Monday, April 14, 2025

BRETT PIKE: James F. Sensenbrenner authored both the 2005 Real ID Act and the 2001 PATRIOT Act

James F. Sensenbrenner, author of the Real ID Act 2005, the same guy that authored the PATRIOT Act in 2001.  At the time, we were told it was to keep us safe from "Middle Eastern [Jewish?] terrorists.  What it really did was expand the government's ability to spy, access emails, track financial records, and, most importantly of all, expand the definition of "domestic terrorism."  After January 6th, guess who the terrorist was?  It was you.  And now the government wants to create a domestic passport with real ID, and they're saying "Don't worry.  It's just for flying."  What they don't want you to know is that Democratic lawmakers have already attempted to require real ID to be shown for the purchase of firearms.  The threat of any legislation is always is potential for expansion.  Remember you are the terrorist now.  In fact, real ID will be required to enter Federal buildings and I wonder if that means that the J6ers would have been charged with additional crimes for not having one?  In George Washington's farewell, 1796, address, he warned against a false patriotism being used against the American people.  But that message was lost in 2001. Don't get lost now.

Sunday, April 13, 2025

Prior to 1913, the American people had direct veto power against spending policies of the federal government because in order for the federal government to borrow any money it had to go to the people.

Prior to 1913, the American people had direct veto power against spending policies of the federal government because in order for the federal government to borrow any money it had to go to the people.  There was no Central Bank it could go to.  It had to sell bonds.  If you didn't want to go to war, you didn't buy the bonds.  If you didn't want this pork project that the government had in mind, you didn't buy the bonds.  It was a very simple system, a Republican system, whereby you had veto power, economic veto power.  And it worked very well until 1913.  That's how come government managed to stay small because it didn't have an unlimited credit line to go on a shopping spree for 80 years and make you pay for it.  So in 1913, there was this convenient new arrangement made.  The Federal Reserve Act created an unlimited credit line for the Federal United States government to borrow directly from the Federal Reserve Bank and obligated the American people to pay it back, completely bypassing what was our veto power, and they no longer had to come to us directly to ask permission to fund something.  They went directly to the bank. 

HEALTH RANGER, MIKE ADAMS: You are living under satanic rule, characterized by ritualistic child sacrifice that's always called "health" or "medicine" or "peace."

VALERI ANNE SMITH: Before the actual trial starts, the participants are put on the drug for 6 weeks & then EXCLUDED from the trial if they have side effects from the drug! It Is Legal To Remove People Who Are Harmed & Not Report It.

Joe Rogan Is Shocked To Learn How Drug Trials Really Work... Before the actual trial starts, the participants are put on the drug for 6 weeks & then EXCLUDED from the trial if they have side effects from the drug! It Is Legal To Remove People Who Are Harmed & Not Report It. Pre-Randomization Run In Period: Before the actual trial starts, the participants are put on the drug for 6 weeks & then EXCLUDED from the trial if they have side effects from the drug! Clinical trials are structured to minimize the harms of the drug & show ONLY the results they want, in order to get FDA approval. This skews the entire end result of the trial data to only include participants who experienced no negative side effects from the drug. The act of excluding a large group of people from clinical trials after they have taken the drug for several weeks is not only legal, but it is an accepted practice. This results in study data that grossly underestimates the actual rate of side effects associated with statins. This explains why the rate of side effects in statin trials is wildly different from the rate of side effects seen in real-world experiences by patients. In The Heart Protection Study, 36,000 participants were removed during the "pre-randomization run-in period," before the actual clinical trial began. Participants took 40mg of Simvastatin daily for 6 weeks & then were removed from participating in the actual clinical trial. Unacceptable side effects were experienced by these 36,000 individuals. It is legal to label this in the trial data as "participant non-compliance." In a clinical trial, a participant is labeled "non-compliant" when they experience adverse drug side effects that they deem too harmful to their health. Since they cannot continue taking the trial drug, they are kicked out of the actual trial, for not continuing the drug dose protocol rules. πŸ‘‡Statin Wars: Real Evidence Of HarmπŸ‘‡ bjsm.bmj.com/content/bjspor πŸ‘‡Adverse Events Reported As Non-ComplianceπŸ‘‡ pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC88 Speakers: Cardiologist

Joe Rogan Experience 

KNOW YOUR RIGHTS. USE YOUR RIGHTS. THIS IS HOW YOU DEFEND WHAT'S YOURS