Monday, June 2, 2025

PAUL SALADINO: 🚨 Unless your chicken says it's "AIR CHILLED" it is full of chemicals and chlorine.

STEAK AND BUTTER GAL: Thick slab of pork belly is better than bacon

Steak and Butter Gang

Steak and Butter Gal Facebook Page.

Steak and Butter Gal YouTube Channel.

Examples of the Hutchinson Effect on 9/11.  One, a look at the front steel beams of the WTC 1 and how the shape of the damage does not match the damage from an airplane penetrating it.   And later in the video, it looks at street damage on the morning of 9/11 that resembles similar effects from Hutchinson Effects.  

Both videos are interesting for their ability to interrogate details outside the official narrative and yet go further at explaining what type of energy, or "explosives" were used on the morning of 9/11.  

This site, 9/11 Revisited, supports Dr. Judy Wood's work and conclusion that the buildings were not brought down by explosives or military-grade nanothermite, but that the buildings were pulverized or dustified or imploded due to dustification.  

At 1:39, this presentation shows police cars with unusual damager, bent chassis, 

Dr. Judy Wood, 2:28

The Towers didn't burn up, nor did they slam to the ground, but turned into dust in midair.  That sort of collapse, that's dust squirting up.  Why did so few people see that?  

3:25  I'm going to stay on Judy Wood here.  Because Judy would interesting background you got a degree in civil engineering master's degree and Engineering mechanics and applied physics and a PhD in material engineering science she's not politically involved she could care less about the politics side it's not something that she talks about but her Theory from several observations she claims cannot be explained by official narrative.  

#1.  Lack of Significant Debris.  

Wood argues that the debris pile after the collapse was much smaller than expected for buildings as large as a WTC Towers she suggests that much of the material was vaporized or justified by a d e w leaving little Rubble behind.

#2.  "Toasted" Cars.  

She points to reports and images of cars near the World Trade Center that were severely damaged or toasted in unusual ways, burned or melted without clear signs of typical fire or explosion damage.  Wood interprets this as evidence of selective energy effects from a DEW.

#3.  Absence of Expected Seismic Impact.

Wood claims the seismic data recorded during the collapse doesn't match what would be expected from a traditional building collapse.  She argues that a DEW attack would produce less ground vibration than a conventional demolition.

#4.  Hurricane Erin Connection.

On 9/11 hurricane Aaron was present in the Atlantic Ocean would suggest a speculative link proposing that the storms energy might have been harnessed or connected to the DEW technology used in the attack.

As for the Pentagon, none of its structure collapsed until 40 minutes POST supposed crashed.  I say supposed because there is no concrete evidence that a plane or a missile ever hit the Pentagon.  

Polysorbate 80 in nicotine gum and lozenges? Yes. So what? Well, it causes your blood brain barrier to leak

Grok confirms that, 

Based on available information, both Nicorette and TopCare include polysorbate 80 in their nicotine lozenges. Nicorette's lozenges, such as the Coated Ice Mint and Cools variants, list polysorbate 80 among their ingredients. Similarly, TopCare's Nicotine Lozenge (4 mg) is explicitly noted to contain polysorbate 80. Other brands like GoodSense and Equate may also produce nicotine lozenges, but specific confirmation of polysorbate 80 in their formulations is less clear from the provided data. Always check product labels for the most accurate ingredient information. 

Evidently, there are gut issues associated with long-term exposure.

Nicotine Lozenges: The amount of polysorbate 80 in lozenges is small, and short-term use for smoking cessation is unlikely to pose significant risks for most people. Long-term use warrants caution due to cumulative exposure.

Recommendation

If you’re concerned about polysorbate 80 in nicotine lozenges, check product labels for brands that exclude it or consult a healthcare provider, especially if you have gut issues or allergies. For broader context, reducing overall exposure to processed foods and medications containing emulsifiers may help mitigate potential risks. Always weigh the benefits of smoking cessation against theoretical risks of additives. If you’d like, I can search for specific brands of lozenges without polysorbate 80 or provide more detailed studies. Let me know! 

Disclaimer: Grok is not a doctor; please consult one. Don't share information that can identify you. 

Further, one brand I've tried, an Amazon brand called Perrigo seems to contain Polysorbate 80.  

Do Perrigo brand nicotine lozenges contain Polysorbate 80?

I couldn't find specific information on the ingredients of Perrigo's nicotine lozenges. Ingredient lists can vary by product and formulation, and Perrigo produces multiple versions of nicotine lozenges, often as store brands. However, based on available data for similar nicotine lozenges, many, including those from brands like Nicorette and Wal-Mart, do contain polysorbate 80 as an emulsifier or stabilizer.

To confirm whether Perrigo's specific nicotine lozenges contain polysorbate 80, check the packaging or contact Perrigo’s customer service directly, as exact formulations may differ. If you’d like, I can search for more specific information or help with something else.

Polysorbate 80 opens up the blood brain barrier?  Dear God.  I wonder if gut bulging, displacement, and distension are the result of a leaky blood brain barrier. 

Sunday, June 1, 2025

Can You Get Gout If You're on Carnivore?

Revero.  Dr. Shawn Baker is a "multi sport world record setting athlete, physician, Founder of  REVERO.com, an online clinic for treating chronic diseases at the root, author of “The Carnivore Diet.”