Earth has been warmer than today for 65% of the last 11,000 years. This scientific fact alone destroys the basis for the UN's long-running fear campaign on global warming. Cycles of warm & cold are not related to carbon dioxide levels. This hoax only exists in virtual reality. pic.twitter.com/8wRmrpNT2i
— Peter Clack (@PeterDClack) November 4, 2022
Saturday, November 5, 2022
Earth has been warmer than today for 65% of the last 11,000 years. Cycles of warm & cold are not related to carbon dioxide levels. This hoax only exists in virtual reality.
AA can depolarize light and other EMF wavelengths. This is why nature uses it to protect cells from potentially harmful EMFs and why mitochondria express high levels of AA transporters in humans
This is a photograph of ascorbic acid (AA) crystals using crossed polarizing filters. AA can depolarize light and other EMF wavelengths. This is why nature uses it to protect cells from potentially harmful EMFs and why mitochondria express high levels of AA transporters in humans pic.twitter.com/u0GeBJ7a3R
— Doris Loh (@DorissLoh) November 5, 2022
Friday, November 4, 2022
"Military voters are [exempt from registering to vote]. They are exempt from providing voter ID or any other type of ID information"
Kimberly Zapata, the deputy director of the City of Milwaukee Election Commission has just been fired for committing election fraud by obtaining fake military ballots and sending them to Assembly Elections Committee chairwoman Janel Brandtjen. pic.twitter.com/TWx9tucGwF
— Carrie ❤️ America 🇺🇸 (@FarmGirlCarrie) November 3, 2022
Five doctors are challenging a California law that threatens to punish them for deviating from the COVID-19 "scientific consensus."
Five doctors are challenging a California law that threatens to punish them for deviating from the COVID-19 "scientific consensus." https://t.co/7phFp0gZFP
— reason (@reason) November 3, 2022
This was a good point. Yeah, given how the scientific consensus changes from day to day, week to week, month to month, how can the law rely on a standard?
Leaving aside the practical challenge of defining the "scientific consensus" at any given time, that consensus is constantly evolving. The very nature of scientific inquiry means that today's majority view may ultimately be proven wrong. The history of the COVID-19 pandemic is littered with such examples.
The scientific consensus on masking and vaccination has raised intense debate.
The California Medical Association argued that A.B. 2098 was necessary because some physicians had been "calling into question public health efforts such as masking and vaccinations." Yet both of those subjects have generated vigorous, empirically informed debates among scientists.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) initially dismissed the value of general masking, then embraced it as "the most important, powerful public health tool we have." More recently, it has conceded that commonly used cloth masks do little, if anything, to stop coronavirus transmission. That view had previously been deemed "misinformation" egregious enough to justify removing it from social media platforms.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)