LINUXHIPPIE: Embrace the horror gentleman and know that it is your time to endure. If you aren't thinking about these events with reference to the above, you will find yourself a tool of the very thing you seek to fight.

Do not despair. "If there be not an excess of tyranny it is more expedient to tolerate for a while the milder tyranny than, by acting against the tyrant, to be involved in many perils which are more grievous than the tyranny itself" (De Regime Principum, III, ch. 10). "A tyrannical government is not just, because it is directed, not to the common good, but to the private good of the ruler… Consequently there is no sedition in disturbing a government of this kind, unless indeed the tyrant's rule be disturbed so inordinately, that his subjects suffer greater harm from the consequent disturbance than from the tyrant's government." (ST II-II, Q. 42, A. 2, ad 3) Resistance is not per se seditious, but it becomes so when the violence of the overthrow inflicts more harm on the common good than the tyranny itself. The tyrant, not the resisters, is the true seditious party: "it is the tyrant rather that is guilty of sedition, since he encourages discord and sedition among his subjects, that he may lord over them more securely." "The remedies against the evils of tyranny rather lie in the hands of public authority than in the private judgment of individuals." Where the people have the constitutional right to elect a ruler, they have the correlative right to depose him." Embrace the horror gentleman and know that it is your time to endure. If you aren't thinking about these events with reference to the above, you will find yourself a tool of the very thing you seek to fight.

— Linuxhippie (@linuxhippie) November 4, 2026

from Linuxhippie,

Do not despair. "If there be not an excess of tyranny it is more expedient to tolerate for a while the milder tyranny than, by acting against the tyrant, to be involved in many perils which are more grievous than the tyranny itself" (De Regime Principum, III, ch. 10). "A tyrannical government is not just, because it is directed, not to the common good, but to the private good of the ruler… Consequently there is no sedition in disturbing a government of this kind, unless indeed the tyrant's rule be disturbed so inordinately, that his subjects suffer greater harm from the consequent disturbance than from the tyrant's government." (ST II-II, Q. 42, A. 2, ad 3) Resistance is not per se seditious, but it becomes so when the violence of the overthrow inflicts more harm on the common good than the tyranny itself. The tyrant, not the resisters, is the true seditious party: "it is the tyrant rather that is guilty of sedition, since he encourages discord and sedition among his subjects, that he may lord over them more securely." "The remedies against the evils of tyranny rather lie in the hands of public authority than in the private judgment of individuals." Where the people have the constitutional right to elect a ruler, they have the correlative right to depose him."

Embrace the horror gentleman and know that it is your time to endure. If you aren't thinking about these events with reference to the above, you will find yourself a tool of the very thing you seek to fight.

 

CHASE HUGHES: Even if you go back to Project Mockingbird, they're just getting some talking points in a letter every once in a while. They're just saying, "Oh, you know what, don't have this guy on your show" or "Don't allow this to be spoken about on your show" or "If they talk about this, you're going to cut it out."

What's hilarious is that this was just sent to me in DM as a threat from a detractor. And FYI, just the idea of how it's done being put into the zeitgeist itself is a form of intelligence operation to stymie speech. So, when @SenatorSlotkin goes full frontal with what the plan is, the signal you should be getting is that they are afraid because there is no more time for subtlety.

— Tom Luongo (@TFL1728) October 21, 2026

Jake Neel is the host of the Jake Neel Podcast. 

I think people would be surprised that the CIA is sophisticated enough to infiltrate the influences that Gen Z and Gen Alpha watch because they're like, "O, there's no way these older guys are able to get in here and do this kind of thing with us.  You know, like we are watching TikTok.  We're watching, I don't know, Sora AI videos, Instagram reels, but if you were theoretically going to design a psychological operation, what would be the main areas you think you would have covered on social media? 

You mean like if I wanted to recruit someone like you? 

No, I suppose like do you think they're everywhere?  Do you think it's just media?  Do you think it's podcasts maybe?  Do you think it's just Tik Tokers?  Like how many, is it everywhere?

I think it's in every area where media is consumed.  And I'm not saying, let's be clear, so when I'm saying like somebody is an operative or whatever word you want to use, they're not like walking around on their off time, pulling out their secret CIA ID card and badging into the main building. That's not what happens.  Even if you go back to Project Mockingbird, they're just getting some talking points in a letter every once in a while.  They're just saying, "Oh, you know what, don't have this guy on your show" or "Don't allow this to be spoken about on your show" or "If they talk about this, you're going to cut it out."  It's simple things like that.  So very basic instructions.  And the way that somebody like a Gen Z is, ah, let's use a hypothetical person instead of a real person.  

So you're talking about how someone like me could get recruited into this? Yeah. So, it's not like designed from birth?

Oh no, no, no, not at all.  They'll typically capitalize on the people who already have talent and skill.  It's not like they're going to like . . . they don't have to worry about that because people are going to rise to the top and they don't have to worry about training them in charisma, media, on-camera presence.  They just find the people that are already doing well.  It saves him a lot of time and a lot of money.  So let's say one day someone, let's just use you as an example.  Somebody comes up and says, "Hey man, I love your podcast . . . ," yada, yada.  They're in a restaurant or bar or whatever and they say, "I have a serious question for you though.  Are you a patriot?  Would you consider yourself a patriot?"  Now I've got you locked into identity, right?  Exactly what we talked about at the beginning of our show here.  So you consider yourself a patriot, and then we'll go on a little bit and I'll get you to make a few more comments and stuff like that, and I'll get you to make a few more agreements that say that yeah I support the country and all that kind of stuff.  And then I say, "Well, I have, I have an offer for you.  But before I show you anything, I just want you to say yes or no, would you be willing to entertain the offer and look at what I have?  And it might be uncomfortable.  Would you be willing to look at it?"

Yep.  Stage One is I show you all of your browsing history, captures from your webcams on all of your phones and computers of you doing the most compromis[ing thing] you could ever possibly imagine.  Every bad thing you've ever done recorded in some way.  And I'd say, "I like your podcast.  I think you're doing a great job and I want to protect you and I want to keep all of this from the public eye.  But we also want to give you $20,000 a month."  So, A, I'm going to protect you, and B, I'm going to give you $20,000 a month from all of this.  So you have the carrot and you have the stick at the exact same briefing and you agreed to receive the briefing from me even after I told you it was going to be stressful.  So now you feel like you chose all of this.  So you walk away not feeling like I shoved this in your face.  I told you it was going to be stressful, and you agreed to it, and you agreed that you're a patriot and all the other agreements.  And now you're, if you say yes, the reason that you're doing this on your podcast is for your country because you're not going to call yourself compromised.  We have this thing called cognitive dissonance that keeps our brain from thinking "I'm a bad person."  We have a hardwired thing in our brain that says, "I did this bad thing for this good reason."  It's in our, everybody's brain.  So now when you start to go back on the podcast, you're going to go back to that sense of patriotism because that's how that person anchored that conversation at the very beginning and probably at the very end.  So now even though you're being asked to silence people, not have certain people on the show, leave something out of your podcast, you're telling yourself and this whoever's your handler is telling you this is for the greater good.  This is for the good of the country because we have these brand new initiative that are coming out.  The Saudis are doing X, Y, and Z.  Chinese are preparing operations to X, Y, and Z.  And if this thing got out, it could have caused a massive panic and a massive crisis so you did the right thing . . . and you kept the Americans safe by doing that.  And you'll tell yourself that and you'll feel good about it.  So when a person is like in this situation they will feel good about what they're doing even if it feels a little off in the back of their mind they'll still feel like I'm at the end of the day I'm doing the right thing.

What happens if I say no?

At the end of the day, if you said no then and this is all hypothetical I'm making all of this up completely.  At the end of the day, if you said no, the conversation would turn to "Well, I think you're doing a great job. I appreciate you having this discussion with me.  And I have to say that there is no way that I can prevent this stuff from reaching the public eye unless we, you decide to work with us, and all I'm asking you to do is just work with us once a week for 5 minutes.  But it's up to you."  And I'll let, that'll be a mind virus in your brain for weeks and weeks and weeks and it'll never go away.  And all I've got to do is leave you a business card with a phone number on it, and you'll call.  Eventually, you'll call.

CARNIVORE TEACHER ALPHA: Carbohydrate poisoning isn’t about one meal—it’s about chronic exposure and what it does to your metabolism over time.

Let me say something bold right out of the gate carbohydrate poisoning is real now I'm not talking about eating a blueberry and dropping dead I'm talking about chronic exposure, day after day meal after meal year after year.  And what does that do to your body over time?  Because when you flood your system with carbohydrates, especially refined ones, you're not just eating food you're triggering a hormonal Cascade that affects every system in your body.  Today I'm going to walk you through exactly what happens and all the conditions that can develop when your body is constantly overloaded with carbohydrates.

SECTION I:  What Is Carbohydrate Poisoning? 

Carbohydrate poisoning isn't a medical diagnosis it's a way of describing chronic metabolic overload every single time you eat carbs especially sugars and starches your body converts them into glucose.  That glucose raises your blood sugar and your body responds by releasing insulin.  And here's the key insulin is not just a blood sugar hormone it's a storage hormone.  It tells your body to store fat, to stop burning fat, to lock energy away, and when this happens repeatedly you start developing insulin resistance where your cells stop responding properly, and that is the beginning of the downward spiral.  

SECTION II:  The Domino Effect that follows.  

Once insulin resistance sets in, it doesn't stay isolated; it spreads, like a crack in a foundation.  Here's what starts to develop.  

#1: Metabolic Syndrome.  

This is the cluster: belly fat, high blood pressure, high triglycerides, low HDL, elevated blood sugar.  And here's the truth.  High carbohydrate intake has been associated with increased risk of metabolic syndrome and abdominal obesity.  

#2: Type II Diabetes.  

When insulin resistance progresses, blood sugar stays elevated.  Insulin levels stay chronically high, and the pancreas gets overworked.  Eventually the system breaks.  And studies show that higher carbohydrate intake is linked to greater incidents of type 2 diabetes especially when combined with obesity.

#3:  Obesity and Fat Storage Dysregulation.  

This is where the carbohydrate insulin model comes in.  High glycemic carbs spike insulin, drive fat storage, increase hunger, lower energy expenditure.  It's not just calories, it's hormones.  And this hormonal environment promotes fat accumulation and persistent hunger.

#4:  Cardiovascular Disease.

With chronic carb over load, you often see high triglycerides, low HDL, and small dense LDL particles.  These changes are linked to increased cardiovascular risk. And when I say LDL, I'm referring to the oxidized, damaged LDL.  Some research shows high carbohydrate diets can raise triglyceride and reduce HDL.  Both of these are risk markers.  

#5:  Fatty Liver Disease.  

NAFLD: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and MASLD.  Excess carbs, especially fructose, get converted into fat in the liver.  This leads to liver fat accumulation, insulin resistance, and inflammation.  High intake of refined carbohydrates has been associated with fatty liver and metabolic disease progression.

#6:  Chronic Inflammation and Oxidative Stress.  

Excess carbohydrate intake increases oxidative stress.  Reduces antioxidant capacity and triggers cellular stress Church carbohydrate overfeeding has been shown to promote metabolic and oxidative stress pathways.  

#7:  Energy crashes, cravings, and addiction cycles.  

You know this one.  Spike then crash.  Hunger then cravings.  Repeat.  This cycle drives over eating.  Dopamine dysregulatation and food addiction patterns.

SECTION III:  Why some people tolerate carbs and others don't.  

This is really important.  Not everyone breaks at the same speed.  Some people can tolerate carbohydrates longer, but many people today are metabolically damaged.  Insulin resistant carbohydrate intolerant. In fact, some researchers describe metabolic syndrome as a form of carbohydrate intolerance.

SECTION IV:  The carbohydrate, low-carb solution.  

Now, here is where everything flips.  When you remove carbohydrates, you lower insulin.  When you lower insulin, you unlock fat burning.  When you unlock fat burning, your body begins to heal.  Low carb and carnivore approaches have been shown to improve insulin sensitivity, reduce visceral fat, and for many people, hunger disappears.  Energy stabilizes and inflammation drops.  

SECTION V:  My final message.  

So when I say carbohydrate poisoning, I'm not trying to be dramatic, I'm trying to wake people up.  Because this isn't about one meal, it's about decades of exposure to sugar, refined grains, processed foods, and the slow damage that built over time.  The good news is that you can reverse it.  You can heal.  You can take control.  And it starts with one simple shift: stop flooding your body with carbohydrates your system can't handle.

DIANA WEST:

FYI. This is the history of communist and Islamic subversion that David Horowitz drove conservatives away from via what Vladimir Bukovsky called "Soviet style propaganda campaign" In 2013. #AmericanBetrayal  https://t.co/nHPOFK4KZg

— @realDianaWest (@realDianaWest) August 28, 2026

JULY 10, 2013

Host is Erick Stakelbeck.  His books.

BLAZE: FORT HOOD SHOOTER FORCED TO WEAR MILITARY UNIFORM HE SAYS REPRESENTS AN 'ENEMY OF ISLAM.'

Well the Muslim Brotherhood is already right here in our own backyards. They and their supporters have managed to infiltrate just about every level of government and they wield tremendous influence.  This has been a steady incursion aided by our own politicians and it's happened before in an almost identical manner. So just how did it happen? What's the process?  Diana West is the author of American betrayal and she joins us now to give us some insight.  Diana, welcome.

Your new book is an absolute must read it is riveting I'm losing sleep over it but I need to know the parallels you draw, Diana, where we had Soviet spies littered throughout our government halls of power and what we're seeing now with Brotherhood operatives, again in the halls of power.  In researching your book, Diana, did you find that we do not learn from the mistakes from the past, we don't learn from history?

Yes, and the reason that we don't learn from history is that we do not teach this history.  We do not know this history.  The extent of the penetration, and this is even before the Cold War, what we think of as the Cold War, the penetration began under FDR in the 1930s to a point where we had about . . . we had hundreds of American traitors working for Stalin at the highest levers of power of our government, media, and so on, and they were able to shape policy through influence.  Because Espionage is not just matters of stealing secrets.  It is influencing policy.  And the parallels today where we look at the infiltration of Muslim Brotherhood front groups, tranches of Saudi other Middle Eastern money, oil, oligarch money into our system is a huge massive influence operation and it has been stunningly successful because we have stopped talking about Jihad. We have stopped educating about Jihad, and we don't even use the word.  So this is where you see parallels to our past when we were doing the same thing with Communism.  Our government whitewashed communism during World War II just as our government in a post 9/11 era has whitewashed Islam.

An interesting point you make in the book, Diana, is that back then you were called a red baiter if you went after the Soviet agency.  Now you're called and Islamophobe.  So you had political correctness then and that really you describe in the book how it laid the groundwork for the mess we're in today, right?

Yes, exactly.  It is such a stunning parallel again because words like that are conversation enders.  They put the person who may be merely asking a question, raising a matter for further discussion, debate, thought, it puts them on the defensive.  And the way these words are used, they're used as smearing terms that end the conversation, that end all thought of the conversation.  So again these are ways to block our information to make us helpless and really to make us go forward in blindness.  So very important point, Eric.

It's amazing to me, Diana, that really the seeds for the march towards socialism we are seeing right now in this country as you lay out in the book was really kind of engineered by these Soviet agents decades ago.  Talk a bit more about how they laid the groundwork for not only political correctness but socialism and really leftist thought control.

Yes, well the leftist thought control is really our inheritance along with the socialism I mean we say we won the Cold War and yet we've got a republican majority in the Congress we can't get Republicans to defund socialized medicine and I repeat socialized medicine this is another term that we have been trained not to think of we've been trained not to think of President Obama in terms of socialist policies.  Again, we've been thought controlled not to have these very Frank natural discussions.  This is a legacy of decades of conditioning when we had this period under FDR aw where hundreds of Agents moved into positions of power they left a legacy and indeed they extended Soviet strategy right into the halls of our own power and in the book I discussed how they actually affected our strategy during World War II so that we ended up thinking that we won World War II by overthrowing a monster named Hitler.  However, we basically instated another monster, an even greater monster named Stalin, who at the end of World War II had an empire in Europe.  They basically replaced the Nazi Empire.  

And just as we have slick Islamic spokesman now in the halls of power telling our Administration "Hey, the Muslim Brotherhood are good guys.  We can deal with them.  We can work with them."  Back then, you lay out in the book how these Soviet agents of influence, and this is documented, this is not just alarmism, they were in the halls of power, Soviet agents, they were saying the same thing about Stalin, right?  "We can deal with Old Uncle Joe.  He's a good guy." 

SEC. OF STATE, MARCO RUBIO: Communism does not sound good in theory. The world that it envisions for all of us is small, flat, and gray, leveled of all exceptions, drained of all that is good and noble in the human soul.

pic.twitter.com/bempAVvBTa

— Tom Luongo (@TFL1728) July 22, 2026

pic.twitter.com/NQj2euaQdh

— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) July 17, 2026

00:05.  This is what radical leftism is.  It may wear various different slogans and ideologies across place and time.  They can call themselves anti-capitalist or anti-imperialists, Communists or anarchists or Marxists, but the fundamental character is always the same.  It's always the same.  It is a poisonous resentment cloaked in the language of equality and justice, liberation and overwhelming need to tear down what greater men have built, to wreck what is beautiful and what is right on behalf of people who are only filled with ugliness and have nothing else to offer the world.  Through violence and through terror, they once again seek to impose their ugliness on all of us.  The old dogma was wrong.  The old dogma was wrong.  None of this is driven by idealism.  It is not utopian.  In fact, it is the opposite.  One of the criticisms you sometimes hear of Communism, for example, is that it sounds good in theory but it never works in practice.  That's actually not true.  Communism does not sound good in theory.  The world that it envisions for all of us is small, flat, and gray, leveled of all exceptions, drained of all that is good and noble in the human soul.  The world it envisions is a world without courage, a world without creativity or ambition, a world without heroes or glory or great causes to strive towards; a world without miracles, without myths, without men who rise above the rest to do incredible and extraordinary things.  And the world communism envisions is a world without God.  For these architects of revolutionary violence, the towering achievement of our civilization for them, it's an unbearable humiliation, a reminder of what they cannot do and a reminder of what they cannot be. 

The host is Jillian Michaels.

MJ MURPHY: Dude. The real disgrace would be telling women their boundaries don't matter. Dignity is not hatred. Privacy is not bigotry. Safety is not discrimination, and protecting sex based spaces does not ruin lives.

Another male crying victim for being excluded from a female sex based space. pic.twitter.com/ORDF7WOw8M

— MJ Murphy (@hothingsgirlsay) June 24, 2026

TRANS KANSAS LAWMAKER SLAMS BILL BANNING BIOLOGICAL MEN FROM WOMEN'S BATHROOMS

Thank you, Mr Speaker.  On its face, this bill obviously discriminates against transgender people.

00:09.  No, it separates bathrooms by biological sex. That is how bathrooms have operated for generations.  Protecting female spaces is not discrimination. It's recognizing sex differences.

In ways that make our lives exponentially more difficult and dangerous . . . 

00:29.  Dangerous for whom?  Women are statistically at far greater risk of sexual assault than men. Sex-segregated bathrooms exist because of that reality. Not because of cruelty.

Good morning seriously it is yet another way of policing women and our bodies . . .

00:52.  Sir, women are not being policed.  Women are asking for boundaries.  Female privacy is not oppression, it's a basic civil right.

In the absence of men and masculinity being subjected to the same scrutiny. 

01:10.  No, Sir.  Men's spaces are not the issue because men are not physically vulnerable to female in the same way females are vulnerable to males.  That's not ideology.  That's biology, Sir.

There's no outrage about trans boys playing in sports.

01:31.  And that's because female athletes lose opportunities when male bodies compete in women's categories.  The performance gap matters.  That's why this debate exists.  

There's no hand ringing about husbands and Sons sharing their bathrooms with trans men.

01:54.  Correct.  Because women are the sex with higher rates of sexual victimization.  Policy follows risk.

This is about blaming women for the bad behavior of men.

02:11.  No sir.  It's about not forcing women to absorb the consequences of male behavior.  Women didn't create male violence.  We shouldn't have to surrender our spaces to accommodate it.

And we may be done with this travesty in the Statehouse but now we've just Unleashed it upon our families and our friends.

02:40.  No, sir.  What's being unleashed is clarity.  Bathrooms are separated by sex.  That standard protects everyone without requiring women to override instinct or privacy.

And our colleagues, and this is an embarrassment and a disgrace, and it is going to no doubt ruin lives.

03:03.  Dude.  The real disgrace would be telling women their boundaries don't matter.  Dignity is not hatred.  Privacy is not bigotry.  Safety is not discrimination, and protecting sex based spaces does not ruin lives.  It maintains clear, neutral standards that protect everyone's rights without forcing women to surrender theirs.  Calling this "life ruining"?  Come on, that's dramatic.  No one's life is ruined by not entering a woman's restroom.  Women's rights however are eroded when male access becomes mandatory.

Arizona trying to steal old man's property from him in broad daylight.

I thought it was only communist countries that take property that belongs to private owners.

It's for the greater good.  It's for higher education.  Don't want to sell?  Fine.  Arizona will take your property.  Your concerns about expenses, so what?  ASU will not tear it down.  It will go to some ombudsman or college president who will fill the home with his presence, artefacts, and family in some last-minute historical preservation bid that ASU and Arizona didn't see or recognize at the time of the purchase.  

Arizona State University filed to use eminent domain to steal a 124 year old Phoenix home from a senior homeowner

The man who owns it is a 89 year old senior citizen who’s owned the home for 50 years

ASU says they need the land for their downtown health campus

ASU made… pic.twitter.com/7kxEGObTKG

— Wall Street Apes (@WallStreetApes) June 10, 2026

ASU offered this guy $850,000 but he keeps denying them because he says it's just too expensive to move and it's unrealistic due to the high cost of relocation.

But there's another issue here that's being ignored and that's the significance of this home.  It's one of the last surviving pre-statehood residential buildings in Central Phoenix.  That means it's older than Arizona itself which got statehood in 1912.  So this has a huge historical significance.  It's been on the Phoenix Historic Property Register since 1990, and they want to tear it down to build a medical facility?

PAGE 7 OF TINA PETERS PARDON LETTER TO TRUMP: "In the new unit, she was attacked by other prisoners 3 times in different locations where guards had to pull inmates off of her"

Mr. President they are going to kill Tina Peters.

Please get her out now!

Use any power or leverage necessary.

This is demonic. pic.twitter.com/wlIxozpr5N

— C3 (@C_3C_3) December 9, 2025

Here's a copy of the full letter and request for Tina Peters pardon to President Trump., dated December 7, 2025.

This  9News report suggests that the reason the state is holding onto Peters is that she's got damning information on Democrat polling practices and how fraud is built into their game.  

Flynn has said Peters, 70, should be moved into federal custody because she could be a witness into an investigation of the 2020 election.

DENVER(AP) — A federal magistrate judge on Monday rejected a bid by a former Colorado county clerk to be released from prison while she appeals her state conviction for orchestrating a data breach scheme driven by false claims about voting machine fraud in the 2020 presidential race.  9News.

Peters argued that the magistrate judge should free her because she said the state judge who sentenced her to 9 years behind bars violated her First Amendment rights. Peters claimed he punished her for making allegations about election fraud, but prosecutors argued that the U.S. Supreme Court has allowed judges to consider people’s speech during sentencings if they deem it relevant.  

During Peters’ October 2024 sentencing, Judge Matthew Barrett called the defendant a “charlatan” and said she posed a danger to the community for spreading lies about voting and undermining the democratic process.

Peters was unapologetic and insisted that everything she did was geared toward trying to unroot what she believed was fraud. She claimed her actions were done for the greater good.

Her lawyers argued that Barrett was wrong to call Peters' statements “lies” and said there was no evidence her speech posed a danger.

President Donald Trump and other supporters, including retired Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn, the national security adviser during Trump’s first term, have called for Peters to be released. In August, Trump warned he would “take harsh measures” if Peters wasn’t freed, saying she was old and very sick.  

The administration sent a letter to the Colorado prison system in mid-November asking that Peters be transferred to federal custody. One her lawyers said he believed the request was made so Peters could more easily be involved in the investigation into the election.

There is no evidence of any widespread cheating in Colorado elections, which have been staunchly defended by county clerks throughout the state, most of whom are Republican. Peters was prosecuted by an elected Republican district attorney, and the three supervisors in her conservative-leaning county also supported the case and defended the integrity of the state’s elections.

The U.S. Justice Department got involved in Peters’ federal case in March, saying “reasonable concerns” had been raised about her prosecution. It also said the DOJ was reviewing whether the prosecution was “oriented more toward inflicting political pain than toward pursuing actual justice or legitimate governmental objectives,” a line from an executive order entitled “Ending the Weaponization of The Federal Government” that Trump signed shortly after his inauguration.

The state objected to the federal government inserting itself, saying the statement the department filed in the case appeared to be a “naked, political attempt” to intimidate the court or Peters’ prosecutors. It unsuccessfully asked for the court to reject it.

Peters’ lawyers pointed to three cases in which federal judges ordered people convicted of state crimes to be released from prison while they appealed, including one involving free speech. In that 1977 case, a judge freed the late Native American activist Russell Means after he was placed back behind bars because he remained active in the American Indian Movement while free on bond from state custody. The state court had largely barred him from participating in the group. The federal judge ruled that was an unconstitutional limit on his First Amendment rights of speech and association.

MARTIN ARMSTRONG: They love to call Russia and China authoritarian and communist. But look at the stats. You have a 340% greater chance of going to jail in the United States compared to China.

Without the rule of law, civilization crumbles. Courts rule in favor of the government. Rarely will you find a judge who will truly defend the Constitution, and good luck in prosecuting a judge or a prosecutor.  --Martin Armstrong

Thank you to Martin Armstrong for his post titled "Why the United States Is Doomed."

QUESTION: I believe you have said that the United States practices the law of tyrants, conspiracy, which only proves a thought crime, not that you committed a crime. Is this why you say we are doomed, because nobody will do real legal reform?

ANSWER: Our legal system adopted the tyranny of the king and replaced him with the Department of JUST US. Its combination of the Pinkerton rule, broad federal statutes like RICO, and the strategic, frequent use by prosecutors makes American conspiracy law one of the most potent and expansive in the world. 

The United States has the most anti-human rights legal system on the planet. For example, under Canon Law used in France, they cannot compel any family member to testify against you. In the United States, they can imprison your children until they testify against you. The only privilege is granted to a spouse or a priest. Then they will use a divorce to get around the spouse rule. Under the Canon law of the Catholic Church, the sanctity of the family unit comes first. Under English Common Law, precedent takes precedent. We had a revolution against the king’s tyranny, replacing him with local tyranny.

They love to call Russia and China authoritarian and communist. But look at the stats. You have a 340% greater chance of going to jail in the United States compared to China. The United States has the highest percentage of its population in prison of any country in the world, so much for liberty. Suppose you lie to a government official; that is perjury, punishable by up to 5 years. If a government official lies to you, that is legal.

Without the rule of law, civilization crumbles. Courts rule in favor of the government. Rarely will you find a judge who will truly defend the Constitution, and good luck in prosecuting a judge or a prosecutor.

DIANA WEST: the subject of American Betrayal is to study that subversion, the communization of our government, our institutions through the stealth aggression of Soviet agents, straight-up Soviet agents, assets, contacts, fellow Travelers, useful fools, who are fanned out in our government in a very meaningful way

Big Lies, Viral Tweets and American Betrayal by Diana W

Read on Substack

It's only been about a week since Putin cycled through Magadan, the edge of Russia and went to a Lend-Lease Memorial and then popped over to Alaska for his visit with Trump.  But it has been a World War II kind of week ever since for me.  I ended up being quite struck by the symbolism that was absolutely over everyone's heads, because, why wouldn't it be? We're never taught these things.  So if you haven't read American Betrayal, which is part of this week's story, you would not know, I didn't know until I researched this and put it in American Betrayal, Magadan, for example, was the transport point.  It was actually a slave built, Soviet slave built, city transit point for the Arctic Circle: gold mining camps, timber, logging camps, and so on, gulag camps, very notorious Kolyma Gulag is in this region.  And in American Betrayal, Magadan comes up in a memoir that was recorded in the 1990s by an eyewitness to seeing American troops in Magadan transiting into that harshest gulag system so that kind of hits you hard when you know that, and you don't see anyone else knowing that.  "Oh, Putin is in Magadan!" and he went to this particular Monument, "Oh, a symbol of Russian-American cooperation!" and he lays a wreath, he lays roses.  He didn't go to the Magadan Mask of Sorrow Monument, 1996, to commemorate the pain and suffering of tens of thousands of poor slaves. including Americans, who were forced into labor camps and so on.  And these would have been American POWs, perhaps I didn't mention that.  Who are discussed in the American Betrayal of soldiers going back really to World War I but really in every war we've ever fought with the Soviet Union, as well as China we've had men left behind, and this is always been denied and turned into a kind of cartoon.  The first real inkling in the public imagination came from the Rambo movies, 1982, which seemed very cartoonish to most people but this was a real story.  Indeed the big shock is the 15 to 20,000 Americans soldiers GIs who had been in German Nazi POW camps when the Soviets came through and took possession of those lands they transited into the gulag system never to return home, and something like 20,000 plus, 30,000, Nationals belonging to the British Empire at the time, British, Canadian, New Zealanders, etc.  They too were left behind so we had this massive cover-up, which is detailed in the book, Chapter 11 of American Betrayal.  But these kinds of images, this history, is encased in the word "Magadan," in the Land Lease statue, and all the rest of it.  It was presented to the American people, to anyone who is paying attention these days, as a symbol of Russian-American cooperation, and Putin puts his bouquet there and goes and does his whatever happened in Alaska with Trump.  And again it was not Russian-American cooperation, it was Soviet-American subversion and the lesson of American Betrayal, the subject of American Betrayal is to study that subversion, the communization of our government, our institutions through the stealth aggression of Soviet agents, straight-up Soviet agents, assets, contacts, fellow Travelers, useful fools, who are fanned out in our government in a very meaningful way.  There's a word I cannot stand, it's not a real word, "impactful way."  I'm only using that to make fun of it no but with an impact to bring an impact starting in a very serious way in the FDR years in the early 1930s and this is the story of the opening of that Network these networks that American Betrayal begins with as Whittaker Chambers arrives in Washington DC in 1934 around the same time in the same season as a man named William Wirt arrived to testify as to what he knew about these networks, what he knew about these secret communist plans to overthrow our government.  I mean this is what he knew, that he would be made fun of derided, turned into a laughing stock by the Democrats in Congress, by the president of the United States Franklin Delano Roosevelt, even though everything he said was true. And Whitaker Chambers would slip into the secret world of communist subversion in Washington DC as a Soviet military Intelligence officer until his defection.  And indeed the first contact the first agent that he was to meet on arriving in Washington DC in 1934 was a man named Alger Hiss who would go into the state department and be one of his most important contacts not the only one by a long shot.  This is kind of the real story of this period, not that there was a singularly one Alger Hiss and then two Rosenbergs and maybe a couple of other people that we sort of play with from time to time as if they were somehow singular in any way.  This has been the dumbing down of our dumb down already history into thinking there were just several players who spied, they stole secrets, is the other big canard of the conventional wisdom, the court historians who dominate this field and indeed were part of the cabal or were the cabal came after American Betrayal.  I was opening up the canvas they were busy shrinking it, and that's essentially our disagreement.  There were a lot of other pieces of it but that sort of is in brief but they don't want you to know the extent they'd rather that we focus on these few including the Rosenbergs who we're almost beside the point as far as believe me the Soviet Union would have had the atomic bomb, or whatever it was that they ended up having, in that time frame without the Rosenberg.  There were so many other scientists involved, there were so many other networks involved, even in America, in Britain, in Canada.  This was just a massive leak is not the word.  It was just a massive transfer of information and materiel, including through that Land Lease line, which is another reason that that kind of grips me when those who portray land lease as some kind of Russian-American cooperation to defeat Hitler.  It was an absolute ransacking of American materiel in all mass Industries, trains, gasoline, oil industry, refineries, all kinds of things, all kinds of precious metals.  The lists are in American Betrayal.  If you're interested in pursuing that and it also included the transfer against the military embargoes imposed by General Grove of the Los Alamos Atomic Project, the embargo on uranium. Uranium was barely known and there was very little of it in terms of the experimental uranium that was being processed to create these atomic piles, these experimental piles and eventually the bombs that were dropped unnecessarily, as I will argue, on Hiroshima and Nagasaki.  But there was an embargo on this material and lo and behold it was going out through the Lend Lease as detailed in American betrayal according to extremely important and very valid valuable witness George Racy Jordan who was an administrator, an expeditor of Lend-Lease materiel in Canada going over across Alaska into the Soviet Union, all this stuff.  And it's great it's actually quite thrilling story that George Racy Jordan tells with lots of details that we've confirmed and so on.  I didn't even mean to go into a big discussion of these details but these are the kinds of facts that the symbolism of Magadan to Lynn lease should be at our fingertips and are not because we have been taught lies Court history and that's where we come back to the big fight over American betrayal so this is how the week started with my own questioning actually of why it is that we still live with these long-ago figures from history, the necessity it seems on the part of the dominant media and voice, to continue denigrating and demonizing Joe McCarthy, Senator Joe McCarthy, for example, which doesn't stop.  The man has been dead for nearly 80 years and yet we continue to flog his carcass figuratively speaking although sometimes it actually feels like a strange fetish like it's not so metaphorical.  But we just had this play, this prestige play, project, starring George Clooney on Broadway, Good Night and Good Luck, where he plays way past his age plays Edward R. Murrow to go after McCarthy it was a property actually made as a 2005 movie 20 years ago.  He felt the need to do it again, and it became one of these events where all the celebrities of the left cycled through: the Obamas, Bono, and all these people come to this and it's almost like they just renew their vows to damn McCarthy to Hell in their own hellscape because, of course, he was our own Patriot who almost turned things around for this country.  But again, Oppenheimer why, why did we have to teach the young about this lie that Oppenheimer was not a communist?  Of course, he was, and I recently posted further evidence that he was probably an agent of some kind.  It's an interesting story that I posted on an eyewitness account of NKVD materiel that did designate Oppenheimer in the vast War chart of espionage as an agent.  I mean agent means something alone, agent.  Agent means agent. It's not "confidential agent," it's not "agent of War," it's not "agent of influence," it's agent, which is a conscience gatherer and funneler is Secret funneler of information and so on and other activities which are divine and peace of the KGB lexicon but we also have other evidence of his coordination with passing information and so on from other sources.  We have to continue to exonerate Oppenheimer in the popular scene.  The court historians at this point will tell you, "No, he was a communist after all."  They've given us that after decades of fighting that piece of it.  But the question becomes why are these figures so important to perpetuate in a situation where most Americans know nothing about anything and yet this has to become part of the popular understanding.  Demonize McCarthy, applaud Oppenheimer, the Rosenbergs were guilty. I mean these are the things we are supposed to take with us into the great night ahead, the Utopia ahead.  It's actually here.  So this is kind of how the week began and I was thinking about these things and I actually made a broadcast for Curtis Bowers agenda weekly which I hope will be up soon talking about some of this at some greater length and then boom all of a sudden couple of days ago up Pops a mention in the most viral clip out there these days millions of views it's a one and a half to two minute clip from a recent Tucker Carlson show with a Cornell chemistry professor, Dave Callum.  Dave Columbus someone I've appeared on a show about American betrayal before a year ago or so on the Mike Ferris show which I appeared on several times and Dave Callum has always been very complimentary of American Betrayal.  He got a lot of his friends to read it from what I can tell.  But in this viral clip the book is actually not mentioned but I am mentioned, Diana West, is the trigger for his doing what he described as he did a mini Daryl Cooper on World War II so Diana West wrote a book and then he mentioned some of the things from my book vaguely without attributing them to my book and talking about doing a "mini Daryl Cooper" on World War II, and coming to a point where you can make the argument, this chemistry professor spitballing, he says, "You can make the argument that we should have supported Hitler in World War II against the Soviets, against Stalin," and then he mentioned something apocryphal

DR. HEFFERNAN: the old free-vaccine community immunity of 95 to 99% for life is out the window.

Dr. Suzanne Humphries Unveils the Unsettling Truth About Measles Vaccine Immunity

In a powerful and detailed presentation, Dr. Suzanne Humphries pulls back the curtain on the long-term realities of measles vaccination, challenging the prevailing narrative of its unassailable… pic.twitter.com/v3g7Jh5UH3

— Camus (@newstart_2024) August 21, 2025

So before the vaccine, recorded measles cases didn't reflect how much measles was in the country.  I already talked about that.  Even the Centers for Disease Control, this is on their website today, says that 4 million annual cases of measles must have occurred in order for their blood surveys, showing that 95% plus immunity, which means that most measles in America were so mild that they never got reported.  Only 1/8 got reported.

Today we have a situation where adolescents and adults are the biggest group who get measles because their vaccine immunity is 23.2 times lower than those induced by natural infection. There's your reference for that.  

Some adolescents and adults susceptible to measles at an age where infection is more dangerous than in toddlers.

Neutralizing (NT) antibody titers induced by vaccination were 23.2 times lower than those induced by natural infection and declined significantly by age 20.

Which includes maternal immunity, so that by 1991 babies were 3 times more vulnerable than they were before the vaccines.  

The attack rate today could be even higher.  

Vaccinated mothers give babies very little immunity via placental transfer or breastfeeding.

Infants whose mothers were born in after 1963 had a measles attack rate of 33%, compared with 12% for infants of older mothers.

Dr. Papania quoted that in his paper only looked at Natural immune mothers in the post vaccine era.  And he underestimated what the protection rate would have been pre-vaccine as I just showed you on that curve, that it's very different, so he was looking pretty much in that middle section. 

1:26. Dr. Peter Orby has pointed out the same trend in Africa, where by 2003, and they were vaccinating heavily, by 2003 in Africa, he said measles was infecting young adults and would infect pregnant women with the worst forms of measles.  

We have already observed an increase in measles incidence among young adults in rural Senegal compared with the pre-vaccination era. This is potentially problematic in areas with high fertility: many young women will get measles while pregnant or they will get measles together with their own children.  These are the worst forms of measles.

And he said, what makes the situation worse is that in the early days of the vaccine's use, immunity was regularly boosted by still circulating wild measles virus, which artificially inflated the efficacy of the vaccine.  

LACK OF NATURAL BOOSTERS

In our earlier study we noted that levels of measles specific antibodies in MMR vaccinated children seem to decline faster in the 1990s suggesting that a lack of natural boosters May modify the protection induced by the vaccine.

By stopping the virus circulating, the presumed protection of the vaccine is no longer as high as they once thought it was.  So in other words, in the beginning when there was still circulating virus and they were vaccinating, it looked like things were going pretty well, because at that point you had all those people in society who were naturally immune for life and you had vaccinated people who were freshly vaccinated and you had them getting boosted by natural viruses circulating. And then that's changed, of course, now we're having those people who are naturally immune are dying off and we have the stoppage of the amount of circulation that we used to have and we have vaccines wearing off as well.  This fact has been . . . analyzed several times by medical researchers who predict that because of shaky vaccine immunity, our future might be somewhat spotty.  

D. L. Levy, "The Future of Measles in Highly Immunized Populations: A Modeling Approach," American Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 120, No. 1, July 1984, pp. 39-48.

J.M. Heffernan and M.J. Keeling, "Implication of Vaccination and Waning Immunity," Proceedings of the Royal Society B, vol 276, 2009.

The analyses of these authors predicted that in 20 to 30 years' time, herd immunity will be so fragile that should measles come through again we'll be worse off than we would have been had they not introduced the vaccine.  Levy, 1984, PMID, said that by 2050 the number of susceptibles will be higher than pre-vaccine times.  He discussed his predictions based on a one-dose vaccine model which was the model at the time that he wrote the paper.  And this is just kind of a the details of how he worked out his figures.  

*  10.6% of population susceptible to measles in Pre vaccine era.

*   All adults immune.

*   Some children not immune.

*   Everyone gained natural, lifelong protection.

By 1982, this susceptibles begin to climb by 0.1% per year as immune die off and vaccines wear off.

Between 220,000 and 300,000, new susceptibles each year to reach pre-vaccine level of 10.6 by 2045 and 10.9 by 2050.  

WHAT ABOUT TODAY'S 2-DOSE MODEL? 

Well, Dr. Heffernan did an analysis, and he didn't really think all that much of that.  He said that 

. . . the dynamic consequences of the interaction between vaccination, waning immunity, and boosting are far more striking.  For high levels of vaccination (greater than 80%) and moderate levels of waning immunity (greater than 30 years), large-scale epidemic cycles can be induced.  

And that's pretty much us.  And his prediction was that, 

We predict that, after a long disease-free period, the introduction of infection will lead to far larger epidemics than that predicted by standard models . . . large-scale epidemics can arise with the first substantial epidemic not arising until 52 years after the vaccination programs began.

Considering that vaccination only really got underway with an effective vaccine in 1980, as this writer described, counting 52 years from there, the year 2032 is a good estimated guess of what more surges of measles cases will become obvious at least in America. 

Some of the first vaccines mass produced in 1963 contained a killed virus.  In 1989, Dr. Feigin of Texas Children's Hospital stated that he believed in 1963 vaccine was "not widely effective" and that the 1967 vaccine was unstable and lost its "effectiveness" if not properly refrigerated.  It was not until 1980 that a stable live measles vaccine became available.

Another medical article put it this way,

that 20 years after two doses of vaccine had been given, 33 to 44% of those recipients would become susceptible to measles again, the old free-vaccine community immunity of 95 to 99% for life is out the window.  

What we see here is the main analysis and these are what are called "confidence intervals," meaning kind of the range of where we could end up.  So what we have over here potentially susceptible people okay and this is based on blood testing on antibody testing actually and this is how many years after people were vaccinated so you can see over here if we go to 20 years out just go to the middle we're looking at 30 approximately 33% of the people being susceptible and when we look at the middle line but if we look at the other line we're up to about 44% and you can see that over time certain percentage of the population after 15 years you're still having about 12 or 13% of people that were vaccinated with two doses not having immunity.  

33% to 44% susceptible after 20 years with a two-dose regimen.  12% susceptible after 15 years. 

MMR VACCINES FOR LIFE?

We know that, and the experts know this.  For this reason, their answer will be more of the same which is to give extra vaccines earlier to babies again to pre-pregnant women, more to us adults who were vaccinated as children, and to make vaccines mandatory by law for everyone from cradle to grave.  They're also researching newer vaccines that may be can be inhaled and given earlier

DIANA WEST:

Why people don't know that when they see "CCCP" on a Russian minister's sweater, they should see 100 million killed is b/c of our corrupt/communist academics and corrupt/communist political leaders, as explained here 👇 (in an essay about my efforts to understand the… https://t.co/ykPWeSbAKM

— @realDianaWest (@realDianaWest) August 15, 2025

Why people don't know that when they see "CCCP" on a Russian minister's sweater, they should see 100 million killed is b/c of our corrupt/communist academics and corrupt/communist political leaders, as explained here (in an essay about my efforts to understand the corruption/communism) by the bravest man in the world, now deceased.

"It is in the nature of a totalitarian regime to try and corrupt not only its own society, but anybody within its reach. This is how they conquer the world. Communism has corrupted greater men than a few arrogant academics. Indeed, the academics turned out to be one of the easier targets. As “Sovietologists” and “Kremlinologists,” their position depended on their ability to travel to Moscow, and therefore, on KGB’s good will. Having now mutated into “Cold War historians,” they are dependent on having such limited access to secret archives as Moscow would choose to grant them. As academics, they are committed to their own theories, true or false. As a ‘community’, they are bound together with their corrupt colleagues, and have to defend their collective monopoly against intruders. It is for a very long time that they have been no more than a self-serving nomenklatura, caring nothing about the truth, but only about their own elevated positions. Like politicians. Like the media. Like the rest of the modern world. American Betrayal is a book about the origins of that corruption. No wonder it has been so popular with thousands of readers who are sick to death of today’s world with all its hypocrisy and lies, and long for an explanation of our moral crisis. Mrs. West sought an answer and found it. As a civilization, we have gone through a major moral disaster. We have been accomplices to mass murders. Moreover, we then tried to cover them up and to live on as if nothing happened. Without a reckoning, without so much as facing the truth about our history, we shall never recover.

"Why Academics Hate Diana West," Vladimir Bukovsky and Pavel Stroilov, Breitbart, September 28, 2013.

And this ought to make history immediate for you.

"The NKVD Labeled J. Robert Oppenheimer a Soviet "Agent." Now What?" Diana West, August 15, 2025.

ROBERT WRIGHT: We've been told that a cancer patient is worth about $1.2 million dollars to allopathic medicine now before they pass

Those are some of the first things, because you need to stop doing things. And people largely don't get that. They say, "Doc, give me a pill." That's why we flock to chemo. It's easy. Doc'll let me eat whatever I want. And I say, "Well, of course, he will," as they're eating their ice cream cone and drinking their soda pop, [while] they're being injected with chemotherapy.  --Robert Wright

Robert Wright is the speaker, founder of the American Anti-Cancer Institute and author of Killing Cancer--Not People, (4th Edition), Robert Wright, 2020.

That this person should do some of the first things are things you should actually stop doing because you need to because you need to stop that cancer in your tracks it is to a degree it is to a degree but if that tumor never grew anymore never grew anymore, if it stayed the way it was, he said, "Well, I feel pretty much okay, Doc. I'm not in a lot of pain."  If it never grew anymore, if it never changed, you could live with it.  That's where people get scared, and, and they and they their doctor says, "We got to get that out of there." Well, you don't really.  You need to stop it from growing is what you need to do.  

. . . And not only do you got to get it out, but you got to do it now, and that's, that's what scares people.

Yes.  Yeah, and I think it's been growing for 5 10 15 20 years why do I have to get it out now and the fact is that in almost all cases unless it's life-threatening, pressing against the blood vessel, blocking the blood vessel, blocking an airway or something.  In almost all instances, you simply do not have to get it out now.  People who do nothing live as long or longer than those who go through the big three.  It's proven in studies.  But I would stop a lot of activities because most people like I said are acidified you got to stop cooking your food to death because there's nothing in cooked food that really does you much good at all if you are cooking any food you need to stop eating the things that are acidic so you need to stop eating out.  You need to start producing your own food, eating organic food whenever possible, drinking the right fluids and water.  You need to juice.  And you need to start seeking out supplements that will help you reverse this cancerous and will help feed your body. If you're diagnosed with a stage 3 or stage 4, you cannot eat 5 lb of cabbage, 5 lb of broccoli, 5 lb of spinach, 5 lb of brussel sprouts a day, and 5 lb of carrots.  You just simply cannot do that.  But, in fact, you probably need the nutrition from that much organic produce and revert that cancer.  So you need to go so you need to go to the supplements along with, in some cases, the ionized water has reverted so many cancers.  So you need to start doing the things that will give nutrition to the body but no sugar.  You got to stop sugar cancer grows and thrives in an acidic but a sugary environment too. Sugar feeds cancer in anaerobic sans oxygen type of situation it ferments sugar to get its energy to perform the angiogenesis so it can go and get more food and more sugar and feed itself.  There's a lot going on in angiogenesis today and of course a lot of drugs are being made now that are supposed to stop that.  They don't work, folks.  They don't work the best chemotherapy you can take is the food you eat.  Here's a good instance, graviola, which was discovered in the Amazon rainforest a lot of years ago, or the American Cancer Society to kill cancer cells was proven to be 10,000 times more effective than Adriamycin, which is a chemotherapy drug.  There's no side effects.  And paw paw is more effective than graviola.  Why wouldn't you take these instead of chemotherapy, which has severe effects?  We have a tendency to call them "side effects," but they're not really "side effects."  They are the effects of the drugs, and all drugs have almost no redeeming qualities or effects.  Period.  They're synthetic.  Your body doesn't like synthetic things.  It likes it likes natural things.  So the best chemo you can take is the food that you eat.  So it's the food.  It's the right supplements.  In an average shower, the equivalent of eight glasses of chlorinated water into your system into your system.  Stop drinking tap water.  The fluoride inhibits 100 enzyme actions within your body.  You actually need those to stay healthy.  

SALT

I would get a full spectrum salt.  People now are flocking to sea salt.  They say, "Oh, I eat sea salt now." Folks, all salt is sea salt.  They don't know this and so they are being buffaloed, "Get some sea salt."  And all the manufacturers are renaming their salt, "Sea salt," and they're right, it's all sea salt.  You need a full spectrum salt.  You need one that has color, that has 84 additional minerals that it was born with, that has the consistency, the mineral consistency of your blood and is actually good for you. Not sodium chloride.  Not the white salt that is bleached and blanched, and everything good in it is taken away.  So you need to stop that because, while doctors are right, that that kind of salt will raise your blood pressure pressure is not good for you and is not good for you they're right but the right kind of salt is actually good for you and you almost can't get too much of it.

What is a full spectrum salt? 

Full spectrum salts, which contain a wide range of minerals, include Himalayan pink salt, Celtic sea salt, and Baja Gold mineral sea salt. These salts are less processed and retain their natural mineral content, making them a healthier choice compared to refined table salt.

DuckDuckGo explains that, 

Himalayan crystal salt is a well-known example of full-spectrum salt, containing all 84 trace elements found in the human body. It is unrefined and hand-mined, making it a pure source of essential minerals.

PEPPER

Stop pepper.  Very acidic.  I love it but it's one of the most acidic things on earth. I'm not talking about peppers.  I'm talking about black pepper.  

And so I covered it in my book, the whole gamut of what to do and what not to do.  Those are some of the first things, because you need to stop doing things.  And people largely don't get that.  They say, "Doc, give me a pill." That's why we flock to chemo.  It's easy.  Doc'll let me eat whatever I want.  And I say, "Well, of course, he will," as they're eating their ice cream cone and drinking their soda pop, [while] they're being injected with chemotherapy.  It's just a sad state of affairs what has happened in America today.

WE LIVE UNDER SICK CARE, NOT HEALTHCARE

America today we have no Health Care contrary to popular belief, or very little. We have sick care.  And the sick care isn't really any good either.  And I know the doctors have very little nutritionist, one term or less in medical school.  And then if they had any at all, they're encouraged to jettison it too before they go into prescribing drugs and becoming a member of the American Medical Association.

LISTEN TO THIS.

00:00. We've been told that a cancer patient is worth about $1.2 million dollars to allopathic medicine now before they pass.  And sadly during thay period of time there's no quality of life for most of them.  We know the real statistics and that's that 97% of all cancer patients who undergo chemotherapy are dead within 5 years.  The American public doesn't know those facts.  I interviewed the people that did that study, so I know that it's true.  But we are about education, we are about forwarding treatments and therapies and protocols that really work for people, and have worked for not even decades, for centuries and eons, the things that really work, the things that God gave us to treat the human immune system.  God gave us that immune system, so if we get a cold we don't die.  We get the flu we don't die.  People don't understand that it's also true about cancer and heart disease and diabetes and autoimmune diseases, neurodegenerative diseases. We should not die of these but we don't know what to do.  So it is in the final analysis truly all about education.

1:12.  Those genetic effects defects that a few of us have maybe up to 5%, they still have to, as you say, be activated.  Angelina Jolie they told her that she had an 80% greater possibility of getting breast cancer.  That was wrong to begin with because they based it on a bell curve and put her right at the top.  And so it was false to begin with, and she believed a lie, and it cost her sadly.  So if we can say that