SCOTT RITTER: That if there's a nuclear war in Europe, the United States will be hit.

I'm telling you right now, the Russian Doctrine is clear: if a nuclear weapon of any size is detonated on Russian soil, Russia will respond with the totality of its nuclear capabilities.  --Scott Ritter, Former UN Weapons Inspector 

We are on the edge of the abyss. pic.twitter.com/J56IH5GWJv

— Kim Dotcom (@KimDotcom) August 30, 2024

The Kremlin has made adjustments to its nuclear doctrine.  

In the U.S., we speak of potential conflict with Russia. 

That if there's a nuclear war in Europe, the United States will be hit.  Russia will not only hurt the US, but if Russia makes the decision to strike it will be a killing strike, designed to destroy America's nuclear force before it launches to minimize America's retaliatory capacity.  This is what Russia will do.  I hope people will take a look at the maps when 150 to 300 megaton warheads, or kiloton warheads land on American cities, the spread of the radiation, how long contamination will be . . . .   Guys, it's over.  Game, set, match, humanity is gone.  The Russians aren't playing around.  They understand the seriousness of this and they are not going to sit back and allow the United States to play stupid games that put the existential survival of Russia at risk.  If you think Russia is going to let the United States put a standoff strike weapon American-made, an American F-16, and pilot it with Ukrainian and, you know, have these weapons be launched against Moscow or St Petersburg, you're insane.  Russia will know exactly where that attack came from, from the United States, and the United States will pay the price.  This is why I say we are on the edge, on the edge of the abyss, and we are closer to nuclear war than we have ever been.  Look at the Biden Administration.  How have they responded to this?  They've issued a new Nuclear Employment Guidance.  This is the war plan which will make it even easier for the United States to use nuclear weapons.  So we are front-loading any potential crisis with Russia with a nuclear employment strategy that's contingent upon limiting the conflict to Europe.  This is why we have a low-yield nuclear weapon the W76-2, so that we can send a signal to Russia.  I'm telling you right now, the Russian Doctrine is clear: if a nuclear weapon of any size is detonated on Russian soil, Russia will respond with the totality of its nuclear capabilities.  That's not me saying this, this is Vladimir Putin saying this.  That's what Lavrov is trying to remind us of: play with fire, and you will get burned.  But ladies and gentlemen, this isn't going to be the burning of the fingers.  This is going to be the burning of your entire neighborhood, of your entire city, of our entire nation.  

Thanks to Judge Andrew Napolitano.

We reached the final step on the escalation ladder. The Pentagon gave Ukraine permission to strike targets deep inside of Russia with ATACMS missiles. They can only be operated with US satellite targeting assistance.

“Washington is now a direct party to the war.” Moscow says.

— Kim Dotcom (@KimDotcom) August 30, 2024

Crawling Strengthens Your Core

Crawling will strengthen your core and improve your athletic performance.

Crawling prepares you for military exercises.

Crawling helps you get to this place.

Budokon: A Combined Practice of Yoga, Martial Arts, and Calisthenics.

So she recommends getting vitamin A from food.

BREAKING: Allstate is set to increase home insurance rates in California by an average of 34.1%, per Bloomberg

BREAKING: Allstate is set to increase home insurance rates in California by an average of 34.1%, per Bloomberg

— unusual_whales (@unusual_whales) August 29, 2024

ROGUSKI: PCR test" for COVID is, in fact, not a diagnostic tool—meaning any time it turns up a "positive" result, it's actually a false positive . . . and health authorities can fabricate "pandemics" out of nothing

"If you look at the PCR process, it's not a diagnostic, so it's always a false positive...the error rate in any testing, if you do mass testing on millions of people, you can create a pandemic anytime you want based on the error rate of the test."

James Roguski (@jamesroguski)… pic.twitter.com/AUIRJKWGa2

— Sense Receptor (@SenseReceptor) August 29, 2024

"If you look at the PCR process, it's not a diagnostic, so it's always a false positive...the error rate in any testing, if you do mass testing on millions of people, you can create a pandemic anytime you want based on the error rate of the test." James Roguski (

@jamesroguski

) reiterates during a conversation with

@ChildrensHD

's Polly Tommey how the so-called "PCR test" for COVID is, in fact, not a diagnostic tool—meaning any time it turns up a "positive" result, it's actually a false positive. Roguski notes that by using false-positive test results, specifically based off of PCR "tests," health authorities can fabricate "pandemics" out of nothing. "I've tried to explain that math in [a] video on PCR fraud, but you just have to stop and go, 'Wait a minute: a positive result could be wrong 50% of the time.' And quite frankly, it could be even more than that," Roguski says. He adds that "if you look at the PCR process, it's not a diagnostic. So it's always a false positive." "The error rate in any testing, if you do mass testing on millions of people, you can create a pandemic anytime you want based on the error rate of the test," Roguski adds. "That's how they trick people into believing that they have an asymptomatic case of whatever the heck it is they're testing for. Don't fall for the fraudulent PCR test and don't fall for any of the other tests." Partial transcription of clip: "If you remember, good old Deborah Birx, who was a member of the COVID Task Force, early on, she presented you know, Donald Trump was standing right by her side and she was presenting to the nation. She said something that I think went right past almost everybody. She said, well, if the specificity of the test is 99 percent, which means it's wrong 1 percent of the time and 1 percent of the population is actually infected if you believe the contagion myth, then a positive result is fifty-fifty. It might be a true positive. It might be a false positive. "And you just go, how does that math work out? Well, I've tried to explain that math in the video on PCR fraud, but you just have to stop and go, wait a minute. A positive result could be wrong 50 percent of the time. And quite frankly, it could be even more than that. And if you look at the PCR process, it's not a diagnostic. So it's always a false positive. And so number one, the math at some point, you go, oh my god. They're just tricking me with statistics. There's a famous picture of Bill Gates with a book in the background, you know, how to lie with statistics. Well, this is how they do it. If you had a pregnancy test and it was 99 percent accurate and you gave it to, you know, a million men. Now I know, you know, in today's world, men can get pregnant. But if any test is wrong one percent of the time, if you gave it to, you know, a hundred or a thousand or a million men, one percent of them would be told by the test that they're pregnant. Now that's a, you know, silly little answer or or analogy, but the error rates in any test and in the PCR process, it's a hundred percent. "But the error rate in any testing, if you do mass testing to millions of people, you can create a pandemic anytime you want based on the error rate of the test. Once people realize that that is how big medicine tricks you, take a cholesterol test, a high blood pressure test, a sugar test, a mammogram, a PSA, you know, prostate-specific antigen test. It's a customer acquisition tool. They go, "Oh, you have to take this high-technology test that you don't understand." And that's how they trick people into believing that they have an asymptomatic case of whatever the heck it is they're testing for. Don't fall for the fraudulent PCR test and don't fall for any of the other tests, you know, quite frankly. 

pcrfraud.com.  PCR Tests cannot identify any active variant.  Don't submit to these or any other tests.  Their margin of error is too high for them to be used ethically or reliably, and will only be used by your doctor to justify some suspicion they've already concocted to prescribe you something.