Friday, October 11, 2024

JOHN BEAUDOIN: The CDC is deleting vaccines as a cause of death from the death records. That's criminal fraud; it's actually felony murder

6:55  The CDC is deleting vaccines as a cause of death from the death records.  That's criminal fraud; it's actually felony murder because it's an inherently dangerous felony that results in murder.  It's felony murder what the CDC is doing to the citizens.  And so I found the same thing in Massachusetts, Connecticut, and Minnesota.  They're deleting vaccines as a cause of death where it expressly states that vaccines killed people on the death record certified by the medical examiner.  The truth is the way to solve that.  And if you study management techniques and organizational behavior and how to reset a corporate culture, it's the same for a country of, say, 5 million people.  In order to reset the culture, to trust government, you don't do it by lying to them or lying by omission because you don't think they can handle the full truth.  No, you do it with the truth.  Javier Milei knows that.  
Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , ,

DR ANDREW WAKEFIELD:

Even though the movie, Protocol 7, 2024, is directed by Andrew Wakefield, he can't do a complete job of showing the chain of custody in Merck's crimes.  The book, Turtles All the Way Down: Vaccine Science and Myth, Anonymous and Zoey O'Toole, 2022, might be a better treatment of Merck's vaccine sins.  


The book, according to Amazon, covers, 
Some of the fundamental vaccine safety issues covered in the book are:

1.  How is safety demonstrated before a new vaccine is licensed? What technique do vaccine manufacturers use in clinical trials to make vaccines appear safer than they actually are?

2.  What “last ditch” technique is employed when the above one cannot be, and what are its grave (and damning) ethical implications?

3.  What is the scientific foundation of the safety of vaccination, and what practical tools does this body of science provide physicians to anticipate, diagnose, and treat vaccine injury?

4.  What fundamental flaws are built into vaccine adverse events reporting systems, and how are these systems used (or misused) by health authorities to support their safety claims?

5.  What kinds of post-marketing vaccine studies are conducted, and how can they be manipulated by researchers to produce “favorable” outcomes?

6.  Why would researchers want to skew vaccine research, and how could skewed results be promulgated by the scientific community?

7.  Why would medical journals publish faulty vaccine science? What is the role of the famed “peer review” in this process?

8.  What are “the studies that will never be done” by the medical establishment and how long it has resisted doing them? (Hint: more than 100 years!

9.  What key CDC-recommended childhood vaccination guidelines were arbitrarily set, without an adequate scientific basis?
In addition, three cornerstones of vaccination lore are covered in depth:
1.  What is herd immunity, and how does it apply (or not) to the vaccines on the childhood schedule?

2.  What role did vaccines actually play in the historical decline of infectious disease?  

3.  Was the paralysis associated with polio actually caused by the poliovirus? Is there a better explanation for the great paralysis epidemics of the 20th century? What are the “19 polio mysteries”?
Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , ,

PETER ST ONGE: 1883 Pendleton Act made bureaucrats professionals who are independent of politicians . . . allegedly to fight corruption. But note that a bureaucracy that’s independent of politicians is also independent of voters

"How the US Government Turned on the People," Peter St Onge, October 11, 2024.

Pendleton Act, 1883

BUREAUCRACY AND THE CIVIL SERVICE IN THE UNITED STATES, Murray Rothbard, 1995.  Here is the Mises copy.

from St Onge, 

As with the economy, the seeds of our political crisis began a hundred years ago in the Progressive era.

The Progressives' big year for taking over the economy was 1913, with the income tax and the Federal Reserve Act.

But the political takeover was earlier — according to historian Murray Rothbard, it began precisely 30 years earlier with something called the Pendleton Act of 1883.

The Act made bureaucrats professionals who are independent of politicians. This was allegedly to fight corruption, but note that a bureaucracy that’s independent of politicians is also independent of voters.

After all, politicians are the only part of the government who answer to voters. So if bureaucrats don't answer to them, who do they answer to?

Simple: they answer to nobody. The government bureaucracy becomes a self-serving occupying army. By design.

Once installed with Pendleton, this independent bureaucracy was, of course, captured by the left — socialists. Because they both wanted the same thing: increased government control.

They began in the Progressive Era with widespread regulations that were billed as “reining in” Big Business but were, of course, written by Big Business, marketed by their paid socialist activists, then implemented by bureaucrats whose funding came from politicians on the payroll — well, the donor lists — of Big Business.

And so was born our Corporatist system — of course, there’s another word for it that begins with F and ends in -ism, but then I’m not trying to get censored.  

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , ,

DR. JASON FUNG: Pharma companies paid over $1 Billion from 2020-2022 to influence medical literature. Billion, with a B. No wonder you still think your prescriptions meds are healthy

Posted by at No comments:

BORDERS HAVE VALUE

Those who would argue otherwise don't put much value on their possessions, or their property, or their own body, or what these things might mean to somebody they love.  All the things that enrich their lives, they suddenly don't care that much about? 

Posted by at No comments:
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)