased risk of adverse reaction to this vaccine if you've already had COVID.  Natural immunity confers a more robust immunity than vaccine immunity could, but vaccinating someone whose already robustly immune increases their risk of adverse reaction 2-to-3 fold.  Two different studies show that.  

And probably the last thing that I would have to say is I am very much a proponent of preserving the individual doctor-patient relationship.  It's a sacred relationship and I believe nothing should come between that and ultimately it's up to the patient to decide how they want to treat their body.  And on a personal note, I believe that God gave us an amazing robust immune system and I don't think that you can improve on God.  No one, not everyone obviously has to agree with that but for those who do and choose to rely on that natural immunity, I think we need to uphold that right to do so without any adverse outcomes on their livelihood.  Thank you for the opportunity to speak.  Happy to answer questions.  

QUESTION #1: Do people with natural immunity to COVID need a vaccine, and is there any increase risk of the natural immune system individuals having an adverse reaction to the vaccine? 

ANSWER:  Natural immunity is more robust than vaccine immunity.  There's a study from the original SARS back in 2002, the people that survived that first SARS, they've looked at them 17 years later and they showed robust immunity still to SARS COV-1 . . . 17 years later.  Historically, we've already, we've always known that natural immunity tends to last a lifetime.  In other words, the measles natural immunity will last a lifetime.  So, no, I don't believe there's any need to vaccinate someone who's already acquired natural immunity.  And we need to remember that natural immunity is more than just antibodies.  You have T-cells, Natural Killer cells, you've got the innate immune response.  You've got a robust immune system, not just antibodies.  And to the second part, reiterating that if you've already had COVID naturally, and some of these will be asymptomatic people and some people won't have a positive antibody test because their T-cells were strong enough that they didn't need to mount an antibody response so you can't catch all these guys with an antibody screen.  But if you had natural immunity, as over 50% of Texans have, then you're at a two-to-three-fold increased risk of an adverse reaction if you get vaccinated.  

QUESTION #2: Can people do anything about their immune system? 

ANSWER:  Absolutely.  Thank you for asking, Senator Hall.  I transitioned from Conventional Family Practice Medicine to Integrative Medicine, integrating our God-given natural ability for the body to fix itself and it's clear in the literature that if we steward this God-given design through nutrition, proper nutrition, hydration, sunlight, most importantly peace, not fear.  Fear has overcome this nation, the spirit of fear that I don't submit to has overcome this nation in my opinion, and if that's influencing policy decisions, I don't want to have to be subjected to those policies.  So, yes, there's much that you can do to improve your immune system.  And it sounds too simple but it's true--eat God food, not man food.  Exercise, get some sunlight, move around a little bit, and most importantly be at peace.  Your immune system will do what it's designed to do.  Thank you.

Monday, September 20, 2021

The tide is turning even if it may not seem like it . . .

15:35 to 16:10  It's so dangerous to your immune system, it wrecks it.  It’s the vaccinated who are breeding these variants because the vaccine doesn’t attack the virus.  And it probably teaches the virus to attack the antibodies and turn them into virus replication factories.  That’s called ADE.  

Not considered vaccinated until the second dose.  The famous folks he lists at the beginning who died from the shots do not qualify as a COVID death because they didn't have their second COVID shot.  

22:00  What they're doing is in violation of the Nuremberg Code.  They're literally engaging in a war crime.  They are literally forcing people to engage in medical experimentation and using their job as coercion.  These are war crimes playing out in front of us, and these fucking morons are clapping when a mom gets escorted off a plane because her two-year-old is having an asthma attack and she took the mask off.  Clap, you fucking sheep!  They'll come for you later.  Don't worry.  Of course, the vaccine is going to take care of a lot of you.  That's the reality.  

23:40  Pull your head out of your fucking ass, fucking Seattle Children's.  [I guess calling themselves "Seattle's Children" is a little too obvious of what the services are really about.  Here he cites a Times of Israel article, titled, "STUDY: COVID Recovery Gave Israelies Longer-Lasting Delta Defense Than Vaccines," Nathan Jeffay, September 2, 2021.  The vaccinated are a danger to everybody because they are spreading these variants, they are breeding these variants because they are getting sick and winding up in the hospital.  And you can lie to our faces, piss on us and tell us it's raining, but we don't fucking believe you anymore and this movement, this understanding has reached critical mass and there's no putting this genie back in the bottle. 

24:30  As they pushing to inject people with something that's going to make most of them sick.  Think about that.  Who the fuck are these people? What an epic, complete fucking failure of the medical system.  They have destroyed the trust that has taken over a century to build. . .

26:30  Reading from the Seattle Children's Religious Exemption form, he says, "Please explain why the COVID vaccines are objectionable based on your religious beliefs . . . while at least some others are not.  Please attach additional pages if needed to provide a full response.  

"Well, as a Quaker, I believe in personal responsibility.  And the fact that the hospitals are taking no responsibility; the fact that the doctors are taking no responsibility; the fact that the manufacturers are taking no fucking responsibility; the fact that the government is taking no fucking responsibility, but me taking this shot is me exercising responsibility in doing my part to be responsible?  Fuck you people!" 

28:00  Find a group.  Help each other out.  They're not going to save us.  We have to save ourselves.  We have to understand that.  [He cites John O'Looney who was a SAIF member of the Funeral Directors' Association.  And?] 

After watching this video this morning Tuesday, October 5, 2021, for 30 minutes, it shut down and was no longer available.  Unbelievable. 

From Pfizer's own documents--stay away from the vaxxed

From GreenEggsnHam.