Monday, May 29, 2023

"because polio was over. The CDC's budget was getting decreases back in the early 80s"

MULLIS. The CDC was looking for something like that when it came along.  They were looking for it already.  They were hoping there was going to be a new plague because polio was over.  The CDC's budget was getting decreases back in the early 80s.

CURRAN. There was double-digit inflation, very high unemployment, a rapid military buildup, and a threat to decrease all domestic programs.  And this led to reductions in force of the public health service, particularly the CDC.

GALLO.  The Centers for Disease Control, the CDC, in Atlanta was under threat for reduction and even theoretically for closure. 

MULLIS. There were memos around the CDC saying "We need to find a new plague."

DUESBERG. For them to justify their expenses and their existence to make their careers, they have to find infectious diseases.

MULLIS. We have to find something that will scare the American people so they'll give us more money.

CURRAN. Once people recognized that this was likely caused by a virus, media attention went from no news coverage to the most-covered news story in history.

People went from neglecting it to fear and panic.  Maybe I can get it.

SONNABEND. All of a sudden AIDS was a very  [fungible] project.  And I suppose the psychology they worked on was "Well, in Congress, this was widespread, heterosexual Congressmen, and if they feel that they can't fuck around without being worried about AIDS, they're going to let the dollars out.  And it worked.

MULLIS. Suddenly, there was a lot of money available for anybody who wanted to study HIV, and nobody ever looked back and said "WHY do we want to study HIV?"  Bob Gallo said on television "It causes AIDS."
 
Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , ,
Posted by at No comments:

TAURINE: protective mechanism against thyroid degeneration for anyone chronically exposed to Insecticides and Lead.

Mercury amalgams.  Those are the cheapest dental fillings [and crowns] in your mouth that your dentists implanted at great cost to you.     

From IAOMT, or International Academy of Oral Medicine and Technology,

Alternatives to amalgam include composite resin, glass ionomer, porcelain, and gold, among other options.  Most consumers choose direct composite fillings because the white coloring matches the tooth better and the cost is considered moderate.

In the past, a common argument against composite fillings was that they were not as durable as amalgam. However, recent studies have debunked this claim. Researchers of a study which was published in 2016 and conducted on over 76,000 patients for over ten years found that posterior amalgam fillings had a higher annual failure rate than composites.1Two separate studies published in 2013 found that composite fillings performed as well as amalgam when comparing failure rates2and replacement filling rates.3Other research has offered similar findings: a study published in 2015 documented “good clinical performance” of composite resins over a 30-year evaluation,4a meta-analysis published in 2014 noted “good survival” of posterior resin composite restorations,5a study published in 2012 showed certain types of composite materials last as long as amalgam,6and a study published in 2011 found “good clinical performance” of composites over a 22-year period.7

Composite fillings have also been criticized because some of them contain the controversial material bisphenol-A (BPA). Dentists have a variety of opinions about the safety of BPA and other types of bisphenol, such as Bis-GMA and Bis-DMA. There has likewise been concern about glass ionomers, all of which contain fluoride.

Patients who are concerned about the ingredients in their dental materials often choose to speak with their dentists about using a material that does not contain certain ingredients. For example, a product named Admira Fusion8/Admira Fusion X-tra9released in January 2016 by the dental company VOCO is reported to be ceramic10and not to contain Bis-GMA or BPA before or after it has been cured.

Another option for dental patients concerned about which mercury-free alternative to use as a filling material is to do their own research and/or take a dental biocompatibility test. If biological testing is used, a patient’s blood sample is sent to a laboratory where the serum is evaluated for the presence of IgG and IgM antibodies to the chemical ingredients used in dental products.11 The patient is then provided with a detailed list of which name-brand dental materials are safe for their use and which ones could result in a reaction. Two examples of labs that currently offer this service are Biocomp Laboratories12and Clifford Consulting and Research.13

Also, in regards to dental allergies, Dr. Stejskal introduced the MELISA test in 1994. This is a modified version of the (Lymphocyte Transformation Test) LLT designed to test for metal sensitivity type IV delayed hypersensitivity to metals, including sensitivity to mercury.14

In addition to considering which material to use for dental fillings, it is essential that dental patients and professionals be familiar with and utilize safety measures when removing dental amalgam mercury fillings.

Posted by at No comments:

Shut Up, Loretta, uh, er, Stan

Olay, it's time to take out the muskets and get back to some target-shooting readiness. 

Posted by at No comments:

FDA allowed the Covid Vaccine mfgers to use different versions of the product on people, “different categories entirely.” That’s usually not allowed. They made an exception this time

Posted by at No comments:
Subscribe to: Comments (Atom)