Showing posts sorted by relevance for query studies and lies. Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query studies and lies. Sort by date Show all posts

Thursday, December 31, 2020

"The vaccines themselves are a conveniently short-lived solution even if they do work."

By Brandon Smith

For many months now I have been warning that the design behind the pandemic lockdowns is a perpetual one; meaning, the lockdowns are MEANT to last forever. We can see this in the very commentary of the establishment elites that are pushing for the mandates; their most frequent argument being that the pandemic restrictions are the “new normal”. This assertion is outlined by globalists like Gideon Lichfield of MIT in his article ‘We’re Not Going Back To Normal’. In it he states:

“Ultimately, however, I predict that we’ll restore the ability to socialize safely by developing more sophisticated ways to identify who is a disease risk and who isn’t, and discriminating—legally—against those who are.

…one can imagine a world in which, to get on a flight, perhaps you’ll have to be signed up to a service that tracks your movements via your phone. The airline wouldn’t be able to see where you’d gone, but it would get an alert if you’d been close to known infected people or disease hot spots. There’d be similar requirements at the entrance to large venues, government buildings, or public transport hubs. There would be temperature scanners everywhere, and your workplace might demand you wear a monitor that tracks your temperature or other vital signs. Where nightclubs ask for proof of age, in future they might ask for proof of immunity—an identity card or some kind of digital verification via your phone, showing you’ve already recovered from or been vaccinated against the latest virus strains.”

In my article ‘Waves Of Mutilation: Medical Tyranny And The Cashless Society’, I dismantled Lichfield’s arguments and outlined why the controls the establishment is attempting to put in place have been planned far in advance. The so-called “great reset” and “Fourth Industrial Revolution” has been in development since at least 2014 when the terms were first being injected into the mainstream economic media. The ideas of a cashless society, the “sharing economy”, biometric mass surveillance, social credit scores, etc, have all been part of the globalist agenda for decades. The coronavirus is merely a useful crisis for them to exploit as a rationale for the draconian measures they have always wanted.

The plan was so predictable that I even pointed out at the beginning of the coronavirus outbreak that lockdowns would not end even if a working vaccination was developed because all they have to do is declare that a “new mutation” of the virus has been found which is resistant to existing treatments. Or, they could engineer a whole new virus and release it into the population in order to keep the Reset machine rolling forward.

Not surprisingly, just as news hit the wires that the barely tested and highly suspect Pfizer and Moderna vaccines were being released to the public, reports have begun to trickle in of more infectious” Covid mutations found in places like the UK, India and South Africa.

I’m not sure how much more transparent the elites can get.

Take the Pfizer vaccine now and you might receive an immunity passport for a few months, and then it will become void with every new mutation of the virus. So, you must then submit to ENDLESS vaccinations, many of then untested and potentially hazardous. As the former VP of Pfizer and other medical professionals have warned, these vaccines are like Russian Roulette and could cause an autoimmune response that leads to sterility or other harmful reactions.

The vaccines themselves are a conveniently short-lived solution even if they do work. They require multiple doses over the course of a month, and renewed vaccinations are to take place possibly every few months. Basically, it never ends. With the mutations and limited antibodies from the vaccines, the elites could keep the lockdowns and mandates in place for many years to come.

The World Health Organization is making it clear that vaccination will not necessarily be considered a solution to viral spread. Meaning, even if you are vaccinated you will still be considered a potential carrier and transmitter of Covid, therefore the lockdowns and mask mandates will not stop. This begs the question – What’s the point of the vaccine?

The WHO chief scientist cites the fact that there is not enough evidence to prove that the vaccines prevent transmission. By that logic, we could also argue that there is no evidence that the vaccines are 95% effective, or that they are safe in the slightest.

In the meantime, the WHO and our friendly neighborhood fascist Dr. Anthony Fauci are consistently spreading the narrative that the “worst outbreak” is yet to come. Gotta keep that fear train chugging forward on the track to the “Great Reset”, right?

For the people that actually believe that the covid crisis will end after mass vaccinations, I’m sorry to say, but you have been duped. Every single element of the establishment response and every public statement they make indicates that they plan to violate your civil liberties for a long time to come. Those promises of relief right around the corner? All lies. The claim that if you go along to get along everything will go back to normal? It’s a con. It is hollow rhetoric designed to make you shut up and submit to medical tyranny for just long enough that it becomes irreversible.

I suspect they are hoping they can condition the public over the next few years to simply adapt to the controls until we forget what life was like before the pandemic and the reset. It seems, however, that the globalist reset plan is not going very well.

The vaccines and the mutation news feel rushed, to say the least. Initially, the establishment said that it would take at least 18 months just to develop a vaccine for trials and testing, and that the lockdowns would continue well beyond that time frame until a majority of the population was shown to have immunity. Instead, they tossed out multiple vaccines within 6 months and the mutation narrative is already in the news.

I believe this is because resistance to the pandemic lockdowns is growing and the number of people refusing to take the vaccines appears to be high. As they say, the revolution will not be televised, but it is still impossible to hide completely.

In Europe, a huge percentage of the population (around 50% or more depending on the country) are hesitant to take the vaccine. In the US, polls show that at least 30% of the population will refuse outright, while 60% of people are hesitant about effectiveness.

Even large numbers of health care workers are refusing the vaccine, and these are the people with the most pressure to submit or face consequences.

Hilariously, the media is arguing that though there have been “some allergic reactions” to the shot, there is “no evidence of serious long term side effects”. Perhaps that is because there are NO STUDIES of the long-term effects and there were minimal trials before the vaccines were released? I mean, is this not basic logic? Do they really think we are that dumb?

So far it seems hundreds of millions of people are not that dumb. Surprisingly, even sheriffs and police across the country are openly refusing to enforce mandates and carry out color-of-law punishments against citizens that do not submit. This is really a huge obstacle for the globalists and their reset.

The virus has produced a 0.26% IFR (Infection Fatality Ratio) among anyone not in a nursing home with preexisting conditions. Over 40% of Covid deaths are attributed to elderly people that were already suffering from numerous ailments. Only around 10% of people that end up hospitalized for covid suffer from long term health concerns (more than three months). And, only around 15% of ICU beds are in use across the US, meaning that the claims of over-capacity and full hospitals were nothing more than fear-mongering all along.

Consider the fact that hundreds of thousands of people already die each year from infectious diseases like the flu and pneumonia and Covid starts to seem far less threatening. It is certainly not an excuse for medical lockdowns and Orwellian contact tracing measures.

On top of that, numerous studies are revealing that the lockdowns and the masks are completely ineffective in stopping the spread of the virus. The states and countries with some of the most strictly enforced mandates also tend to be the places with the highest infection spikes.

Because of this, it makes sense that many people are refusing to comply with the mandates. The media claims we are conspiracy theorists that believe the virus “doesn’t exist”; this is not the case. In fact, I have long suspected that the narrative that the virus “doesn’t exist” was a psyop or strawman that would be used against the liberty movement later to discredit our resistance to medical lockdowns.

Most of us are well aware [that] the virus exists. Some of us have already dealt with it and recovered from it. What we are saying is that the CDC, the WHO, and the medical community’s OWN STATISTICS show that Covid is not a threat to more than 99% of the population. If we are to accept their stats as even remotely accurate, then Covid becomes a non-issue for most people.

Again, I will ask the question that the mainstream refuses to ask:

Why is 99% of the population being told they must sacrifice their jobs, their businesses, and their liberties in the name of making less than 1% of the population feel safer? Why not ask the 0.26% of the people under threat from the virus to volunteer to stay home so that the rest of us can get on with normal life? Why are we doing the opposite of what makes the most sense?

The answer is that the pandemic response is about dominance, not public health. People are starting to recognize this, and they are about to revolt.

So, the next logical step for the establishment if they really want to institute their reset agenda is to introduce a new threat. Meaning, they need a “mutation” of the virus or a completely new virus in order to create the kind of fear that is required to manipulate the public into going along with further control.

Will a new and deadlier virus be found? Maybe. In most cases, viruses tend to evolve into less deadly strains of the original. They also tend to balance out their rate of spread versus their rate of mortality. In other words, like any other creature, viruses evolve to survive, and a virus cannot survive if it kills off a majority of its potential hosts. So, they mutate to become more infectious, but invariably less deadly.

If a “mutation” does show up on the scene that is more deadly than the current form of Covid-19, then I would be highly suspicious of its origins. What is most likely is that that the elites are in a panic and they are using the mutation narrative as a propaganda tool to illicit terror and conformity in the public. There may be no mutation at all, or the mutations will have no significant bearing on the death rate.

Ironically, by rushing out the vaccines as well as the mutation stories, the elites have sabotaged themselves. They wanted to blitzkrieg the public with the lockdowns and they met heavier resistance than they expected. So, they put the vaccination program on a bullet train, and now the public is wary of being injected with a vaccine model that is barely tested. Now, they are promoting the mutation bogeyman and this only makes people question why they should take any vaccine at all? If the virus is going to continually mutate then why take a questionable vaccine that could be useless in a matter of months?

All the mutation narrative does is further expose what the true agenda is – What the elites want is never-ending lockdowns. There is no program to save lives or flatten the curve. The entire health argument is utter nonsense. Nothing that has been done so far supports the notion that public health is the priority. Instead, what we are seeing is a mad dash towards totalitarianism using Covid as the excuse, and the effort is failing.

If you would like to support the work that Alt-Market does while also receiving content on advanced tactics for defeating the globalist agenda, subscribe to our exclusive newsletter The Wild Bunch Dispatch.  Learn more about it HERE.

With global tensions spiking, thousands of Americans are moving their IRA or 401(k) into an IRA backed by physical gold. Now, thanks to a little-known IRS Tax Law, you can too. Learn how with a free info kit on gold from Birch Gold Group. It reveals how physical precious metals can protect your savings, and how to open a Gold IRA. Click here to get your free Info Kit on Gold.

 


Thursday, February 4, 2016

 
"Tea and coffee contain naturally-occurring fluoride . . ."

On the heels of my recent post of "Toothhealth is dependent on gum health, and gum health is . . . related to vitaminC . . ." I was reading Sarah C. Corriher's article How to Cure Cavities at Twitter. And I thought I would comment on it a bit.


And I will start with a caveat.  This applies only to teeth that do not already have fillings, amalgam or otherwise.  Once your tooth has an amalgam filling inside your tooth, your tooth's movement is greatly restricted.  And if your tooth's movement is restricted, healing seems rather difficult.  In fact, one of the reasons why a filling might pop or fall out is because your tooth might be trying to regrow.  Sounds crazy, I know.  But this is what happens.  As long as bone is in your mouth and connected to roots that are connected to your jawbone that is connected to other bone structures, it means that your bones are being fed from somewhere.  And if they're being fed from somewhere, likely they are moving.  And by moving I don't mean they are doing somersaults or spinning like whirling dervishes.  I mean they move around.  So as they grow upward, they move upward or outward or to the side.  If they grow, they move. 

So there's that.  

Let's see what Ms. Corriher says about curing cavities.  I always learn something from the Corrihers.  When I first came across their site in 2014, I spent way too many hours combing through all of the different and helpful articles.  

WESTON A. PRICE
Anyone old enough to fly through cyberspace for more than a decade or so knows--boy do we know--how extensive all of the health information is.  And the one shining light in all of this information, the light on which so many other have launched blogging efforts is Weston A. Price's Nutrition and Physical Degeneration, 1939.  Corriher opens her essay by citing Weston A. Price and conclusions he reached from his travels and studies that conflict with prevailing information that was accepted as knowledge.  
While traveling to some of the most remote regions and cultures of the world, Dr. Weston A. Price discovered that some groups which had no access to traditional medicine had extremely low incidences of cavities. He discovered that the cultures which consumed foods that were high in fats and minerals had the best dental health. Some of those groups did not even brush their teeth.
So, wait, ". . .some groups which had no access to traditional medicine had extremely low incidences of cavities"?  That in itself is remarkable.  Foods high in fat and minerals provided people with the best dental health.  Good to know.  But what stunned me was that last statement in that paragraph, "Some of those groups did not even brush their teeth."  How can that be?  My guess is that these groups did not consume large amounts of sugar that kids in more advanced, modern societies did. 

It's funny how things work.  My mom and dad were of the WWII generation.  For dates my dad would buy her a Snickers or Powerhouse candy bar, and they would split it.  And a Coke.  Very little concern, if any, given to the destructive effects of concentrated sugar consumption.  And if any concern was given, it was probably brushed away as something that the dentist would take care of.  There was so much trust in this and other medical professions.  I don't know why.  Actually, I do.  She explains here:
When people are malnourished, dental problems are often the first indicator. Most people from the Western world believe that teeth naturally decay with age, so everyone will inevitably get cavities. Popular consensus is that teeth self-destruct. However, a person’s diet primarily determines his dental health. The myth that people have no control over the deterioration of the teeth is one of the justifications for the fluoridation of water supplies, because it is tacitly contended that human teeth disintegrate without help from the chemical industry. In truth, cavities and dental malformations occur as a result of malnutrition, which is actually exaggerated by chemicals, such as pharmaceuticals and fluoride. Western foods are not only deficient in vitamins and minerals, but they also contain chemicals which impair the utilization of nutrients in the body. Tooth decay is more common in pregnant and nursing women, because these women have greater nutritional needs.
Ah, so it's the municipal monsters who wanted to put fluouride in the water supply and tell gullible citizens that it is good for your health.  Don't worry.  Be happy. 

But it wasn't just the municipal authorities.  It was the chemical industry that forced it or bribed it on them.  And we've been paying the price ever since.  Though I must say that I see many kids today with large, healthy, full teeth.  And that is excellent.  It's a sign that at least awareness on the topic is alive. 

Yet there are things that people continue to consume that ain't so good for them.  Yes, the fluouride in the water supply is one.  People still eat sugar--donuts, cereals, candy, cakes, you name it.  So we still need to be careful.  Me?  Rarely, if at all.  Heck, I don't even eat breads. 

On fluouride, she explains the how and the why it is such a terrible chemical not only on bone, tooth enamel but also on brain tissue.  Ever heard how bad fluouride is on brain tissue?
Fluoride, in particular, pulls calcium and phosphorus into areas of the body that they would not normally travel, such as the pineal gland and the arteries, so these minerals are not properly used for strengthening the bones. Teeth too are bones. Fluoride can prevent the healing of cavities, because it disrupts the proper mineral usage of the human body.

It is most remarkable and should be one of the most challenging facts that can come to our modern civilization that such primitive races as the Aborigines of Australia, have reproduced for generation after generation through many centuries — no one knows for how many thousands of years — without the development of a conspicuous number of irregularities of the dental arches. Yet, in the next generation after these people adopt the foods of the white man, a large percentage of the children developed irregularities of the dental arches with conspicuous facial deformities. The deformity patterns are similar to those seen in white civilizations.” – Dr. Weston Price, Nutrition and Physical Degeneration, 1939
One of the most demoralizing aspects to this fluouride problem are the lies.  Advised by their corporate masters deep within the pharmaceutical industrial-war complex is the instruction to peddle repeatedly the lie that fluouride is good for you.  So the city lies with impunity.  It's tradition.
   
HEALING CAVITIES
On healing cavities, she starts off like this:
When provided with the right diet, cavities can heal. This healing process is known as remineralization, because it is a process of giving the teeth the minerals that are needed to repair them. The two minerals that are most important for dental health are calcium and phosphorus. To use calcium properly, the human body also needs adequate amounts of vitamin D from sunlight or fish (not the chemical type found in milk), and the body also needs magnesium from vegetables and nuts. In addition, the fat-soluble vitamins are invaluable. Fat-soluble vitamins include A, D, E and K. These vitamins can be found in butter, eggs, dairy products, and meats. A healthy diet that heals cavities is the opposite of the low-fat diets that are most often promoted by the media, and the ideal diet is reminiscent of the Atkins Diet.
Ah, yes, diet.  Diet seems to be implicated in almost every ailment.  Her opening statement goes "When provided with the right diet, cavities can heal."

Tuesday, January 18, 2022

The Truth About Mass Psychosis

Reading is one antidote. And if you're reading, it means you're already thinking. 

Let's hope and pray that folks can see all of the institutions in society as corrupt and corruptible from education to medicine to legal to farming and entertainment. They're all lying to us. Unfortunately, too many of us are okay with that kind of treatment. That's just one more shackle that we must dispose of.  Mass psychosis exists because no one trusts society's institutions to do right by them anymore.  So though mass psychosis seems like things are crazy, chaotic, and out of control, and they are, this is also the beginning of awareness and the start of an exit strategy from the matrix of corruption.  

Mass psychosis relies on rendering every individual anonymous.  It started with the hooded, dark-shade-wearing Unabomber, Ted Kazinsky.  Mr. Anonymous.  Then the kids in high schools all began wearing hoodies, with their faces and gaze recessed as far back in the hoodie as possible for maximum anonymity.  They didn't want to be called on in class.  They retreated to their rooms at home, the only place of solace from the collection of adults who've allowed their world to become so corrupt.

How many times have we heard someone say, "Oh, his ego is too big!"  Good, I say.  We need more individuality.  When people act on behalf of group identity, where the only personal ambition is some goal purportedly agreed-upon by and for the group, then society is doomed.  That is fascism.  Or communism.  

We hear of an alter ego, a bruised ego, stroke one's ego, or "Lee is on an ego trip" as if all of these experiences are bad.  All these say is that the listener or audience is upset that the man with the ego is invested in something he likes.  And the problem is?  We need more people to have an ego, and to not surrender identity to the crowd.  For example, I'm not a fan of LBGTQ's politics or their advocacy for surgical reassignment of gender, but I do kind of like their exuberance with personal identity.  It's just an identity that is outside of my wheelhouse.  It's nobody's business.  You live your life, and I'll live mine.  Let's call it mutual and peaceful respect.  So I don't like it when someone else tries to destroy another man's, or woman's, ego.  But it's baked into the language now that when we don't like someone else's exuberance, we complain to anyone who will listen to us that he's just "stroking his ego."  This kind of attack comes most often from unhappy folks.  It's envy.  

The psychology of the crowd, however, is the exact opposite: the crowd prefers anonymity, whereas the individual celebrates an ego, a personality, joie de vivre, a joy of conversation, a vitality of standing out, of expression.  It's like the dark, brooding, sulk of Antifa has become the mascot of modern-day life, our dark and brooding muse.  

2:35  Reese states that AP and Reuters claim that mass psychosis does not exist you should understand that these publications are the mouthpiece of the vaccine manufacturers.  James C. Smith, President and CEO of Thomson Reuters, was also a board member of Pfizer, the decision-making body.  So when Reuters promotes or defends vaccines, Smith engages in flagrant conflicts of interest.  Waging psychological warfare against a group of a population who believe that the media would never lie to them.  Though people know that the media news lies to them, they have a hard time wrapping their minds around the fact that the media news also lied about bodily integrity.  People find themselves in such a symbiotic relationship with media--love and hate, consolatory media, where they've settled for spoon-fed information rather than devote the time and work of reading, comparing, concluding, and revising for themselves, for the truth.  They're realizing that they've surrendered their stronger selves for those few delicious hours of storytime.  that flip side of their conclusion, of their belief, or tWhy would people believe that the media would lie?  Where do people watch their favorite shows?  Where do they binge-watch?  Who broadcasts their favorite football team home and away games in the cold northeast?  Why would these networks lie to people about a vaccine or any kind of medicine for that matter?  What I hear a lot from folks who've been vaccinated is a recitation of the lies told them by Fauci, Collins, Gates, CDC Director, Walensky, and other priests of the vaccines and you can hear the heartbreak at knowing the extent of their injuries. 

ARTICLES REFERENCED

Here is the Moosmosis article, "Psychology 101: Crowd Psychology and the Theory of Gustave Le Bon," cited in the video.   Here is their home page.  

"Psychology in Social Roles Today," Mosmosis.

Pathological Subconsciousand Irrational Determinism in the Social Psychology of the Crowd: The Legacy of Gustave Lebon,” Gregory R. McGuire, Science Direct, 1987.

Fearing the Masses: Gustave Le Bon and Some Undemocratic Roots of Modern Rhetorical Studies,” Jay P. Childers, Advances in the History of Rhetoric, March 2014.   

How Does the Concept of Individualism Help Explain the Renaissance?” Staff Writer, Reference, March 25, 2020.  

"The Shadow: Carl Jung Warning to the World," Staff Writer, Eternalized: In the Pursuit of Meaning, October 1, 2021.

Thursday, October 28, 2021

NIH ANIMAL EXPERIMENTS: 89% of preclinical experiments can’t even be reproduced—which is fundamental to good science—resulting in an annual waste of $28 billion.

Good to see that PETA has been on the attack of Fauci and Collins for a while, for experiments like these.   

90% of studies on animals ultimately fail to produce viable medications for humans. Yet, half of NIH funding goes toward experiments on animals.  She said that animals are cheap, universities and agencies receive large amounts of funding to carry out these “experiments,” and most of them are done in secrecy.


Thanks to Martin Armstrong.  

(From PETA’s website: “To keep driving the message home, PETA supporters in giant blow-up dinosaur costumes have been following the president to various events carrying signs that read, ‘Biden: Don’t Appoint Another NIH Dinosaur.’”

PETA has finally spoken out against Dr. Fauci’s cruel experiments on beagle puppies. When the news was first released, the agency was banning anyone who tweeted them about Fauci, but now, PETA is calling upon the Biden Administration to fire all National Institute of Health heads. Although PETA certainly has [its] own extremist views on other topics, they are making valid points about how utterly unnecessary these very expensive tests have been.

PETA Vice President Kathy Guillermo appeared on Tucker Carlson’s show in 2019 and explained how 90% of studies on animals ultimately fail to produce viable medications for humans. Yet, half of NIH funding goes toward experiments on animals. She said that animals are cheap, universities and agencies receive large amounts of funding to carry out these “experiments,” and most of them are done in secrecy.

Newsmax directly asked Guillermo if she thought Fauci should resign, and without hesitation, she said, “Yes!” As a reminder, the Food and Drug Administration does not require animal testing to pass new drugs. PETA has raised the flag and called for NIH Francis Collins to resign for conducting similarly cruel experiments. Fauci’s experiments “amounted to lies,” and Guillermo is now calling on Americans to urge President Biden to remove Fauci from office.

Billions of taxpayer dollars are going toward these experiments that have not produced any significant improvements toward human life. PETA’s page to remove Collins notes, “Eighty-nine percent of preclinical experiments can’t even be reproduced—which is fundamental to good science—resulting in an annual waste of $28 billion.” An annual waste of $28 billion is beyond alarming. Fauci has moved on to testing drug concoctions on humans, and we need to wake up and realize that we have become the new sample group.

Wednesday, September 4, 2024

why if 50%-80% of the population in India are vegetarians, how come they have such a high index of colonic disease?

It's another lie that you've all been taught: red meat causes colon cancer.  Then explain to me, sir, why if 50% of the population, in fact, and in some places it's even more, in India, it's 80%, in certain areas of India, are vegetarians, how come they have such a high index of colonic disease?  It has nothing to do with red meat and chicken.  It has to do with sugar. What's the biggest poison in the world?  Sugar.  So this is all lies,  "red meat, red meat."  I don't mind red meat, but you have to eat grass-finished red meat, so it contains all the vitamin K2 and none of the Omega 6 in it.  

You see, now the meat you buy today is manufactured because they're eating corn.  Since when are cows supposed to eat corn?  And then you give them antibiotics because the corn rots in their stomachs.  There are 4 stomachs.  They're supposed to reach all four stomachs, you know ruminants, right, but they can't because of the corn it starts rotting and then they die.  So you have to give them antibiotics to kill all the bad bacteria in the gut.  And then there's bacteria, and then all those antibodies get into your bloodstream and then you get dysbiosis, and then you wonder why you all have dysbiosis and why you got so many antibiotics going on in your colon, killing those poor bacteria in your gut.  We should be actually helping you.  Do you see the vicious cycle here?  So I don't mind meat.  And all my studies clearly show that.  But make sure it's grass-finished, natural, without that Omega-6 corn oil.

Oh, no, but we got fields and fields of corn for this purpose.  80% of the corn is fed to animals, not even humans.  But it gets to you through the fat, and it's all Omega-6.  

The speaker is also on Instagram.  

Thursday, August 29, 2024

BIG PHARMA LIES WITH SHARYL ATTKINSSON

One of them I would say is Viagra causing blindness.  I broke that story internationally some years ago at CBS when other journalists didn't care.  --Sharyl Attkinsson

Here is the podcast, and the 36-minute interview doesn't start until the 1:08 mark.  

18:45. Well, like you say, the stuff that sounded unbelievable to me but as I started to understand the science behind it these are things that opened my eyes.  One of them I would say is Viagra causing blindnessI broke that story internationally some years ago at CBS when other journalists didn't care.  It was nothing more than a laugh to them when a small article came up on the wire services, and I talked about how the people who uncovered these side effects that the government should [have been] covering, the drug company should be telling us about, like blindness with the erectile dysfunction drugs, they're not coming up with it because they're not looking for it for whatever reason.  The doctors who are prescribing it aren't asking.  So this tells how this was discovered by me and also by independent doctors who were treating as it happens; not the urologists who should have been looking for this, but an eye doctor noticed these patterns.  So I thought that was fascinating.  I talked about the tricks that FDA scientists say the drug companies use to hide Adverse Events in their studies that they submit to being approved so that these things won't show up until it's too late