Saturday, August 5, 2023

Here is the direct link to Katherine Watt's presentation.

9:46. MAIN FINDING

*  mRNA/DNA injections and other "Emergency Use Authorized" products are biochemical compounds exempt from U.S. regulations governing drug development,  manufacturing, and distribution.

LEGAL QUESTION PRESENTED

*  Are they medical treatments authorized for economically, socially, and psychologically coerced administration under International and Federal Public Health Emergency laws?

*  Or, are they toxic weapons prohibited under International and federal Weapons of Mass Destruction laws?

 *  Answer: BOTH.  They are biochemical weapons disguised as Medical Treatments and forced on people under psychological pressure, social pressure, economic pressure, and all the other pressure points that the government has been able to bring to bear because of the public health emergency that they program underway.  

MAIN WORK PRODUCTS GENERATED

A website post of a timeline that traces the chronological development of changes to U.S. law that enabled the camouflaging of an intentional democide as a public health emergency response.  First posted on April 28, 2022.  It is updated regularly.

Next, Congressional activity intensified in the 1910s, and then 1930s and 1940s (with the administrative state); 1960s and 1970s (DoD, R&D); 2000s to present: the public health emergency program.

The McDowell triplets are conclusive proof that vaccines cause autism

Some folks find anything they read as apocryphal, that somehow they need tangible, concrete proof of the veracity of a thing, otherwise, they'll continue to play the odds of chance.  Good luck.  Here's a three for three.  What are the odds?  

"I swore an oath 11 years ago and I think most people in this room swore it at one time . . . to uphold the Constitution. It says Life right in the beginning"

Taurine can inhibit calcification in tissue (reduce heart attack risk), prevents oxidation of the retina and optic nerve, can stave off hearing loss and its neurological effects (reduce anxiety)

Friday, August 4, 2023

45 studies using Ivermectin late in the game, 41% improvement in outcomes, meaning they didn't die.

See this post with Dr. Bryan Ardis for Ivermectin resources. 

1:22. I admit I was scared to use it initially.  The way I put my mind at ease was by researching it, and I went to the FDA's website to look at the original studies where the drug became approved for human use.  And I looked at their safety data and there's something called the LD50 which is a benchmark number for a drug's toxicity.  And LD50 means, okay, what dosage of the drug will kill 50% of lab animals.  For Ivermectin, you'd have to give about 100 times what we're giving to approach the LDC what we are giving to approach the LD50. And I researched deaths, either accidental or intentional overdose of Ivermectin, and could find nothing.  No case reports.  So, the people who are dismissing Ivermectin are just being lazy.  

And the Texas Medical Board is being lazy because they're not taking you to task over the science of your claims.  They're taking you to task because you didn't tow the government controlled line during the pandemic.

They're making accusations that are not true.  They're making it sound like I just marched into the hospital and started writing orders for a patient that wasn't mine without having privileges, which is not how it happened at all.  Everything I did was part of a lawsuit that the patient's wife was bringing against the hospital, and I was the expert witness.  I was the one they granted me privileges and then I would be writing the prescriptions.  But they're making it sound like if I had gone in there and written orders without permission; that would be a bad thing but that's not what happened.