Well, no one is going to enjoy reading, listening, learning about this but it absolutely explains both the behavior of the Vaxx'd and their condition. The only scientist and writer whom I've followed that has performed a relentless pursuit of what's happening on the cellular level and comparing that to other condition is the gentleman by the name of Walter M. Chestnut. No one is going to like this news. I know I didn't. But I'd rather know than not know.Bats? No wonder. "Lessons" have been learned from hibernating animals! https://t.co/o64CjkKSRd
— Walter M Chesnut (@Parsifaler) December 27, 2022
GET NUTRITION FROM FARM-DIRECT, CHEMICAL-FREE, UNPROCESSED ANIMAL PROTEIN. SUPPLEMENT WITH VITAMINS. TAKE EXTRA WHEN NECESSARY
Monday, December 26, 2022
Married Folks Make More Money . . . a Lot More
Factor by which married couples' age 25-34 net worth exceeds that of same-aged singles: 9x (Harper's Index Nov 2022
— Dr Jordan B Peterson (@jordanbpeterson) December 26, 2022
81% of men are married for the first time by age 35, which means it’s well distributed across income quintiles. That means that those people who aren’t married are probably focused on the wrong things (hedonism) while those that are work together towards worthwhile goals.
— B. Adams (@BAdams0317) December 26, 2022
37% of real estate agents in the US couldn't afford to pay their rent in November
37% of real estate agents in the US couldn't afford to pay their rent in November — another bad sign for the housing market. Here are 3 crucial takeaways for sellers right now https://t.co/59CuB6hSzB
— An Avenging Angel (@aveng_angel) December 27, 2022
KARI LAKE'S ELECTION LAWSUIT "A TRAVESTY OF JUSTICE"?
"The trial court judge in Kari Lake’s "election lawsuit predictably threw out her case on Saturday, putting on a sham trial that on the surface looked fair to the general public that doesn't know any better, but to legal minds was a travesty of justice."
— Kari Lake War Room (@KariLakeWarRoom) December 26, 2022
https://t.co/4vDnkQvuBs
How so, you ask.
For starters, the judge granted only 2 days of trial, and some claim that his judgment was already written. No deliberations on the merits of the case.
Maricopa County Superior Court Judge Peter Thompson only gave her two days for a trial and issued his ruling immediately afterwards, even though rare gearing to put the results of an election to the test. Not sohe could have taken several days, and it was one of the biggest, most important cases in the country. Legal experts believe his decision was ghostwritten, they suspect top left-wing attorneys like Marc Elias emailed him what to say.
And the burden of proof of intentional interference was high.
Instead, Thompson said Lake had to show an extremely vague, high bar in order to prevail, that an election official intentionally caused the printer changes in order to change the results of the election, and that it did affect the outcome. He explained away many of the disturbing election anomalies as accidents or mere coincidences. He ignored the vast majority of them; in a show of arrogance, his opinion was less than eight pages long.
I, too, thought this was a rare example of the election results being cross examined. Turns our it's not.
Thompson said in his opinion that it was unprecedented in history to set aside an election like that, but he was mincing words. It’s happened many times. In 2013, in Pembroke, North Carolina, a new election was ordered for town council after it came out that at least two candidates helped bring people to the town's early voting location who were ineligible to vote. In 2018, in Sharpsburg, North Carolina, a judge merely cited “an irregularity” as enough to order a new election. There, only 20-25 voters were alleged to have been disenfranchised.
LAKE VS. HOBBS
Just glad to see that the United States is that City Upon the Hill . . . ahem.
🔥 Lake vs. Hobbs pic.twitter.com/mtRwzUAYLd
— Merissa Hansen🇺🇸 (@MerissaHansen17) December 26, 2022