Today half of the world’s tax havens are linked to the UK and responsible for much of the estimated $8.7 trillion held offshore. It started with the overthrow of Mossadeq - Iran 1953.

Safe Havens: The UK's Second Empire

Today half of the world’s tax havens are linked to the UK and responsible for much of the estimated $8.7 trillion held offshore.

It started with the overthrow of Mossadeq - Iran 1953. https://t.co/99s8Lb66Y7 via @nybooks

— Joshua Landis (@joshua_landis) May 5, 2024

Flight 93 stopped responding to messages from air traffic controllers at 9:28am. At 9:45am, [Beamer] told GTE Operator Lisa Jefferson that “the airplane was about to be hijacked” by 3 individuals. Passenger Jeremy Glick phoned his wife @ 9:40am

Todd Beamer was the Flight 93 passenger who reportedly said to “Let's roll!” before passengers allegedly stormed the cockpit to regain control of the aircraft.

Less known is the fact that at around 9:45am, he is said to have told GTE Operator Lisa Jefferson that “the airplane… pic.twitter.com/pyeUb2xx8X

— International Center for 9/11 Justice (@ic911justice) May 6, 2024

Todd Beamer was the Flight 93 passenger who reportedly said to “Let's roll!” before passengers allegedly stormed the cockpit to regain control of the aircraft.

Less known is the fact that at around 9:45am, he is said to have told GTE Operator Lisa Jefferson that “the airplane was about to be hijacked” by three individuals who “were preparing to take control of the flight.” Jefferson said she spoke with Beamer for seven minutes “before” two of the hijackers entered the cockpit. The problem is, according to the official account, the cockpit of Flight 93 stopped responding to messages from air traffic controllers at about 9:28am. The 9/11 Commission and NTSB inferred that the cockpit was overtaken around this time, and the plane allegedly made its nearly 180° turn shortly after. Beamer is not the only Flight 93 passenger or crew member to have allegedly reported the hijacking taking place much later than the official time. Flight attendant Sandra Bradshaw is also said to have told her husband that at 9:50am hijackers had not yet entered the cockpit. Passenger Jeremy Glick, meanwhile, is said to have told his wife that hijackers entered the cockpit only after his call started at 9:40am. So why did three of the callers report that the plane was taken over much later than it was according to the 9/11 Commission and the NTSB? As with virtually every aspect of 9/11, something doesn't add up. See Davidsson, Elias, Hijacking America's Mind on 9/11: Counterfeiting Evidence, pp. 188, 258. 2013. https://ic911.org/ten-reasons/#phone-calls

Hijacking America's Mind on 9/11: Counterfeiting Evidence https://t.co/8yMrG7IvLI via @amazon

— St. Michael, the Archangel (@aveng_angel) May 6, 2024

DAVID ALLEN BURGESS: the typical smartphone actually has 3 computers in it.

The guest is David Allen Burgess, a telecom, cellphone, and cell tower expert witness.    

It’s #nationaltelephoneday! Time for an exposé! Yay!
Have you ever heard of proactive SIMs? That send messages that no one wants to talk about? Yeah, I hadn't either... pic.twitter.com/KOk6NkNPch

— Naomi Brockwell (@naomibrockwell) April 25, 2024

Every once in a while a courtroom attorney is going to request cellphone activity records from Mobile operators.  And then these random numbers show up in message history, and people get really confused and say, "I didn't make this," so talk me through this case that you mentioned.  What did you find?

01:22. In this particular case, there was a car accident, and what we get is called an "activity record."  It's produced by a mobile operator.  In this case, it was AT&T under a subpoena.  Right around the time of the car accident, like literally within seconds of the accident, the activity records from AT&T showed that the cell phone has sent a text message to a particularly strange-looking number.  in this case, the number was 11113 4000 2.  Immediately, one of the parties in the lawsuit started saying, "This is distracted driving.  The driver was playing with the phone.  This is why there was an accident."  

02:06. So you did some testing and found out that the SIM was sending messages all on its own without the knowledge of the phone owner.  

02:14. Correct.  So the typical smartphone actually has 3 computers in it.  It has the application processor, which is the part that most people think of as their cell phone.  It's usually running Android or iOS and that's the part that people interact with.  And then below that there's something called the baseband processor that manages the telecommunications functions of the phone, and it actually makes telephone calls and connects to your mobile operator for cellular data sessions.  Then below that there is the SIM which is actually a full computer system it's a little hard to believe that that little piece of plastic has as much power as you would have found in a desktop computer maybe 20 years ago.  It's got its own operating system.  It's got its own file system.  The way these are arranged is the application processor communicates with the baseband processor; the SIM communicates with the baseband processor; and the baseband processor communicates with the cellular network.  This means that there can be communication going on between the baseband processor and the SIM that's not visible to the application processor.  So iOS or Android don't know what the SIM in the baseband processor are doing with each other.  It doesn't say that protocol.  

You can think of a smartphone really from any evolutionary standpoint.  In one evolutionary branch, we had cell phones which today we would call feature phones that were kind of dumb.  And what's in a feature phone is a baseband processor and SIM and in a feature from the only real general-purpose programmable computer in the phone is the SIM.  In the early days of cell phones before smartphones when mobile operators wanted to put special applications on a phone for things like mobile banking for example these applications would be programmed into the SIM and the SIM needed to have enough power and enough access to the base band processor to actually run those types of applications like cellular account management like I said mobile banking that's a big one and just before the iPhone age it's also very simple web browser so that one branch of evolution with the feature phones the other branch of evolution was something called pdas which were the first sort of pocket computers like a handspring visor was a big entry in this market early on what happened with the iPhone sort of the beginning of the real smartphone they took the functionality of the PDA and combined it with phone from the point of view of the Telecommunications Network what a smartphone is it's just it's still just sort of basic feature phone with this really fancy user interface on it which would be the application processor so from the point of view of a typical smartphone user they say oh it's an Android or an iOS phone and they mostly see Android and iOS and that's what the interact with from the point of view of the Telecom Network that whole Android or iOS or whatever it's just a bolt on accessory that's been attached to the phone that runs a lot of dubious third-party software that should never be trusted under any conditions that's from the point of view of the Telecom Network so from the point of view of the Telecom Network the baseband processor and the Sim are the phone and everything else is just an accessory that sits on top of those.  

05:47. What you've discovered is that there are things that

Houston doctor Mary Bowden made some powerful enemies during the COVID-19 pandemic

🔥🚨 DEVELOPING - THE PERSECUTION OF DR. MARY BOWDEN

Houston doctor Mary Bowden (@MdBreathe) made some powerful enemies during the COVID-19 pandemic. Can you believe the Texas Medical Board is still wasting tax money trying to punish her? ENOUGH IS ENOUGH!

YouTube:… pic.twitter.com/myyqLzl4x9

— Dolcefino Media (@WayneDolcefino) May 1, 2024

Carnivore sues the hospital!! pic.twitter.com/bYRVVar5o2

— Dr Shawn Baker 🥩 (@SBakerMD) May 5, 2024

An interesting conversation I had last night.

I was in Palm Springs last night, I was there speaking at a medical food freedom forum.  Some interesting talks there.  Obviously, I was talking about the health benefits of meat, trying to make sure that we have access to that in the long term.

00:30. Interestingly, I was talking to two lawyers.  I spent 2 hours talking to these guys about what they're doing they are suing in the state of California they were suing a bunch of hospitals over some of the events over the last couple of years and they are using a novel legal argument called constructive fraud basically because a lot of the measures performed during an emergency situation gives hospitals immunity and they can't be prosecuted or sued for what they did they're using the concept of fraud.  Hospitals benefited financially and left out critical information so that patients were not able to give fully informed consent.  That's the nature of the lawsuit so far they said 16 to 17 judges to hear the case on those grounds which is a good precedent for that.  But, the interesting part is that I was talking with one of the lawyers and he was telling me that he had been on this carnivore diet for 15 years now he knew Owsley Stanley [an advocate of eating red meat raw] and some of the other and one of the proponents of the all-meat type of diet.  Interestingly, one of the lawyers who is using this novel approach of constructed fraud, and will likely see success in the lawsuits, is also on the carnivore diet, maybe giving him greater brain power.  He's been eating straight-up meat for 15 years now.  

Beef Carpaccio.

Steak Tartare.

Yukhoe.

Gored Gored.

Kifto. 

Sashimi.

Larb.

Crudo.

Kibbeh Nayyah.