Never forgive. Never forget. Hold
the Line. Following Nikki Minaj's statement that her cousin's friend grew
impotent following the vaccine, Slate, who pretends to do
investigative journalism, slams MInaj in a hit piece calling her claims
"vaccine misinformation." Tags can work to praise or
condemn. So instead of vetting her claims, Slate goes to treat her
dissenting claims as delusional. Slate writes,
A
classic example of vaccine misinformation and how it spreads, Minaj’s post set
off a nightlong round of ridicule. Many speculated her cousin’s friend in fact
acquired a sexually transmitted infection that derailed his wedding,
calling her conversations with friends and family
"rumors," in an effort to effectively dismiss any untoward claims
about the vaccines outright before an investigation. Why report on what
she says at all? Does one person, one celebrity have that kind of influence
over Pfizer's bottom line? Funny how the media doesn't run down other
celebrities who helped launch the fear and panic porn of 2020 around
COVID. Remember it was Tom Hanks and his dutiful wife who took their
marching orders and came out confessing that they too got COVID. Very
convenient Too convenient.
So instead of getting health records on her cousin's friend, Slate
accuses the friend of promiscuity, of being a whore, and carrying an STD,
suggesting somehow that the person should be avoided for their opinion because
he is a possible biological vector but for certain a business destroyer.
The truth is that it's not just men but women, too, who have reported swelling,
bleeding, and inflammation from their reproductive organs. Primarily
because the vaccines destroy the pineal gland of the brain, the one
controls the sex hormones and youthful appearances.
But
rumors like the one Minaj heard, particularly around men’s sexual health, have
made up a common thread of COVID vaccine conspiracies that
really do affect vaccine decision-making. And they obscure an actually alarming
fact: COVID-19 itself, not the vaccine, can “linger” in the penis and
have serious effects on men’s sexual health. I called Dr. Aaron Spitz, a
prominent urologist and the author of The Penis Book: A Doctor’s Complete Guide
to the Penis, to explain what the current science tells us
about what COVID really does to men’s bodies, the fears he’s heard from his
patients, and why viruses like this only become real to some men when it
concerns their dick. Our conversation has been condensed and edited for
clarity.
Ironically, an article that urges men to get the vaccine, simultaneously reveals how sexual impotence is acquired by COVID and its
vaccines to prevent COVID.
Coronavirus infection is already known to
damage blood vessels, and vessels that supply blood to the penis appear to be no exception.
Researchers armed with an electron
microscope found coronavirus particles in penile tissue samples taken from two
former COVID-19 patients who became impotent following their infection, which
had occurred six and eight months earlier.
Further study revealed evidence of blood
vessel damage in the penises of the COVID-19 patients, compared to two other
men with erectile dysfunction who'd never been
infected, the researchers reported May 7 in the World Journal of Men's
Health.
"We found that the virus affects the
blood vessels that supply the penis, causing erectile dysfunction," said
senior researcher Dr. Ranjith Ramasamy, director of the reproductive urology
program at the University of Miami's Miller School of Medicine. "The blood
vessels themselves malfunction and are not able to provide enough blood to
enter the penis for an erection."
Finally, someone making sense. We know that the vaccines
cause blood clots, colloquially referred to as "Clot shots." Any
impairment in circulation is going to disrupt function, maybe even cause
permanent damage.
Melatonin is uniquely suited to treat COVID-19 in men,
particularly older men, as well as treat fallout or adverse effects, like
infertility and impotence, from the vaccine. NCBI explains,
As a
matter of fact, Covid-19 may be remarkably severe in elderly males, i.e. in a
population in which plasma levels of MLT may be particularly low (Touitou et
al. 1985).