What created the plane shaped holes in the twin towers? pic.twitter.com/oBlmvBazaf
— 9/11 Revisited (@911Revisionist) June 1, 2025
Examples of the Hutchinson Effect on 9/11. One, a look at the front steel beams of the WTC 1 and how the shape of the damage does not match the damage from an airplane penetrating it. And later in the video, it looks at street damage on the morning of 9/11 that resembles similar effects from Hutchinson Effects.
Both videos are interesting for their ability to interrogate details outside the official narrative and yet go further at explaining what type of energy, or "explosives" were used on the morning of 9/11.
This site, 9/11 Revisited, supports Dr. Judy Wood's work and conclusion that the buildings were not brought down by explosives or military-grade nanothermite, but that the buildings were pulverized or dustified or imploded due to dustification.
I Have The Power - Hurricane Erin on 9/11
— 9/11 Revisited (@911Revisionist) June 2, 2025
Weather as a witness... or Weather as a weapon?
A fully developed hurricane can generate over 200 times the world’s electrical generating capacity. Imagine a bomb exploding every second — for days.
That’s the raw energy inside a… pic.twitter.com/ngP8FEqPtI
At 1:39, this presentation shows police cars with unusual damager, bent chassis,
Dr. Judy Wood, 2:28,
The Towers didn't burn up, nor did they slam to the ground, but turned into dust in midair. That sort of collapse, that's dust squirting up. Why did so few people see that?
3:25 I'm going to stay on Judy Wood here. Because Judy would interesting background you got a degree in civil engineering master's degree and Engineering mechanics and applied physics and a PhD in material engineering science she's not politically involved she could care less about the politics side it's not something that she talks about but her Theory from several observations she claims cannot be explained by official narrative.
#1. Lack of Significant Debris.
Wood argues that the debris pile after the collapse was much smaller than expected for buildings as large as a WTC Towers she suggests that much of the material was vaporized or justified by a d e w leaving little Rubble behind.
#2. "Toasted" Cars.
She points to reports and images of cars near the World Trade Center that were severely damaged or toasted in unusual ways, burned or melted without clear signs of typical fire or explosion damage. Wood interprets this as evidence of selective energy effects from a DEW.
#3. Absence of Expected Seismic Impact.
Wood claims the seismic data recorded during the collapse doesn't match what would be expected from a traditional building collapse. She argues that a DEW attack would produce less ground vibration than a conventional demolition.
#4. Hurricane Erin Connection.
On 9/11 hurricane Aaron was present in the Atlantic Ocean would suggest a speculative link proposing that the storms energy might have been harnessed or connected to the DEW technology used in the attack.
As for the Pentagon, none of its structure collapsed until 40 minutes POST supposed crashed. I say supposed because there is no concrete evidence that a plane or a missile ever hit the Pentagon.
