Sunday, September 1, 2024

DR. SUZANNE HUMPHRIES: describes for Dr. Joseph Mercola how the "polio disease" as people know it is not due to the poliovirus, which she says is commensal (i.e. harmless), but rather environmental toxins

"The oral polio vaccines [in India]...were causing paralysis in children...when pulse polio [vaccination went] down, paralysis in India went down...polio is [actually] a commensal virus that's existed for time immemorial." Dr. Suzanne Humphries, a physician and author of the book Dissolving Illusions, describes for Dr. Joseph Mercola (
@mercola
) how the "polio" disease as people know it is not due to the poliovirus—which she says is commensal (i.e. harmless)—but rather environmental toxins. Humphries, whose Dissolving Illusions book dismantles 225 years' worth of "vaccine" lies, notes that poliovirus was actually found in Brazilian tribes, which were living—and thriving—with a near-100% infection rate. "When researchers went down to the Brazilian rainforest and they found these tribes called the Xavante Indians and convinced them to give them some blood samples and fecal sample samples, they found that just about a hundred percent of these native people were colonized with polio, and there was no history of paralysis anywhere in the tribes," Humphries says. She adds that it was only when Westerners came in with "lifestyle habits of sugar, tobacco, [and] medicines that contained mercury, lead, [and] arsenic" that polio as a disease began to spring up. Furthermore, Humphries also notes in this clip that the oral polio "vaccine" causes paralysis. The physician notes that "oral polio vaccines [in India]...were causing paralysis in children" and "when pulse polio [vaccination went] down, paralysis in India went down." Partial transcription of clip: "There's this doctor, doctor Jacob Puliyel who lives in India, and he wrote the papers on the pulse polio rounds in India, the oral polio vaccines, how they were causing paralysis in children, and how with increased pulse polio rounds, you'd see increase in paralysis. Well, guess what? After those papers were written, pulse polio in India decreased. So what did they do? Doctor Jacob Puliyel went and did the same study again, reanalyzed everything, and found that, guess what, when pulse polio goes down, paralysis in India goes down. "You know, Enders (American physician and virologist John Enders) and the early researchers were trying to infect monkeys that, with poliovirus, and they couldn't infect them with it. They stuck it up their noses. They would inject it into their bodies. They couldn't they couldn't cause paralysis in these monkeys until they injected, matter from other paralyzed humans or animals into their brains. That's that's what it took to actually paralyze them. "So...Polio is a commensal virus that's existed for time immemorial. When researchers went down to the Brazilian rainforest they found these tribes called the Xavante Indians and convinced them to give them some blood samples and fecal samples, they found that just about 100% of these native people were colonized with polio, and there was no history of paralysis anywhere in the tribes. Nobody talked about people who couldn't breathe. They were fetchingly healthy. Same happened in the Philippines.  

"When you look at the people that were living close to the earth living healthy lives. And then in comes...the lifestyle habits of sugar, tobacco, medicines that contained mercury, lead, arsenic, you know, arm-to-arm vaccination spreading syphilis. So latent syphilis gives you poliomyelitis. Lead can give you poliomyelitis. Arsenic is probably the most interesting because not only does it clinically give you the exact scenario, poliomyelitis, but even in the spinal cord, exactly the same, and that's been proven." 

Here is the complete video:

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , ,

Pretty sure that's not fire causing those timed explosions

Posted by at No comments:

2011, the President of the Council for National Interest Foundation sounded the alarm on the influence of AIPAC over U.S Politicians and the money America was sending to Israel

Posted by at No comments:

PER BYLUND: What causes poverty? Nothing. It is the original state, the default and starting point. The real question is what causes prosperity?

Per Bylund, Prof at Oklahoma State, author of How to Think About the Economy.  

You are Twitter famous for one of the best economic tweets in history, "What causes poverty? Nothing. It is the original state, the default and starting point.  The real question is what causes prosperity?"  The biggest problem in any discussion nowadays and also in science, is that we are asking the wrong questions, and it's mostly more important to ask the right questions and to have a good answer I like to twist things over a little bit and uncover an actual issue that we're talking about we tend to assume so much, and we tend to assume that in today's society that there's plenty of wealth.  So the problem becomes just how to spread it around?  The wealth comes from somewhere.  It is the case that if you don't do anything, you're not going to have produced anything.  If you don't do anything at all, you're just going to die.  But if you just rely on nature and don't do anything with nature, you're also going to die pretty soon; you're definitely not going to be wealthy.  So we have to ask, where does this prosperity that we are living in and benefiting from, enjoying everyday, where does it come from?  That's the real question, "How come someone is poor?" because that's a lack of prosperity, a lack of wealth.  Real question is, "Why are some countries, or nations rich and wealthy universally, and some countries they haven't caught up, and how can they catch up?  These are the main questions really in economics. 

Mainstream economics tends to be more focused on the distribution of wealth it almost takes wealth as a given and it focuses a lot on who is getting that wealth income inequality which kind of suggests a more political project really than than an economics project like which voting constituencies are we trying to appeal to but in Austrian the focus is much more on production and do you you're familiar course with the Robinson cruso tight do you know when you give your courses sort of introducing students to Austrian Theory or economic theory, like how things are producing how we get prosperity in the first place?

Robinson Crusoe is a good example although most days most students don't know what Robinson Cruso is.  So you have to talk about Tom Hanks in Castaway, and then they get it which is sort of funny.  It wasn't the case 10 years ago they don't really know what it is.  But starting from the default point where you have nothing and talking about how can you accumulate wealth and by what means do you do that, I mean, that's super important cuz for the individual person, like Robinson Crusoe, alone, and also for society like where does it come from and how come we experience growth but not GDP growth but actual growth in terms of increased well-being?  And where does it come from? How can we get more of it, how can we share it, or what is it actually mean?

So what are the top policies in your mind that would increase well like if we look at today's America for example what kinds of policy changes do you think would have the biggest impact?

One is to lower the barriers to entry.  I think a lot of economists go wrong when they think about how competition is important, and they count the number of businesses doing the same thing.  Well if they're all doing the same thing, they're not going to contribute a whole lot maybe making a specific production process more effective.  But economic growth and actually producing wealth is about disrupting and creating new value not not stopping entrepreneurial ship but creating new businesses and new types of production and we have a huge problem there

Posted by at No comments:

Saturday, August 31, 2024

British invented communism and other subversive movements, then blamed them on the Jews


55:20  If you look at the period we call "The Age of Revolution," when all of a sudden people started rising up and overthrowing governments, late 18th century through the early 20th century, the Russian Revolution.  This was the age of Revolution, and this was exactly the age when the British Empire rose and basically took over the world and became the master of the entire planet.  Its only real rival was, by the time of WWI, the real rival of Great Britain, was not Germany, it was Russia, and I explain in geopolitical terms why this was in my book.  

56:00  Germany was a rival, yes, but they understood that Russia was potentially a much greater rival, and there is no question that British elites went into WWI with a very definite plan to defeat both Germany, their enemy, and Russia, who was supposedly their ally, and they accomplished both.  And the reason they dared to do this, obviously, it was a very risky thing to do, to take out your ally, Russia, in the midst of trying to defeat Germany, but they did it because they already knew that the Americans were going to  enter the war because this had already been arranged in advance with Colonel House and Sir William Wiseman and all the British intelligence people who were controlling Woodrow Wilson.  They said, "Oh, it's already been set up and arranged," so the British already knew that the instant that they took out Russia the Americans were going to come in and replace Russia with fresh troops and finish off what was left of Germany.  That's exactly what happened.  It was admittedly a very risky move; could have gone badly for the British, but they're a risk-taking people; that's why they got where they got.  They took this risk and they won.  It absolutely happened exactly as they planned it.  And the key was their control of the United States, and their absolute ability to know with 100% certainty that they could get Woodrow Wilson to declare war on Germany.  It was an intricate and fascinating set of maneuvers, but it really happened.  It was so well documented.  But the way that covered it was the British to have Winston Churchill get up in 1920 at a point when the whole world was totally disillusioned by war, by geopolitics.  So many people had died, and the catastrophe in Russia, in particular, was still going on, so many millions slaughtered.  What was it all about?  And so Churchill got up there and said "It was the Jews.  The Jews did it.  It was all their fault.  And we need to defeat these bad Jews in Russia," he said, "and we need to encourage these good Jews who are going to set up 
Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , ,
Subscribe to: Comments (Atom)