By 2043, . . . interest expense as a percentage of GDP will be 7%. That is 144% of all current discretionary spending.

MUST WATCH:

Stan Druckenmiller destroys Janet Yellen.

“I literally think if you go back to Alexander Hamilton, it was the biggest blunder in the history of the Treasury. I have no idea why she has not been called out on this. She has no right to still be in that job.” pic.twitter.com/aHp2iz7x1A

— Stephen Geiger (@Stephen_Geiger) October 30, 2023

Janet Yellen: 2 years @ 15 basis points. 

When the debt rolls over by 2033, interest expense is going to be 4.5% of GDP if rates are where they are now.  By 2043, sounds like it's a lot of time, but it's really not, it's 20 years, and interest expense as a percentage of GDP will be 7%.  That is 144% of all current discretionary spending.  Let me repeat that: interest expense alone will be 144% at today's rate of all discretionary spending.  So the politicians that are telling you and think that they're not going to cut entitlements, it's just an outright lie.  The numbers absolutely don't work.  It's a fantasy.

 

By 1968, the immigration that defined America [from northern and western Europe] for most of its history became a relic of yesteryear

After the Hart-Celler Act went into effect in 1968, the flows changed again, and the immigration that defined America for most of its history became a relic of yesteryear: pic.twitter.com/HD64whgXnE

— Crémieux (@cremieuxrecueil) October 30, 2023

Meet Jena “Crazy Eyes” Griswold @JenaGriswold - Colorado’s deranged Communist Secretary of State, who’s trying to keep President Trump off the ballot.

Colorado's Karen?

Meet Jena “Crazy Eyes” Griswold @JenaGriswold - Colorado’s deranged Communist Secretary of State, who’s trying to keep President Trump off the ballot. She despises the U.S. Constitution and free and fair elections. She’s an absolute disgrace and an embarrassment to this country. pic.twitter.com/3yim4e4JYM

— LivePDDave 🇺🇸 (@LivePDDave1) October 30, 2023

Pink Floyd Guitar Backing Track Jam in E Minor (Remastered) | 55 bpm

More.

"In The Virus: A History of a Concept, Sally Smith Hughes also suggested that virology emerged as an independent science around the midpoint of the 20th century"

Thank you to Michael McKay @ Lew Rockwell. 

Ton van Helvoort (1996) has recalled Nobel Laureate immunologist and virologist Frank MacFarlane Burnet believed that prior to the late 1950s virology did not exist as an independent field of research.

So it does seem as though virology has had a dubious origin, kind of like a fiat origin.  I say it exists, therefore, it exists.   

Why don’t defenders of virology ever want to discuss the history and foundations of virology when they try to defend it?

Even though researchers said that they were studying “viruses” in the late 1800s, virology was not accepted as a “science” until the late 1950s.

Before the 1950s, “viruses” were merely a concept.

It wasn’t until Andre Lwoff astoundingly stated “Viruses should be considered as viruses because a virus is a virus” that this concept was *simply accepted as fact* & virology journals surfaced.

In other words, the field of virology did not exist before the 1950s.

 

Source: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1369848616300061

Now we know that Virology is a pseudoscience built on logical fallacies, corrupted experiments, and the overwhelming laziness of those so-called virologists to examine its fraudulent historical and scientific roots.

You can easily learn this for yourself by going HERE if you are a scientific researcher or medical professional.

If you are new to this topic please go HERE.