Tuesday, July 11, 2023

"it’s living that’s hard; when all you ever cared about has been butchered or raped."

Monday, July 10, 2023

"What's the movie going to do? Are people going to pressure their local aldermans to stop Colombian child sex trafficking?"

Check out Owen Benjamin's comments on the marketing of the movie versus what it is calling you to do.

Hollywood has made a ton of child abduction, pedo-fantasy, and murder-porn movies, including Taken, 2008, Man on Fire, 2004, Sleepwalkers, 1992, and others.  I was obsessed with this.  I would see convicted pedos rehired at Nickelodeon, the history of DiCaprio, Spielberg, the symbology, all that stuff.  I am known for going down the rabbit hole on this stuff.  I lost a lot of platforms exposing this stuff.  It doesn't even matter as much as people think, and I'll explain real quick.  The reality is that when the good guys kick in the door and get these exploited kids . . . .

A money grab to absolve people of their sins?  If you sit in a movie theater and you watch this movie, you feel you did something?  Do you feel that you've saved the children?  Saving the children is not easy and it requires daily, constant effort.  There is no Go-Fund-Me.  A lot of these kids as adults are institutionalized for the rest of their lives.  And suddenly all of these do-gooders stop caring when they're adults.  

You don't get the win without the game.

Liz Wolfe from Reason Magazine, the satirical version of libertarianism, is hunting Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., here:

The Food and Drug Administration is, if anything, overly cautious with vaccine testing.  Bringing a vaccine to market generally takes 10 to 15 years and costs several billion dollars."  One, the FDA rushed the mRNA vaccine to market in months, not years, and only by way of the EUA.  Two, billion of dollars over the course of 10-15 years, perhaps, but not here with the mRNA.  This gal is looney,

RFK, Jr. says that his children got 72 doses of 16 vaccines.  All she needed to do was check the list of childhood vaccines on the CDC's schedule to know that that number is way within reason.  But she thinks cliches give her presentation oomph rather than critique him with facts. 

And her point about the measles vaccine and she's right that the disease was on the decline when he was a kid so vaccine wasn't really necessary because hygiene and diets were improving she doesn't mention that she doesn't mention that because she's a pro vaccine chick.

The gal is a ditz.  

John Franklin Enders 1954 paper is considered the definitive proof for the discovery of a measles “virus.” This evidence was presented as the “isolation” of measles and served as the basis for which the vaccine was built upon. It also laid the groundwork for the use of cell culture experiments as a way to cultivate “viruses” as well as the resulting claims that the indirect evidence known as cytopathogenic effects (CPE) can act as a surrogate measure for “viruses” being present in the toxic cell culture soup. Reading the paper and Enders conclusions, however, tells a completely different story than the isolation of a “virus.” Highlights from his paper below:


Sound of Freedom: Is It Ringing in Microchipped Surveillance?

I have not seen the Jim Caviezel and Mel Gibson movie, but I have to say that I am very suspicious of it.  Apparently, as one of the strategies for retrieving a child is to have the child microchipped.  So use an issue that few do really anything about and put the rescue in terms of microchipping kids.  America really is Idiocracy.  Oh, oh, put Mel Gibson, aka, William Wallace, aka, Benjamin Martin, aka Martin Riggs, aka, Walter Black, and so forth on it and Americans buy it.  However entertaining it is, the message is that tracking kids with microchipped electronics is "safe and effective."  But because it presents some resolution on adult women's childhood trauma, why this gains wide acceptance and championed by the social justice warrior feminists, convicting them to save our children. 

I particularly did not like the promotion of the film by Mel Gibson, who by all appearances is portrayed as a beleaguered Catholic fighting against a blasphemous Jewish powerbase in Hollywood.  Jews may not be innocent but they do get blamed for an inordinate amount of problems in society. 

But for this film, Gibson is standing in a rolled-up long-sleeve white Latin Guayabera or Indian Nehru casual cotton summer shirt or Madras that you might find popular at seaside resorts with the top two buttons undone, suggesting openness and vulnerability, and a relaxed  sunbathing atmosphere, standing in front a wall ornament that could be taken for a cluster of halos, like he wants to convey the image of Christ or to put the image of Christ as an overlay, a patina of Christ on the branding of the movie and moral force behind it.  He is trying to recreate the Byzantine image of Christ. Who is his audience?  Eastern Orthodox Christians or Arab Christians I find it disingenuous and manipulative.  Don't trust politicians or county or federal health officials or actors whose mouths are moving. 

Zuckerberg censored doctors treating patients AND stopped [Hazan] from recruiting [for her] trials on Hcq and Ivm approved to be run by @US_FDA

He sounds like he could be the emperor of Idiocracy.