Wednesday, October 29, 2025

🚨BREAKING: In a 5-4 decision, SCOTUS has struck down the Biden-Harris administration's rewrite of Title IX, which would have allowed men in women’s sports, bathrooms, locker rooms, dorms, and compelled speech.

🚨 Illinois Democrats even passed a law specifically to give illegals healthcare, with complete “Total coverage” for free

This is 100% paid for by state taxpayers.  The program of health care that they get is actually better than those of our own residents that are on Medicaid.

And in addition to the over $1 billion dollar cost of healthcare, we are also providing free daycare for their children, including free housing, food subsidies, cash subsidies.  So the total cost of this program is in the billions of dollars, and that means key programs for our developmentally disabled, for our seniors, these the people are now being crowded out.  --Illinois Senator Dave Syverson

Last year, and we raised this concern last year, the Democratic majority and the Governor put into place a law that said we were going to provide free health care for undocumented citizens from age 42 on up, that we were going to provide them free healthcare.  At the time, they said they anticipated about 10,000 residents would take advantage of this program.  We raised the concern.  We said that was going to be a problem.  By the beginning of this year, the state said, "Well, we're wrong.  There was about 52,000."  Now this week the state came out and said, "We are wrong again.  That number is now 120,000 undocumenteds are going to be receiving free hTlthcare at a cost of over $1 billion dollars.  That's money that's not in the budget.  That's going to create a significant problem.  And so here in Illinois, we are now adding thousands a month as you have unhealthy and sick undocumented citizens from around the country, from frankly around the world, that are coming to Illinois because of the fact that we're the only state that covers these individuals for "Total HealthCare," and so this is something that is really creating significant problem for our budget.

1:33.  Let's talk a little bit more about saving the coverage they are receiving. It's my understanding that the federal government provides no matching dollars for this program, that it's fully Illinois taxpayer funded.  What about the health care that they are receiving.  It's also my understanding that it's probably even better than people on Medicaid, our  citizens on Medicaid, who really need coverage.  Can you kind of talk about that?

1:55.  This is important issue is well, another frustrating thing.  The president opens the borders up, but then he says we're not going to pay for any of the healthcare.  This is 100% paid for by state taxpayers.  The program of health care that they get is actually better than those of our own residents that are on Medicaid.  And so our low income, struggling families in Illinois that are on Medicaid, they do not get as good of services as these non-citizens are getting that are coming into Illinois.  So it's/they're costing us significantly more than it costs our own residents.  And in addition to the over $1 billion dollar cost of healthcare, we are also providing free daycare for their children, including free housing, food subsidies, cash subsidies.  So the total cost of this program is in the billions of dollars, and that means key programs for our developmentally disabled, for our seniors, these the people are now being crowded out.  Our own citizens' programs are not getting the funding they need because now we are becoming the healthcare provider for every sick individual in the world that can come to Illinois.  If this doesn't stop, I can guarantee you this does not end well for Illinois.  

Here is a summary from Grok,

Illinois Senator Dave Syverson Reveals $1.1 Billion Cost of Undocumented Immigrant Healthcare Program.

Illinois State Senator Dave Syverson disclosed that the Health Benefits for Immigrant Adults program, launched in 2020 under Governor J.B. Pritzker, enrolled 120,000 undocumented adults over 42, far exceeding initial estimates of 10,000, with annual costs over $1.1 billion funded solely by state taxpayers. The program provided comprehensive coverage including primary care, prescriptions, dental, vision, and transportation, but closed on July 1, 2025, after depleting funds, redirecting resources to a seniors-only initiative amid concerns over straining services for citizens. A 2023 state audit highlighted enrollment underestimations and improper sign-ups, intensifying scrutiny of the policy's fiscal impact.

ZEID AL NOMAN: The [Muslim Brotherhood] has an internal security apparatus to protect it from FBI, CIA, etc.

O, this ought to be comforting. 

In 1981 in Missouri, Zeid al Noman, a member of the U.S. Muslim Brotherhood’s Executive Committee, spoke with Muslim Brothers about the history & objectives of the MB in America. The discussion revealed several key points:

1. The Muslim Brotherhood controlled the location and method of how many muslims settled in the U.S. 2. The first national Islamic organization - Muslim Students Association (MSA) - was created by the Muslim Brotherhood [note: MSA’s are on nearly every major & mid-sized college & university in America today to recruit jihadis & put out disinformation about Islam] 3. The MB has an internal security apparatus to protect it from FBI, CIA, etc. 4. The MB has jihadi/terrorist weapons training camps in the U.S. 5. The Muslim Brotherhood’s Special Section - its military jihadi arm which conducts attacks, assassinations, bombings, etc - is present in the United States.

A recording of this discussion was found during the FBI’s raid of the home of Hamas operative Elbarasse in Annandale, VA in 2004. The recording & the transcript were entered into evidence in the largest terrorism financing trial ever successfully prosecuted in American history (US v HLF). See the full document below.

Guandolo adds,

Muslim Brotherhood operatives are employed by the FBI, CIA, DHS, military, national security staffs, NSA, DIA…they have access to all of our classified system. That’s a noteworthy early warning system in and of itself.

Tuesday, October 28, 2025

KOUJI JAPAN: Many people around the world, including Japanese people, are unaware of this, but Japan’s supreme law is not the Constitution of Japan. Japan’s supreme law is the San Francisco Peace Treaty, which was signed under duress aboard the USS Missouri, 1951

Many people around the world, including Japanese people, are unaware of this, but Japan’s supreme law is not the Constitution of Japan.
Japan’s supreme law is the San Francisco Peace Treaty, which was signed under duress aboard the USS Missouri.
The San Francisco Peace Treaty is a treaty concluded between the Allied Powers and Japan on September 8, 1951, following World War II. On the surface, it is said to have ended the approximately seven-year occupation by GHQ, allowing Japan to regain independence as a sovereign nation. However, in reality, it was a treaty that ensured the U.S. military (DS) would continue to dominate Japan even after GHQ’s withdrawal.
As a result, all of Japan’s politics up to now have been decided by the U.S. military (DS). And the entity that decides this is the Japan-U.S. Joint Committee.
In fact, former Japanese Prime Minister Yukio Hatoyama testified: “Until I became prime minister, I thought all laws were decided in the Diet. But when I actually became prime minister, I was shocked to find that everything was decided at the Japan-U.S. Joint Committee at the New Sanno Hotel.” 

Trump is the first American president to promise to abolish that Japan-U.S. Joint Committee. For Japanese people who know the truth, Trump is like a god. He is working hard to liberate Japan from the DS. 

In 1970, Ronald Reagan introduced no fault divorce in California which was the same policy the Soviet Union introduced in 1918. At least on marriage, Reagan was a Communist

Ronald Reagan served as the 33rd governor of California from January 2, 1967, to January 6, 1975. No fault divorce was first introduced in California in 1970 

Who knew that Reagan introduced the Communist policy of no-fault divorce tried initially in the Soviet Union in 1920s post Revolution.  Reagan was no conservative; he was a jokester communist.  In fact, Russians living under the Soviet Union were more conservative than Reagan or even Americans, at least the coastal Americans. 

Gospel Coalition explains,

A primary goal of the Bolsheviks was, as Elizabeth Brainerd explains, to “break down the traditional ‘bourgeois’ structure of the family in order to equalize the status of men and women.” They did this by implementing a number of changes to the Family Code: allowing civil marriages (whereas before only religious marriage was allowed), granting equal rights to illegitimate and legitimate children, making abortion legal (and free if done in a hospital), and instituting no-fault divorce.

By 1926, to get a divorce a spouse needed only to register with the local bureau of statistics and the other spouse would be notified three days later.  The results were what we would expect: “Divorce became much more common,” says Brainerd, “and for men, re-marriage emerged as a new and widespread marital institution in the wake of divorce. Women were much more likely to remain divorced.”

In July of 1926, The Atlantic Monthly published an illuminating from this period of “postcard divorce.”  In “The Russian Effort to Abolish Marriage” a “woman resident in Russia” provides a fascinating glimpse into what happens when thousands of years of marriage is replaced almost overnight with a looser moral standard. 

On the Soviet Union's "1918 Code on Marriage, the Family and Guardianship," Wikipedia adds,

The 1918 code also served to recognize the legal rights of the individual at the expense of the existing tsarist/patriarchal system of family and marriage. This was accomplished by allowing easily obtainable "no-grounds" divorces. It abolished "illegitimacy" of birth as a legal concept and entitled all children to parental support. It abolished the adoption of orphans (orphans would be cared for by the state to avoid exploitation). A married couple could take either surname. Individual property would be retained in the event of divorce. An unlimited term of alimony could be awarded to either spouse, but upon separation each party was expected to care for themselves. Women were to be recognized as equal under the law; Prior to 1914, women were not allowed to earn a wage, seek education, or exchange property without the consent of their husband