Prior to 1913, the American people had direct veto power against spending policies of the federal government because in order for the federal government to borrow any money it had to go to the people. There was no Central Bank it could go to. It had to sell bonds. If you didn't want to go to war, you didn't buy the bonds. If you didn't want this pork project that the government had in mind, you didn't buy the bonds. It was a very simple system, a Republican system, whereby you had veto power, economic veto power. And it worked very well until 1913. That's how come government managed to stay small because it didn't have an unlimited credit line to go on a shopping spree for 80 years and make you pay for it. So in 1913, there was this convenient new arrangement made. The Federal Reserve Act created an unlimited credit line for the Federal United States government to borrow directly from the Federal Reserve Bank and obligated the American people to pay it back, completely bypassing what was our veto power, and they no longer had to come to us directly to ask permission to fund something. They went directly to the bank.
Joe Rogan Is Shocked To Learn How Drug Trials Really Work...
Before the actual trial starts, the participants are put on the drug for 6 weeks & then EXCLUDED from the trial if they have side effects from the drug!
Joe Rogan Is Shocked To Learn How Drug Trials Really Work...
Before the actual trial starts, the participants are put on the drug for 6 weeks & then EXCLUDED from the trial if they have side effects from the drug!
It Is Legal To Remove People Who Are Harmed & Not Report It.
Pre-Randomization Run In Period:
Before the actual trial starts, the participants are put on the drug for 6 weeks & then EXCLUDED from the trial if they have side effects from the drug!
Clinical trials are structured to minimize the harms of the drug & show ONLY the results they want, in order to get FDA approval.
This skews the entire end result of the trial data to only include participants who experienced no negative side effects from the drug.
The act of excluding a large group of people from clinical trials after they have taken the drug for several weeks is not only legal, but it is an accepted practice.
This results in study data that grossly underestimates the actual rate of side effects associated with statins.
This explains why the rate of side effects in statin trials is wildly different from the rate of side effects seen in real-world experiences by patients.
In The Heart Protection Study, 36,000 participants were removed during the "pre-randomization run-in period," before the actual clinical trial began.
Participants took 40mg of Simvastatin daily for 6 weeks & then were removed from participating in the actual clinical trial.
Unacceptable side effects were experienced by these 36,000 individuals. It is legal to label this in the trial data as "participant non-compliance."
In a clinical trial, a participant is labeled "non-compliant" when they experience adverse drug side effects that they deem too harmful to their health. Since they cannot continue taking the trial drug, they are kicked out of the actual trial, for not continuing the drug dose protocol rules.
Statin Wars: Real Evidence Of Harmhttps://bjsm.bmj.com/content/bjsports/52/14/905.full.pdf?ijkey=Rsap0XafljfcOCR&keytype=ref…Adverse Events Reported As Non-Compliancehttps://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8861267/…
Speakers:
3:00. Europe is probably the worst of all. It's mainly the French who are probably the most hostile to anything. What we were all taught in school was propaganda from the 30s. If you look at the facts, after World War I, Europe had basically blown its economy out of the water. It was the place where all the sugar production and refining and all that was taking place. The British pound was the financial center of the world. It was the reserve currency, so they just blew themselves out of the water. So to try and recover, they put on excessively high tariffs after World War I, all before 1929. Sugar production, for example, had fled Europe and went to the Caribbean. Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act, 1930, only came out in 1930, a year after the crash, right. So, no serious economist that I ever saw blamed the tariffs for the Great Depression. That was all the Democrats during the 1932 election, just a fake rhetoric, you know, blaming Smoot-Hawely because they were two Republicans, and the tariffs were really on agricultural products. So that has hung over because FDR was using that, but, you know, look, the tariffs didn't prevent the Great Depression and they didn't cause it. It's as simple as that. What Trump has done, a 10% tariff, is a legitimate tariff. When you're talking about putting 20%, or 30%, whatever, that is a political tariff. That's the force negotiation; it's not realistic. And, so all these people freaking out saying it's crazy by the press. One of our readers I thought put it very well. He said, "If Kamala had won and this happened, they would be blaming the Republican capitalist for trying to make her look bad," which is exactly what they're doing. You have Bloomberg coming out and saying "Oh, the NASDAQ is in a bear market, the S&P is soon to follow." It didn't even take out the uptrend line. I mean what is this? The fake news is going all the way into financial now? Crazy, but they have created the crash and got everybody scared to hell. Our computer had projected actually April 7th as the target for the low well in advance. And we had said, look, there's going to be a short-term correction, then it'll turn back up. It was just tim[ing], that's all, like I said before. You can raise your hand in the air, no problem, but keep it there and eventually it gets very tired and it falls back down. That's what markets do. They run out of energy. I've said before. I was in Tokyo and this one guy bribed to get into one of our institutional sessions. He apologized and said, "I just had to talk to you." I said what was so urgent? He had bought $50 million dollars the very day of the high of the Japanese stock market, but what I found interesting was it was the first time he ever entered the market, and I asked him, "Why did you do this?" And he said, for 7 years, brokers had called him, and said the Nikki goes up 5% every January. And he watched it, and they were correct. So he tried it in December, 1989. So when you have suckered in the very last possible guy to buy, you're running out of energy. That's your arm standing straight in the air and you can't keep it up anymore. Who's going to buy? Everybody's long. That's what creates the crash because anybody that's been a serious trader gets into these incidents and everybody's trying to sell. And you call the broker, "Where is the bid?" There's no bid. That's when it goes down a thousand points because everybody's scared.
