Thursday, September 1, 2022

Bill Gates & Pierre Omidyar wanted to target India's poor populations because they're considered unbanked

Up front, I cannot stand Russell Brand. Not like that matters, but I do like some of his guests, like Max Blumenthal, Founder, editor-in-chief, and reporter at The Gray Zone.  


The virus was more virulent in the beginning with Delta, which attacked the lungs, and then onto Omicron, which was much milder.  A new mechanism of control comes in: the vaccine passport.  I want to say that the vaccine was the passport: get it, and you could travel.  Don't get it, and now's you can'ts leave.  The blueprints for the vaccine passports had been laid well before the pandemic.  I mean there'd been a plan for a digital ID well before it.  The World Bank had ID 4D.  It had invested over a billion dollars into this concept of digital ID.  Bill Gates had been pushing digital ID in India and Africa.  And you want his pal, Nandan Nilekani, who runs the digital ID testing system, Aadhar.  It's been tested on a majority of Indians, and basically you register your irises, your iris scans and your fingerprint scans and [these] give you access to government services.  

And we saw what happened in India as the result of large parts of the population being forced into a system of digital ID and total panopticon style control.  In the province of Jharkhand, which is a poor rural province, in 2017 when the system started failing and backfiring, people were unable to access basic government subsidies, like rice, and they were starving and dying because their retina scans were not working because they didn't register with the locals, or there was a corrupt local authority.  People were dying across Jharkhand, and this was widely reported in Indian media.  This is the population that figures like Bill Gates, or the tech billionaire, Pierre Omidyar, wanted to target because they're considered unbanked.  In other words, they are rural populations of poor people, in Africa or India, who don't have credit.  They're not in the credit system; they're not in debt.  They're not paying with electronic payment systems, and they're not identified, and so by bringing them in to your system, you reap massive profits.  That's the target with all of this.  And so, with the rise of . . . with the impetus for everyone to get vaccinated in this call to vaccinate the world that provides the momentum to identify the world, and get the world into digital identity, and so you had the vaccine passport.  The vaccine passport is unscientific because the COVID vaccines that were produced under Emergency Use Authorization don't prevent transmission or infection.  We can see that with double-boosted Fauci getting it, double-boosted Biden getting it, double-boosted Jill Biden getting it.  So, it doesn't make sense to exclude people who are unvaccinated.  First of all, it was about control.  That's why Novak Djokovic, the best tennis player in the world, is being excluded from the U.S. Open because he's unvaccinated.  Whereas any unvaccinated Americans can walk across the U.S. border from Tijuana or enter by airplane?  It doesn't actually make sense.  First, it's about control.  It was also a way to break the social solidarity that we saw rise up during the Occupy Movement and continue through 2019 by creating another false division within the 99% between the vaccinated and unvaccinated and painting the unvaccinated in Joe Biden's words, "people who believe they have the freedom to kill you," a massive public health threat and then to demonize them as such.  And in the minds of many who supported Biden, people more to the left, the unvaccinated represent the figure of Trumpism and are right-wing, when, in fact, here in Washington D.C., 40% . . . 50% of black youth have not taken the COVID vaccine and they will be prevented from going to school this year, according to Mayor Muriel Bowser unless they do so.  Everyone 12 or older has to do that [get vaccinated].  So, it's also about coercion, intimidating people into accepting a government demand at the price of being socially excluded.  So, what does that amount to?  It amounts to social credit, a kind of social credit system that conditions obedient behavior on your cooperation in society is something that should not be allowed in any democracy, but we have allowed it to come in through the pandemic restrictions and vaccine passports and it will move to digital ID ultimately as Bill Gates mapped out in his ID 2020 organization and agenda.   

Open letter to the CEOs of Pfizer and Moderna in BMJ asking for transparency on the mRNA vaccine trials.

AB 2098 would designate conflicting opinion as unprofessional conduct, allowing the Medical Board to take action against such physician or surgeon.

AB 2098 is a bill intended to punish doctors if they contradict the COVID narrative.  Opinions are no longer valid.  What did Biden's press secretary say today that anything against the administration is an extreme position.  The bill would designate conflicting opinion as unprofessional conduct, allowing the Medical Board to take action against such physician or surgeon.

The bill, AB 2098, which passed the state Senate on Monday night, would give the Medical Board of California and the Osteopathic Medical Board of California, the agencies that license physicians, the ability to suspend or revoke doctor's state licenses for spreading COVID-19 disinformation or misinformation, which is vaguely defined as information that goes against "contemporary scientific consensus."  

Current status of the bill is that it has passed both the Assembly and the Senate and awaits the Governor's action.  Call the governor's office and leave this message: 

Sample Call Script: "I am calling to ask the Governor to VETO AB 2098 which would designate the dissemination or promotion of misinformation or disinformation related to COVID-19 by a doctor as unprofessional conduct. Doctors go through rigorous education and training and should be allowed to voice their medical and professional opinions freely. We already have a system in place for disciplining doctors that are causing harm." 

Prefer writing to speaking?  Write this email.  This is really a free speech issue.  This has to be stopped.

Here are the authors of the bill.  These democrats are just evil Bolsheviks.

Evan Low.

Cecilia M. Aguiar-Curry

Akilah Weber, M.D.

Buffy Wicks

Richard Pan

Scott D. Weiner



80% of the French earn less than $3,000/month; 50% earn less than $2,000/month. The middle class is gone.

Zelensky just rented out his luxury Italian villa to a Russian couple for $50,237/mo.