Friday, May 24, 2024

LATYPOVA: This means that, for practical purposes, there is no private biopharmaceutical manufacturing industry in the U.S. It is all controlled by the government and specifically, by the DOD

 A very good read, I was extensively quoted in this article: childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/bill-

Latypova told The Defender that “mRNA is entirely funded and pushed on the market under military contracts and funding. It is represented as ‘defensive’ activity [to] skirt the Bioweapons Convention, [1975] which prohibits making offensive bioweapons.” According to Latypova, “The Pentagon came up with the cover story of ‘pandemic preparedness’ [to] fund on a large scale the making of biological poisons and related systems, including making them at scale.” As a result of this research, Gates has invested in companies actively pursuing mRNA technology — and continues to invest in those companies today. "“In 2020-2021, DOD spent $50 billion funding COVID products alone. This represents approximately 50% of the entire U.S. pharmaceutical industry spending on R&D per year. This means that, for practical purposes, there is no private biopharmaceutical manufacturing industry in the U.S. It is all controlled by the government and specifically, by the DOD,” Latypova said. Latypova told The Defender that, “mRNA technology can get around the Bioweapons Convention restrictions because it is a synthetic chemical drug, not a live pathogen.” Live pathogens are banned under the convention. Latypova also highlighted the role of Col. Matt Hepburn of DARPA, who she said helped mastermind the COVID-19 “pandemic preparedness and response” and DOD linkages with Big Pharma years before the pandemic."

LATYPOVA: and those people get promoted through Academia and Military and everywhere and those people are just as programmable actually better programmable because they're they're coin operated.

People think it's some sort of a new thing that they now can make gain-of-function (GoF) viruses.  And I assure everyone that, first of all, nobody can make viruses in the labs or anything alive, really.  And secondly, they don't make gain-of-function viruses.  So this is an area that on purpose has a lot of mythology around it.  But it goes back decades if not centuries.  So so-called biowarfare or using biological agents, and primarily using bacterial toxins.  So bacteria are real.  They are live organisms. They are large.  They're single-celled animals, and as part of their life cycle they excrete toxins.  Most bacteria are benign in fact actually beneficial we have a lot of bacteria living inside us as our gut biome those are very beneficial bacteria now there are some in nature that can excrete toxins especially if there are a lot of them and they tend to be associated with things like sewage from humans and animals getting into the water and those bacteria like E coli and other types can create secretions that are toxic and can be transmitted through water and that was noticed a long time ago thousands of years ago so there is historic there are historical accounts of people knowing this and preventing this through Water Sanitation centuries ago because of this 

1:45. This idea of buy a Warfare of the scientists and Labs able to create these viruses and release them out onto the population and get everyone sick and kill you know like large swaths of of the population is largely a myth.

2:00. It's largely a myth.

2:01. They have not been able to achieve that.  Now however in treating or creating the antidote to the biological warfare when they talk about vaccines that are being injected into your body, they are penetrating your skin,  the body's first offense, and then being distributed by lipid nanoparticles to all areas of the body, crossing over the blood-brain barrier, that, on the other hand, can be very harmful.  

2:28. Exactly.

2:30. So they love this Boogeyman of the released virus so that they can deploy what is actually the bioweapon device.

2:40.  A bit of reality that, yes, there is this danger with bacterial toxins in the water, especially, and once all those problems were solved with water sanitation, then this whole mythology about viruses started being created.  It was originally created in the 1800s but then started getting more propagandized.  I remember through my own sort of professional life in this healthcare that viruses used to be like nothing.  They were considered basically when doctors didn't know what to tell you.  They would tell you, "Oh, it's a virus," so this was like a . . . and then this whole mythology of all viruses, viruses everywhere.  And then viruses infect Hollywood and propaganda, all kinds of entertainment propaganda getting programmed to everyone's brain that viruses can be weaponized.  And this is the preferred narrative of the government and [the Defense Dept] who make up narratives like, "Oh there's going to be a lone wolf, some crazy PhD in a lab, and they will create this enormous danger by releasing gain-of-function viruses. . . ."  And remember that those Anthrax letters, which were clearly the handiwork of the Department of Defense, even the strain came from Fort Detrick, it was all pinned on Bruce Ivins this whole thing was created.  

It's Bruce Ivins because he's crazy.  He just did it.  He was a lone wolf.  No reason whatsoever.  He had access.

But 400 other people had access. 

. . . but it's him. 

And so they pinned it on him and suicided him and end of the story, right? They did this from the anthrax letters and then they made through several iterations the Zika and a few other pandemic scares: the avian flu, that's another false one; it's a fake narrative.  The Swine Flu, the Avian Flu.  The Avian Flu is a false narrative.   Swine flu is a false narrative.  So they practiced these over and over and over, and they figured out that this was a story that would scare the largest number of people.  Everyone had been pre-programmed, including their own internal experts.  So it's not like everyone is in on this deal.  They have a whole bunch of people who will do anything for money.  They cannot think.  Will not think.  And have been promoted through the system because of these personality traits these people specifically look for people who are very ambitious, not very smart, and will do anything for money.  And those people get promoted through Academia and Military and everywhere and those people are just as programmable, actually better programmable, because they are coin operated.

5:33. So there is a vetting process for leadership in the United States of America: have to have a huge ego, do anything for money, and be quite dull.  

5:43. You notice them everywhere.  They're all over the place.

5:50.  They can spot an intelligent person miles and way away and like, no, you are not getting in the Inner Circle.  There's no way.

6:00.  So because of these features in the leadership people are saying well no so many people cannot be in on the scam they don't have to be so everyone is given the narrative The narrative over time and now we're into the military programming this and planning this out . . .  

Here's the full video. 

Thursday, May 23, 2024

 
106:18. If they introduce CBDC and relied strictly on cash and they subjected us to some control by a Draconian system of control, where you're allowed so much red meat per week or gas per month, you know, they conditioned all of our transactions with whatever rules they invent, people would 100% opt out and go transact in the black market.  And then you can simply just leave your smart device at home and go about your business without it, and they wouldn't have any idea where you are, what you're doing or if you're using some alternative local, regional currency.  They would have no way to track what you buy, so they lose control, in fact, by trying to get complete control.  The only way that they could have complete control is if we accepted the chips under our skin, because then there's no getting away from it.  That was their idea.  They have a 5G Network everywhere, so everywhere you go it registers.  So they know where every person is, and if you buy or sell something they instantly know it in the real time, and they have rules that allow you to buy certain things but you can't buy other things.  

107:55. That's their fantasy of control.  It will never happen.  It will never happen because people will not comply.  And another reason it will never happen is because implement that they already launch their first attempt in Nigeria and it failed miserably in 2021.

LAYNE KILPATRICK: Chick-Fil-A bringing back antibiotics into their chicken

from Layne Kilpatrick, the Hormones Specialist.

 
Why is Chick-fil-A moving to chicken-raised with no antibiotics important to human medicine (NAIHM)?

To maintain supply of the high quality chicken you expect from us Chick-fil-A restaurants in the US and Puerto Rico will shift from chicken raised with no antibiotics ever to chicken raised with no antibiotics important to human medicine ((NAIHM) starting in the spring of 2024.  Canadian restaurants will transition from chicken raised without antibiotics the chicken raised with no antibiotic important to human medicine starting in the spring of 2024.  www.chick-fil-a.com/our-chicken-commitment. 

Chick-fil-A is reintroducing antibiotics back into their chicken when I heard that I was a little alarmed so I did some research maybe I can help you understand what's happening in the chicken industry.  Chick-fil-A made a pledge in 2014 to serve only chicken that had never been exposed to antibiotics as did Tyson Foods, one of their suppliers.  You see in the poultry industry has been using antibiotics routinely in chicken feed to prevent disease in crowded conditions with poor sanitation.  And, if we're honest, because they learned that antibiotics make them gain weight.  But daily antibiotics also make smart bacteria mutate and become resistant and this would transfer to people who ate the meat.  And more [chickens] began getting nasty infections that no longer responded to any antibiotics and they were dying.  The pressure was on and No Antibiotics Ever or NAE became a status label in the chicken business.  They just charged 20% more for the extra care required without antibiotics.  And to make up for the dead chickens that got sick after a decade or so, that 20% increase has been absorbed into the collective acceptance of grocery shoppers and largely forgotten.  Well, it has been forgotten.  That's just the price of chicken, right?  Things were good for a while.  The whole process was better.  Then along came super inflationary pressure on production costs, and the industry is again looking for pharmaceutical relief.  And frankly sticker-shocked consumers are looking for a reprieve as well a difference designation in the chicken Market is now in favor. NAIHM, or No Antibiotics Important in Human Medicine.  Has the industry dropped the bar a little here Tyson Foods announced last year they are largely abandoning the NAE standard preferring instead the NAIHM label.  This means that they can now use antibiotics in raising chickens that are not used to treat conditions in humans except, of course, in their organic line where antibiotics are still prohibited.  So this reserves antibiotics for human diseases for us, preserving their effectiveness there, and this is with the blessing of the FDA and the World Health Organization.  The more relaxed standard seems to even have the buy-in and some of the more natural-minded.  Although she works for Southland Organics, veterinarian student Alyssa Routon says,

NAE was correct in it's time, [but it is] not ideal for animals.  We cannot treat disease, and that drives prices up for consumers. 

I get that there can be overreach and regulation which needs to be adjusted as greater understanding comes to light but the implementation here seems a little wonky on this.  There doesn't seem to be a listing I can find anywhere that specifies which drugs qualify for the NAIHM designation. So who gets to decide that status?  As a pharmacist, I worry that we won't always know the full impact of animal antibiotics on humans when they eat the meat.  We are after all animals too so what about negative effects on our gut bacteria?  I would say we need to test them for safety? We could test them in other ways but that probably won't happen.  For me personally, I think I just prefer to pay a little more and buy organic which will always be NAE, No Antibiotics Ever.  They position an NAIHM in the best interest of animal husbandry.  But let's face it, the public information spigot of Big Food doesn't exactly have the reputation of being a fountain of Truth.  Consumers are pretty smart.  We've had the NAE standard already baked in the price of chicken for nearly a decade.  Now they want to drop the standard, but I bet they won't drop the retail price proportionally.  Sales for Tyson Foods were almost $53 billion in 2023.  Profit was $933 Million which was down 79% from 2022.  Maybe that's the real motive. 

 
 
What is LIBOR? London Inter-Bank Offered Rate.  It is the primary benchmark, along with the Euribor, for short-term interest rates around the world

The same day as the Biden Summit in Geneva the Federal Reserve that and it was supposed to be an inconsequential meeting they didn't do anything, right?  Well they did.  They raised the payout rate on the reverse repo contracts from 0% 5 basis points.  Basically, the Fed was not willing to pay 5 basis points or .05% for anybody willing to execute a reverse repo contract which in this case the Fed will sell them a US Treasury and they would take dollars out of the market.  That's what a reverse repo does.  The Fed buys dollars and sells for a certain time period a U.S. security. It could be an overnight.  It could be a 7-day, a 14-day, 30 days.  Repos come in all forms, shapes, and sizes.  This one shut down other things that are making noise so that was a big deal hadn't gone