🎯🎯🎯 pic.twitter.com/mD1Kjgh0vw
— Kelly DNP🩺 Faith Family Freedom (@kacdnp91) November 2, 2022
Wednesday, November 2, 2022
Without medical ethics, you have no profession; you have a trade, but no profession
Furin insert is critical to make [the] spike protein infective in people, and the U.S. government own[s] the patent to it
ICYMI pic.twitter.com/N7PHX6a1Bl
— Kelly DNP🩺 Faith Family Freedom (@kacdnp91) November 2, 2022
Three things to look at:
1. HIV Glyco-protein 120, which is a part of the HIV virus.
2. We have the papers which show that Dr. Shi Zhengli-Li of the Wuhan Institute intentionally inserted that into the spike protein to make the Coronavirus infective. There's also something known as the prra insert, and so those 4 amino acids at which those 3 nucleotide bases, which are the genetic for them, for each one, that's 12. That insert is called a furin insert and no other coronavirus on the planet has that. That insert is critical to make this spike protein infective in people, and the U.S. government just happens to own the patent for. Not only is the glycoprotein a prion, so a prion is something that when it comes into your body it changes your protein so that it becomes abnormal. Classic diseases that people are aware of are Mad Cow disease and Alzheimer's disease, and those are because of prions. It turns out that not only is the glycoprotein 120 a prion but very much like a bix when you step on it you change the rest of the shape of the box. When the prra inserts and the glycoprotein 120 are inserted in the spike protein they change the shape of the spike protein compared to other coronaviruses, and it turns out that the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 is a prion. You can find the grants that paid for the research that led to this happening. One of the patents is for the express purpose of altering, changing, genetically changing the spike protein on coronaviruses. Now, I don't know how much clearer you have to get than patent, federal funding, genetically change spike proteins of coronaviruses. I'm sorry. I mean I am just dumbfounded by the fact that we don't already have these guys in prison, but we're going to get there.
ORIGIN & CHRONOLOGY OF TODAY'S CORONAVIRUS from Dr. Douglas Gabriel
In 2002, following the SARS-CoV-1 outbreak in China, Dr. Shi Zhengli-Li and colleagues at the Wuhan Institute of Virology began investigating how SARS-CoV-1 was transmitted. In particular Zhengli was interested how SARS-CoV-1 was transmitted from person to person. To do this, she developed chimeric (Gain-of-Function) coronaviruses using human immunodeficiency, virus-based pseudovirus systems (laboratory man-made viruses) with the cell lines of people, civet cats, and horseshoe bats. In March 2004, the US Health and Human Services agency announced that it was going to create the National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity to be managed by the National Institutes of Health, thus consciously violating U. S. laws prohibiting such research. In 2005, Dr. Ralph Baric published a paper declaring he could alter the genome of coronaviruses. In 2006, using chimeric (Gain-of-Function) research, Chinese scientists in Wuhan reported their ability to combine parts of four different viruses into a single viral genome. They combined parts of four viruses: hepatitis C, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV-1, AIDS), SARS-CoV-1, and SARS-CoV-2. Thus, COVID-19 was made in a laboratory as an attempt to kill human beings
FBI wants Seth Rich records sealed for 66 YEARS!
FBI wants Seth Rich records sealed for 66 YEARS! https://t.co/L3GT4nDLiz
— WND News (@worldnetdaily) November 2, 2022
No one ever tried to FOIA the Fed until after the 2008 global financial crisis
1:30 Robert and I moved forward, I guess instigated, a FOIA request, a campaign where I put up about $65,000 and then we did a Go-Fund-Me thing for the other $35,000 to come up with a FOIA request against the FED because we wanted to push back against the auditing that they're doing, but more specifically them completely ignoring the Federal Reserve Act in 2020. So the way this work is that you've got to do the FOIA request first and if they tell you to pound sand long enough, then you've got to give them a deadline, you have to go ahead and sue them. We were hoping we wouldn't have to come to the lawsuit part of it, we'd go ahead and do the request, we dot the i's, cross the t's. It's incredibly expensive to hire an accountant to do that. But we were hoping they'd say, "Okay, that's fine. Here's what you requested," but I guess that's not the path they've taken.
2:36 We started out with some basic requests, then we expanded it to a lot of detailed requests across the entire history of the Federal Reserve, so we wanted internal documentation on how they interpreted their own legal authority. [Whoa] How have they interpreted any limitations or restrictions or restraints on their legal authority. How have they interpreted their authority to the income tax and various revenue acts that have passed. The things we know that they have done some internal review on, we asked for everything that could possibly relate to that categorically. So not just to specific items in 2020 and in past years where they took actions that appear to be outside the Federal Reserve Act but also everything they have internally talked and discussed about their own power or the limits on their own power and how it correlates with the income tax, and, of course, given that the Federal Reserve came in at the same time as the income tax, 1913. And I've seen some documentation concerning other banks talking about what the Fed was talking about all the way back to 1915 in the New York Public Library. So we incorporated all of that, . . .
3:48 Hired a forensic accountant who is also a former bank auditor to say that we really want to audit the Fed, what should we ask for, so he came up with very specific requests as if he were auditing the Federal Reserve and we combined the two, submitted it, they gave us the run-around, the run-around, the run-around, and finally they said, "We have no idea what you're talking about. We don't have indexed files here. We don't even know how to search our own files here at the Federal Reserve. If you could tell us exactly which day we actually did that analysis, then we can search for it. But if you don't have the exact day and the exact time . . . ," the Fed has got away with this
4:31 This is the game they play. Explain that, Robert, because to the laymen, they may say, "Well, that's a legitimate claim, but no, no, this is just a game to draw this out as long as possible to make sure you're spending as much money and they're just hoping that you drag it on long enough to where you just forget about it or you run out of cash.
4:51 It's apparent that no one has ever asked for this before. No one ever tried to FOIA the Fed until after the 2008 global financial crisis and then some media institutions, including Bloomberg did, but they requested very specific information they already knew about in advance . . .
5:07 And they were successful. . .
Absolutely.
Remdesivir increases the risk of death by 3%, the chances of renal failure by 20%, and costs $3,000/course. Ivermectin reduces the risk of death by 50% and costs the W.H.O. two cents
It should be clear by now that when you put your trust in doctors using hospital care, those doctors are not using their best tested, studied options or practice. No. Unfortunately, they're merely following the orders from on high, even from international bodies, far removed from local knowledge, local, standard, and tested care. So when you think you are under the care of an expert, ah, your doctor is only an expert at following the orders of outside agencies.
Remdesivir is bad. Fauci was so thrilled to push it. pic.twitter.com/8WWh7AKtpH
— Broken Truth 🐭 (@BrokenTruthTV) November 1, 2022
If you look at the 4 independent studies, including the large studies by the W.H.O. it shows the opposite effect. Remdesivir increases the risk of death. Let me say that again. Remdesivir increase the risk of death by 3%. It increases your chances of renal failure by 20%. This is a toxic drug. But just to make the situation even more preposterous, the federal government will give hospitals a 20% bonus on the entire hospital bill if they prescribe Remdesivir to Medicare patients. [Oh, so the federal government is trying to kill elderly patients. Huh.] The federal government is incentivizing hospitals to prescribe a medication which is toxic. So it should be noted that Remdesivir costs about $3,000 a course. Dr. Kory spoke about Ivermectin. Ivermectin reduces the risk of death by about 50%. It costs the W.H.O. $0.02. Two cents. So as regards Dexamethazone, This is the wrong drug in the wrong dose for the wrong duration of time yet every clinician in this country will absurdly use this homeopathic dose of Dexamethazone. Why? Because the NIH tells them to do this. So what the NIH and other agencies have ignored are multiple FDA-approved drugs. These are FDA-approved drugs. These are not experimental drugs, which are cost-effective, and safe, and have unequivocally, unequivocally been shown to reduce the death of patients in the ICU and in hospital . . . .
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)