"We need to go into the Capitol. Into the Capitol!" He says it repeately. He's so emphatic about it, encouraging other people to commit a federal crime that the crowd around him decides that he must be a federal agent, and the crowd around him begins chanting, "FED! FED! FED! FED!"
The same paper
that cheered Ashley Babbit's death, the New York Times, but this same paper is weeping for Ray Epps
because people have been mean to him online? The New York Times author of the piece was Adam Goldman who's done work for the intelligence agencies. Wonderful. So the FBI and other assorted intelligence agencies are writing the narrative for the January 6th protest to keep the legal indictment against innocent people airtight, while allowing their agents, Ray Epps, to run free?
Have
prosecutors reviewed Ray Epps's text to his nephew? The New York Times
doesn't tell us. Nor does the NYT tell us whether or not Ray Epps had any
contact with any federal agencies in the period before January 6th. But don't ask more questions, says the New York Times or Ray Epps may be killed by Mexican drug cartels. Good one, Tucker. But according to the paper, there are people who have heard, "some cartel members talking about killing Mr. Epps." Right, because the drug cartels are committed Trump voters and they feel betrayed by Ray Epps, maybe there are Q-Anon people too? Hysterical. Tucker does a great job of mocking the New York Times' farcical fiction. Wow!
This is the New York Times. Wonder why no one is ever surprised by their fiction. And it's fiction that lacks style.
Tucker is right: if you spend more than a year looking into the protest and you ignore Ray Epps's role in the protest and then run cover for him by saying that he's the victim of conspiracy theories and cartel threats, why then it's more than strange. It's an indictment of your motives.
